Satellite exposure

I have already submitted my comment . Need to add the following Url for the microwave auditory effect . This is valid science and if the cell towers have emitters speed > 2.4 Ghz and SAR ( specific absorption rate > 1.6 kW/kg A person who is exposed with such an emission condition that is this high speed WIFI signal may experience auditory effect. Targeted Individual or Havana effect people who experience such violations should look into this matter as well. ( Just blaming the weapon systems won't work ) They may be ignoring the obvious cell towers with high speed energy range as another cause for their syndrome. Here is the science for Microwave auditory effect https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/979546 The science paper is 1961 discovery conducted with low speed emission and clicks as control experiment setup used in 1961. We are now in 2027 with very high frequency used with the 5G network speed upto 75 Ghz. We are using more than 2.4Ghz speed for our consumption which is way above the threshold mentioned in the scientific experiment !The exposure for satellite launchers, ground satellites, high speed IOTS are all causing health issues and V2k Syndrome as well. Please look into this

Oct.20.21 Toronto, Canada I am writing as a concerned citizen of planet earth. From May 2020 to the present, I have personally experienced severe life-threatening health effects, Anomalous Health Incidents, severe sleep and pain issues, sudden onset and offset of severe headache, vertigo, nausea, heating of the skin, cognitive fog, digestive issues, cyst on the ovary, knee pain and difficulty walking, urinary tract and ear infections, vomitting, spitting up of toxic fluids, loss of appetite and swelling of the cheeks and mandible muscles preventing eating, dehydration, vertigo and dizziness, difficulty breathing, compression and pain in the spinal cord and neck, extreme muscle tension, pain and nausea while using cell phone, stroke-like symptoms causing incapacitation along with heat and pain to the head and body and much more. All Anomalous Health Incidents have been accompanied by a high pitched ringing sound. I have been hospitalized due to severe pain several times. Several Complimentary Healthcare Practitioners diagnosed a spinal scoliosis in my thoracic (upper) spine in Costa Rica in 2022, following several weeks of a circle of heat and pain on same part of my spinal cord. A brain aneurism was found on the lower left side of my brain in 2020 via MRI in Toronto Canada. I have observed similar phenomena in my friends and family. I have been diagnosed with Electrohypersensitivity by Dr. Rina Bray at Women's College Hospital in Toronto Canada 2020. I have been diagnosed with Severe Environmental Illness and Multiple Chemical Sensitivity by Dr. Dempster ND in Toronto Canada 2020. There are ultrasounds, Xrays, MRIs and pages and pages of medical reports from 2020 to the present. I have been seen by multiple Doctors and Complimentary Health Practitioners from 2020 to the present, both in Costa Rica and in Canada. I was in excellent physical, mental and emotional health in May 2020 (the happiest and healthiest I have ever been in my life), immediately preceding the sudden onset of extreme insomnia at the end of May 2020 (lasted for one week), followed by severe and unnatural pain, heating, sleep issues and more. I assume all the ill health effects are a result of EMF and non-ionizing radiation, pulsed radio frequencies and other frequencies and chemicals in the environment, from an infrastructure of cell phones, cell towers, sattelites and other frequency and radiation-emitting devices. I have observed similar (although not as severe) effects in friends and family in my community. Many bees have dropped dead in my apartment over the past few months. Over the past few years I have observed negative impacts on plants and animals around my during the time of such anomalous health incidents. I am extremely concerned about the health and life of humans, animals and plants in my community and on planet earth, now and into the future. Please take immediate action in looking into this matter. I thank you kindly from the bottom of my heart. Marni Helene Levitt #1A 195 Wychwood Ave. York, Ontario Canada M6C 2T5 marnilevitt1@gmail.com

I have been experiencing dew attacks everyday non-stop 24/7 since approximately mid 2019. Among many other symptoms, my entire body is being hit with a frequency called "buffeting" which causes vibrations. This has been severely debilitating and each day I struggle to function with even basic ADL's (activities of daily living). It is also extremely difficult to think clearly since my brain is experiencing ongoing trauma due to military grade weapons via airplanes, cell towers, & satellite. I have audio evidence as well as 2 separate scans - a RF (radio frequency) scan & a non-linear junction scan. This is due to synthetic nanotechnology which has been activated that resides within my body. This can happen to anyone worldwide. I am more than willing to provide further information upon request.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a person who has been educated about the dangers of EMFs and RF and Wireless Radiation Exposure. After years of exposure from a beeper and cell phone attached at the hip of a family member and using a laptop on the arm of a chair as he sat in that chair, he had a massive infection that became a tumor that would be called cancer, likely due to all that radiation he was exposed to. I thank God for Hope 4 Cancer in Mexico for bringing him back to health and ridding his body of the toxic tumor that formed. We need Hope 4 Cancer Centers across America to help others recover from infections (cancer) caused by EMFs, RF and Wireless Radiation Exposure. The information about the damages caused by EMFs, RF and Wireless Radiation Exposure is being hidden, most people going about their lives are not exposed to this important information. This truly is about life and death, people and the planet are being damaged because of their exposure to these things on a daily basis and with more and more of the towers and satellites being put up the humans, animals, bees, vegetation, all of the planet is being damaged. This excessive use must be stopped and looked at carefully so that we can be smart about how we use technology. Money and the powers that be, who seem to be in control, need to step back. This needs to be investigated deeply, our lives and the life of the planet are at stake here. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

. & 2. I am responding as: 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)Apple phones with latest updates 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):Tumor on thumb for a year with agonizing searing pain in the presence of cellular phones, but absolutely updated Apple phones. I have generalized EMF sensitivity for 10 years as a background with fatigue. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:Fatigue Agonizing pain Nausea and vomiting 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:The change would’ve been the tumor coming on my thumb with a fungal infection and as soon as that started to be controlled, the pain totally goes away with the iPhones 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?Yes 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?My home was mitigated 10 years ago. I have no Wi-Fi in the house. Everyone’s cell phone is off in my house. We are ethernet. My problem was when I went anywhere. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information:Oh, we could talk for days on the metering my husband and I have done in our home. The one other wild card was installing Starlink. Plugging in the Starlink put the dirty energy in the house up to 1700! I know that is not the focus of the study, but that was a huge part of my problem until we mitigated the one plug for Starlink. Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's: B1a. Sources you experience as causing you Adverse Effects:Dirty energy, magnetic fields, Wi-Fi, cellular phones, especially Apple phones that are newly updated. Transformers on the powerlines, kitchen appliances. B1b. Sources you can sense, but don't seem to harm you:Before the tumor on my thumb, I would’ve said being around cell phones. But that tumor was ago agony with cell phones. B1c. Sources you can use without sensing or being harmed:Ethernet Provide be B1d. Sources that seem to provide benefit (i.e., electrotherapy):Frequency, specific micro current Rife PEMF Photo wave therapy B2a. Health conditions you think may contribute to your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless:Massive fungal infection in the thumb. If I am in Wi-Fi or EMR’s out of the home, it causes blistering on the thumb and severe pain. History of Lyme, disease and fatigue and mild exposure B2b. Health conditions you don't necessarily associate with your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless, but might be relevant:After reading the invisible rainbow, everything is connected to it. B3. For each subquestion please list up to 5 drugs or therapies or home remedies (if any) B3a. That you recommend, as they helped you tolerate or recover from EMF exposure:Avoidance Greenwave and Satik filters Astaxanthan Ray wave Supplement EMF protective clothing B3b. That you recommend, but you’re not positive that they help:The products they sell for cell phones to put on your cell phone to mitigate B3c. That helped you but you don’t recommend. (e.g., the benefit did not last long or the side effects were too harmful):A lot of the filters they sell to mitigate it for your cell phone B3d. Treatments that had no effect:Having to go to places blasting with Wi-Fi and dirty energy for my treatments. And everybody else on staff walking around with their cell phones. B3e. Treatments that made your sensitivity worse:55-64 B4. What is your age range?55-64 B5. What year did you become aware of your sensitivity to wireless radiation or electromagnetic fields?Around 2015 I was dealing with mold, exposures and lime. I bought a hybrid car and that pushed my body over the edge for wireless and dirty energy. B6. What country, state, province, or major city were you living in when you first noticed your sensitivity to wireless or electromagnetic fields?Michigan Link to HHS Comment Submission Form

Victoria Marshall Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health Re: Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure Docket #.: HHS-OASH-2026-0397; Federal Register Notice: 91 FR 59792 (Sept. 21, 2026) Dear Ms. Marshall and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health: This is an abridged version. The full version is attached as a PDF. I worked in satellite communications in the late 1980s. The field was new; we transmitted live sports via audio then video within 18 months. The company grew from ~23–24 to ~350 employees in five years. I worked under the executive VP overseeing engineering. Safety was taken seriously—rigid line and transmission equipment were tested and kept within then-applicable exposure margins. Despite this, I was chronically ill the entire time. I have had multiple RF, wireless, and magnetic exposures (satellite RF, extreme magnetic fields exceeding accepted standards, ordinary/not ordinary wireless). I may be more sensitive than average. One can literally feel the low-level “noise” of these emanations as continuous low-level stress on the body, separate from any bio-field or optogenetic-type effects. RF/wireless/magnetic safety limits have not been meaningfully updated in ~30–40 years. FCC limits adopted in August 1996 (based on ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 and NCRP) remain essentially unchanged (reaffirmed 2019). They rest on a ~4 W/kg whole-body SAR threshold linked to roughly a 1 °C core temperature rise, with large safety factors yielding a public limit of 0.08 W/kg. The safety exposure levels for RF, wireless, microwave radiation have not been meaningfully updated in roughly 40 years. The current U.S. FCC limits were adopted in August 1996, based on the ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 standard and NCRP recommendations which was studied in the 80’s which govern the frequency range from 3 kHz – 300 GHz. Those numerical limits (and their thermal-only basis) have remained essentially unchanged; the FCC reviewed and explicitly reaffirmed them in 2019. The foundational threshold is approximately 4 W/kg whole-body average SAR, associated with roughly a 1 °C rise in core body temperature (and with the behavioral disruption seen in earlier animal studies that was attributed to heating). Large safety factors are then applied—reducing the occupational limit to 0.4 W/kg and the general-public limit to 0.08 W/kg. Military development and fielding of RF/microwave directed-energy systems as non-kinetic tools is itself proof that governments know these fields can produce physical effects. They would not have researched and deployed such systems if they believed the fields were inert. The same applies to medical and commercial remote-sensing tools. For 30 years, medical, military, and commercial sectors have been using and further developing methods to sense and influence the body via RF, wireless, magnetic, and related pathways. IEEE 802.15.1–.6 (including Body Area Network standards) define networks in which the human body itself functions as a node and essential backbone. Without living bodies as nodes, the systems do not function as designed. This has occurred under SMART/IoT/IoB, and many other Io'X' labels without clear public disclosure that the architecture depends on human bodies. Absence of consent is criminal. I have found no clear independent studies showing that continuous use of the body as a communications node does not affect cellular energy, molecular/photonic processes, or long-term health. Robert O. Becker, M.D. (Army Medical Corps, VA orthopedics, The Body Electric), documented the body’s intrinsic DC electrical system (currents of injury, perineural control, piezoelectric bone) and its sensitivity to external fields well below thermal levels. The body is an electrical organism. Are there rigorous studies showing that treating it as a network node does not disrupt those systems? Every person in range of expanding sensor/wireless infrastructure should be informed of the body’s role as a network node and given a practical ability to opt out of remote/wireless/magnetic access or use of their body as a network element by any party when no onboard or near-body device is present and no consent has been given. This inquiry is decades overdue. If Making America Healthy Again is to be taken seriously, RF, magnetic, wireless, and related exposures—including use of the body itself as network infrastructure—must be examined alongside diet and traditional medicine. Best Regards,

Re: HHS-OASH-2026-0397, Request for Information on EMFs, RF Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure Thank you for asking. Federal RF exposure limits date to 1996, and in 2021 the D.C. Circuit found the FCC had not adequately explained why it kept them. Since then wireless has moved from 3G to 4G to 5G, with 6G planned around 2030: more antennas, closer together, more of the time. It doesn't stop. HHS should give the public, and the FCC, a real health record to work from. 1. Update the limits on modern science. Revisit the 1996 limits using current research, with special attention to children and long-term, close-to-body exposure. HHS should lead the health review and hand the FCC a record that answers the court. 2. Take public reports seriously. Many Americans report real symptoms they connect to wireless exposure. Their experiences should not be dismissed simply because no one has funded a peer-reviewed study to examine them. Absence of funded research is not evidence of safety. HHS should collect these reports systematically and fund independent studies, free of industry money, designed to test them. 3. Review each generation before and after rollout. Every new wireless generation should get an exposure assessment before broad deployment and ongoing monitoring afterward, rather than riding on decades-old assumptions. As another commenter noted, most instruments were built to check heating limits, not to record everyday exposure continuously. HHS should fund continuous, real-world measurement where people live, work, and sleep. 4. Set device efficiency standards. For most people the closest source is their own phone. Push for standards that make phones and wearables connect at lower transmit power, whether to towers or satellites, and publish real-world exposure data for each model. 5. Study satellite connectivity as a lower-exposure path. Satellites with large antenna arrays, paired with more efficient phones, could cover rural and remote America with fewer towers near homes and schools. HHS should study this side by side with dense 5G and 6G networks, including the higher power phones may use to reach orbit, and communities should be able to choose it where it works. 6. Health comes first. More connectivity is not automatically progress. Faster video is not what stands between Americans and abundance; affordable energy, medicine, and housing are. Each new generation should show it is needed and safe before it is built into every neighborhood, and the burden of proof belongs on the deployers, not on families. Please publish the underlying data and keep the review independent. Alec Snelling California This comment was crafted with super intelligence (SI) support.

I have been negatively impacted by EMF radiation for many years, Exposure to EMF's have affected my health a well being. I live in a choosing community. My building has four units and a mechanicals room, which means for a number of years I have had to live with 5 smart meters on the outside wall of my living room. If I stand near these meters outside I experience debilitating nausea. I have also experienced incredible fatigue, sleep disturbance, and dizziness inside my house. I have done some shielding which is very challenging. I still do not experience the level of wellness that is my birthright. I do not have a smart phone, smart appliances or any other smart devices or equipment. Unfortunately I cannot get away from everyone else's smart phones and devices. Unfortunately I am exposed to a sea of radiation from internet, wifi, cell phone towers and all those 'smart' things in our world. I know there are many scientific studies verifying the harm to human health and well being. I am terrified of 5 G and the intended blanketing of our earth with EMF radiation to be projected from thousands of satellites towards us and all plant and animal co-inhabitants of out planet. Can our species really be that insane?

I first noticed a light headed feeling when I was close to a modem many years ago. When I moved to another room, the feeling subsided. The next experience was when our power company installed smart meters wherever it was most convenient for them. They put one on my bedroom wall and I was dizzy, light headed and unable to sleep. I had to move and when it happened again at another rental unit, I was told I was too sensitive. I am unable to be close to modems for more than 15 minutes as I get dizzy and light headed, and have chosen to shut them off at night in order to sleep more soundly. I have found that I cannot live in some places because of the EMF fields and the radio frequencies, etc. and that if I can put up a 16" piece of sheet metal, on the wall where the smart meter or fuse box is, I cannot pretty much mitigate the intensity of the waves. I recently was visiting a home of a friend and felt very strange and light headed, almost losing my balance when I entered the bathroom, and it subsided when I went into the other room down the hall. I went back to that area and the same thing happened. I asked my friend and she said that their TV satellite dish was on the roof right at that room. And when I went into the bedroom to take a nap, the same thing happened. I looked on the wall and the smart meter was right on the bedroom wall and the neighbor's Satellite dish on their roof was aimed right at the bedroom as well. I had to leave the home as I was starting to feel very shaky from the EMF's and radio waves. Some of us are truly more sensitive than others to EMF, radio frequency waves and wifi. The cell towers they are putting into our communities are put right in front of people's homes and there are numerous cases of children and adults getting symptoms and there is nothing we can do about it because the county gave them permission to "help" us have better cell phone access and they are not required to alert the homeowners and phone companies are able to put them where they feel it is best for their company. We, the people, would like to have choice about our bodies and how we are impacted by new technologies. Smart meters should be put on garages where no one lives and not on our bedroom walls. And now we have new AI data centers that are being built with no care for the impact on the populations nearby. I cannot sleep with the modem on at night and have had to shut it off to avoid the way it impacts my sleep and my brain function. My hand starts aching when I hold my cell phone for more than 10 minutes. I use some protections that are sold by companies claiming to have devices that block the EMF's but they do not block them completely. I feel relieved when the phone is on airplane mode but still, the only full relief I feel is when it is shut off completely. I only can share personal experiences and have no documents to prove anything. I request that you please expedite safety reviews of the new technologies that will be even stronger than 5 G. As well as how we can be protected from all the smart meters and cell towers and computers that are everywhere emitting radio frequencies and wifi signals that truly have an impact on our bodies and brains and immune systems. There have not been enough research studies done to clearly document the impacts. And the research needs to be across a large population of children, adolescents and elders and those who have compromised health issues already, because I truly believe that we are harming ourselves and our families by not having protections available and having choice about what the new technology companies can do without our permission. Thank you for finally considering science do research about this. In our area, those of us who have the financial means to hire specialists come to our homes to use expensive meters that can check for "dirty electricity" and for EMF exposure and help us find ways to shield ourselves from the impacts on our bodies when we have not been able to figure out why we are not feeling well and there is no reason for it. And then we find out that our homes have very high EMF and radio frequencies and that the cell towers close by are all contributing to the high readings.

To whom it may concern, I feel the need to be direct when I state that the fact that in 2026, we’re just now “seeking public input” on a subject that has been, beyond all shadow of a doubt, scientifically proven for many decades, feels like an afront to anyone who can see the broader economic picture, and the (all-too-typical) deprioritization of public health in favor of corporate greed. Let’s face it, The Invisible Rainbow, first published in 2017, covering countless, well-documented scientific studies going back more than 100 years, makes it abundantly clear that WE HAVE KNOWN ABOUT THE DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION ON BIOLOGY FOR A LONG, LONG TIME. That said, as for my personal experience, my life has been fundamentally and irreparably altered as a consequence of EMF exposure. I’ve been hospitalized several times, and am now permanently unable to participate in many of the activities most people take for granted. I have to cover myself from head to ankle with expensive and uncomfortable faraday clothing when I leave my home. Even with this protection, I cannot stand to be in high-EMF environments (which is pretty much everywhere now) for longer than several hours at a time, and the effects on my health are catastrophic. My activities have been limited, my diet has been limited, my social and professional life have been decimated, and my life will never be the same. But at least I haven’t died of a brain tumor, as quite a few of my clients, colleagues, friends, and family members have. Again, the fact that we’re “seeking public input” on this topic is a bitter bill to swallow. It feels a bit like asking people what their experience has been drinking arsenic-infused soda that we’ve been insisting is safe for the last 50 years, as if the people making money (huge, HUGE amounts of money) haven’t known the answer from the beginning. Anyway, I digress. On the upside, I now run a business that stays consistently busy helping clients who are becoming sick en masse due to the electromagnetic radiation soup we’re all now swimming in. Tragic. The recent acquisition of the 800mhz band by Starlink is a nightmare waiting to happen. I’ve published a book, created online content, read the studies (no – not all of them, let’s face it – there are many thousands), read the books, watched the documentaries, deep-dived into the science, the biological mechanisms, and worked with countless clients suffering the effects of EMR. We don’t need more science. It’s been done. The effects are clear. The BioInitiative Report alone made this point, as have innumerable other sources. What we need are protections and education for an unaware populace suffering while corporations yield record profits at the expense of their customers’ health and, yes, their very lives. I can only hope that enough individuals in the decision-making process have enough integrity to stand up for what is right, rather than being cowed (or bought) by the financial interests committed to keeping this subject marginalized and quiet. I must say, based on history, I’m not optimistic. But perhaps I’ll be pleasantly surprised. I hope you choose to do what is right. You do have the power to make a difference. I thank you for your consideration. - Anonymous EMR-S sufferer P.S. – I’m choosing not to attach files below because I fail to see the point. Yes, I have countless studies, infographics, PDFs, etc. stored on my computer that I could include, but as I mentioned – we all already KNOW the truth. The Environmental Health Trust, The BioInitiative, and literally COUNTLESS resources online have enough data to drown in. And it all says the same thing – as the BioInitiative Report put it “Bioeffects are clearly established”. Full stop.