https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-abstract/157/1/e2025072941/205716/Smartphone-Ownership-Age-of-Smartphone-Acquisition?autologincheck=redirected
"Smartphone Ownership, Age of Smartphone Acquisition, and Health Outcomes in Early Adolescence Available to Purchase"
"RESULTS
At age 12 years, compared with not owning a smartphone (n = 3849), smartphone ownership (n = 6739) was associated with higher risk for depression (odds ratio [OR] 1.31, 95% CI: 1.05–1.63), obesity (OR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.20–1.63), and insufficient sleep (OR 1.62, 95% CI: 1.46–1.79). Younger age of smartphone acquisition was associated with obesity and insufficient sleep (for each earlier year of acquisition, OR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02–1.16, and OR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02–1.12, respectively). At age 13 years, among 3486 youth who did not own a smartphone at age 12 years, those who had acquired a smartphone in the past year (n = 1546) had greater odds of reporting clinical-level psychopathology (OR 1.57, 95% CI: 1.12–2.20) and insufficient sleep (OR 1.50, 95% CI: 1.26–1.77) compared with those who had not (n = 1940) after controlling for baseline mental health and sleep. Results were consistent across several sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSIONS
Smartphone ownership was associated with depression, obesity, and insufficient sleep in early adolescence. Findings provide critical and timely insights that should inform caregivers regarding adolescent smartphone use and, ideally, the development of public policy that protects youth."
1. & 2. I am responding as: an individual
3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)smart meters
3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):constant feeling of being radiated on daily basis, 3 years since smart meeters have been implemented in the area where I live/our building
3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:foggy brain, sense of my nervous system being fried, restless legs, anxiety, skin rash, hair loss.
3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:I felt the change immediately and then discovered smart meeters in our residential building.
3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?No.
3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?Yes. I purchased EMF protection devices which helped lessen the symptoms.
3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information:No.
Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's:Constant feeling of being under stress and my whole body feels under attack - I feel drained of my energy and life force.
B1a. Sources you experience as causing you Adverse Effects:Mobile phone, Smart meter, Wireless router, Street lights, 5G masts
B1b. Sources you can sense, but don't seem to harm you:
B1c. Sources you can use without sensing or being harmed:
B1d. Sources that seem to provide benefit (i.e., electrotherapy):
B2a. Health conditions you think may contribute to your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless:None. Apart from being sensitive to EMF radiation I do not have any other health conditions.
B2b. Health conditions you don't necessarily associate with your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless, but might be relevant:
B3. For each subquestion please list up to 5 drugs or therapies or home remedies (if any)
B3a. That you recommend, as they helped you tolerate or recover from EMF exposure:EMF protection technology; phone/router/ laptop patches, Geo Cleanse, orgone devices
B3b. That you recommend, but you’re not positive that they help:
B3c. That helped you but you don’t recommend. (e.g., the benefit did not last long or the side effects were too harmful):
B3d. Treatments that had no effect:
B3e. Treatments that made your sensitivity worse:45-54
B4. What is your age range?45-54
B5. What year did you become aware of your sensitivity to wireless radiation or electromagnetic fields?My first mobile phone in 1998
B6. What country, state, province, or major city were you living in when you first noticed your sensitivity to wireless or electromagnetic fields?London, UK
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12888-019-2350-x.pdf
PSU = Problematic
Smartphone Use
"Nonetheless, recent years have seen an explosion
in research considering the prevalence of problematic
smartphone use (PSU), which has been operationa-
lised in such a way that it maps onto concepts of be-
havioural addiction: tolerance, withdrawal (dysphoria
when the battery dies), preoccupation, neglect of
other activities, subjective loss of control and contin-
ued use despite evidence of harm [13–18]. Other be-
havioural addictions, such as problem gambling, show
robust associations with common mental disorders
such as depression [19],where sporadic gambling does
not. If a distinctive problematic pattern of smart-
phone use can be demonstrated to be prevalent, and
if this pattern of use is associated with harm, there is
value in identifying children and young people with
this pattern of use and potentially addressing it clinic-
ally. Given the large increase in research studies using
tools to estimate the prevalence of PSU (and examine
mental health associations), it is now appropriate to
evaluate the evidence"
...
"Prevalence of problematic smartphone
usage and associated mental health
outcomes amongst children and young
people: a systematic review, meta-analysis
and GRADE of the evidence"
...
"...PSU associated with mental health outcomes
PSU has been consistently associated with measures of
poor mental health, in particular relating to depression,
anxiety, stress, poor sleep quality, and day to day func-
tional impairment demonstrated by poor educational at-
tainment. Of the studies included, 20 investigated the
relationship between PSU and mental health amongst
CYP. This is summarized in a qualitative synthesis (See
Additional file 1: Table S6)"
As a mother and a longtime Santa Monica resident, I want families to have clear, trustworthy information
about wireless radiation and health. Technology is part of everyday life, and I want federal agencies to
examine potential risks carefully and explain what is known, what remains uncertain, and what practical
steps are justified by the evidence.
I submit this comment as an individual member of the public, not as a scientific expert. My requests are
informed by the peer-reviewed review cited below. I ask HHS and the FCC to conduct transparent,
independent assessments of radiofrequency exposure that consider children, long-term and repeated
exposure, and realistic conditions of device use.
Mevissen and colleagues (2025) reviewed experimental animal cancer studies and reported high-certainty
evidence for increased glioma and malignant heart schwannoma in male rats. The authors also emphasize
that extrapolating these findings to human risk is complex. These findings warrant careful evaluation; they
do not, by themselves, establish that everyday wireless exposure causes cancer in people. Please assess
this review alongside its 2026 corrigendum, the underlying studies, and relevant human research, including
findings that do not show harm.
I respectfully request that the agencies:
1. Publish an accessible assessment that distinguishes biological changes from adverse health outcomes,
animal findings from human evidence, and established conclusions from uncertainty. Explain study quality,
exposure levels, limitations, and conflicting results.
2. Explain whether current exposure limits and compliance testing adequately address children, long-term
use, and devices used close to the body. Identify where evidence supports current practices and where
additional testing or research is needed.
3. Prioritize independent, reproducible research on developmental and neurological outcomes, reproductive
health, and cumulative exposure, with transparent funding and conflict-of-interest disclosures.
4. Provide practical guidance on reducing unnecessary exposure where warranted, while preserving access
to communication, education, and assistive technology.
For HHS, please use this request for information to identify concrete research priorities and public-health
guidance needs. For the FCC, please provide a reasoned response to the evidence relevant to the
court-remanded issues, including non-cancer outcomes, children, and testing procedures. The cancer
review cited here is offered as broader scientific context, not as proof of non-cancer effects or a substitute
for addressing the specific remand record.
Families deserve decisions supported by rigorous science and explanations they can understand. Thank
you for considering my comment.
I am against the widespread use of excessive Wireless radiation exposure. Everywhere we go there are towers and too much exposure that is unhealthy to our children and to all of us. I personally know individuals who have been exposed be in the schools that used excessive WiFi connections or in all public places. We are not paying attention to the health hazards of brain fog, headaches. Unexplained weakness and pain and many other health problems . Please be concerned . I believe there will be an epidemic of issues associated with prolonged excessive exposure to EMF and RF and wireless exposure
PUBLIC COMMENT TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Docket:** HHS-OASH-2026-0397
Submitted by:** Direct Energy Weapons Agency, Inc.
Date:** October 20, 2026
1. Introduction
Direct Energy Weapons Agency, Inc. sincerely thanks the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for inviting public participation in its review of electromagnetic fields (EMFs), radiofrequency (RF) radiation, wireless exposure, and potential health effects.
Incorporated in 2021, our organization advocates for civilians reporting unexplained neurological and physical symptoms they believe may be associated with directed-energy exposure or assault.
2. Our Experience and Background
Our organization stepped forward to collect civilian incident reports because people repeatedly told us they could not find an agency willing to document their experiences.
We could not stand by while Americans were suffering and feeling that their country did not care. Despite limited resources and no physical investigation facility, we established a process to receive complaints, conduct case reviews, and prepare incident reports.
To date, approximately 1,000 civilians throughout the United States have submitted incident reports to our organization.
Complainants describe unexplained pain, burning sensations, vibrations, pressure, sleep disturbances, hearing unusual sounds or voices, and other neurological and physical symptoms.
Complainants stated in their reports that they have no mental health conditions and that their injuries are often misdiagnosed.** Many believe someone is remotely operating wall-penetrating energy devices against them inside their homes.
Although these reports do not independently establish the cause of symptoms or confirm exposure to particular technologies, the suffering described deserves medical attention and scientific investigation.
We have contacted federal security and investigative agencies seeking assistance but have not received a substantive response.
3. Medical Research and Our 6 Pillars Proposal
We are concerned that civilians experiencing unexplained neurological symptoms lack access to coordinated medical evaluations.
DEW Agency developed its proposed **6 Pillars Baseline Neurological Tests** to encourage comprehensive medical assessments:
1. Balance and Vestibular Testing:** Evaluate balance, dizziness, and inner-ear function.
2. Extended High-Frequency Hearing Tests:** Identify hearing changes beyond standard assessments.
3. Cognitive Processing Testing:** Assess memory, attention, and reaction times.
4. Automated Eye Tracking:** Evaluate eye movements and visual function.
5. Advanced Neuroimaging (DTI):** Consider specialized brain imaging when medically indicated.
6. TBI Blood Biomarkers:** Evaluate appropriate use of brain-injury biomarkers, including GFAP and UCH-L1.
We ask HHS and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to evaluate this proposed framework and determine which assessments may benefit civilians reporting unexplained neurological symptoms.
Our goal is to identify and treat measurable health problems without requiring patients to first establish what caused their symptoms or whether a crime occurred.
4. Recommendations for Federal Action
We respectfully request that HHS:
1. Establish a national reporting system for civilians experiencing unexplained symptoms they believe may involve RF/EMF exposure.
2. Support independent medical and scientific research into reported symptoms and potential causes.
3. Collaborate with the FCC to improve exposure monitoring, detection technology, and public safety education.
4. Encourage development of affordable residential RF/EMF monitoring and alarm systems capable of detecting potentially hazardous emissions.
5. Develop medical evaluation guidelines and referral pathways to ensure respectful, evidence-based care.
6. Coordinate with appropriate agencies regarding concerns about unauthorized electronic access and technology-related harassment
5. Request for Federal Collaboration
DEW Agency welcomes an opportunity to assist HHS and other federal agencies by continuing to receive, organize, and refer civilian reports under an authorized arrangement.
We are willing to discuss sharing anonymized information from our records to support public health research, subject to appropriate privacy protections.
6. Closing Statement
People are suffering today. They need medical answers, scientific investigation, and a safe place to report their concerns.
We respectfully ask HHS not to overlook civilians simply because the causes of their symptoms remain unexplained.
The United States should lead in medical research, public health protection, and the responsible evaluation of emerging technologies.
Thank you for giving organizations such as ours an opportunity to be heard.
Respectfully submitted,
Direct Energy Weapons Agency, Inc.
www.DEWAgency.org
Tel: 781-561-8753
MY NEIGHBORS AND ANIMALS ARE DYING
I am SICK. My family members have been SICK SINCE more than a hundred UNREGULATED TOWERS WENT LIVE over our community.
This has been a challenge for me to get anyone to help in my community. I wanted to share my story in hopes of helping others. My story is one of many in Terrebonne Parish. After multiple (9) 300-foot 5G towers were put over our homes, four 300-foot 5G towers were put over my home and animal sanctuary, and four 300-foot towers were put over my office. At the same time, smart meters were put on my home, along with those of every other Entergy customer.
I began getting sick, very sick. It began in my petting area with heart palpitations, headaches, vomiting, ringing in my ears, confusion, bleeding gums, insomnia, nightmares, dizziness, anxiety, ears buzzing 24 hours a day, severe fatigue, muscle weakness, and more. I have now been diagnosed with radiation syndrome / EHS (electromagnetic hypersensitivity syndrome) caused by extreme exposure to radiation. Many residents are experiencing similar symptoms. Countless children are now suffering.
Being a very healthy person my whole life, this has been a life-changing situation. I am usually the one helping others; now I need your help. I never thought this could happen until I was forced to face it by becoming sick. I'm not sure where this illness will take me. However, I must do all I can to protect my family and my community. Seven neighbors on my street and friends have died after the towers went live over their homes. Many other residents are also sick.
My community is surrounded by towers that have no regulatory testing information, nor does our planning department ask for it, citing the FCC's outdated RF radiation guidelines. I became certified in RF radiation testing. I now test the towers and smart meters. I can confirm that the EMF (electromagnetic frequency) / RF (radio frequency) radiation being emitted is extreme for every single product, tower, and smart device I have tested.
It has been a fight to protect my family, my community, and myself, with EVERYONE CITING THE FCC'S OUTDATED RF RADIATION GUIDELINES. I had to learn all I could about this to protect my health and theirs. I've had to turn my home, where I have lived for 28 years, into an EMF-safe house (until I sell it), as well as my barn, which is surrounded by EMF material and protection.
My bed is covered with EMF protection as well due to the radiation levels in my home. I now have to wear protective clothing all day. Leaving my safe area means becoming exposed due to the unbridled towers around me.
I am a very private person. This is not easy to share, but if I do not ask for help now, many more innocent people will be sick, or they will die like my neighbors, my friends, and my animals.
Since the towers went live, six of my horses have died instantly under the towers. All of my little animals have died. My 200-pound tortoises started going blind.
I'm not sure where the daily radiation exposure will take me, so I thought now is the best time to ask for your help in making a change.
THE FCC MUST REGULATE THE RADIATION, OR THE DEATH & DESTRUCTION WILL NEVER END.
Technology is safe only if it is REGULATED.
They put a new cell tower up by my office. I’ve noticed I’ve started getting headaches and brain fog more and more. Something I use to never get. I’ve also noticed arthritis in my hands, especially when I use my cell phone. Unfortunately my office does have a WiFi box right under my desk so that does not help matters. Everyday I can’t wait to clock out just so I can go home turn all the lights out and lay down. I know it’s the insane amount of emf I’m exploded to while working because on weekends and when I’m on vacation I do not experience this.
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.
I am responding from the perspective of my own experience as well as 2 of my children. For myself I suffered for almost 4 years before finally making the correlation of my symptoms with cell phone towers and boosters cities have put up. I noticed every time I drove through certain areas of our city I'd get what felt like an electric jolt go through my arms and I'd be left with relentless fatigue. I now have to avoid areas of my city where cell signals are boosted as my body immediately feels the unpleasant jolts. I live in constant paranoia driving around town and especially to other cities knowing I may get these electric jolts going through my arms and then left with horrible fatigue. Doctors do not know what to do with me, I was told by one physician to "just move out to the country" which is easier said than done especially when I'm dealing with 2 special needs kids at home who need services. Both of my special needs kids struggle with EMF's, it's very clear when they have had way too much exposure via at school, malls, city parks w/cell towers etc... My son gets extremely agitated very easily and becomes self-injurious as well as depressed. When my daughter is exposed to everyday EMF exposures her POTS/MCAS and Ehlers-Danlos all collide into a nightmare. She sweats horribly, she is overly stimulated and can't get her words out her energy goes way down to the point she can't stand, she has to sit and her dizzy spells leave her crying on the floor. She too also gets really depressed when EMF's are too high like her brother. We have had to spend so much money trying different devices and clothing that claims to repel EMF's but when it's a constant bombardment life is never enjoyable, we are just trying to survive each day. I am fearful for 6G being rolled out as I fear its may land one of my children in the hospital which is riddled with EMF's and what that could do to either of them and their already weakened bodies. We have no help, no support and nothing is regulated which HAS to change and not years from now, TODAY, PLEASE!!!
10 comments displayed. More load as you scroll.
These are separate official submissions grouped by topic. A comment can appear in more than one board.