All comment threads

Our current regulations are astoundingly outdated... originating when most people did not even know what a cell phone was! Likewise any knowledge of the effects of microwave radiation was an unstudied unknown. We need new, updated, protection!

Questions 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16 and 18 I submit this as a resident concerned about persistent noise, perceived vibrations, health effects, and possible RF/EMF exposure near my home. My family has lived for years in an all-electric home near Whitewater Hill in the Palm Springs area, beside an aging wind farm, with a freeway below and numerous communications and radio towers nearby. In November 2024, I awoke to a loud, high-pitched, sustained sound apparently coming from outside toward the wind farm. Similar sounds and perceived vibrations have continued almost daily and nightly, changing throughout the day and often becoming particularly disruptive late at night or early in the morning. I am concerned about a nearby 5G tower that appears directed toward my home. Its involvement has not been established by testing. The disturbance has caused prolonged loss of sleep, severe headaches, exhaustion and two early-morning hospital visits. I was evaluated for tinnitus and told it did not explain my experience. My hearing specialist added a white-noise setting to my hearing aids. I have reverse-slope hearing loss. I have spent nearly two years and considerable money investigating and trying to obtain relief: Southern California Edison came three times, including at 10 p.m. My solar company inspected its equipment several times. Tesla replaced both costly home batteries multiple times; a senior representative also inspected the equipment. I shut off electricity to the entire house twice for 24 hours. The sound and vibrations continued unchanged. One shutdown damaged a pool pump, costing $2,300. I painted an entire room, walls and ceiling, with RF shielding paint. I purchased and installed special RF shielding curtains. I replaced all household ducting. I reinsulated the attic. I installed a new attic fan. I kept a log of disturbance dates and times. I installed a metal fence intended as shielding. I tried to measure the sustained sound on my phone, but the display only thickened and did not yield useful measurements. I filed a written FCC complaint. I contacted Palm Springs code officials, who referred me to the county. I paid a San Diego company $3,500 to measure frequencies. It tested only during the day and reportedly found a solar-equipment issue; the nighttime disturbance remains unexplained. I contacted the wind farm operator. After I reported noise around 10 p.m., its representative arrived about an hour later, after the sound had stopped. I wrote to a college seeking help through a research project. I sought a tinnitus evaluation; my hearing aids were adjusted for white noise. I purchased white-noise machines. I purchased four EMF hats, two EMF blankets, an EMF nightgown, noise-canceling earmuffs, and marketed EMF-blocking stickers for household electrical equipment. The shutdowns showed that switching off household electricity did not stop the disturbance, but they do not prove that a 5G tower or any other external installation caused it. My purchases do not prove that shielding products are effective. My property formerly had substantial bee activity and was once a bee farm, yet I have observed no bees over the past year. I cannot identify the reason; habitat, weather, pesticides, disease and other factors may matter. I ask HHS to support independent, multi-day and overnight investigation of complaints like mine; coordinated measurements of RF/EMF, audible and low-frequency sound, vibration and electrical interference; public access to relevant tower operating and compliance information; evaluation of cumulative conditions near homes, towers, wind farms and freeways; and better coordination among health agencies, the FCC, utilities and local authorities. Research should examine sleep disruption, headaches and possible environmental effects, including pollinators, without presuming causation. After repeated service calls, private testing, home alterations, government complaints and medical consultations, I still have no explanation. Residents need a practical route to independent testing at the times disturbances actually occur. Please consider this experience when setting research and public-health priorities.

I am writing to request strong deliberation regarding EMF and RF exposure. The effects are largely similar to many of us- headaches, trouble sleeping, irritability, the list goes on. A government's role is to guard the nation and keep a set of principles that unite us. Installing and supporting the growth of Electromagnetic fields and Radiofrequency Radiation is a danger to the citizens health, I dont think that protects our citizens. If it harms one person it should be enough to rethink. Please consider your actions carefully as these decisions affect the heath of a decent portion of the nation, and even more that just haven't realized the root cause.

Please find attached a submission from the Soft Lights Foundation related to electromagnetic radiation in the visible light portion of the electromagnetic spectrum from products that use Light Emitting Diodes.

I feel that EMF radiation has not been properly evaluated for human exposure and before we go to 6G we need to evaluate the effects this has on humans. My husband has AFIB and he has been holding his phone over his heart for years which I believe has contributed to this condition. He has been in the ICU for this problem and no doctor has ever brought up his EMF exposure as a possible explanation for his condition.

I've been hit with these microwave directed energy weapons assaults since May of 2006. It causes lack of concentration, forgetfulness, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, rashes, skin irritations, irregularities to internal organs, balancing problems and much more. I think suffering from these covert attacks could reach epidemic proportions if not stopped right away. It is imperative that a moratorium be placed with the deep state on the continued operations of this immoral and illegal targeting surveillance.These symptoms experienced are consistent with those of the Havana Syndrome. Thank you for taking the time and interest in dealing with this important situation. Sincerely, R.Ellis

1. & 2. I am responding as: caregiver for an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)WIFI, Mobile phone, etc. 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):Our organization in the Netherlands help people in thier home's to reduce exposure from RF fields: (Founding "StralingsBewustZeist".) During the years 2021- now, in city Zeist, Netherlands. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:Example: Lady with heavy heart-beat: we enlarged distance from her WIFI and her desk by a few meters, which reduce the radiation exposure with more than a factor 100 x. A week later her heart-beat was over. 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:Later we helped people with grounding their body, which improved the health situation. Example, with a grounding mat in bed, which helped people to sleep better. 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis? 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?Example: Lady with heavy heart-beat: we enlarged distance from her WIFI and her desk, a week later heart-beat was over. Some people recovered from head ache by grouding their body. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information:Book: "Earthing, the most important health discovery ever!" by Clinton Ober, Stephen Sinatra, Martin Zucker. Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's:More than 100 homes were tested on RF radiation during those years. email: uyten_wj@euronet.nl

HHS-OASH-2026-0397 RFI Questions 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 18 People should be able to rely on health protections without having to become scientists. When published research reports malignant tumours in exposed animals or damage to reproductive cells, the public has good reason to want those findings examined carefully. Understanding their implications matters to people who cannot assess the science for themselves. I offer the attached review, Health protection deserves clear answers, to help bring that evidence within reach. Important findings are scattered across technical journals and government reports. Their significance can be difficult to follow, especially for someone already worried about their own health or that of their family. This review gives concerned readers an accessible way into the original work, with the detail needed for scientific examination alongside it. A strong starting point is the cancer evidence, records RF-001 and RF-002. The US National Toxicology Program classified malignant heart tumours in male rats after prolonged whole-body radiofrequency exposure as "clear evidence" of cancer-causing activity. A separate lifetime experiment at the Ramazzini Institute reported a significant increase in the same rare tumour type at its highest exposure. These are disease outcomes in experimental animals. Their meaning for human protection deserves close attention, while recognising that these experiments alone cannot calculate the risk from everyday phone use. The reproductive findings, RF-006 to RF-008, are another important starting point. Experiments with isolated human sperm and whole-body-exposed mice reported impaired sperm function and DNA damage. Sperm movement and genetic integrity are directly relevant to reproduction. The findings warrant attention on their own terms; they do not establish infertility in people. The report explains the exposure conditions, identifies the related research groups and records what the experiments did and did not show. Other experiments examine whether radiofrequency exposure can influence tumour development in mice also given a cancer-causing chemical. They raise a distinct question about combined exposures and biological susceptibility. The review also covers brain-tissue observations, objective responses in blinded human experiments, and ecological findings. One prolonged-exposure experiment reported fewer bees returning home. These different outcomes each need to be understood under the conditions in which they were observed. The report is deliberately selective. It brings together published adverse findings, exposure-associated symptoms and biological responses potentially relevant to harm. It does not attempt to settle the overall balance of the literature. Animal disease, cellular damage and a measurable biological response carry different meanings; the review keeps those distinctions visible. Relevant nonconfirming follow-ups, corrections and publication notices are included. Abstract-level records and unfinished retrieval leads are clearly marked. Please begin with the short opening chapters and the coloured "Why this matters" panels. There is no need to master the technical detail before understanding why a study deserves attention. Clickable contents, bookmarks and indexes lead from those introductions to the study records and original sources. The attachment is intended to be useful to interested members of the public as well as to readers equipped to examine the science closely. My hope is that this contribution helps these findings receive serious consideration alongside the other evidence submitted, and informs the work of the public bodies on which people rely for protection. Cancer prevention and reproductive health give these questions an importance beyond specialist debate. Clear explanations of what the evidence means for protection would matter to many people. Simon Fox Director, Resonance Sciences Limited, UK Perspective and source basis (Q2): a public, literature-based contribution drawing on peer-reviewed original research and government technical reports.

My history with this issue began September 2006 when National Grid came to my home and replaced our analog meter without our knowledge or consent with a digital smart meter. I immediately heard something that interfered with my sleeping. I never heard this before. I bought my home in 1999. There was never a problem with hearing a continual noise that never stops. Symptoms followed such as headaches and migraines of which no reoccurring history. I also had nose bleeds, nausea, muscle spasms, fatigue, to name the worst of them. I called the DPU, DPH, DEP, EPA, verizon and national grid hired noise experts electricians, power quality studies in my home with a dranetz. SPL octave band studies for pure tones. Learned in 1990 Barbara Kwetz signed into law pure tone regulations for MA. But to no avail. Our experts were not equipped to provide us with help or had conflict of interest. When the first generation of smart meters were rolled out the costumers of utilities and safe to say most of population were ignorant of what the impact of smart grid technology ie., radio frequency radiation pollution would negatively have on us when exposed. There is no escaping it where this technology is turned. The state did not complete a single test that would identify the problem and mitigate. It was a clown show. They also ignored an affidavit from arlo Guthrie who is a forensic sound engineer who identified pure tones are the source of the grid and telecommunications layer of grid. The agencies never reached out to speak with him. The testing the state planned, for a couple years allowed national grid to test at or property without hiring a disinterested party to watch the wolves in the hen house. National Grid left an SPL meter over night in our home and another outside and both had glitches and produced zero data to complete the testing protocol. Several demand letters later in 2012 in July we finally got our analog meter back. I felt better immediately and the severe symptoms have not come back since removing the digital meter. One thing I predicted would not be mitigated; that being the noise. The pulsed RF signals are causing interference on the uninsulated exposed wires so it is broadcasting 24/7 even during a power outage because of the back up batteries. We are being charged $26.00 a month to have a reader come out to read the meter! This has to be illegal because it is our right to be protected not abused for wanting safety and our health protected.

I have been experiencing dew attacks everyday non-stop 24/7 since approximately mid 2019. Among many other symptoms, my entire body is being hit with a frequency called "buffeting" which causes vibrations. This has been severely debilitating and each day I struggle to function with even basic ADL's (activities of daily living). It is also extremely difficult to think clearly since my brain is experiencing ongoing trauma due to military grade weapons via airplanes, cell towers, & satellite. I have audio evidence as well as 2 separate scans - a RF (radio frequency) scan & a non-linear junction scan. This is due to synthetic nanotechnology which has been activated that resides within my body. This can happen to anyone worldwide. I am more than willing to provide further information upon request.