Li-Fi, fiber & alternatives

First, we don't need more research and studies. The scientific community already has more than 20,000 studies. This is an established science. We have more than enough studies to put in place much stronger regulations and bans. Scientists for Wired Technology (scientists4wiredtech.com) is an excellent in-depth scientific knowledge base on the hazards of continuous exposures to pulsed, data-modulated, Radio-frequency Electromagnetic Microwave Radiation (RF-EMR), which is a manmade, toxic, highly xenobiotic agent that causes systemic biological damages at levels many thousands of times lower than current U.S. RF-EMR radiation exposure guidelines. See especially "The Largest Unethical Human Experiment In Human History" on that website. The FCC is not a health and environmental agency. So why has it been in charge of defining what is acceptable for humans and other living beings? We need scientific standards (set in collaboration with ANSI and public health experts) based on the solid knowledge gained for the past 70 years, --not mere guidelines -- let alone outdated ones from 1996, which were rubberstamped for their 1965 version or even as old as 1953!? We also know what microwave sickness looks like and why this RF-EMR technology is so suitable for use by the military as a weapon. The mere fact that wired technology is faster (has the speed of light), much more energy-efficient, secure (not hackable like wireless), much longer lasting (30-50 years vs. 5-6 years for wireless), safer, provides more privacy, does not depress home values, AND has already been subsidized to the tune of billions of US tax payer dollars (Irregulators vs. FCC) -- should be sufficient to immediately stop the wireless and 5G buildup, set scientific standards, and ask the telecom industry to fulfill their paid obligation and complete the wiring with copper and fiber optic cable networks to provide real and safe broadband to every community in the country, especially including the last half-mile or so from the street into homes. What is the justification for choosing the slower, energy guzzling, unsafe, hackable, privacy invading, wasteful (think of all the additional junk generated with each upgrade of wireless technology every few years), and posing a fire risk (as with smart meters) to boot -- over its opposite? What is "green" about this technology?

Subject: Professional Comments on EMF/RF Exposure Frameworks and Public Health Observations From a professional standpoint within the Michigan legal and advocacy sector, this comment is submitted anonymously to safeguard organizational identities while contributing vital observations gathered from public intake. Over a period of several years, a number of individuals have sought professional consultation regarding physical grievances, environmental instability, and institutional barriers stemming from exposure to various electromagnetic fields (EMF) and radiofrequency (RF) frequencies. Many complaints show a deeper concern regarding pulsating frequencies in particular – Wi-Fi, 5G, and Bluetooth are common issues. Primary concerns brought forward during these consultations involve radio frequencies emitted by consumer wearables and cellular devices, with 5G infrastructure frequently cited as an accelerating factor. Furthermore, individuals have reported sensitivities to workplace LED lighting systems introduced into healthcare and commercial facilities, as well as providing an outpouring of criticism regarding outdoor LED lighting creating vision difficulty and a blinding effect. A distinct subset of inquiries involves the recent rapid deployment of fiber-optic installations. Documentation presented during these intakes indicates that standard installations frequently fail to prioritize the mitigation of electromagnetic interference (EMI). Specific technical areas of concern include improper grounding techniques and the utilization of copper tracer wires. There is significant concern that the integration of 5G and small-cell infrastructure onto existing tracer wires inadvertently elevates ambient radiation within residential zones. Additionally, the strategic placement of converter stations near high-density residential areas introduces low-frequency magnetic fields that communities are ill-equipped to shield against. Consequently, individuals are increasingly requesting regulatory requirements for enhanced insulation, structural shielding, and strict hardwired enforcement policies that explicitly prohibit the retrofitting or attachment of wireless small-cell antennas or radio units to fiber backhaul lines. Beyond structural infrastructure, a growing portion of professional inquiries involves individuals seeking assistance in navigating their relationships with medical care teams. The records indicate a troubling pattern of institutional friction and discrimination when patients request simple environmental accommodations, such as asking staff to leave wireless devices outside the examination room. Reports include accounts of individuals being ridiculed or dismissed by medical personnel. To mitigate these hostile environments, some individuals now incur the personal expense of hiring third-party witnesses to accompany them to appointments to ensure respectful treatment, while others rely on portable audio recorders to preserve the details of their consultations. Given the accelerated pace of modern clinical environments, where overlapping appointments frequently result in hurried communication, the ability to record a medical visit serves as an essential tool for patient comprehension and data retention. Regulatory frameworks should explicitly protect a patient’s right to record their own paid consultations. Accumulated data over years of professional intake underscores the necessity for updated regulatory oversight. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) guidelines must be modernized, as the foundational exposure limits rely on data compiled long before the ubiquity of modern wireless infrastructure. The current deployment pace outpaces long-term biological safety tracking, impacting both human populations and local wildlife ecosystems. Observing these consistent reporting patterns has prompted immediate changes in my own personal technology habits, resulting in measurable improvements in cognitive efficiency and energy levels. Stricter federal guidelines, independent biological studies, and the establishment of verified low-EMF zones are entirely appropriate, necessary, and vital to preserving public quality of life.

Digital meters were put on our homes in Oklahoma in 2014 and my husband died in early 2017 diagnosed with bulbar ALS and mononeuritis multiplex. He could not talk, eat, drink. after he died i added a sine tamer filter to our home circuit box and home stetzer readings were 50 until this year when i changed internet to fiberoptic. readings were 1999 (the max the stetzerizer meter reads). the router is dirty and was not filtered or shielded and added lot of dirty electricity to my home wiring. my home is 40 years old and does not work well with corrosive microwave radiation. i bought shielded surge protectors and only turn router on when using and have it in a faraday cages. home outlet readings are about 250-300 now (25-50 normal). Spent 3 days in Maine at 3 major hotels that all read 1999 on stetzerizer meter and the rooms all had loud locust sound from acoustic nature of fiberoptics. came home and did labs.my nitrotyrosine was double over the max value and my iron saturation very low as well and other values not normal. i took molecular hydrogen to fix the iron and NAC with selenium and molybdenum for nitrotyosine for 2 months and other supplements like glutathione and coQ10 that help with the electron transport system. i take supplements every day to try to stay detoxed. i truly believe that by not testing labs completely for nitrotyrosine (very difficult to do in the USA) and nitric oxide and do complete thyroid and not just TsH /T4 (also not done in USA like should be) if body temperature lower than 98.6 then take tyrosine and iodine (T4 wont fix it) cause reversible T3 needs fixing and thyroglobulins affected)) and do complete iron and correcting it with molecular hydrogen and lactoferrin cause the charge needs fixing back to Fe4 electron transport from Fe3 storage. iron is paramagnetic and emf causes rouleaux effect and affects the charge and then iron gets stuck at neuromuscular junction at motor cortex and cant change from chemical to electrical so does not function as it should as iron and enzymes systems wont work. pilots are exposed to nonionizing and ionizing radiation. My husband flew a lot. must protect pilots because they sleep in these toxic hotels and are becoming suicidal more. plus just their occupation has cumulative effect and they should be tested annual for nitrotyrosine levels and detox. test complete thyroid and iron level and fix their tyrosine and iodine levels and body temperature and filter and shield these dirty electricity hotel rooms. look at zinc/copper ratio- magnesium cause calcium goes intracellular thru calcium voltage gates causes Blood brain barrier capillary leak issue and neurodegenerative diseases (use vit D, K2, Omega 3) Do a complete amino acid profile annual and fix those. Taurine detoxes myeloperoxidase, histidine for RA, sulforaphane for NRF2 activation, citrulline and beets for nitric oxide, glutathione and blueberry for glutamate, SOD superoxide dismutase major antioxidant for free radicals, pregnenolone for myelin sheath, CoQ10 and PQQ for electron transport system, methylated B Complex with C to help recharge body battery. For areas with high emf, look at dentist offices, the malls, pharmacies with pharmacists standing in front of laser printers and pharmacists losing babies, perhaps use of faraday cages in order, airports and scanners and planes and pilots. look at hard wiring home instead of wifi but harder now to buy a laptop with ethernet connection, its our world blanketed in emf/ rfr /wireless so we must protect ourselves and call these problems that come with it what it is. start testing and treating it for what it is before we all die. i really miss John.

1. & 2. I am responding as: an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)mobile phones, WIFI, Bluetooth 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):When exposed and for as long as the exposure lasts, for at least 10 years. Bluetooth is worst, followed by WIFI, followed by cellular frequencies. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:Headaches 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:Almost immediately 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?no 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?Turned off all Bluetooth, WIFI, and minimize cellular radio time, wired house with Ethernet.. Headaches gone unless radios turned on. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information:no Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's: B1a. Sources you experience as causing you Adverse Effects:Bluetooth, WIFI, cellular, smart meters

Wireless technology is harmful in many ways. I beg you to not exploit this. Keep the landlines please.

Wireless technology is harmful in many ways. I beg you to not exploit this. Keep the landlines please.

1. & 2. I am responding as: an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)RFMW from Mobile Phones, Wi Fi routers and Cell Towers 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):Started to notice head warmth around 2003, by 2009 started to associate wireless with headaches. and around 2012 blurred vision happens even when wearing shielding clothing. Around 2019 instant headache passing cell tower or when people next to me turned cell phone on or a call came in. Bloody noise after being in wireless room for 3 or 4 hours. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced: Warm side of head where phone was used, vice grip headache around temples, shooting pain in head, blurred vision, bloody noise and the sound of my voice changes to me like I am in a metal room. 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects: Noticed immediately using a cordless phone, moving away knowing Wi Fi router was close, shooting pain passing cell tower on highway or cell phone turned on. Sometimes it can take 20 to 30 minutes before I notice adverse effects if people near me have a cell phone on or Wi Fi is in the building. 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis? EHS diagnosis at the E.H.C. at W.C.H. in Toronto in 2015. 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?Home is hardwired and no cell tower in sight, do not use mobile phones, use shielding if I am in public, turn off wireless devices whenever I can at work or visiting family/friends. Use PEMF Therapy as my antidote and bio geometry to reduce exposure. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information: Educated and worked as Electrical/Electronic Technologist. I use Microwave meters & Magnetic Field meters to measure my environment. Noticed drastic increase in transmissions from cell phones, Wi Fi Routers, Cell Towers and smart meters around 2019 and then again around 2023. Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's: Doctor and Naturopath could not find anything wrong with me. A medical Intuitive suggested a dormant bacteria or fungal. After following parasite protocols for 4 months due to a wrong diagnosis, my adverse effects have lessened. B1a. Sources you experience as causing you Adverse Effects: Cell Phones, Wi Fi Routers and Cell Towers B1b. Sources you can sense, but don't seem to harm you: Low Frequency and Low Intensity PEMF devices B1c. Sources you can use without sensing or being harmed: Magnetic Fields from Electronic control panels, Electric motors or electrical breaker panels B1d. Sources that seem to provide benefit (i.e., electrotherapy):PEMF Therapy like Magnetic Resonance Stimulation B2a. Health conditions you think may contribute to your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless: Excellent Health but after following parasite protocols for 4 months due to a wrong diagnosis, my adverse effects have lessened. Now after 20 or 30 minutes in a wireless environment it seems like my voice sounds like I am in a metal room. Still get what feels like a kick in the head when a cell phone is turned on or a phone call comes in. B2b. Health conditions you don't necessarily associate with your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless, but might be relevant: I am in excellent health but I have electrocuted myself at work several times. B3. For each sub question please list up to 5 drugs or therapies or home remedies (if any) B3a. That you recommend, as they helped you tolerate or recover from EMF exposure: PEMF Therapy is my antidote. Gets me back feeling good quick. Avoiding wireless transmitters, distance from the transmitter, quality shielding clothing and bio geometry. B3b. That you recommend, but you’re not positive that they help: Walk in nature, swim in a lake/river, exercise/movement in wireless free environment. B3c. That helped you but you don’t recommend. (e.g., the benefit did not last long or the side effects were too harmful):nothing I can think of B3d. Treatments that had no effect: nothing I can think of B3e. Treatments that made your sensitivity worse: nothing I can think of B4. What is your age range?55-64 B5. What year did you become aware of your sensitivity to wireless radiation or electromagnetic fields? 2009 B6. What country, state, province, or major city were you living in when you first noticed your sensitivity to wireless or electromagnetic fields? Toronto

Hello, my experience w/ EMF ha been a devastating one. A cell tower was put up at a fire station without any notice, and I used to subscribe to the local newspaper, so I should have seen something about it. I had no idea the problem was EMF but after several years of suffering, trying everything to help myself, nothing worked. Long story short: the problem was EMF; the tower directly outside my living room window, with a clear line of sight to our home. I had 15 different health problems (wish I had kept that list), but included heart palpitations (still having this problem), horrible hot flashes, very poor digestion, Reynaud's syndrome, vertigo, always swollen tongue, always feeling zapped/tired, couldn't sleep more than an hour (exhausting) and so on. I was looking to quit my job as I couldn't drive w/ the vertigo. It was bad, turned out life upside down. Once I found out about EMF and practicing "distance and avoid" the symptoms disappeared, some overnight! I also bought a very good quality meter to be sure this was not "in my head"; it wasn't; everytime I'd get near it or overexposed, the symptoms would reappear. My neighbors chickens developed huge ulcers hanging from their necks due to smart meters. The eggs had strange shapes. I've seen first hand "damages" done by these wireless radiation exposure. So, please limit the distance and exposure of EMFs to PEOPLE, espcially residential neighborhoods. It is WRONG to have cell towers near homes, where we should be able to get good slepp to recover and rejuvenate our bodies, our beings. Listen to Environmental Health Trust (EHT) and Childrens Health Defense (CHD) and others like 5G Free California; these people genuinely care and study EMFs; they know what they are talking about. If you need proof, here are a list of some; trust me, EMF problems are real; they cause real health issues and the sad thing is no one is clearly and openly warning people. Thanks to Mr. Kennedy and some others who now are. EHT has been warning us from the start too. * on women's health: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1915745/full * here is one on sleep quality: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1755918/full * how it actually changes our DNA: https://www.emfdata.org/de/studien/detail&id=944 * on testicular health: https://www.emfdata.org/de/studien/detail&id=947 * how it disrupts bats navigation abilities: https://www.emfdata.org/de/studien/detail&id=941 There are many more. It's criminal to put up a cell tower on elementary school grounds or stick laptops on kid's hands to stare at many hours a day. Please take measures to limit wireless tech exposres. I'm not against it; I want CHOICE to use it if I want it. Some want the full exposre, great! They should have it, but it should be a CHOICE to those who don't want it. I live in deep woods, almost off grid, to get away from so much exposure, and it's helped me. I should be able to live in town like others. I've accepted I no long er fly; I no longer to to concerts or any place w/ a lot of people (who all have cell phones). THANK YOU for considering these thoughts. Please help! Please limit exposures and please have it be an option to use wireless. The corded items should be kept as a choice who want it.

1. & 2. I am responding as: an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)wi-fi, smart meters 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):2years until i found the cause 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:fatigue, insomnia, irritable, headaches, aching in muscles 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:moved into new home, neighbors with smart meters, immediately felt fatigue unusually in the new home. immediate effects. 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?no 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?removed my wi fi completely, cancelled cell phone, land line only, now much better. do feel some blast of weird energy driving by towers and such. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information:no all personal with a rf meter Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's: B1a. Sources you experience as causing you Adverse Effects:wi fi router, cell phone, neighbors smart meters B1b. Sources you can sense, but don't seem to harm you:wireless at library, not there long enough, two hours once a week B1c. Sources you can use without sensing or being harmed: B1d. Sources that seem to provide benefit (i.e., electrotherapy): B2a. Health conditions you think may contribute to your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless: B2b. Health conditions you don't necessarily associate with your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless, but might be relevant: B3. For each subquestion please list up to 5 drugs or therapies or home remedies (if any) B3a. That you recommend, as they helped you tolerate or recover from EMF exposure:did not realize the actual cause till later B3b. That you recommend, but you’re not positive that they help:nutrition to help cells be resistant to radiation damage, bioflavinoids etc B3c. That helped you but you don’t recommend. (e.g., the benefit did not last long or the side effects were too harmful): B3d. Treatments that had no effect: B3e. Treatments that made your sensitivity worse:65-74 B4. What is your age range?65-74 B5. What year did you become aware of your sensitivity to wireless radiation or electromagnetic fields?2016 B6. What country, state, province, or major city were you living in when you first noticed your sensitivity to wireless or electromagnetic fields?camp verde az usa

I was diagnosed with electromagnetic Hypersensitivity about seven years ago. My symptoms were itching. Dry eye. Headaches. Brain fog. I was unable to ride in cars Due to their Dirty energy And exposure to. Wi Fi capabilities. My house Now uses. Incandescent lighting. No wireless capabilities. I use Ethernet to connect to my computer.. People are not allowed to use Their cell phones in the home. I had to give up driving. And all social activities outside the home. Currently I go to. A grocery store once a week for about 15 minutes. I am primarily housebound and have had to give up all. Social activities. The FCC is using. Research. That took place in the 1990s. And has been. Corrupted by. Technology companies. I appreciate your looking into this significant problem. As I have had several friends who have had tumors operated on. I currently have a tumor on my. Adrenal gland. It appears to be benign. If you look at the. Research By the government, that costs $25 million years ago. You can see The peer reviewed results. That was done on mice and rats. Thank you. Sincerely. SHARON. MCWETHY.