HHS EMFTHE PUBLIC COMMENT FORUM
The people. The questions. The public record.An independent RF Safe project
Forum index › TopicsLatest posting day

TOPIC BOARD

Research & federal duties

2151 original comments · Newest first

Browse topics
Read full comments below. More load as you scroll.
Posted 2026-10-26#5037 · Permanent link ↗

Requests transparent independent research, realistic long-term exposure assessment, evaluation of protect…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Thank you for seeking public input on RF/EMF exposure and human health. I support a transparent, independent review of the scientific evidence, with particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations. I encourage HHS to prioritize the following: - Clearly distinguish established health effects from preliminary findings, inconsistent results, and unanswered questions. - Evaluate long-term exposure and realistic exposure patterns in homes, schools, workplaces, and communities. - Assess whether current safety standards adequately address children’s exposure and identify the evidence supporting any recommended changes. - Compare U.S. and international standards, explaining the scientific reasons for differences. - Support high-quality research with transparent methods, disclosure of funding sources, and independent replication. - Provide practical, affordable guidance for families and schools, including whether exposure-reduction measures offer demonstrated health benefits. Public guidance should explain both what the evidence shows and its limitations. It should avoid overstating either harm or safety and help people make informed decisions without unnecessary fear. The goal should be clear, accessible recommendations grounded in the strongest available evidence, alongside a concrete plan to address remaining research gaps.
Posted 2026-10-26#5034 · Permanent link ↗

Reports digestive symptoms associated with phones, power lines and other electrical exposures, with impro…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I have the worst digestive issues and I have exponential exposure to emf through the phone, hotspot, and through the electric towers on the powerline that I'm only 100 ft from. I generally don't have stomach issues when I'm out and about so much unless it's something really bad, but when I'm anywhere with high emf, my digestive symptoms are increased. I also had a infectious step bacteria in a building that had ungrounded/faulty outlets I could feel something funky in the building like it was buzzing. The strep became resistant to all antibiotics. Also was right next to several businesses and police precinct that most likely was using radio waves and advanced wifi. I can note that my symptoms are much less when I am away from everything out in the woods or away from a bunch of electronics, and when I leave my phone in the other room I do seem to have better stomach and digestive ability. I would like to know more about the possibility of the emf contribu to my quite disabling digestive disease, and what could actually block or limit the exposure if it is contributing to destroying my biota and enhancing bad bacteria?!
Posted 2026-10-26#5033 · Permanent link ↗

Reports EHS beginning in elder housing, restricted technology use and continuing symptoms after rural rel…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I came down with electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) in October 2008, at the age of 61. It was sudden: I was moving into HUD elder housing in Cambridge, MA, between Harvard and MIT, into an apartment on the ninth floor. At the time, I knew nothing about EHS. But I have since learned that high floors, including the ninth, are generally more exposed to cell tower and urban repeater antenna wireless radiation than are lower floors. I have also learned that the tipping point, from not having EHS to having EHS, is often sudden, as it was in my case. I was sitting at the large window of my new apartment, looking at the view, and after about 20 minute I noticed that I felt like I had been on my cell phone for over an hour. So I moved away from the window. I didn't think much of it, until I tried to use my cell phone, and it felt like one side of my head went higher and the other half went lower, like my head had become a split-level. And it felt like my brain was in the grip of an iron fist, and I could barely think or see straight. I waited for some hours and tried my cell phone again, with the same result. Then I waited a few days and tried again: same result. I soon became sensitive to computers as well. Now, 18 years later, I can use a fully wired (no wi-fi) computer, for two to three hours per week, but still cannot use a cell phone. I am also sensitive to smart meters. I have lived in rural Arizona since 2012. This has helped, but cell towers, smart meters, etc. have been closing in at an accelerating pace, even here, and at ever-higher frequencies (5G plus) And so new symptoms have been appearing, such as "surges" that mimic going in and out of overstimulated parasympathetic nervous system. I have discussed this with an MD, who confirms that this is what it sounds like. I feel affected by cell tower radiation a good deal of the time, with symptoms ranging from skin and eye irritation, burning, and even redness of skin and eyes, to "brain fog", dizziness, and a feeling like a spike is going up my spine. I became ill with EHS at a later age than most. I know people whose productive lives were brought to a halt by this illness when they were in their 30s and 40s, mid-career. Other EHS-afflicted acquaintances have committed suicide. I have letters from my doctor in Cambridge, Christina C. Wee, MD, at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, in my support reporting my self-reported symptoms, and from doctors in Arizona. One of these MDs, Kristi Mattson, has confirmed my EHS disability at a functional level. But there is no way for a doctor to officially diagnose this illness or even test for it at an official level, because there has been virtually no funding of any serious research that takes into account that different people are sensitive to different wavelengths, and examination rooms must be fully shielded and devoid of wavelengths that can confuse the issue. (For example, I am much more sensitive to kilohertz than to FM radio megahertz.) Thus, establishments of all kinds have preferred to call this illness "idiopathic", a dog-whistle word for "all in the head". They used to say this about other illnesses, such as epilepsy, lupus, etc. I hope this comment period signals a change in attitude, and serious consideration of this emerging illness. Thank you very much.
Posted 2026-10-26#5027 · Permanent link ↗

Describes years reviewing wireless-effects research, work with highly sensitive individuals, and reported…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
For 9 years I have been researching and lecturing on the biological effects of wireless radiation, at conferences, on podcasts, and to legislatures. I have looked at 100's, possibly 1000's, of research results among the more than 10,000 published studies. I work with people who have developed extreme sensitivity to electromagnetic radiation (EMR), and seen positive results when the radiation is removed. My family has been affected by EMFs. We have had building biologists and EMF remediation experts in our home, where shielding has helped.

Attachments · 1

Original public attachments. Their contents are not included in category reviews.

Posted 2026-10-26#5023 · Permanent link ↗

Describes a child's nosebleeds, a spouse's cardiac symptoms and personal tingling associated with wireles…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Question 2: Perspective My response represents the perspective of a family member and individual consumer. Question 3: Personal Experiences and Reported Potential Adverse Health Effects a. Types of wireless technology involved: Our family’s symptoms appear linked to mobile phones, Wi-Fi networks, and cellular service infrastructure. b. Nature, duration, frequency, and timing: Symptoms occur consistently in environments with active wireless radiation or during direct use of cellular devices. The effects are more pronounced with prolonged exposure (e.g., using a cellphone for more than two hours per day) or when in close proximity to high densities of devices. c. Potential adverse health effects: Child (Son): Frequently suffers from nosebleeds when exposed to Wi-Fi and cellular service for extended periods. This is especially severe during prolonged cellphone use. Adult (Wife): Experiences increased heart rate and cardiac irregularities (heart skipping a beat) when wireless radiation pulses (such as 5G) seem directed toward her device, or when multiple devices are active simultaneously. Adult (Self): Experiences tingling sensations in fingers when working on a cellphone using cellular data. d. Onset of symptoms: Symptoms typically appear after consistent exposure over time. e. Medical evaluation: We have observed these patterns firsthand within our household. f. Steps taken to reduce exposure: To manage these symptoms, we have implemented significant mitigations. I have stopped using cellular data for work, instead using only a LAN-connected cellphone. We have eliminated WiFi from our home, even though we work from home and run a business as well as hold down a corporate leadership job working from home. We have observed that minimizing exposure in this way helps reduce the frequency and severity of these reported symptoms. g. Supporting documentation and scientific context: We urge the Department to consider that these reported experiences align with concerns regarding non-thermal biological effects. We draw the Department’s attention to the extensive body of peer-reviewed and published studies on the biological effects of wireless radiation available via bioinitiative.org . Additionally, we emphasize the findings of the https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/research/topics/cellphones , which provide critical evidence regarding non-thermal risks that should be incorporated into federal health evaluations.
Posted 2026-10-26#5017 · Permanent link ↗

Alleges nonconsensual implants and RF-related health injury, describes advocacy for affected people, and …

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
See attached file(s) hello my name is Autumn Mattox and I am sendingcopies of my scans that have been done showing that I was non-consensually implanted and showing that my body immense radio frequency… And it is affected my health greatly. The effects that I have felt have caused me many health problems, including almost 80% blind and the crippling effects of what appears to be multiple sclerosis, but I have yet to be able to finish the testing to have that done that I have the request for a neurologist in Seattle to be tested for after his initial consultation with me. I have been associated with an amazing man from Cairo Egypt named Dr ayman… Who works with many people all over the world that have been diagnosed with syndrome or have AHI’s to help return their frequency to a safe level… And he is the reason I’m even still alive. I will also be attaching a file with a letter from him explaining what he does and he is easily contacted for more information about that as Weil. I am also an advocate to many other people that have gone through the same kind of sensitivity to EMF to 5G technology 6G technology and radio frequency. I’m associated with many people that have had the effects recorded bio an amazing woman named Amy Holem who also does digital forensics and has done some in my case as well. Please feel free to contact me at any time and I can give you those reports as well. She has done so for other people that I’m an advocate to as well ranging an age from 10 years old to 82… From nonverbal autistic to retired veterans… Thank you so much for your time. The following is a letter from Dr ayman from Cairo Egypt Very Important and Urgent To His Excellency President Donald Trump Please intervene to save the United States from the international cyberattack targeting VIPs and celebrities. I am well aware of your keen interest in finding superior medical talent. In fact, I am one of the few who possesses extraordinary medical skills. Reference: Mr. Butti Al Shamsi Chairman of the Emirates Red Crescent in Egypt +971506111143 Ms. Fatima Al Zaabi +971555990555 Dr. Mohammed Manea Al Mansouri +971503333313 They are among my most prominent patients who have recovered in the UAE. Also Autumn Mattox +1 512 809 7696 WhatsApp +1 512 962 4511 +1 469 717 0602 From the USA Texas Austin And the American researcher in the field of monitoring cyber-targeting Amy Hollem +18153074619 Jonathan Zijlstra From the Netherlands +31681012594 I look forward to helping remotely help victims and patients of Havana Syndrome and migraines in all around the world. I treat patients and victims of cyber-targeting remotely for the sake of God Almighty, anywhere in the world, for free, especially diplomats and VIPs. Havana Syndrome AHI (Anomalous Health Incidents) EHS (Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity) EMF and Radio Frequency Wave Harassment Electronic targeting with electromagnetic waves can cause the target to experience a state of resonance, which often results in medically unexplained symptoms such as migraines, cluster headaches, and medically unexplained pain. The only solution for the victim is to change their personal human energy frequency to a safe level through telepathy, whether face-to-face or via remote sessions, to render the target invisible to any electronic targeting. I change the personal human energy frequency to a safe level, making it invisible to any other attack on any victim in the world, for free, for the sake of God Almighty, through mental telepathy sessions. I urge victims to contact me via Messenger or WhatsApp for remote assistance in eliminating their suffering. I would also like to participate in a research paper in which I personally act as a tool to change the personal physical energy frequency to a safe level, eliminating the resonance state suffered by the victim. Targeting We can start with migraines and cluster headaches, because the pain in these cases subsides once the resonance, which often causes medically unexplained pain, is eliminated. Dr. Ayman Al-Shami +201223126271

Attachments · 1

Original public attachments. Their contents are not included in category reviews.

Posted 2026-10-26#5013 · Permanent link ↗

Calls for research on short- and long-term exposure from wireless towers and surveillance systems in scho…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am a concerned citizen who believes common sense should dictate research on every new installment of wifi towers,surveillance systems in schools,working environments and shopping establishment s.Its getting over utilized and we don't know how much electromagnetic exposure will effect us short term much less long term.Its COMMON SENSE to study the exposure. Stop putting profits before people. Thank-you.
Posted 2026-10-26#5011 · Permanent link ↗

Describes a friend's restricted life around wireless exposure and requests thorough investigation before …

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Good evening, in reference to EMFs, RF and Wireless Radiation Exposure I have a friend who is effected to the point where they virtually can't live a normal life. Actually I believe everyone is effected but in different ways and to different degrees so I hope these concerns, especially for those who are suffering more seriously, are investigated thoroughly before any more loose federal regulations are put into law. Thank you for your time and God Bless.
Posted 2026-10-26#5008 · Permanent link ↗

A parent describes advocacy to remove a school tower following reported staff cancers and alleged permitt…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
My name is Heather Gallagher, and I am writing to you as a parent demanding immediate, modernized safety standards for wireless radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMFs) in school environments. Parents should not have to fight relentless, exhausting battles with school board districts and multi-billion-dollar telecommunications corporations simply to ensure that our children are safe from non-ionizing radiation exposure while attending public school. My teenager attended Casa Grande High School in Petaluma, California, where a massive industrial cell tower was operating directly on the school's athletic fields. Alarmingly, we discovered a heartbreaking cluster of young Physical Education teachers and athletic coaches from that school diagnosed with rare cancers. Distracted and deeply concerned, I hired a professional Building Biologist to conduct independent testing on the school ground. The measured radiation levels were shockingly high. Recognizing the severe risk to students and faculty, I worked tirelessly to educate our local school board on the biological science surrounding RF radiation. After reviewing the evidence, the school board voted to remove the tower. During this process, we uncovered an even more egregious outrage: T-Mobile had installed the tower illegally, having failed to secure the proper local permits. It took lengthy and arduous legal negotiations between the district and T-Mobile to undo this violation. Finally, after immense public pressure and community advocacy, the tower is scheduled to be taken down this November 2026. Following this ordeal, our school district passed a moratorium on new cell towers on school grounds. It is utterly ridiculous that a parent must act as a full-time advocate, investigator, and legal watchdog just to keep children safe at school—and unacceptable that telecommunications giants like T-Mobile can bypass municipal laws to erect unauthorized towers on campuses where children spend five days a week. The FCC’s current exposure guidelines are decades out of date, relying on obsolete thermal models that ignore an overwhelming and growing body of peer-reviewed scientific literature demonstrating non-thermal biological harm—particularly to developing children. Scientific Evidence on RF/EMF Exposure & Children's Health In September 2026, the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF)—including renowned experts such as Dr. David Carpenter (University at Albany), Dr. Ronald Melnick (former NTP toxicologist and lead designer of the NIH cell phone study), and Dr. Joel Moskowitz (UC Berkeley)—issued a clear warning: “The current body of research provides sufficient evidence to warrant the adoption of policies that mitigate risk by reducing exposure. Research has reported biological effects from exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMFs) at levels well below current FCC, ICNIRP, and IEEE exposure limits. Studies have reported numerous adverse effects, including cancer, oxidative stress, genetic impacts, blood-brain barrier permeability, sperm damage, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, impairments in cognition, learning and memory, sleep impacts, EEG alterations, and other neurological effects.” Fetal & Early Gene Expression Disruptions: A 2025 Yale Medical School study (Cakir et al.) reported disrupted neurodevelopment and increased expression of autism-related genes in fetal-brain laboratory models exposed to BT/RF radiation at levels ~4,000 times below FCC exposure limits. Disproportionate RF Absorption in Children: Children absorb far more RF radiation than adults due to thinner skulls and unique tissue composition. Scientific modeling demonstrates absorption rates in children that are 2-fold greater in the cerebellum, 2–5-fold higher in the eyes, and up to 30-fold higher in the hippocampus. Lee & Choi (2023) modeled daily brain energy absorption from continuous cell tower exposure exceeding direct cell phone exposure by more than tenfold in young children. Studies consistently link prenatal/postnatal wireless exposure to developmental delays, lower cognitive scores, memory performance deficits, and behavioral issues in children. The FCC can no longer ignore this expanding body of peer-reviewed research. Protecting the health, safety, and developing brains of our children must take precedence over corporate convenience. I urge the FCC to: Update and lower RF radiation exposure limits to reflect current non-thermal biological research. Establish strict federal buffer zones banning industrial cell towers on or directly adjacent to K-12 school property. Enforce stringent legal penalties against telecom companies that erect unauthorized or improperly permitted infrastructure near sensitive populations.

Attachments · 3

Original public attachments. Their contents are not included in category reviews.

Posted 2026-10-26#5002 · Permanent link ↗

Requests research on RF interactions with metallic implants, describing neurological and cardiovascular s…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
HHS RFI — Reported Health Effects and Research Gaps I request that HHS investigate potential biophysical interactions between RF exposure and passive metallic implants. I have two titanium neck implants measuring approximately 6 cm and 7 cm, work in direct line of sight of a telecommunications tower, and have developed new cardiovascular and neurological symptoms. Kranold et al. (2025) identify implant-related electromagnetic dosimetry as a neglected safety issue, raising concerns about whether current exposure guidelines adequately protect people with implants. I have been unable to locate a physician qualified to evaluate this specific concern. I urge HHS to identify this as a clinical and research gap and facilitate independent scientific investigation under real-world RF exposure conditions. Reference: Kranold L, Xi J, Goren T, Kuster N. “Dosimetric Electromagnetic Safety of People With Implants: A Neglected Population?” _Bioelectromagnetics_. 2025;46(6):e70023. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.70023

10 comments displayed. More load as you scroll.

These are separate official submissions grouped by topic. A comment can appear in more than one board.