HHS EMFTHE PUBLIC COMMENT FORUM
The people. The questions. The public record.An independent RF Safe project
Forum index › All threadsLatest posting day

THE LATEST SUBMISSIONS

All comment threads

7067 original comments · Newest first

Browse topics
Read full comments below. More load as you scroll.
Posted 2026-10-13#2308 · Permanent link ↗

Cites epidemiological and exposure studies to argue that ordinary compliant wireless exposure has not bee…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
The current human evidence does not establish that ordinary, limit-compliant exposure to 5G, Wi-Fi, cell towers, or smart meters causes cancer or other illness. This is not proof of zero risk. HHS should use reproducible evidence and measured exposure, not fear or anecdotes. A 2024 WHO-commissioned systematic review examined 63 epidemiologic articles from 22 countries. Mobile phone use was not associated with increased glioma risk (pooled relative risk 1.01; 95% CI 0.89–1.13), meningioma risk (0.92; 0.82–1.02), or acoustic neuroma risk (1.03; 0.85–1.24). The review also found no association between modeled exposure from fixed-site transmitters and childhood leukemia or pediatric brain tumors. A 2025 peer-reviewed UK field study measured RF emissions at 56 active 5G base stations across 30 publicly accessible locations. Worst-case estimates were at most 5% of ICNIRP 1998 public reference levels; 5G accounted for less than 10% of total measured RF exposure on average at those sites. HHS should maintain science-based, enforceable exposure limits; independently verify compliance; publish understandable measurements of actual exposure; and continue research into long-term exposure, higher-frequency 5G, children, and other understudied groups. Protect against established high-exposure hazards and study uncertainties. Do not portray compliant 5G, Wi-Fi, or smart meters as proven hazards without evidence.

Attachments · 2

Original public attachments. Their contents are not included in category reviews.

Posted 2026-10-10#2305 · Permanent link ↗

Reports changes in sexual impulses after gaining Wi-Fi access and questions possible testosterone effects…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I have been feeling homosexual impulses since I got access to wifi. I am worried it might be affecting my testosterone
Posted 2026-10-10#2304 · Permanent link ↗

Calls for moving cellular towers away from schools and children.

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Get the towers away from schools! In Illinois several districts have cell towers on school property or right next to a school! Get them away from children!
Posted 2026-10-10#2303 · Permanent link ↗

Reports auditory sensations, sleep disturbance, itching and cognitive difficulties following installation…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I live in a building in pottsville Pennsylvania at 101 mahantongo st 1 yr ago they put cell equipment on the building shortly after it was done i have had microwave auditory effect squeeling noise and poor sleep itchiness lack of concentration memory gettin worse i can literal feel it on me at times pulsing sensation this kind of thing should not be on building people live its un called for
Posted 2026-10-10#2302 · Permanent link ↗

Links recurring symptoms and Havana-syndrome accounts to alleged directed-energy and sensing technologies…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
My husband and I have been living in San Mateo CA for over 26 years. I detected high elevated radio frequencies in 2022 after my long-time neighbor shared her swelling legs symptoms with me. My researches since 2022 and many recurring medical symptoms over the years have led me to believe that Havana syndromes and many unknow-cause medical issues and diseases as well as the symptoms shared by so-called “Targeted Individuals” on social medias are most likely induced by a common source which includes Directed Frequency Energy Neuro-weaponry Systems, Nano-sensors, Remote Drug Delivery and Monitoring and 5G/6G technologies, etc. Per my observations, worldwide general public including doctors, local governments and law enforcement have almost zero knowledge about the existence of these invisible high-tech weaponry systems and the detailed medical symptoms they induced. I would like to recommend the following items for now to the officials of HHS. a. Please extend the duration of this Request for Information on EMFs, RF Radiation and Wireless Radiation Exposure longer, instead of the one-month period. b. Please officially inform all states and local public sectors, medical fields and their corresponding agencies and contractors etc. about this request. c. Please extend the scope of this Request to worldwide and collaboratively collect inputs from other countries. d. Please monitor and detect frequencies of all kinds, including ELF and solar lights, in the environment as soon as possible. e. Please register all flying aircrafts and what they carry and spraying in the air, and make the information available to the general public. f. Please make blood test of Graphene Oxide and other Nano-technologies related materials available for general public. g. Please include the detection of body implants and nano-sensors in medical health plans for all levels of government employees, law-enforcement and military personnel, school teachers and professors, doctors and medical field personnel, and general public via other health insurance coverages, etc. Thanks
Posted 2026-10-10#2299 · Permanent link ↗

Reports decades of exposure without associated adverse health effects and urges HHS to follow WHO guidanc…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am commenting as an individual United States citizen. Over the course of my life, I have experienced decades of prolonged exposure to low-level electromagnetic radiation such as wi-fi internet, mobile wireless including 5G, radio towers, cell phones, bluetooth, as well as the rather miniscule levels of EMF given off by rather ordinary devices like toasters and microwave ovens and speakers, etc. Over decades of exposure to these levels of EMF radiation, I have experienced no major or minor adverse health effects that were linked to the EMF, and I believe that with proper adherence to the WHO's guidance, these technologies are, as has been demonstrated in peer-reviewed scientific papers published by the very same organization, quite safe. I also highly encourage the HHS to seek out the WHO's work on this topic, and to adhere strictly to the science at hand, rather than getting caught up chasing a manufactured culture war talking point.

10 comments displayed. More load as you scroll.

These are separate official submissions grouped by topic. A comment can appear in more than one board.