Proposed biological mechanisms

I had a professional career specialising in creating benign living environments without harmful modern interventions. Choice of technology became key to avoiding adverse stimulus for the occupants in the interest of the least overall toxic load within habitable indoor spaces. These long term career interests suddenly and unexpectedly experienced a further stage of amplification when a family member developed severe electromagnetic radiation syndrome (EMR-S) over 14 years ago. This was formally diagnosed by a registered specialist medical doctor. My household had to learn how to manage and mitigate the adverse effects and symptoms arising from exposure to ubiquitous ambient emissions from pervasive anthropogenic environmental toxin known diversely as high wireless frequency microwave radiation or non-thermal, non-ionising radiation. This required cold, hard scrutiny and non-stop research and cross-referencing of evidence which was not captured agency generated, or industry aligned. Thus began a knowledge specialisation which has continued to this day, with ongoing further development, to include a full study of the German Building Biology Institute’s course. For more than a decade I have carried out RFR surveying, on a voluntary basis, assisting those affected by this same syndrome. Interestingly, approximately 90% of respondents are female; being perceptively aware, open-minded and well-grounded individuals. When not subjected to prolonged or concentrated RFR exposure causing symptoms which turn a fight /flight response into an inability to think straight, these same people are cogent, analytical thinkers. I have met all manner of people whose lives have been fundamentally destabilised by becoming EMR-S, whether being forced to lose their jobs, livelihood, savings and homes as a result of needing to search for a less EMR stimulating environmental. This has, in turn caused estrangement from friends, family and support networks as they become outcasts because their judgement, sanity or credibility is placed under ‘consensus view’ dismissal. This story leads inevitably to a hermit-like existence for the most EMR-S. Sadly, those most severely affected even contemplate ending their lives, if they can find no relief from the complex and ubiquitous overlay of multi-source RFR in our modern ambient environment. I have known two people to end their lives by hanging as a result of this level of despair. I have encountered all of the most common symptoms listed in the independent, non-industry compromised research studies, papers and volumes already produced on the subject of RFR and EMR-S. I have encountered less common symptoms and biological effects, to include streaming sinus reactions proximal to an on-call smart phone. I have even experienced, in real time, the ability of certain pharmaceutical blood pressure medications, which works by acting as calcium channel blockers to the blood / brain barrier actually reducing EMR-S symptoms in the person taking those same medications. None of the people I try to help have known each other yet all of their EMR-S related stories and adverse issues share common themes to the extent of overlapping heavily, or being almost the same in every detail, to include triggers, symptom delay, duration, power density, frequency combination or stimulus. The mast cell activation / inflammation pathway presentation from EMR stimulus is often evident. None of the people I try to help have anything to gain by amplification or distortion of the facts as they are presented: their lives are far too deeply impacted in existential ways for that to be a risk. There is now overwhelming evidence of the harm and potential for harm to all if you know how to connect the dots, interrogate and see through the narratives. One of the most respected researchers co-authored a paper which I post here. It demonstrates that the continuous deliberate attempts by industry to push the non-thermal / lack of adverse energy doctrine to claim the inability of RFR to harm is ill-founded and disingenuous. Bio-chemical cascades in living biological systems provide the explanation which the projected consensus narrative will not admit or give the oxygen of credibility. As if to underline this, a study by the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) group, Unit 1296 confirmed biological mechanisms which demonstrated that those with EMR-S do not suffer from psychosomatic issues: https://lagedefaire-lejournal.fr/electrosensibilite-une-realite-biologique-enfin-demontree/ For now, safe ‘white’ zones are for the EMR-S whilst the industry influence is neutered, scrutiny and prescription of safety should return to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) in order properly to interrogate the fallacy of no harm and the lack of the precautionary principal. If this does not happen successive wireless technology will be likely to make us all EMR-S.

Patient Advocate for Victims of RF/EMF Exposure P.O. Box 1039 Roseville, CA 95678 (916) 692-4999 PatientAdvocateEMF@proton.me I am a private person who is interested in helping myself and others as it relates to injuries from RF/EMF exposure. I have created and pulled together many sources of information from my own experiences, the experience of others, scientists, doctors, researchers, patients, victims, advocates, friends, community members, etc. The information I have obtained has been from my own experience as a victim and through my own medical files from many highly advanced doctors and medical specialists. I believe my approach to using so many doctors and such advanced medical testing gives me the advantage of a highly complex and comprehensive medical file. I have discovered that many patients are often segregated and usually experience a very narrow category of diagnostic testing and treatment. I am approaching these injuries of RF/EMF from a wholistic perspective meaning I want to leave no stone unturned when it comes to both diagnostic testing and treatment. Any diagnostic testing that can be given that remotely has to do with RF/EMF exposures to nonionizing radiation should be taken by a patient like me. I have put together approximately 500 to 1,000 pages of medical records by highly advanced expert subject matter witness doctors across various specialties. I have also put together photos of burns, meter readings, frequencies, clinical observations, advanced patient histories, historical timelines, etc. I have discovered approximately 75 to over 100 neurological symptoms associated with excessive exposure to RF/EMF nonionizing radiation. I was able to discover approximately 35 to 50 different diagnoses related to RF/EMF exposure. I was specifically able to find approximately 20 to 30 points of leverage where RF/EMF nonionizing radiation can be leveraged by taking the so-called safe exposure limit of the FCC and magnifying, amplifying, and increasing the potential damage of those RF/EMF transmissions exponentially. I also want to advise that my use of terminology in this last sentence is intended for colloquial English. Google will specifically deny some of my information as being accurate if the precise term is not used scientifically. These leverage points extend far beyond exposure limits which many victims speak about which is accurate, but the nefarious nature of RF/EMF extends way beyond exposure limits which involves these 20 to 30 highly advanced mechanisms of leverage. These leverage points also are intended to "fly under the radar" of most doctors, scientists, institutions, and government officials as well as various agencies and society itself. It is important to know that RF/EMF exposure is related to polonium and hafnium exposure as well as to mold, diabetes, Lyme Disease, Bartonella, and other sever chronic diseases and infections like Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS - a grave, short, emergency, life threatening infection), and Chronic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (CIRS - an ongoing, acute, daily infection/inflammation related to mold). RF/EMF is also related to heavy metals. RF/EMF is also related to various burn patterns at a scar tissue and cellular level. Certain burns come as associated with certain wattages and frequencies. I have these related to my meters. RF/EMF is related to burn dynamics, meaning certain methods of burning/feelings/symptoms/and order of burning are related to certain types of burns, certain wattage coupled with certain frequencies. The physical injection of polonium and hafnium into the body for purpose of target acquisition, tracing and tracking can be used. Polonium and hafnium can be created or transferred into the body through ingestion. Yes, this is nefarious, but it is also scientifically plausible and provable. Polonium and hafnium can be ingested through breathing, and through any opening in the body. In vague general nonscientific terms polonium and hafnium and I am sure other elements can be "created" or "appear" or "transferred" through a plasma process. Conductive metals directly reflect and scatter radiofrequency (RF) and electromagnetic fields (EMF), which can alter the local power density of a signal by creating reflections, standing waves, and multi-path interference. There is a process called entrainment where RF/EMF nonionizing radiation can be purposely pulsated to fly under the radar of safe FCC limits while causing more advanced physical trauma which causes the body to conduct more EMF while the process also causes the software of the brain to be hijacked or altered causing Functional Neurological Disorder of FND.

I am Dr Margaret Christensen, MD former board certified OBGyn and now Functional Medicine environmental medicine specialist. The lack of updated regulations and limit ions around the whole area of electromagnetic radiationEMFs and 5G/6G is beyond appalling. It’s unbelievable how our government which is supposed to be for the people had been completely co opted by industry. We are failing our children!!! They are being radiated beyond belief (and adults too) impacting cognitive, developmental neurological and immunological symptoms. I see this every day in my clinic on the damaging effects of radio frequency on cell membranes and mitochondria. Particularly impacting the brain and heart! Terms of studies on these areas have been ignored! No wonder we have the sickest generation of kids ever, depressed, anxious, ADD and suicidal from constant low level bombardment. Wake up and save your selves and generations to come instead of making a devils bargain for short term profits!

Question 3 Personal experience I first noticed symptoms around 2009, but I did not understand what was causing them. I went to an engineering school that twas known for its connectivity and they recently upgraded the school network, I had to start commuting.
 My symptoms include tingling in my extremities and body; head tension; widespread sustained muscle tightness; brain fog; and fatigue. Over time, I began recognizing a pattern in when they occurred and which environments I could tolerate. From 2012, the problem became more pronounced after I installed one of the faster Wi-Fi routers on the market including dual-band with 5 GHz capability. This created problems, while other wireless environments were tolerable. I lived comfortably for years with older equipment, yet experienced symptoms in particular homes and workplaces.
 In 2020, triggering episodes became more frequent and disruptive with certain routers and some cellular exposures, specifically after the new repeater tower rollout in March 2020. 

More recently, newer phones have become an everyday challenge. The iPhone 17 Pro for example will trigger symptoms within seconds of being within a couple of feet. I have also experienced this response in a blinded test along with other devices. Oddly enough I have no issues with iPhone devices before 15 Pro.
 For these newer phones specifically, cellular triggers symptoms as if its home router, while Wi-Fi-only operation is generally better tolerated. In addition newer Wi-Fi routers and satellite-internet equipment also trigger very very strong episodes (the starlinks are extremely harsh on my system). 

For personal use I obtained was a modifiable router - JRS Eco - and adjusting the beacon setting changed/reduced the intensity of my response, but doesn’t change my issue.
 An encounter of around ten seconds from a strong device can begin a reaction that takes hours to recover from. Continued exposure makes the symptoms build. After leaving, they gradually decline. Fatigue can be the last thing to clear. That said I return to my normal baseline if given space to recover. Severe episodes, recovery can take days.
 When fully recovered, I work, exercise regularly and enjoy an active social life. But repeated episodes can be debilitating: I lose hours of functioning to reactions that took seconds to begin. Recovery does not resolve the disruption of being repeatedly triggered in ordinary environments.
 I work with several medical practitioners, but we have not identified why my body responds this way. We have tried many approaches to help manage recovery, but have not found a reliable way to prevent the reactions.
 Question 5 Exposure assessment Please assess modern cellular handsets, infrastructure, Wi-Fi across generations (including Wi-Fi 6/7) and satellite-internet equipment, covering sub-6 GHz and mmWave exposures. Measure frequency, modulation, pulse rate/timing (important), duty cycle, peak/average power, beamforming, and simultaneous transmissions.
 DO NOT treat absence of tissue heating as a complete answer about safety. Investigate whether membrane properties, sodium/calcium-channel regulation or cellular signaling can be affected independently of heating. Determine whether any changes disrupt normal biological function, particularly in susceptible individuals. Question 11 susceptible populations Investigate susceptibilities or response thresholds that population averages could miss. Document both triggering and tolerated conditions, rapid onset, build-up and declining recovery. Account for normal functioning between episodes; a normal assessment should not automatically end an investigation.
 Question 16 Research/clinical priorities I want research that connects the physical exposure to a biological mechanism and then to a useful treatment. Please investigate: * Changes in voltage-gated calcium & sodium-channel activity. * The membrane–channel interface & factors that could alter channel sensitivity. * Calcium regulation, mitochondrial function and inherited or acquired differences that could affect susceptibility and recovery. (My hypotheses, not mechanisms I claim) 
 Investigate whether susceptibility can be reduced while preserving normal function, with independent replication and transparent reporting. PLEASE develop clinical pathways so patients and their doctors have somewhere useful to turn for evaluation and treatment. Success should mean being able to work, sleep, travel and participate in ordinary environments—not simply recovering faster after leaving them.
 I am not interested in becoming a recluse or living off-grid. I want to live my life. For people experiencing this, the need is not only an answer about exposure standards; it is an explanation of what is happening and a medically useful way to address it. If any clinicians are working on this, my email: curare.90.firs@icloud.com

• Wireless radiation disrupts lymphocytes by opening calcium channels (VGCC's) in cell membrane and increasing intraceullar Ca2+ (Puri et al, 2019, attached), thereby assisting bacterial and viral infections. • Cell phone radiation impairs DNA repair in lymphocytes https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/1 • After 30 days of exposure time, 1 h/day EMF exposure resulted in significant decrease in immunoglobulin levels (IgA, IgE, IgM, and IgG); total leukocyte, lymphocyte, eosinophil and basophil counts; and a significant increase in neutrophil and monocyte counts. These changes were more increased in the group exposed to 2 h/day EMF. Vitamin D supplementation in EMF-exposed rats reversed these results when compared with EMF-exposed groups. In contrast, 7, 14, and 21 days of EMF exposure produced nonsignificant differences in these parameters among all experimental groups. We concluded that exposure to mobile phone radiation compromises the immune system of rats, and vitamin D appears to have a protective effect. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27901344/ • GSM cell phone radiation microwaves under specific conditions of exposure affected human lymphocytes similar to stress response https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3165836_Nonthermal_GSM_Microwaves_Affect_Chromatin_Conformation_in_Human_Lymphocytes_Similar_to_Heat_Shock • As compared to the control group in the radar operators a statistically significant decrease in the total T8 cell count and a significant increase in the IgM level was found pointing to the radiation induced disorders in lymphocyte system. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2131394/ Read more on effects of wireless radiation and 5G on the immune system https://mdsafetech.org/immune-system/ Studies that shows that wireless radiation affects vitamin D and glutathione: • Marshall 2016 reported wireless radiation lowers vitamin D receptor (VDR) activity by changing the shape of the VDR, thus impairing VDR activity and its ability to bind with vitamin D, and that this effect peaks at just under 6 GHz https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Trevor_Marshall2/publication/305254443_Electrosmog_and_autoimmune_disease/links/5785e9a008ae3949cf546f52.pdf?origin=publication_detail (Wi-Fi uses 2.45 and 5 GHz, but just recently, WiFi using 6 GHz was introduced in 2020 https://blogs.cisco.com/networking/wi-fis-new-6ghz-spectrum-is-a-new-frontier) • Belpomme et al, 2015 reported vitamin D deficiency can result from inflammation caused by chronic wireless radiation exposure http://www.ehs-mcs.org/fichiers/1454070991_Reliable_biomarkers.pdf • Garaj-Vrhovac et. al, 2011 found that radar workers, after 10 years, had glutathione that was more than 50% lower than non-radar workers. “The glutathione concentration in the exposed group was significantly lower than in controls (1.24 vs. 0.53) whereas the concentration of malondialdehyde was significantly higher (1.74 vs. 3.17), indicating oxidative stress. Results suggests that pulsed microwaves from working environment can be the cause of genetic and cell alterations and that oxidative stress can be one of the possible mechanisms of DNA and cell damage.” Results were statistically significant (p<0.05). Average exposure levels for radar workers were no higher than 0.00000835 W/kg, or 8.35 E-6 W/kg, well below government exposure standards (FCC Whole Body SAR limit is 0.08W/kg average.) http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1438463910001069 (my highlighted copy attached) • Deluca et al, 2014. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/mi/2014/924184/ found reduced levels of glutathione and impaired detoxification ability in those with microwave sickness (EHS). Risk of EHS development was increased 9.7 times in individuals who are missing two genes GSTM1 and GSTT1, which are glutathione S-transferase (GST) enzymes that detoxify by conjugation with glutathione o a statistically significant lowered level of antioxidant/detoxification enzymatic activity of GST (glutathione S-transferase) in EHS compared to non-EHS (~1.9 in EHS vs. ~2.5 in non-EHS, p=0.000001, see Figure 5a) o a statistically significant increased level of antioxidant/detoxification enzymatic activity of GPX (glutathione peroxidase) in EHS compared to non-EHS (~24.9 in EHS vs. ~22.8 in non-EHS, p=0.012151, see Figure 5b)

• Impact of Radiofrequency on DNA Damage and Antioxidants in Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes of Humans Residing in the Vicinity of Mobile Phone Stations, Zothansiama et al, 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318916428_Impact_of_radiofrequency_radiation_on_DNA_damage_and_antioxidants_in_peripheral_blood_lymphocytes_of_humans_residing_in_the_vicinity_of_mobile_phone_base_stations found that people residing with 80m (~250 ft) of cell phone towers had statistically significant lowered levels of glutathione (p < 0.01) and other antioxidants CAT and SOD (p < 0.001) and statistically significant increased levels of micronuclei (MN) (p < 0.001) and lipid peroxidation (LOO) (p < 0.001) when compared to a control group residing 300m or more away from cell towers was just published in August 2017. The frequencies emitted by the cell towers was between 900MHz and 1800MHz. The RF exposure level for the exposed group was in the range of 2.80–7.52 mW/m2, well under the FCC limit of 10,000 mW/m2. The RF exposure level for the control group was 0.014–0.065 mW/m2, which is at least 100 times lower than the exposure level in the exposed group.

According to the National Institute of Health, there are severe, adverse, long-term biological effects with exposure to non-native EMF's. “The Invisible Rainbow” by Arthur Firstenburg also details, to a great extent, the exposures that other portions of the world (Germany, Asia, etc.) have already, under scientific study, diagnosed physiological effects as neurasthenia. I have had adverse biological effects due to long-term exposure to my Tesla Model Y 2022. I am highly concerned and angered by the fact that Tesla is allowed to -not inform customers of the hazardous effects their vehicles have on human life -subject people to high amounts of EMF radiation/poisoning -no recourse is present for customers whom have purchased it and later learned that health conditions they have developed are directly due to exposure -or, not allowed Tesla owners to rescind lease agreements and place the burden on Tesla for the purchase of the vehicle, after finding out after purchase the hazardous, biological affects of the vehicle. Non-native EMF's, such as those poured out like a mobile microwave that a Tesla is, directly affect human bodies and can be measured by a Geiger Counter. The magnetism count for the Tesla vehicle when utilizing the Geiger Counter is off the charts, and I spent the first two years (myself and my daughter) charging inside this vehicle and being exposed to high-concentrated amounts of radiation in the driver seat, in any seat as there are wi-fi/electrical sensors in the seating, the middle console, the battery itself, the steering wheel. What’s more, is any cell towers in nearby areas ping and increase the radiation exposure to an individual. I have healthy blood panel readings, but have observed the hair in my genital areas turning gray, and no other areas on my body graying. The hair on my head is not gray. I sit in my vehicle for long periods of time. Over the summer when I did not drive as much, it turned back to the original color. Tesla is subjecting young children and pregnant mothers with the equivalent of microwave radiation and no consumer warning is provided. Another area of concern, electric companies charge consumers, such as FPL, a cost for opting out of smart meters and placing an undue financial burden on customers who choose to opt into a healthier option. Similarly, local cities such as the City of Daytona Beach forces customers to change their standard meter to a smart meter, which gets pinged at the Giga.hertz level and affects biological health in the area and unstructures the water. I made several requests to opt out and was told I wasn’t allowed to. This is a deep concern for homeowners that local governments will not provide alternative options for limiting their exposure to emf poisioning. EMF radiation opens the voltage-gated channels of the cell to allow calcium to pour in. This country needs to implement significant updates to the general policies and understanding of citizens to also include medical doctor’s. For example, my daughter’s dental office forces me to sign paperwork that indicates language, “Refusal of Diagnostic Dental Radiographs…” and states that I am subjecting my child to potential diseases by refusing X-ray exposure. Children with developing brains/bodies are more susceptible to the hazardous effects of emf radiation, and for doctor’s to indicate refusing consistent x-rays is hazardous to their health is absurd.

I have experienced clear, reproducible adverse effects from RF, electric, and magnetic fields for over 10 years. For the past five years I have been able to document these effects with simultaneous RF measurements.One of the clearest examples occurred when our Starlink router automatically reset after an update and re-enabled its Wi-Fi radios (we normally run it on Ethernet only). Both my partner and I independently noticed increased irritability, poor sleep, heart palpitations, and inflammation. We did not initially realize the settings had changed. When we measured with a Safe and Sound Pro II meter (200 MHz–8 GHz), we found substantially elevated RF levels. Returning the router to Ethernet-only mode eliminated the symptoms. This sequence has repeated multiple times. Because the exposure change was objective, measurable, and unknown to us at the time symptoms appeared, it strongly indicates the effects are physiological rather than purely psychological.A similar pattern occurred when our HOA installed a public Wi-Fi network with a bridge antenna directed toward our home. The same cluster of symptoms returned. Temporary aluminum SCIF-grade shielding between us and the source reduced symptoms; subsequent deactivation of the device produced further improvement that correlated with a clear drop in measured RF levels. In our experience, levels above approximately 10 mW/m² produce noticeable symptoms.The symptoms themselves are not minor: heart palpitations, disrupted sleep, irritability, depression, increased anger, light-headedness, and reduced immune resilience. These meaningfully degrade quality of life. I am particularly concerned about people who experience these effects without knowing the cause. Persistent, unexplained physical discomfort of this type can contribute to severe distress and, in some individuals, elevated risk of suicidal ideation. This is a form of environmental exposure that is difficult to escape without specialized knowledge and resources that many people lack.Mechanistically, the work of Dr. Martin Pall provides a coherent, experimentally supported pathway. Non-thermal RF fields can activate voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs). Excess intracellular calcium then drives increased nitric oxide and peroxynitrite formation, generating oxidative stress capable of damaging DNA and disrupting normal cellular signaling. This mechanism is documented in the peer-reviewed literature (Pall, J Cell Mol Med, 2013; PMID 23802593) and is consistent with the broader body of studies showing oxidative stress and related biological changes at non-thermal exposure levels.RF is not the only relevant source. Wiring errors can produce elevated magnetic fields associated in some epidemiological literature with long-term cancer risk. High electric fields from unshielded wiring commonly disrupt sleep and can produce tinnitus-like symptoms. Many people report that properly grounded shielding (creating a low-field environment) produces a subjective sense of calm and “quiet.” Dirty electricity—high-frequency voltage transients from smart meters, solar inverters, and other switching devices—is another reported contributor; some individuals note symptom improvement after installation of whole-house filters.I urge attention to sources that individuals cannot readily control: smart meters, cellular infrastructure, and radar systems. These can affect entire buildings, schools, and communities. I also encourage coordination with cellular carriers, utilities, and relevant government contractors to reduce population-level exposures where feasible.Looking ahead, SpaceX and others are developing space-based direct-to-cell services. Frequency selection matters biologically; 2.4 GHz, for example, coincides with a resonant range used in microwave ovens and is known to interact strongly with biological systems. It would be valuable for government agencies to evaluate whether certain frequency bands produce measurably lower (or even negligible) biological disruption compared with currently dominant bands, especially for systems that irradiate large ground areas from above.In summary, a decade of personal observation, repeated objective measurements correlating with symptoms, and the existing scientific literature leave me convinced that current ambient EMF exposures produce adverse biological effects in at least a subset of the population. Reducing the most pervasive uncontrolled sources, improving public education on practical mitigation, identifying particularly susceptible groups, and incorporating biological considerations into spectrum and infrastructure decisions would meaningfully improve population health and well-being. Key resources EMF-Portal database: https://www.emf-portal.org/en Research summaries compiled by Dr. Henry Lai / SaferEMR: https://www.saferemr.com/

Patient Advocate for Victims of RF/EMF Exposure P.O. Box 1039 Roseville, CA 95678 (916) 692-4999 PatientAdvocateEMF@proton.me October 20,2026 The Honorable Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Secretary U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20201 RE: Public Comment on Request for Information (RFI) regarding Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure (Docket No. HHS-OASH-2026-0397) FCC Faulty Exposure Safety Standards: One of the things I learned is that the FCC exposure limits neglect to account for accumulated exposure. Their standards are for exposure related to a few minutes and up to 40 minutes. We are all generally exposed to EMF/RF frequencies for more than 30 minutes. So, there is no such thing as "safety" based on FCC limits. Doctors Untrained at Nonthermal Dielectric Burning: Also, the FCC and mainstream scientists and doctors generally hold the attitude that "If the given EMF/RF are not thermally burning a given person, they are not dangerous or harmful, but when they are burning a person, they say, "That is a rash, not a burn." First of all, the vast majority of scientists and doctors have no training on this matter as they lack the very basic knowledge to know the difference between a myriad of different types of skin rashes and burns. Next, there are many studies out that clearly show the various harms that EMF/RMF causes at various power levels and frequencies. The FCC states no harm is being done when clearly it is being done. In summary, doctors are not aware of or trained in nonthermal burning or dielectric burning when the bodies cells are vibrating at millions of times per second so that friction is caused by rubbing against other cells!!! Heavy Metals in the Body Magnify, Amplify, and Radiate Heath Caused by RF/EMF: Next, the FCC does not consider heavy metals in a person's body that may reflect, magnify, and/or amplify various EMF/RF. So, a given EMF/RF can be hitting a victim at a given power and frequency only to have the effects of the EMF/RF change in effective power upon hitting the victim’s body. This is a way for the FCC to hide and keep the discussion focused on the power of the EMF/RF before it hits the person's body and not after it enters the person's body. The Heavy Metals of Polonium and Hafnium can be Delivered into the Human Body by RF/EFM: In my case, hafnium and polonium are those amplifiers. Polonium and Hafnium can be ingested through a plasma process of RF/EMF. These particles can be in the air, caried by RF/EMF and ingested into the human body. The Polonium later turns to Lead-206 which is kept in the body and in the bones. RF/EMF can be Pulsated Like a Rifle to Cause More Physiological Damage while at the Same Time it Hijacks or Interrupts the Software of the Brain – This is Termed Entrainment: Next, the FCC does not consider the pulsating nature of EMF/RF frequencies. There are frequencies that are sent out and sent in pulses where the given frequency goes extremely high every second or every other second. The FCC likes to claim averages. The FCC can then claim the averaged power of a group of pulses is low. The problem with this FCC method of measuring is that when the power of EMF/RF is sent to the victim in very high bursts of power separated by lower bursts of power, there is an effect called "entrainment" where the sudden burst a t very powerfully in a strategic way. What happens is the pulsating bursts literally hijack a person's organic electrical system and change it which dysregulates and scrambles a victim's electrical software system, it is called "entrainment." When EMF/RF highjacks and scrambles a victim's organic electrical system, Once a victim's organic electrical system has been changed, the victim's body can take on a myriad of melodies such as neurological symptoms, loss of vision, loss of mobility, dizziness, headaches, cognitive dysfunction, the ability to swallow, loss of weight, pain in the ears, tinnitus, balance issues, eardrum pain, headaches, neurological collapse, executive collapse, disassociation, phantom limbs, pins and needles all over the skin, internal body vibrations, tremors, convulsions, and almost any neurological symptom imaginable. Entrainment Allows the Weaponized System to be Under the Safe Averaged Wattage and Exposure Limits of the FCC, etc. These pulsating, amplified, and cumulative EMF/RF waves are weaponized by these strategic and tactical leverage dynamics while at the same time, they look like pure innocence because they are "under the FCC's 'safe limit!'" The problem is as the saying goes, "The devil is in the details, which everyone neglects to take into consideration. The details can be everting. Not investigating, not questioning, no researching, not looking, not seeing, not studying, and not knowing is not an excuse that will do any of us any good. Instead, it is killing...

Nous sommes une association de scientifiques aidant les personnes électro-hypersensibles souffrant dans les champs électromagnétiques de micro-ondes pulsées. Parmi celles-ci, il y a des personnes qui sont de véritables détecteurs d'ondes, qui les ressentent dans les mains et dans tout le corps. Le doute n'existe plus : ces micro-ondes pulsées entrent en interférence avec la micro-électricité des corps animaux (l'homme faisant partie des animaux) et aussi des végétaux. De nombreuses personnes ont des certificats médicaux attestant les perturbations cérébrales dans ces expositions (encéphaloscans, échodoppler pulsé), et des perturbations métaboliques prouvées par des analyses de sang et d'urine. Les troupeaux de bovins, de caprins, tous les animaux souffrent dans ces expositions. Les arbres aussi car ils ne peuvent pas bouger et c'est pire pour eux. Nous avons parmi nous une personne dont l'électro-hypersensibilité a été acquise génétiquement et qui est un véritable appareil de mesures. Dès qu'il n'y a plus d'exposition aux ondes toxiques, les troubles s'arrêtent. Nous avons vu une personne âgée faire un accident cérébral dans des ondes Wifi. Une autre une crise d'épilepsie.