All comment threads

I have been a victim of targeted direct energy attacks. "Havana syndrome" is real, and the US and Canadian governments are targeting citizens who criticize the government, or fight for transparency against wallstreet There is a US naval HAARP bounce station here in Vancouver, BC. Actually in Langley bc, It helps talk to, and hunt submarines in the pacific using ground penetrating radar. They are boiling the ionosphere to create plasmonic mirrors, which direct communications/signals over the horizon. These signals leach into the surrounding environment. Planes and satellites use side-looking-radar to peek into houses, blasting residences with large amounts of photonic radiation. Our wifi modems and Bluetooth devices blast harmful invisible waves into our brains

Having to deal with this myself, growing up, and having worked with so many individuals with dementia and children with special needs, I am passionate about neuroplasticity and cognitive development. I have numerous articles that I would love to share with you all if you are willing to do so. At one time, I reached out to Dr. Kennedy, but I do not know whether or not he viewed my research. Thank you all for your research on this subject. I will continue to conduct research, myself, and I look forward to seeing your data, as well. Thanks you!

Dear OASH staffs, I’m the Chair of the Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection and I just received information about US Health Ministry the Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields from few my US colleagues (Dr’s Moskowitz, Pakhomov, Slesin etc). As is well known, the EMF exposure limits for the general public in Russia is more strong than in the USA (in 100 times). The main reasons for this is differing criteria for assessing harm from EMF biological effects, as well as the specific nature of the state regulatory system for electromagnetic field sources in Russia. Russia has 130 years of scientific school in EMF biomes research, therefore we have collected datas about most of EMF bioeffects, including non-thermal, information and thermal effects. As Russia has strict mandatory EMF limits under states service control, we haven’t issues regarding EMF hypersensitivity or EMF cancer. The question of specific EMF limits for children in digital education environment is discuss now (for example, on national hygiene science and radiobiology conference last week). Hope you and colleagues know, that the international debate over the reasons for and advisability of a strict EMF limit has been ongoing for more than 50 years, include direct discussion between US and Russian scientists since early 1970th. Mandatory EMF limits were established in Russia (USSR) in 1968; some last, EMF limits for general population covering all EMF frequencies since 1971. One of the most edition of EMF radio frequency limit took place in 1984, after finish of the USSR-USA joint EMF health research project under government’s agreement (1975-1985). Our EMF health scientist has joint Russia-USA bioEMF projects in 1997-2006 too. US Scientists from few universities participated in these projects, as EPA staffs and EMF researchers from AFRL (Radio Frequency Radiation Branch, Brooks Air Force Base), who was as IEEE C95 members. Huge collection of EMF biological effects data has been summarized and analyzed; these are likely the best syntheses available, enabling the establishment of «dose-effect» relationships and the prediction of both medical and biological effects for new exposure conditions. Although biological effects can vary, when we talk about medical consequences, it's clear that adults human has a limited number of possible ways to react, adapt, and de-adapt to electromagnetic overexposure. Therefore, it is not the best methodology way to find for distinct effects based on the specific EMF source (such as 5/6G). However, there are specific aspects to the EMF impact on a child's organism, including effects on the formation and development of children’s nervous system, that necessitate a special approach to electromagnetic safety for children. The WHO Electromagnetic Project, launched in 1996, was unsuccessful; it failed to resolve the issue of EMF health standard int harmonization and has some accusations of industry influence. Despite the turbulence, global economic and technologies continue to evolve, therefore need to have a common approach for electromagnetic safety for humans. So, the EMF initiative of the Minister Mr. Kennedy could be international. We know that China’s exposure limits fall somewhere between those of Russia and the USA; however, the country’s system for monitoring electromagnetic safety regarding environmental sources has utilized Russian methods as base for adopting. As a chairperson, I possess all the original materials regarding research into the biological effects of electromagnetism in the USSR and Russia. Of course, the majority of these publications are in Russian, which presents a challenge for analysis in English. I’m attaching our article in English, which summarizes main conclusion of EMF bio-medical research in Russia. We would appreciate your opinion on possible international participation in the electromagnetic safety system. Several years ago, I received a mail from Mr. Kennedy, when he was not yet the USA Secretary for Health. We would be happy to restart scientific cooperation for public health once again in EMF health safety issues. This letter doesn’t represent the position of the government, was not initiated by the government, and is not intended to influence the policies of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Sincerely, Dr. Oleg A. Grigoriev Dr. Sc. (radiobiology), Ph.D.(radiobiology & hygiene of non-ionizing radiation) Chairman, Russian National Committee for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Member of the Board, Scientific Council for Radiobiology, Russian Academy of Sciences

I am sensitive to electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs) and radio frequencies (RFs) caused by cell phones, electricity, WiFi, cell towers, and other wireless and electronic devices. To say that the discovery of my sensitivity greatly impacted my life, is an understatement. It nearly RUINED me, I had thoughts of ending my life. It has certainly ruined my career as a public school teacher. I can no longer teach in person because I cannot tolerate being around antennas, cell phones, smart meters, and all of the other miscellaneous wireless devices. I am forced to work from home and do not make nearly the amount of money that I used to make. I began having health issues in 2016. My symptoms included leg numbness, brain fog, balance issues, gastrointestinal issues, heart issues, and list goes on. I had never had any health issues prior, at that time I was in my mid 40s. That year, in 2016 was the first year they put WiFi on the ceiling of my classroom. Additionally, I was in a classroom with several iPads and cell phones. Through my health insurance, I had several tests done. The doctors told me it might be MS or a brain tumor. Over a 4 year period, I had blood tests, MRIs, nerve tests, endoscopy, colonoscopy, ekg, and several visits to address the many symptoms that I was experiencing. In the spring of 2020, 5g towers were being deployed all over my city and around my neighborhood. I started developing ear infections, heart issues, and my body felt like it was vibrating all the time. I knew that I hit the end of the road with Western Medicine, all the tests were inconclusive and there was nothing they could do for me. So, I decided to take matters into my own hands. I got rid of my WIFI and cell phone, I fully wired my home and began sleeping with the electricity off in my bedroom at night. I was still living in a housing tract and was surrounded by cell towers, so my symptoms did not completely go away, but they were greatly reduced by the changes I made. Today, I live with a lot of land separating me from my neighbors. I have a shield on my smart meter, as my electric company will not entertain an analog meter and I am 3 miles from the nearest cell tower. I do not allow cell phones or other wireless devices in my home. I now live a relatively comfortable life with minimal symptoms as long as I stay home. When going out to run errands or traveling I often experience the following: headaches, watery eyes with head pressure, trouble focusing, brain fog, inability to think clearly, balance issues and many other health symptoms depending on the type of EMF or RF and the concentration. I cannot be comfortable out in public, my trips are usually very short. There is plenty of research out there that shows the dangers of wireless radiation. In 1971, the Naval Medical Research Institute in Maryland researched the biological effects and clinical manifestations attributed to radio frequency and microwave radiation. I highlighted the symptoms that I have personally experienced as a result of wireless radiation. In the Naval Medical Research Institute report, they found that the radiation caused all of the following and more: heating of organs, corneal damage, altered menstruation, altered fetal development, liver enlargement, decreased lactation in nursing mothers, altered renal function, changes in the oxidative processes in skin and organs, altered blood flow rate, electrocardiographic changes, myocardial necrosis, dehydration, death, headaches, insomnia, cranial nerve disorders, seizures, convulsions, altered heart rhythm, structural alterations in synapses of vagus nerve, stimulation of parasympathetic nervous system and inhibition of sympathetic nervous system, depression, impotence, anxiety, lack of concentration, tremors, dizziness, scalp sensations, chest pain, increased irritability, blood disorders, vascular disorders, biochemical changes, metabolic disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, endocrine gland changes, and genetic and chromosomal changes. (Navy-Microwave-and-RF-Effects-Brief-1971.pdf)

We lived 560 ft from three macro cell towers in Moorpark, CA, right off of Tierra Rejada near Brookhurst. In the home that we lived in, our family of six experienced ear ringing, vertigo, heart palpitations, and headaches. We measured the distance of our home from the three macro towers from AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile. Other neighbors had also experienced issues. Four of our neighbors who were closer to the cell towers ended up getting leukemia and cancer. These eventually passed. We had several city council meetings at the City of Moorpark addressing our concerns. The city said that the towers were to be present according to the Brown Act, which required telecommunications to be available to the community should there be an emergency. We stated that sufficient telecommunications had been available with the previous versions of 1G and 2G, but with the advancement of telecommunications allowing for higher levels of data for video and internet service, there was a stronger signal that was posing health risks to homes. Our plea to move the towers was ignored, and other towers were placed near homes. At Peach Hill Rd., another tower was placed near a family home, which was 45 ft from the home and 12 ft from the child's playhouse. This was not acceptable. This family also began to experience symptoms as our family had. This family also approached the Moorpark City Council in July of 2017 and December of 2020. This family's concerns were also ignored, stating the Brown Act. Other cities such as the City of Malibu and the City of Calabasas had ordinances in place to allow safe placement of cell towers from homes, but Moorpark does not. This concern was ignored. There are other homes in the area that have been at risk for health effects, such as homes that are near the Verizon tower on Tierra Rejada in Moorpark. One home is only 50 ft from the tower. Other homes close as well. A person should be allowed to live peacefully in their home without outside intervention. What we and others have had to endure living in a home where we were bombarded day and night with EMF, which caused symptoms that should not have occurred. We were unfairly driven from our home to be in a healthier environment, which our City was telling us was safe and not an issue at all. While we are not opposed to telecommunications, we are in favor of safe telecommunications where equipment is placed safely away from homes. Our experience has been heartbreaking, as we felt that we were driven from our home to be at a safe location where we and our children could be healthier. We ask that the United States government look into this issue and to provide regulations to the telecom companies as to where they can place their equipment. Equipment should not invade homes but should be placed at safe distances. If airports and fire departments are protected from unsafe placement of telecom equipment, why can't homes where people live for many hours. Something needs to change to help.

See attached file(s)

My name is Karim Benitez and I have been being electronically harassed and tortured through psychotronic and direct energy weapons for 4 years in the Las Vegas valley and I have also been tracked by star shield satellites and ground relay stations that have had data breaches and been hacked by third party dark web companies and I accept my new beta stolen and put on the satellites so they can track me I need to find a way that someone can help me whether it be a government or private agency I need this as bad as anyone because it's a matter of life and death I've been exposed to microwaves radio waves and radar waves if you could please get back to me at 725-2 84 0-589 please I need some kind of consensus of how I should proceed because I'm sure that this was probably going to make me sick and end up leading to my death

We don’t know for sure the long term effect of RF and EMF in human’s brain activity; DNA delicate balance; nervous system equilibrium; vital organs electro activity field e.g. heart; Immune System sensitivity to Towers Radiation, and all other things we don’t know. Also, some rare form of Cancer, Tumors, and Homeostatic Abnormalities related to high exposure to RF and EMF emitted to 5.G Towers.

I am SICK & my neighbors are dying under endless 300 foot cell towers See attached file(s)

I cite the attached as evidence of the environmental hazards of W-fi radiation exposure.