Power lines, wiring & solar

1. & 2. I am responding as: an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)Wi-Fi and mobile phones 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):Exposure frequency is every day. One can't get away from this type of micro radiation. So it's been years of exposure. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:Fatigue, brain fog, memory, mood changes like agitation, irritability and more easily angered, and in particular, disruption in sleep. Effects are more noticeable in an environment where there are more concentrated EMF's like in a hotel, office buildings, malls, apartment buildings, etc. 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:Probably a number of years of exposure before I realized the negative effects EMF's were having on me. Sleep disruption, more difficult to fall asleep and stay asleep, was the main effect I noticed. 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?No. I did research on exposure effects to humans. 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?We had our bedroom configured to be able to turn off the electricity at night, which also turns off our router. Sleep improvements were immediate. I sleep much better with this arrangement. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information:https://greenmedinfo.com/content/emfs-linked-cancer-autoimmunity-immune-dysfunction https://jackkruse.com/emf-5-what-are-the-biologic-effects-of-emf/ https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/new-paper-identifies-smoking-gun?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1135210&post_id=157821523&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=2b987c&triedRedirect=true Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's: B1a. Sources you experience as causing you Adverse Effects:Wifi, blue tooth, cell phone close to body. B1b. Sources you can sense, but don't seem to harm you:My computer B1c. Sources you can use without sensing or being harmed:My computer B1d. Sources that seem to provide benefit (i.e., electrotherapy): B2a. Health conditions you think may contribute to your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless:Autoimmune thyroid - Hashimoto's B2b. Health conditions you don't necessarily associate with your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless, but might be relevant:Variable levels of fatigue B3. For each subquestion please list up to 5 drugs or therapies or home remedies (if any) B3a. That you recommend, as they helped you tolerate or recover from EMF exposure:Getting out in nature, turning off wifi in the home at night. Limiting exposure in high density living or working environments. B3b. That you recommend, but you’re not positive that they help:B complex, Vitamin C, optimal levels of Vit D3, magnesium, alpha lipoic, NAC supplements B3c. That helped you but you don’t recommend. (e.g., the benefit did not last long or the side effects were too harmful):Don't know B3d. Treatments that had no effect:Don't know B3e. Treatments that made your sensitivity worse:75+ B4. What is your age range?75+ B5. What year did you become aware of your sensitivity to wireless radiation or electromagnetic fields?2009 B6. What country, state, province, or major city were you living in when you first noticed your sensitivity to wireless or electromagnetic fields?Boulder County, CO. USA

This recommendation focuses on a specific loophole in current standards of electromagnetic exposure that is being exploited by specific foreign-built consumer grade electronics to express a comprehensive approach to ensuring operating safety for the end-user consumer in the United States. Current standards mainly focus on intentional electromagnetic radiators such as smart phones at cellular frequencies or tablets at Wi-Fi frequencies. These intentional radiators are combined with a charger or AC/DC adapter which adhere to a poorly defined and poorly enforced FCC Class B standard for unintentional radiation. The integration of foreign manufactured components into the final consumer product sidesteps individual component testing. Foreign electronics manufacturers intentionally alter the electromagnetic signals emanating from components to prevent accurate measurements from foreign accredited testing laboratories that are selectively testing to low standards. With the recent technological shift to faster switching semiconductors and burst mode charging capability combined with poor end-user habits, emanations from cheap foreign handheld consumer electronics with biologically unsafe signatures create a health risk to Americans.

I am a Licensed Electrician and perform EMF Mitigation for private residences. I received training through the Building Biology Institute and am in process to be certified through BBI as an Electromagnetic Radiation Specialist. For the past 6 years I have measured and mitigated electromagnetic fields in homes with a primary focus on sleeping areas. My work is guided by the Building Biology Evaluation Guidelines, which are based on the precautionary principle and the goal of creating environments that support long-term health rather than merely avoiding acute thermal injury. I appreciate HHS’s initiative to examine RF/EMF exposures, particularly as they affect children and other vulnerable populations. There exists a large gap between U.S. standards and precautionary guidelines. U.S. and ICNIRP standards are based almost exclusively on heating (thermal) effects. A substantial body of peer-reviewed research documents non-thermal biological effects at levels far below those limits. Mechanisms repeatedly discussed in the literature and observed in practice include activation of voltage-gated calcium channels leading to oxidative stress, disruption of melatonin and circadian rhythms, DNA damage, increased blood-brain barrier permeability, and effects on sperm and reproductive tissue. From my professional experience, the most consistent and rapidly reversible effects are on sleep quality and overnight recovery. Clients frequently report improvements in sleep, energy, headaches, heart palpitations, cognitive clarity, and skin sensations after reduction of nighttime exposures, even when daytime exposures remain largely unchanged. These observations align with the emphasis Building Biology places on sleeping areas. Children are of particular concern. Their thinner skulls, higher tissue conductivity, developing nervous and immune systems, and longer cumulative lifetime exposure increase vulnerability. I regularly encounter elevated RF and AC electric/magnetic fields in children’s bedrooms from Wi-Fi routers, baby monitors, cordless phones, cell phones, tablets, gaming devices, smart meters, and poorly designed electrical wiring. Building Biology Evaluation Guidelines for Sleeping Areas: • Radiofrequency: ideally < 0.1–10 µW/m² • AC magnetic fields: < 0.2–1 mG (20–100 nT) • AC electric fields / body voltage: very low (typically aiming for body voltage < 10–100 mV) These levels are orders of magnitude below current FCC public exposure limits. Several European medical associations (e.g., Austrian Medical Association, EUROPAEM) and the BioInitiative reports have recommended substantially lower precautionary limits than those adopted in the United States. To address the current research gaps, the following areas should be prioritized: • Long-term studies of chronic, low-level, pulsed RF exposures typical of real-world environments (Wi-Fi, 4G/5G, DECT, smart meters) rather than short-term, continuous-wave laboratory exposures. • Effects on sleep architecture, melatonin, and overnight recovery in children and adolescents. • Combined exposures (RF + dirty electricity/microsurge electrical pollution + AC electric and magnetic fields). • Identification of susceptible subgroups (including those with electrohypersensitivity/EMR syndrome) and objective biomarkers. • Prospective studies of mitigation effectiveness in homes and schools. Recommendations: 1. Prioritize sleeping areas — Turn off or place Wi-Fi routers in airplane mode at night; keep cell phones and tablets out of bedrooms or in airplane mode; prefer hardwired Ethernet connections. 2. Reduce close-range device use — Encourage speakerphone, wired headsets, or airplane mode for children; avoid carrying phones against the body. 3. Address electrical environment — Identify and correct wiring errors that elevate magnetic fields; consider demand switches or circuit control for bedrooms to reduce AC electric fields during sleep; minimize dirty electricity from dimmers, inverters, and certain electronics. 4. School and institutional settings — Prefer hardwired networks where feasible; locate wireless access points away from classrooms and offices; provide low-EMF options for sensitive students. 5. Siting of infrastructure — Avoid placing cell antennas, small cells, and smart meters in close proximity to homes, schools, and daycare facilities. 6. Education — Provide clear, accessible information so parents, teachers, and clinicians can make informed choices while research continues. I urge HHS to incorporate precautionary considerations for non-thermal effects into its evaluation, especially for children, and to support independent research that examines real-world exposure patterns and mitigation outcomes. Practitioner observations and the existing body of non-thermal research should be weighed alongside the thermal-only framework that currently underpins U.S. standards. Respectfully, William Pursino

I submit this comment as a 27-year-old resident of France who has experienced localized physiological and neurological symptoms associated with ambient and near-field electromagnetic environments since early 2021. My experience highlights the importance of assessing whether current regulatory standards adequately address real-world exposure conditions and individual sensitivities. Firstly of all, current testing protocols often assess wireless devices under controlled conditions that may not fully reflect simultaneous use of GPS, cellular data, and Wi-Fi. Such multi-radio activity can affect device power consumption, heat generation, and exposure levels. I therefore encourage the Commission to evaluate simultaneous transmissions in realistic operating and handling conditions when reviewing Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) and power-density standards. Relevant industry developments, including U.S. Patent No. US20120231784A1, illustrate the technical challenges of managing emissions in multi-radio systems. Secondly, exposure assessments should also consider the broader environmental context. Atmospheric electricity, temperature, low-frequency fields, and device-generated noise may coexist in everyday settings. Although their combined physiological effects require further investigation, I encourage the Commission to support research into potential interactions between environmental factors and neurological responses, including symptoms reported by sensitive individuals. Thirdly, metal enclosures such as trains, subways, elevators, and vehicle cabins can affect signal reception and prompt mobile devices to adjust transmission power. These changing conditions may produce exposure patterns not adequately represented by averaged outdoor measurements. Testing should therefore include realistic indoor and enclosed transport environments, transient transmission peaks, and common device-use positions. Furthermore, building materials, architectural design, and local topography can also influence radiofrequency distribution. Masonry may attenuate signals, while windows, upper floors, and reflections from nearby structures can create variations in indoor exposure. I encourage the FCC to collaborate with architects, engineers, and materials scientists to investigate shielding materials, develop standardized testing methods, and assess practical measures to reduce indoor exposure where appropriate. Finally, disabling wireless interfaces and using wired connections may reduce radiofrequency emissions, but electronic devices continue to generate low-frequency electromagnetic fields, heat, and other electrical emissions. I therefore recommend that regulatory bodies assess these sources alongside radiofrequency emissions, including during close-proximity use of battery-powered and mains-powered electronics. In conclusion, I respectfully encourage regulatory authorities to review existing safety standards in light of realistic device operation, changing environmental conditions, building characteristics, and emissions across different frequency ranges. Further independent research and appropriately precautionary safety margins could help clarify potential non-thermal effects and improve protection for the general public, including individuals reporting heightened sensitivities.

1. & 2. I am responding as: an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…) Mobile phones 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):When people use their mobile phones to access cellular data, the initial signal is very strong while the phone is connecting to a tower. It is about 20 seconds long and gives me symptoms. This has been happening to me for six years. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:Wakes me up from sleep, heart palpitations, and headaches. 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects: 4 years. A change of exposure (to additional EMF) greatly increased the symptoms. 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis? Medical treatment was sought, but unsuccessfully. 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects? Yes. This involved removing all wireless devices from the home and moving to a different house away from neighbors. Additionally, because of the proximity of neighbors' wireless devices, it necessitated sleeping in the basement. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information: Apple iphones, when "wifi assist" is turned on, default to the cell tower for internet access. When I first started waking up 5x a night with heart palpitations, my baby in the other room would wake up 10 seconds later, screaming. This happened on the hour and the half hour. It turned out that this was directly correlated with our neighbor using her cell phone between TV programs. (She stayed up later than we did.) When she turned off "wifi assist" so her cell phone accessed the internet through her own wifi router, the night waking ended immediately. Unfortunately, this was just the beginning of realizing I had become EMF sensitive and eventually I had to move. Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's:I was mildly sensitive to EMF, but it was not enough to notice, until I moved to a different house. This house, we later learned, was bordering on the right-of-way of a high voltage power line (69kV). Additionally, a smart meter was installed after we moved in. After a pregnancy, I had a situation that required a chest CT scan, which, of all medical imaging, has the highest amount of radiation. I think this overexposure created the perfect storm to make me very EMF sensitive.

1. & 2. I am responding as: family member of an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)high voltage power lines 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):During two years when we lived very near to high voltage power lines. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:My 4 year old son was diagnosed with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia at the age of 4 years old after living for two years in close proximity to high voltage overhead power lines. 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:approximately one year after exposure over a two year period he was diagnosed. 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?Yes, he received three years of chemotherapy and cranial radiation after the diagnosis of ALL 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?We moved away from the power lines once he was diagnosed.

. & 2. I am responding as: 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)Apple phones with latest updates 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):Tumor on thumb for a year with agonizing searing pain in the presence of cellular phones, but absolutely updated Apple phones. I have generalized EMF sensitivity for 10 years as a background with fatigue. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:Fatigue Agonizing pain Nausea and vomiting 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:The change would’ve been the tumor coming on my thumb with a fungal infection and as soon as that started to be controlled, the pain totally goes away with the iPhones 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?Yes 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?My home was mitigated 10 years ago. I have no Wi-Fi in the house. Everyone’s cell phone is off in my house. We are ethernet. My problem was when I went anywhere. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information:Oh, we could talk for days on the metering my husband and I have done in our home. The one other wild card was installing Starlink. Plugging in the Starlink put the dirty energy in the house up to 1700! I know that is not the focus of the study, but that was a huge part of my problem until we mitigated the one plug for Starlink. Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's: B1a. Sources you experience as causing you Adverse Effects:Dirty energy, magnetic fields, Wi-Fi, cellular phones, especially Apple phones that are newly updated. Transformers on the powerlines, kitchen appliances. B1b. Sources you can sense, but don't seem to harm you:Before the tumor on my thumb, I would’ve said being around cell phones. But that tumor was ago agony with cell phones. B1c. Sources you can use without sensing or being harmed:Ethernet Provide be B1d. Sources that seem to provide benefit (i.e., electrotherapy):Frequency, specific micro current Rife PEMF Photo wave therapy B2a. Health conditions you think may contribute to your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless:Massive fungal infection in the thumb. If I am in Wi-Fi or EMR’s out of the home, it causes blistering on the thumb and severe pain. History of Lyme, disease and fatigue and mild exposure B2b. Health conditions you don't necessarily associate with your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless, but might be relevant:After reading the invisible rainbow, everything is connected to it. B3. For each subquestion please list up to 5 drugs or therapies or home remedies (if any) B3a. That you recommend, as they helped you tolerate or recover from EMF exposure:Avoidance Greenwave and Satik filters Astaxanthan Ray wave Supplement EMF protective clothing B3b. That you recommend, but you’re not positive that they help:The products they sell for cell phones to put on your cell phone to mitigate B3c. That helped you but you don’t recommend. (e.g., the benefit did not last long or the side effects were too harmful):A lot of the filters they sell to mitigate it for your cell phone B3d. Treatments that had no effect:Having to go to places blasting with Wi-Fi and dirty energy for my treatments. And everybody else on staff walking around with their cell phones. B3e. Treatments that made your sensitivity worse:55-64 B4. What is your age range?55-64 B5. What year did you become aware of your sensitivity to wireless radiation or electromagnetic fields?Around 2015 I was dealing with mold, exposures and lime. I bought a hybrid car and that pushed my body over the edge for wireless and dirty energy. B6. What country, state, province, or major city were you living in when you first noticed your sensitivity to wireless or electromagnetic fields?Michigan Link to HHS Comment Submission Form

Grok has found these health experiences, a couple of them are comments to deleted posts that I kept in as they were of interest. In #2 for example a person described a mushroom mildened their EMF sensitivity. HHS-OASH-2026-0397, health experiences found on Reddit. 1. A new Wi-Fi repeater caused headache and dizziness. They could not turn it off. https://redd.it/10ahav6 2. Comment; post removed. They believe Reishi mushroom helped, via porphyria (a blood and liver condition). Only Reishi is named. https://www.reddit.com/comments/10seusf/_/j8lwy45 3. Near power lines and an airport: hard to catch their breath, woke short of air, headache, fatigue, and trouble with memory and thinking. Fine when away. Fume cleanup failed. https://redd.it/148vgpq 4. Poor sleep with a Wi-Fi router on the other side of the wall. Better after moving their head away. https://redd.it/1w8faog 5. Lyme symptoms eased after leaving the power grid to avoid these fields. https://redd.it/1wh6czw 6. They blame radio waves for insomnia. No test. https://redd.it/e1i4jw 7. They turn the cell phone off to sleep and to work. https://redd.it/lghzts 8. High home-meter readings, blamed for headaches and thinning hair. Post removed; numbers gone. https://redd.it/ohu0ua 9. Comment on a deleted post: an earpiece tingled the ear, so they quit Bluetooth earpieces. https://www.reddit.com/comments/stwxwf/_/hx6s73u 10. Same thread: Bluetooth devices hurt, and they trust no research they found. https://www.reddit.com/comments/stwxwf/_/hxarf7b 11. A protective pendant stopped headache and dizziness. Post removed. https://redd.it/sx77i9 12. A dark, grounded bedroom built free of these fields, for sleep. https://redd.it/sz1irk 13. Some laptops and a fanless tablet, not the phone, cause pinprick feelings. Suspect a wireless chip or the power circuit. https://redd.it/1m462eu 14. Phone off for a day, felt well; sick 10 minutes after turning it on. https://redd.it/1qa93di 15. Phone on the ear: lasting pain. Uses speaker or a wired headset. Asks if Bluetooth is better. https://redd.it/1w23p6w 16. Insomnia a week after a first cell phone. Possibly coincidence. https://redd.it/12j0688 17. Asks if anyone else is sensitive to these fields. Post removed. https://redd.it/zs19wv 18. 5 gigahertz Wi-Fi causes headache and poor sleep; 2.4 gigahertz does not. Not cellular 5G. May be a placebo. https://redd.it/18dz3am 19. Wireless earphones bring migraine more often than wired ones. https://redd.it/xstdk1 20. Bluetooth headphones cause headache, worse with noise cancelling. Wired earbuds mostly do not. https://redd.it/1tu7v1t 21. Bluetooth by the head: headache stops when the device is off. A running microwave feels similar. https://redd.it/1b9cd6k 22. Wi-Fi 7, 3 feet away: head pressure within 5 minutes. Unplugged. Wi-Fi 6 had not. https://redd.it/1mohjgm 23. Galaxy Buds: headache gone a week after they stopped. https://redd.it/bmupqb 24. Nausea after under 30 seconds beside high-current power cables. https://redd.it/yr7qky 25. Wi-Fi in a pocket tingles that leg in 5 minutes. Mobile data does not. Not heat, they say. Australia. https://redd.it/1k6hhzo 26. Many routers and Bluetooth devices: headache, brain fog, and a drained feeling. https://redd.it/14sqnti 27. Asks how others cope with electrical and magnetic sensitivity. No test. https://redd.it/sydm9r 28. Blames towers, power lines, and Wi-Fi. Left the house; measured with Wi-Fi on and off. https://redd.it/ogicw6 29. Computers, phones, TVs, and Wi-Fi sicken them on entering a room. They stay farther away. https://redd.it/17262hz 30. Week without AirPods: milder migraines. Diet, screens, and sleep unchanged. https://redd.it/1ly37ca 31. Tower about 100 meters away: daily headache, pressure, poor sleep; better when away. Wi-Fi and power off: no change. Carrier: met the federal limit. https://redd.it/1n6u9al 32. Wireless charger 18 inches from the head. Unplugged it and slept normally that night. https://redd.it/9tusgm 33. New hybrid car: spouse's headaches blamed on these fields. No test. https://redd.it/1ilxi4d 34. Moved for less mold, then worse sleep. Asks if the building's fields caused it. No test. https://redd.it/1lgabgj 35. Turning phone 5G back on brings a headache. https://redd.it/1emfg3i 36. Headache near a running microwave or a Wi-Fi router. https://redd.it/16qb1kl 37. After a brain injury it feels like an electric shock. No test. https://redd.it/13hm1p9 38. Mother's tinnitus, worse by the router, eased days after it was moved. https://redd.it/2cyna4 39. Father's headaches from Wi-Fi and phones. Paint to block wireless signals, cables instead of Wi-Fi, mesh against neighbors' signals. Child's account. https://redd.it/vumod8 40. Headaches from 5 gigahertz Wi-Fi. Has not tried adding the 2.4 gigahertz band. https://redd.it/170kagt 41. Real high-voltage fault: husband's headache, vomiting, and burning. Only he felt it. Better at his parents'. https://redd.it/1w6p49f

I got electrosensitive about 6 months ago after being exposed to a smart meter nearby (I was almost "attached to it" for a couple of days as I did not pay attention that there was a smart meter), and at the same time I started working in a new office room very near to a base station with especially high RF levels. I experience symptoms from phones, wi-fi, base stations, practically any wireless technology, but unfortunately also from electrical fields (when devices I touch are plugged into a power outlet, and cars) and electromagnetic fields (cars, power lines ecc). Especially phones and hybrid and electrical vehicles, subway and train are detrimental for my health. Just a couple of days near to a smart meter and base station made me this sensible, but of course previously I had been exposed to many RF fields with various levels for years, as they are ubiquitous. Now I get symptoms quite fast, in a couple of minutes, depending on the intensity of the exposure. Symptoms include strong tinnitus, headache, cold and numb hands, insomnia, pain and “waves” in my face and head, tiredness, nausea and rarely, after longer and strong exposure, also vomiting. I have not got any specific medical treatments, as there is no understanding in the health care system about this condition. I got help and advice from peer support groups. I am still looking for specialist that could help me. Luckily I have been able to continue working, at least for now, with specific keyboard, mouse, ethernet connection and asking collaborators to switch their phones in airplane mode when we work face-to-face. My work place has had a very understanding attitude. A crucial element in my capacity to work was leaving the premises where I fell ill as soon as I understood my symptoms were connected to radiation. Now the premises where I work have quite low back ground levels.

1. & 2. I am responding as: 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)Wi-Fi 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):Wi-Fi at work, at home, in the building and everywhere one goes, 20 years but longer at computer, son't know whether that was Wi-Fi 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:tiredness, less vitality, headaches. Don't have them when on holiday in nature, away from exposure 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:can't quite remember, worked all day with computer since 1987 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?Doctors didn't believe in it, no diagnosis 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?stopped working in 2006 due to ME, but then Wi-Fi came up everywhere so it got worse even 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information: Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's:it gives unrest B1a. Sources you experience as causing you Adverse Effects:pylons of electricity and Wi-Fi or 5G B1b. Sources you can sense, but don't seem to harm you: B1c. Sources you can use without sensing or being harmed: B1d. Sources that seem to provide benefit (i.e., electrotherapy): B2a. Health conditions you think may contribute to your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless:high sensitivity, ME B2b. Health conditions you don't necessarily associate with your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless, but might be relevant: B3. For each subquestion please list up to 5 drugs or therapies or home remedies (if any) B3a. That you recommend, as they helped you tolerate or recover from EMF exposure:walking especially in nature, forests B3b. That you recommend, but you’re not positive that they help: B3c. That helped you but you don’t recommend. (e.g., the benefit did not last long or the side effects were too harmful): B3d. Treatments that had no effect: B3e. Treatments that made your sensitivity worse:75+ B4. What is your age range?75+ B5. What year did you become aware of your sensitivity to wireless radiation or electromagnetic fields?1980 B6. What country, state, province, or major city were you living in when you first noticed your sensitivity to wireless or electromagnetic fields?Belgium, Antwerp