HHS EMFTHE PUBLIC COMMENT FORUM
The people. The questions. The public record.An independent RF Safe project
Forum index › All threadsLatest posting day

THE LATEST SUBMISSIONS

All comment threads

7067 original comments · Newest first

Browse topics
Read full comments below. More load as you scroll.
Posted 2026-10-28#5768 · Permanent link ↗

Presents low-frequency field logs around severe-weather events, acknowledges unresolved sources and confo…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Two logs from one fixed Chicago station bracket the July 27 and Aug. 11, 2026 wind events. They do not record those storms. They record ELF magnetic flux density well above the station baseline and leave artificial induction of ELF unexcluded. HHS is asked to treat the pair as environmental-exposure evidence under Q14 and Q18, and with NOAA to test whether artificially induced ELF was present and bears on severe weather that destroyed homes, leveled trees, and cut power in the Chicago/Indiana region. The logs do not establish weather modification or any causal link. They are the reason to test that possibility against lightning-network data and any ELF records from the days before the damage. Meter: Tenmars TM-192D, triaxial AC, stated passband 30-2000 Hz. It misses the static geomagnetic field and the Schumann fundamental near 7.83 Hz. Same indoor window-adjacent setup. Baseline 0.12-0.15 uT. Ratios use 0.15 uT. July 15-20, before the storms (one photo per sampled day; July 17 and 19 missing): July 15 21:38: 0.334 uT (2.2x). July 16 20:09: 0.468 (3.1x). July 18 ~09:06: 0.598 (4.0x); reported day max 1.60 (10.7x), not a separate photo. July 20 22:12: 0.847 (5.6x); reported day max 2.38 (15.9x), not a separate photo. Photos climb ~0.33, 0.47, 0.60, 0.85 uT (step ratios ~1.4, 1.3, 1.4). "Doubling every day" is the climb against the old baseline, not a factor of two between photos. The rise coincided with Canadian smog. No mechanism or causal link is claimed; no paired air-quality data; wiring not surveyed. Between the logs, NWS Chicago describes two fatal wind events 16 days apart. This station was not logging those mornings. July 27: supercell to compact bow echo; estimated gusts 80-105 mph in parts of DuPage, Cook, and Will (IL) and Lake and Newton (NW IN). Aug. 11: derecho; 70 to locally 100+ mph from NE Illinois into NW Indiana; estimated peaks 100-110 mph in parts of northern Lake and Porter (IN); 99 mph at Gary/Chicago airport. NWS: 8 tornadoes in its area, widespread tree and line damage, outages over two weeks in parts of NW Indiana, one Gary fatality from straight-line winds. Aug. 11 damage was likely worsened by injury from July 27. Aug. 18-19, seven days later, a different weather system. 43,449 samples at ~1 Hz, Aug. 18 21:08:54 CDT to Aug. 19 09:13:08 CDT (12.07 h). Evening pulses to 0.667 uT at 21:15:23 CDT matched convection over southern Lake Michigan; the median floor then returned to ~0.15 uT while multi-axis pulses continued. Session max 1.171 uT at 07:51:51 CDT, ~15 s above 0.85 uT. The 08:55-09:12 window peaked at 0.418 uT. 14:00Z radar for ZIP 60640 shows the metro clear; remaining rain was hundreds of km away. Grid and appliance noise remain confounds and more often raise a floor than a 15-second three-axis burst. Exotic ELF induction may be present; no transmitter, operator, or purpose is identified, and it is not treated as fact. 1.171 uT is 0.59% of the ICNIRP 2010 public reference of 200 uT rms (25-400 Hz). July peaks are still ~1%. No exceedance is claimed (Health Physics 99(6):818-836, 2010). IARC 2B concerns chronic 50/60 Hz averages near 0.3-0.4 uT. The 12-hour mean was 0.187 uT; some pulses reach that band. This is not a dose survey or a health assessment. A 1-second fixed magnetometer plus radar can show a baseline, a climb, a pulse, and a radar-quiet continuation. It cannot name a source. Still needed: a lightning overlay on the Aug. 18-19 pulses (especially 03:44, 07:51:51, and 08:55-09:12 CDT); any other magnetometer files for July 27 and Aug. 11; orientation, passband, and at least 2.5 readings/s; more than one station; paired air quality if the smog coincidence is studied. RF monitoring will not see a 30-2000 Hz magnetic pulse. The comment asks whether any federal system archives ELF magnetic fields, and whether a small archive should sit with weather radar. Nothing here shows these fields changed the weather. ELF at one station rose by roughly tenfold above a documented baseline in the weeks before two rare ~100 mph wind events, and a week later the session maximum occurred on clear local radar. Artificial induction aimed at that destruction is a hypothesis to test, not a finding. Test it with a lightning overlay, other magnetometers from July 27 and Aug. 11, and a physical account of whether a field of this size and band can couple to a storm. Publish an exclusion if one is earned. Asks: (1) Accept ELF logs below the ICNIRP level under Q14 and Q18. (2) Ask NOAA and NWS Chicago to reanalyze July 27 and Aug. 11 with any ELF records, and match the Aug. 18-19 file to a lightning network. (3) Ask CDC and state health offices to keep the injury, death, and outage burden in view, without assuming a field mechanism. (4) State what measurement would confirm an artificial ELF source and what would retire it. (5) Keep the limits: smog is only co-occurrence; the meter did not act on the weather; neither file is the derecho.
Posted 2026-10-28#5765 · Permanent link ↗

Reports severe headaches and repeated emergency visits after moving near a tower, attributes the symptoms…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Ever since I have moved to an apartment where there is a cell tower I have been experiencing massive headaches have been in and out of er's and I'm now put on meds due to this I had nothing wrong with me prior and the doctors can't find anything the only thing that's different is that I live next to a huge cell tower and believe they are sending frequencies and emitting radiation that is causing my pain! I believe they should have never been put up in the first place they are not for cell service we never needed this back in the day they are poison and ruining our health!
Posted 2026-10-28#5764 · Permanent link ↗

Requests research on low-frequency fields reaching sleepers and shielding placement, describes subjective…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I ask HHS to study shielding against extremely-low-frequency fields that reach a sleeper from below, including fields that may be targeted, and to publish which materials and placements actually reduce that exposure. In the nights beginning September 20, 2026, I woke with a feeling of hopelessness and despair that was present before the thoughts and dreams that agreed with it. A copper–nickel mesh cloth left the feeling unchanged when I used it as a cover. The same cloth was associated with relief when it lay under my back, between my spine and the bed. The trial was subjective and unblinded. I have no magnetic-field measurement of those nights. People I know in Florida described a similar feeling on waking over roughly the same week. I cannot tie their reports to my room. The published work I consulted, Adey and the Loos patents, does not report hopelessness. It does report that weak fields in bands overlapping sleep-related rhythms can reach physiological systems at levels that do not heat tissue. A thin conductive cloth is not a shield against a slowly varying magnetic field. Families have no tested guidance for a source under the bed (ground / terrestrial based.) That is the gap.
Posted 2026-10-28#5763 · Permanent link ↗

Reports low-frequency magnetic readings near a gateway and changes in morning motivation after equipment …

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Residential Wi-Fi is discussed in this docket as a radiofrequency source. The exposure I logged at an Xfinity gateway was the extremely-low-frequency magnetic field, and I made no radiofrequency measurement at all. Over months, a TM-192D meter about 4 feet 6 inches from the modem showed a recurring morning elevation around 10:00 a.m. CST, typically 15–20 mG (about 1.5–2.0 µT), sometimes held near that level for on the order of an hour, lined up with the time I woke. Those mornings were when motivation was worst. After the modem's own Wi-Fi was turned off and a low-power Wi-Fi bridge was put in its place, a spot check read 0.127 µT, the morning peaks did not return, and the report describes four years of lower readings and of waking with ordinary drive, through March 2026. There was no controlled re-exposure. I ask HHS to treat the ELF magnetic field of the gateway as part of Wi-Fi exposure, to require time-of-day disclosure of that field, and to test simple equipment changes as a way to reduce it.
Posted 2026-10-28#5762 · Permanent link ↗

Alleges directed-energy targeting related to whistleblowing and identifies such weapons as a cause of Hav…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
The main cause of Havana Syndrome & Radiation sickness around the world including the US is from Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs). These military devices are being used illegally on American Citizens & US grounds. Many, including myself are exposed daily assisting me to a slow death. Due to being a Whistleblower against fraud in my self owned agency, I am being hit with DEWs from drones, towers, handheld devices along with smart LED emf exposure from bulbs, appliances etc. There is daily Radiation poisoning and death to humanity,animals and mother earth. DEW Police agency is working along with others to source and eliminate the dangers of DEWs -Please see the attached PDF report. Kindly be aware and support the abuse from the directed energy/EMF/Radiation exposure used by boots on the ground in America --- It was never just the those in government that suffered from Havana Syndrome and never just outside of the United States...WE The People are being violated without a voice being heard. Your support is greatly needed & appreciated. Kimberly Colombo

Attachments · 5

Original public attachments. Their contents are not included in category reviews.

Posted 2026-10-28#5761 · Permanent link ↗

A parent and health-information professional objects to involuntary wireless exposure, especially in scho…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
October 21, 2026 I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I’m an experienced health information management professional – a certified clinical coding specialist and medical transcriptionist – and a parent of two young children, and I have grave concerns about the harmful health effects of compulsory and/or undisclosed microwave radiation exposure on a largely uninformed, un-consenting, and unprotected population of United States citizens. With more and more biologically hazardous cell towers, small cell equipment, and smart meters being forced on United States citizens (often against their wishes) and with public schools now enforcing the use of wireless devices in every classroom, and the daily, up-close, compulsory exposure of vulnerable schoolchildren to wireless infrastructure (“WiFi”) health risks all day while held in captivity by order of the state; soon there may be no place left for anyone to hide from the dangerous cumulative effects of so many unchecked layers of microwave radiation. Without the benefit of appropriately serious health warnings provided by the government institutions we trust to protect our citizens, most people don’t even question the safety of wireless devices at all! How many of you know of a teenager who sleeps with a cell phone on her pillow, resting directly against her brain all night long? How many times have you seen a drooling baby in the shopping cart, keeping quiet with a tablet’s microwave radiation warming his private parts - or teething with A CELL PHONE IN HIS MOUTH? I once witnessed every single pregnant woman in the waiting room at my OB/GYN doctor’s passing the time innocently holding a cell phone pulsing with invisible radiation directly over her pregnant belly - likely without any clue she is causing harmful microwaves to penetrate the delicate cells and organs of her precious baby developing inside. One of these mothers-to-be stood up when called and placed the biologically interactive cell phone inside the belly pocket of her hoodie, pressed right up against her baby growing inside. The woman sitting next to me was nursing a tiny new baby, while casually scrolling on a cell phone that was resting directly on her infant’s head! Most often when I speak up, these uninformed mothers tell me they had no idea there was any harmful “radiation” coming out of their wireless device, and they thank me for telling them. WHY ARE THERE NO CLEAR AND OBVIOUS HEALTH WARNINGS BEING ISSUED BY THE COMPANIES THAT SELL THESE DEVICES, OR FROM AGENCIES ENTRUSTED TO PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH?” Sadly, my experience is that school administrators, teachers, parents, and people in general are typically not even aware that “WiFi” is microwave radiation! Well-meaning people in charge of keeping schools, hospitals, office buildings, and other spaces safe - who make crucial decisions that affect people’s safety, on behalf of the public, all seem to be under a false impression that the science is settled, and that “WiFi” (whatever that means) is a completely harmless, unquestionably safe, and necessary part of life now. Meanwhile citizens are being forced and coerced into absorbing wifi radiation from “mandatory” smart meters in their own homes, and now even wired landline phone connections are being phased out in favor of wireless tech – leaving those of us who are concerned about the known health risks from wireless radiation becoming more and more terrorized by the prospect of a future where there is nowhere left to hide from the EMF, RF, and Wireless Radiation exposures being forced upon us. (….continued in Comment to HHS Part 2)
Posted 2026-10-28#5760 · Permanent link ↗

Reports longstanding tinnitus and neurological symptoms worsening with RF technologies, mentions directed…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Approximately 2008, the buzzing in my ears or (head) started upon awakening and an electrical current pulling at my skull. In 2010, my symptoms progressed to extreme tinnitus, nearly 24hrs a day. It interfered with everyday tasks and cognition. I could feel a disabling pulsed signal followed by a loss of balance. Over the years, with every advancement in RF technology, my symptoms worsened. Overall adverse effects are; Rapid aging, Flashing strobe lights in a dark room, Hair loss, sore scalp, Extreme itching and extreme tinnitus. Also directed energy. My Optomologist, diagnosed eye damage due to exposure to UVs. Otherwise, I am a strong healthy woman. Ruling out an unhealthy lifestyle and learning about exposure to RF radiation from experts in the field, I have limited my exposure to anything wireless. NO Ring door cam; No Alexa; No Nest; Refused smart meter, and avoid anything SMART. Use protection on cell phone. Given the option, I plug in. Use the earth for grounding. And polarized lenses. There is nowhere to hide in NYC from Wifi and WBAN. I have never consented to this! This is torture! Please help us regain our quality of life in the USA.
Posted 2026-10-28#5759 · Permanent link ↗

Argues that cellular electrical processes warrant study of EMF effects, cites calcium-channel mechanisms …

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
EMF must be further explored as a contributing factor to poor health in humans, plants and animals. Every physical system that features a voltage drop is inherently sensitive to electromagnetic frequencies (EMF). Anything with a voltage drop, including human, animal, and plant cells, will respond to electromagnetic frequency. This is a fundamental law of physics: a voltage drop implies the presence of an electric field and moving or resting electrical charges (electrons or ions). Living cells function exactly like miniature, dynamic batteries. Every living cell maintains a strict resting membrane potential (a voltage drop across the cell membrane, typically around -70 millivolts). Because electromagnetic waves are composed of oscillating electric and magnetic fields, they physically interact with these charges, exerting forces that alter their behavior. Allowing the world and children to be bathed in varying EMF is irresponsible and unscientific. Various frequencies must be fully studied. Cancer rates are high and getting higher every few years, I can't take the "war on cancer" seriously until chemicals and electromagnetic frequencies are studied and taken seriously. Depression and anxiety are also common. We have a very sick society. Health is wealth. Many studies show change in calcium channel gates and thus biological stress, inflammation, and chronic inflammation leads to various diseases. I strongly believe that EMF affects health. Multiple studies supports my belief. Here is one: Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12940-022-00900-9

10 comments displayed. More load as you scroll.

These are separate official submissions grouped by topic. A comment can appear in more than one board.