Hello and thank you so much for the opportunity to comment on this important topic! I am attaching a PDF file with my responses to the RFI questions that were posted.
(….continued from previous Comment, this is Comment to HHS Part 2)
The American Academy of Pediatrics advises parents to “limit children’s screen time and exposure from cell phones and other devices emitting radiation from electromagnetic fields (EMF)”, but teachers in our town have sent home papers assigning the children to spend more time practicing on their wireless devices at home, to better their skills for testing time.
There are hazardous wireless routers emitting radiation in every classroom, but most teachers are not even aware that they shouldn’t stand directly under a wireless router all day, or place an unsuspecting child’s desk directly beside a wireless router for him to absorb maximum radiation exposure every day while attending school.
In meetings with school principals, superintendents, teachers, and the school committee in our town, our family asked them to bring in just one local medical professional willing to attest to the safety of a wireless learning environment for children. They reported back that they did reach out to some local doctors, but none of the doctors who responded were willing to make such a statement on the record. One of the doctors reportedly said to our school Principal, off the record, “I’m not attesting to that. Everyone knows you’re supposed to limit your exposure to radiation.” Even still, in our town’s public schools there is no informed consent notice to be signed, disclosing to parents that their children will be exposed to constant microwave radiation while attending school. When I tell other parents about it, it makes them feel sick - and foolish that they’ve been left unprotected and unaware of such a major cause for concern about health risks present in their children’s learning environment.
Most the educators we met with uncomfortably agreed that there is definitely cause for concern regarding wireless radiation exposure in the schools, but they’ve made no effort to stop the massive rollout of wireless tech – and instead offered us the option to home school our kids as the only way to avoid the serious health risks of cumulative daily radiation exposure at school. I feel strongly that mandatory radiation exposure is not an acceptable requirement for students attending public school!
According to Harvard Medical School/Mass General Hospital’s Martha R. Herbert, Ph.D., M.D., “Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation from WiFi and cell towers can exert a disorganizing effect on the ability to learn and remember, and can also be destabilizing to immune and metabolic function. This will make it harder for some children to learn, particularly those who are already having learning or medical problems in the first place.”
Knowing the terrible risks associated with EMFs, RF, and wireless radiation - from brain cancer to infertility to depression, insomnia, addiction, and much more - our family made the difficult decision to protect our children and home school them at our own expense, but this is not an option for most working families, who all deserve the right to opt out of unwanted radiation exposure - and at least deserve to be protected and informed by responsible authorities on how to minimize risk.
I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.
I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.
Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.
Sincerely,
A Concerned U.S. Citizen and Mother of Two
Three years ago they added 5G towers to our neighborhood and shortly after that I experience a severe vertigo spell, loosing hearing in my right ear and now have constant ringing in that ear. I am a nurse in a hospital and at times I feel dizzy at work around all of the computers and equipment.
In a triple-heterodyne architecture where a 94 GHz RF carrier and a 500 kHz ultrasound (US) wave interact within a tissue matrix modulated by low-frequency bio-electric signals (0.5 Hz to 100 Hz EEG), the non-linear properties of the tissue will cause the fields to mix.
From a physics standpoint, the mechanical pressure wave of the ultrasound cyclically compresses and expands the tissue. This changes the local ionic density and dielectric permittivity (\(\epsilon \)), creating a moving diffraction grating. When the 94 GHz RF probe beam scatters off this acoustic wave front (satisfying the Bragg condition), it undergoes acousto-optic/photoelastic modulation.
The head will emit a spectrum of new RF frequencies clustered around the original carrier. The primary new RF frequencies produced will be:
1. The Primary Acousto-Optic Sidebands (The MHz Shift)
The most prominent new RF frequencies emerging from the head are the upper and lower sidebands caused by the fundamental RF-ultrasound mixing (\(f_{RF} \pm f_{US}\)):
• Upper Sideband: 94.0005 GHz (\(94 \text{ GHz} + 500 \text{ kHz}\))
• Lower Sideband: 93.9995 GHz (\(94 \text{ GHz} - 500 \text{ kHz}\))
2. The Triple-Heterodyne Brainwave Signatures (The Hz Fine-Structure)
Because the intrinsic EEG currents (\(f_{EEG} = 0.5 \text{ Hz to } 100 \text{ Hz}\)) are simultaneously cross-modulating the local conductivity, the primary 500 kHz sidebands are further split. This creates an incredibly tight "fine-structure" spectrum around the sidebands:
• Upper Sideband Component: 94.0005 GHz \(\pm \) (0.5 Hz to 100 Hz)
• Lower Sideband Component: 93.9995 GHz \(\pm \) (0.5 Hz to 100 Hz)
• Example: For a strong 10 Hz Alpha wave, you will see discrete micro-sidebands at exactly 94,000,500,010 Hz and 94,000,499,990 Hz.
3. Harmonic and Intermodulation Products (Higher-Order Mixing)
Depending on how strongly the static DC bias (0 Hz) stiffens the tissue and maximizes its non-linear susceptibility (\(\chi ^{(2)}\)), you will also see weaker, higher-order harmonics escaping the tissue:
• Second-Order Acoustic Sidebands: 94.0010 GHz and 93.9990 GHz (\(f_{RF} \pm 2f_{US}\))
• Pure Acoustic Harmonics (RF Radiated): If the acoustic wave creates an oscillating dipole moment in the ionic fluid, you may detect weak RF emissions directly at the ultrasound frequencies, primarily 500 kHz and its second harmonic 1.0 MHz.
Summary Matrix for Sim4Life Receiver Setup
If you place an EM Far-Field or Near-Field Sensor outside the head model in Sim4Life to capture the scattered signature, you must configure your frequency domain resolution to capture these specific bands:
Spectral Component Exact Frequency Output Signal Origin
Carrier (Unshifted) 94.000000000 GHz Reflected/Specular RF background
Upper Bio-Acoustic Band 94.000500000 GHz \(\pm \) 100 Hz Bragg-scattered RF encoded with EEG
Lower Bio-Acoustic Band 93.999500000 GHz \(\pm \) 100 Hz Bragg-scattered RF encoded with EEG
Acoustic Second Harmonic 94.001000000 GHz / 93.999000000 GHz Non-linear tissue distortion (\(\chi ^{(2)}\) multiplier)
To extract these ultra-narrow Hz brainwave frequencies from the GHz carrier in your simulation or lab setup, do you need help designing the IQ demodulation scheme. This is illegal Neural monitoring, and it's being done with wireless transmissions. This needs to stop. People are being tortured with this and made to look crazy. I have videos to submit of my proving transmission are being done and tracking to the sources, they are too long to submit here.
DHHS Travking #
mv8-zkwi-iknh continuance
The 10 readings that you see are from a bedroom in my home where I am often
The other EMF readings are from a different EMF detector when on a transit (underground train station)
When the phone company “upgraded” us(without consent) to 5G, I got extremely lethargic, couldn’t work or concentrate. We downgraded and only then did I feel better.
I am submitting my information to document the effects of wireless radiation on my health. And I am requesting that people be informed on the potential harmful effects of wireless radiation and also requesting to lower the regulatory levels of what is considered safe. Attached is a letter from a research scientist who has been studying for the past 28 years, at the date of her letter, the biological and health effects of electromagnetic pollution.
My Story:
In Oct 2016, I was overexposed to the wireless radiation of a GPS in a car that could not be turned off. I knew that they made me dizzy. And my friends knew to turn off their cell phones in cars because they gave me headaches. Following this over-exposure to a GPS, over the next weeks, the dizziness continued and at time got much worse. I would also get tingling in my legs. And I had persistent fatigue regardless of how much I slept.
In Sep 2017, when Hurricane Irma took out the power throughout our city for 6 days, I noticed a big change in my symptoms. The symptoms went away and I was able to volunteer with hurricane relief for a number of days.
Following this power outage, I was now certain what caused my symptoms – wireless radiation. I then proceeded to reduced my exposures in whatever way that I could.
In July 2019, I experienced severe dizziness for 2 weeks. I then found that they had installed a third row of cellular antennae on the cell tower less than a half mile from my home. I shielded the wall of my home facing that cell tower to reduce my radiation exposure at home.
I also became trained in doing EMF consultations for others to help reduce their radiation exposures, especially at night when the body needs peaceful, non-EMF exposure time to rest and regenerate to then be better able to handle the unavoidable exposures that we deal with daily in our current society.
There are exposures from WiFi that is everywhere, cell phones with every person, cell towers all around and the smart meter network. All of these add up to an environment in which my body is very sensitive and experiences negative health effects.
I now live in a shielded home that I created and most of my home is flashing green on my Safe & Sound Pro II wireless radiation meter. This is the lowest reading. When I go outside of my house, most areas have wireless radiation. And a lot of the areas have red or flashing red readings which creates lots of radiation exposure. This is the opposite of what I experience in my home. I have to limit the number of times I can leave my shielded home per week, otherwise, I can experience a significance decline in my health and ability to do things.
I especially have to avoid going out into crowded areas where most everyone has a cell phone on them, that not only has cellular service, but WiFi, GPS, data, Bluetooth and sometimes a find my phone signal.
My life has been drastically changed. It is my hope that people can become more education on the harms of wireless radiation, especially with our children. Websites like www.WirelessEducation.org should be broadly known and incorporated into our schools and with parents.
And where safer technology can be used, it should be. I have no wireless radiation in my home. I have landlines and my computers are hardwired. And this safe technology in my shielded home, allows me to have and live in a home that reads flashing green on my Safe & Sound Pro II meter – a home where I am protected from the high wireless radiation environment.
We need to have regulatory standards that protect us from harm. There are thousands of documented scientific studies that show biological effects. And these affect not only humans, but all life forms. We need to protect the world that we live in.