The expansion of wireless radiation has caused many people to have serious health effects. Safety NEEDS to be a consideration with expansion into 5G and 6G and beyond. Personally, I used to have photographic memory up until my early 20s. Around 3G/4G and increased wifi exposure I went to having brainfog and memory issues on a constant basis and having difficulty forming clear thoughts/words/sentences at times. I do everything I can to reduce exposure... use 4g (turn off 5g) on my cell phone and use wired headphone buds or speaker phone for my calls, turn wireless off at night in my home, put a faraday cage to help reduce exposure from the Smart Meter... but it is impossible to avoid towers that come to neighborhoods without our say or knowledge or consent. And they are documented to mess with our cells (gated calcium channel effects) and cause anxiety etc.
My own daughters 15 and 21 both suffer alot of unexplained anxiety that has increased SIGNIFICANTLY the past few years since 5G was introduced and I do believe there is a connection considering how much wireless frequencies /EMF they are exposed at school.
No schools or homes or playgrounds should have wireless towers near them.
There are OVER 10,000 studies worldwide showing the negative health effects of wireless radiation, and levels much lower than what the US deems allowable cause harm. I truly believe we will face a health crisis. See all the turbo cancers that have recently garnered attention may also be connected.
Je soumets ce commentaire en réponse à la demande d'informations du HHS sur les champs électromagnétiques (CEM), les rayonnements radiofréquences (RF) et l'exposition aux rayonnements sans fil ainsi que l’envoi d’ondes par les armes à énergies dirigées.
Je réponds du point de vue d’un membre de l’Association du Collectif des Personnes Ciblées.
Valérie Larosière, membre actif de l’Association du Collectif des Personnes Ciblées et la Présidente de l’Association située à Draguignan en France, qui a 46 ans est une « personne ciblée » depuis 47 ans par le biais d’armes à énergies dirigées utilisés sur les civils et par le biais du logiciel tortureware et le Programme MK ULTRA. Ces armes ont des lanceurs d’ondes comme les frigos, les wifis, les luminaires, la télé, le portable le plus douloureux pour le cerveau. Elle subit le « Syndrome de la Havane » , un processus de nettoyage de son cerveau par le Programme MK ULTRA avec acouphènes persistants, FIBROMYALGIE déclenchée par l’exposition abusive et intensive, nausées, vomissements, vertiges, douleurs dans le corps, maux de têtes récurrents, augmentation de la tension et du pouls cardiaque, maladie chronique tel que les rhumatismes, l’asthme, impossibilité de diminuer les ondes car les PEERPS sont connectés 24H sur 24 et 7 jours sur 7 sur le cerveau de la personne.
Depuis 17 ans Valérie subit par un pompier professionnel de la BMPM de Marseille un harcèlement électromagnétique conséquent qui lui a fait perdre sa vie intime, privée, dignité humaine jusqu’au lavage de cerveau pour s’obliger à se tuer...
Je soutiens l'implication active du Département de la Santé et des Services sociaux (HHS) dans l'examen des effets potentiels des rayonnements sans fil sur la santé et l'environnement. Les questions relatives à la santé humaine devraient être traitées par les agences fédérales possédant l'expertise appropriée en médecine, biologie, épidémiologie et santé publique, et les témoignages des personnes et des familles qui se disent affectées devraient être pris en compte au même titre que les données scientifiques.
J’exhorte le HHS à évaluer soigneusement ces expériences et les données scientifiques, à identifier les lacunes de la recherche actuelle, à accorder une attention particulière aux enfants et aux autres populations potentiellement vulnérables, et à établir des priorités de recherche fédérales appropriées concernant les rayonnements sans fil et la santé publique.
Merci de donner aux individus et aux familles l'occasion de se faire entendre.
Independent experts concur that the 1996 RFR exposure limits remain ineffective because they were based on thermal heating of tissue, while ignoring lower frequencies. Studies based on thermal heating used a 200 lb male dummy and a water filled balloon for head exposure. Debilitating health effects occur at much lower frequency levels. Health impacts for pregnant women, babies, children and those working in fields with chronic exposures weren't considered. Fast forward thirty years, and the amount of RFR emitting devices and ambient RFR levels has skyrocketed. The proliferation of cell phones, cell towers, 5G, 6G, antennas, WiFi, smart meters, and other smart products is unprecedented. No federal agency has assessed/evaluated the impacts on human health and our environment by addressing these combined multiple exposures. Requesting public comment and subsequently amending exposure limits to ensure safety is urgently needed.Major areas of concern include: impacts on children, the environment, EHS individuals and the cumulative, involuntary exposure most people encounter every day.
As a grandmother, I'm extremely worried about the constant RFR exposure experienced by our children and its long term effects. Children are more susceptible to environmental harms as they are smaller physically and in the process of developing. Their skulls are thinner, allowing more radiation to penetrate. Many schools now default to wireless connectivity with no evidence of safety, subjecting our children to this invisible toxin daily. An increasing number of people experience Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity due to current excessive exposure levels. This involuntary exposure while navigating work and/or public spaces is impossible to avoid. Many individuals through repeated exposure develop hypersensitivity and must actively avoid all exposures. Personally, I find airports intolerable. I experience headaches, vision problems and brain fog that lingers for hours. My home is hard-wired with ethernet cables and I keep my cell phone on airplane mode when not in use. Additionally, unless a state has enacted a no-fee opt-out, involuntary exposures include Smart Meters, which emit continuous pulsed radiation.
The natural world is similarly affected. It is known that RFR radiation affects bees and migratory birds, disrupting their ability to navigate and forage effectively. Flora and fauna are known to experience die-offs in close proximity to cell towers. In 2021, Kent Chamberlin Chairman, Emeritus of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of New Hampshire concluded one of the key recommendations of the New Hampshire Commission to Study The Environmental and Health Effects of Evolving 5G Technology is that cell towers be placed no nearer than 1,640 feet from places where people live, work or recreate. This 500 meter setback should become immediate public policy.
There should be an immediate moratorium on any new devices while safety studies are performed to evaluate the countless RFR emitting products already on the market.
European Union study finds children absorb more wireless radiation than adults across rangeof 5G frequencies - EHNhttps://www.ehn.org/5g-wireless-radiation-children-exposure
1 The FCC Is Supposed to Protect the Environment. It
Doesn’t.
https://www.propublica.org/article/fcc-environment-cell-
towers-failures
Environmental Procedures at the FCC: A Case Study in
Corporate Capture (2022)
19 https://ehtrust.org/electromagnetic-fields-impact-tree-
plant-growth/
20 https://ehtrust.org/environmental-effects-of-wireless-
radiation-and-electromagetic-fields/ 21 https://ehtrust.org/published-research-adverse-effect-
wireless-technology-electromagnetic-radiation-bees/ 22 https://ehtrust.org/radiofrequency-radiation-effects-on-
agronomy-agricultural-crops-and-crop-yields
Je soumets ce commentaire en réponse à la demande d'informations du HHS sur les champs électromagnétiques (CEM), les rayonnements radiofréquences (RF) et l'exposition aux rayonnements sans fil ainsi que l’envoi d’ondes par les armes à énergies dirigées.
Je réponds du point de vue d’un membre de l’Association du Collectif des Personnes Ciblées.
Andrée Préau, membre actif de l’Association du Collectif des Personnes Ciblées, qui a 78 ans est une « personne ciblée » depuis 15 ans par le biais d’armes à énergies dirigées utilisés sur les civils. Elle est domiciliée à Pautaines-Augeville où les personnes de sont village sont armées avec des armes à énergies dirigées et utilisent ces armes sur Andrée à des fins de crime contre l'humanité. Ces armes ont des lanceurs d’ondes comme les frigos, les wifis, les luminaires, la télé, le portable le plus douloureux pour le cerveau. Elle subit le « Syndrome de la Havane » avec acouphènes persistants, membres lacérés par les ondes, nausées, vomissements, vertiges, douleurs dans le corps, embolie pulmonaire, cancer lymphome aucune façon de diminuer l’impact des ondes et chaque jour son quotidien est de pire en pire.
Je soutiens l'implication active du Département de la Santé et des Services sociaux (HHS) dans l'examen des effets potentiels des rayonnements sans fil sur la santé et l'environnement. Les questions relatives à la santé humaine devraient être traitées par les agences fédérales possédant l'expertise appropriée en médecine, biologie, épidémiologie et santé publique, et les témoignages des personnes et des familles qui se disent affectées devraient être pris en compte au même titre que les données scientifiques.
J’exhorte le HHS à évaluer soigneusement ces expériences et les données scientifiques, à identifier les lacunes de la recherche actuelle, à accorder une attention particulière aux enfants et aux autres populations potentiellement vulnérables, et à établir des priorités de recherche fédérales appropriées concernant les rayonnements sans fil et la santé publique.
Merci de donner aux individus et aux familles l'occasion de se faire entendre.
I am electrohypersensitive and I really feel bad when I'm near a phone with an active internet connection, and also near wifi and antennas, and in general in places with a lot of people and active connections. I develope: headache, tiredness, weakness and bad mood. My muscles also hurt. When I have the opportunity to stay in safe places (such a rare thing!), like for istance in the nature, I feel really good, without any problem. When I come back to the exposition it is very disturbing. I think we could avoid a lot of exposition using the cable (I do in my home) and having a better consciousness of the problem. And also using the wireless connection very much better and less than now.
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.
I am responding from the perspective of a patient and victim of what feels like intentional harm to my wellbeing and that of other human beings.
In 2017, I became extremely ill from exposure to Wifi frequencies, electric and magnetic fields. I was in my late 50’s and forced into an early “retirement”. I could no longer keep any job and function anywhere near other people, electronics and modern buildings, shopping centers, basically most public environments. I lost all contact with friends, family members and others due to the fact I had to remove myself from location where cell phones, laptops, wifi networks were in use. I went to the best clinic in the nation that does double-blinded clinical trials on EMF hypersensitivity and was officially diagnosed and told the only way to recover my health was to exit basically society and find a remote place to live.
My symptoms included brain fog so bad my short-term memory was gone, nausea, panic attacks, a buzzing sensation in my legs that lasts for days, bone pain, the feeling of internal heat and red skin, skin rashes, extreme constant fatigue not helped by any amount of sleep, the desire to way overeat, total lack of energy to do any household chores or exercise, depression, increased blood pressure.
The only thing that has helped has been to remove myself from society, turn off the electricity, use ethernet cables (no wifi) and sit far away from a desktop computer. I do not use a cell phone nor any “smart” modern devices. I can’t ride in any modern cars full of EMF fields and are constantly bouncing signals of cell towers and other cards on roadways. You don’t seem to understand that this EMF technology is fueling all types of diseases – making them happen faster. As long as you focus on the symptoms instead looking at the core body’s reaction to being assaulted by frequencies that are not natural in ever increasing strength you will never resolve anything.
Almost 10 years later, I have only recovered slightly and exposure to modern cars, public spaces, people’s homes full of toxic EMFs still triggers intense symptoms to include intense immediate pain, nausea, migraine headaches, edema, buzzing in the nervous system (lasts for days), brain fog and panic attacks. The increase in 4G to 5G is easily felt in my body and has intensified the response to exposure from this technology. It is a complete lie to say that this type of radiation does not affect the body. I am dumbfounded that a recognized disability with ICD-10 coding produces zero accommodation from the ADA department of the government. I feel like people like me, our lives, mean absolutely nothing to a modern society on a path to the internet of things – all living things to be incorporated into some global network. Modern people have become so addicted to their devices that it is tearing apart our society, families are being broken apart. Children think their parents are insane for asking cell phones be turned off. I have met many people personally who are in the same situation of all ages.
I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Yet I do not hold out much hope as our society has placed dollars, governmental controls, winning some global tech race over human beings, animals, plants and the natural order of creation, against the very Creator of all life.
I urge HHS to carefully consider the environment it operates in. What good is any research if the other branches of our government, other agencies, are bought by industry and global interests? Will your efforts to do any more research do any good? So many research studies already exist pointing to this technology’s harmful biological effects and yet it has had zero impact on slowing down the march to technological destruction of the biological life by those that want to create a new race of people that are hybrid human beings.
Please ban dangerous technology. 5g is bad enough. 5g gives me headaches. Please ban 6g.. invest in innovation to find safe alternatives. Ban dangerous technology please.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit a comment. I absolutely oppose the 2-way wireless radiation emitting smart meters and digital meters that have been forced on Americans’ homes, including mine.
Additionally I am very concerned about increasing levels of other sources of electromagnetic radiation and how exposure will affect all Americans, especially my family, as well as the enviroment.
Over 1,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies have demonstrated serious adverse health effects from the wireless radiation coming from our cell phones, cell towers, and "Smart" meters radiating our homes 24/7. This includes DNA damage, infertility and reproductive damage, cardiac effects and arrest, neurological conditions (anxiety, depression, Alzheimers), immune system dysfunction, and cancer.
Environmental Health Trust provides a list of scientific evidence on this webpage that I am including with my submission.
https://ehtrust.org/send-science-to-the-fcc-govt-is-asking-for-evidence-you-can-help-now/
The FCC was sued in 2021 for failing to update their safety guidelines for human exposure limits that were established in 1996 when we were using 2G wireless technologies, not the 4G and 5G we have today. The lawsuit was successful, but now over 5 years later the FCC still has not responded to the court and is refusing to regulate the Telecoms. The reality is NO ONE is measuring our cumulative daily human exposure of EMF “electrosmog” coming from all of our current sources of wireless radiation including 4G/5G “mega” towers, 5G small cells, and the EMF pulsing Smart meters attached to our homes. https://ehtrust.org/in-historic-decision-federal-court-finds-fcc-failed-to-explain-why-it-ignored-scientific-evidence-showing-harm-from-wireless-radiation/
Because I am aware of the health risks, I have tried my best to create a safe healthy environment in my home. We do not have WIFI in our home and haven't for years. Instead we use hard-wired internet. We kindly ask anyone entering our home to please turn off their Cellular Data, Bluetooth, and WIFI on their phones and tablets as my husband and I do the same when we are in our home. Rarely do we need to use the internet on our phones but if we do, we do it quickly and away from our son and then once we are done, we make sure to turn it back off, immediately. We have asked our neighbors to apply faraday cages on their utility meters and they gladly obliged. We take all these measures, and I could go on listing more, because we are aware of the dangers. We do the best we can, to control what we can, knowing once we leave our house, it's a battle zone of cell towers and cell phones. I ask that HHS do everything in its power to better protect Americans from increasing sources of “electrosmog.”
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.
I am responding from the perspective of an individual patient and a concerned member of the public.
I started work at a major R&D laboratory in Cambridge, Massachusetts in 2000, and the institution began roll-out of complete building wireless communications within the next three years. By the year 2006, I had developed severe tinnitus, headaches, dizziness and balance issues. In the years 2006-07 I was diagnosed with an acoustic neuroma which continued to increase in size until significant treatment was required (a complete course of fractionated stereotactic radiation). This was massively disruptive to me, my family and workplace. This experience significantly and negatively affected my daily life until resolved in 2009.
I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.
I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.
Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.