All comment threads

I am submitting these comments again on behalf of my client, Dr. Len Ber, who submitted them on October 15, 2026 and NO COMMENTS appear for that date. This is a gross violation of his First Amendment Right of Petitioning for Redress and commenting on this matter of utmost public interest. His comments are attached.

Re: Department of Health and Human Services - Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure DECLARATION OF DOROTHY “DOE” KELLY Oct. 21, 2025

My son has had to leave in person schooling and most in person events due to his extreme EMF sensitivity. His quality of life is being stolen and nobody is s monitoring it or seems to care enough to protect him and ALL of us. Please step up! Protect Americans from this poison!

I am submitting this as a caregiver to my partner with severe EMF hypersensitivity and as someone with a milder form myself. After becoming aware/knowledgeable of the existence of this illness I noticed EMF reactions I had experienced myself I had previously ignored/dismissed. I have always felt burning or pain in my legs when having my laptop on my lap or pain in my hand with my mobile phone which if I ignore it, travels up my arm until my whole arm is burning. I always drove old cars with low electrics/radiofrequency with no issues but started feeling the burning in my hands touching the steering wheel in my newer model but only recognized this in retrospect. These issues started before I was even aware of EMFs. In September 2020, my partner became extremely ill and bedbound from one day to the next. He was very fit and healthy, lifting weights and walking 20km every day and eating healthy and one day collapsed after a flu like illness and described feeling a flash/snap in his brain. From then on he started having a myriad of symptoms which haven't eased, only changed at times for the last 6 years with not a single moment in those 6 years without at least 10 debilitating symptoms at once. Initially he was bedbound for weeks and couldn't tolerate any daylight or function at all. He was dismissed medically by multiple doctors despite ending up hospital several times and told his bloods were normal and they didn't know what was wrong with him. Since then we have been on a journey to discover the origin of his illness and seen multiple specialists and spent hundreds of hours of research and his condition has increased in intensity. At the time he was living in a house riddled with toxic moulds (proven by an ERMI later) and started to develop reactivity to many things including chemicals,smells,foods,cosmetics,synthetic materials and EMFs. The intensity of these reactions continued to increase until we became more aware of the source of the different reactions and were able to measure them and isolate what triggers caused which reaction. We have done measurements with EMF meters in many locations and I can 100% say my partner is able to feel with accuracy the level of EMFs by the symptoms he experiences. He reacts to levels FAR below the international safety guidelines.I know that there has been discussion that people react to the trigger as a trauma response and by calming the nervous system or using brain retraining they will not react and I can tell you that this is categorically not true. It may work for some but not my partner at all. He reacts to an exposure before the awareness he is being exposed eg. we go to nature spots far away from EMFs to ease his symptoms.He will tell me he is feeling awful and the next minute someone will walk around the corner with a phone. The has happened over and over. I am a counsellor and work with many clients with trauma and support brain retraining and I can say with confidence this is NOT a trauma response. My partner reacts to all kinds of EMF exposures differently and can often tell if it is radio frequency, electric or magnetic. The list of symptoms he experiences would cover an entire A4 sheet of paper so I will not list them all but in terms of EMFs specifically, he experiences headaches, full body pains, seizures (convulsing and unresponsive for up to half an hour), brain fog, memory issues, tinnitus, vertigo, burning sensations or skin rashes, insomnia, night sweats, nightmares, constant chronic fatigue, heart palpitations/heart racing, heaviness/stiffness, gut issues, mood swings amongst others. We have moved at least 5 times in the last 6 years and are moving again and have spent thousands on mitigation attempts which do help to a certain extent but finding a safe house is becoming impossible. We never use WIFI, rarely use a mobile phone and switch it off when not in use, only have one circuit on for several sockets but have all other circuit switches off at the breaker at all times and have protective shielding equipment but the EMF levels are still not safe and my partner is still deathly sick. He has no medical support as all doctors have washed their hands of him, no accommodations and no official diagnosis. We need extensive research without any funding conflicts carried out in a scientifically valid way. We need recognition of this condition medically and training so people are not left to die and live in primitive conditions, we need accommodations in rental clauses and work accommodations recognized and we need to create safe low EMF zones and protect these to create safe communities. The data is flawed and doesn't measure cumulative exposure to the levels we are experiencing now. Please take this seriously. People are dying whilst being ridiculed, neglected and forgotten and they do not have a voice as they cannot access the channels to have a voice (all these channels are online). I wrote this on behalf of my partner as he could not do this.

Part Two - Michele Hertz References

. & 2. I am responding as: an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)Wireless phones, cell towers, micro-broadcasters, electric cars, some wifi routers, 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):Sometimes stabbing pain in previously injured ( 40 years ago) head trauma when i am in a beam from a tower AKA in a car in traffic/ at a red light, and the symptoms disappear within minutes after the car moves on...Back around 2012 it started and I was treated in Emergency for seizures, and the drug made me really sick and I developed severe IBS.... A second neurologist examined me while under an episode and diagnosed me with a "full body migraine" and prescribed drugs... I have avoided symptoms by dietary and supplement additions, but overexposure ( too ling in certain parts of the city or airplane travel ) time wise , .... it's not linear - seems to be fluid-factors of 1- Strength of signal, 2- Distance from the source 3- Duration of exposure.... one of these three factors primarily may give a different response than another factor, but I have not been able to figure that out. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:The symptoms change each time but consistently from the following. : Dizzy, "zoned out" like a drug sometimes slurred speech or inability to move, sometimes falling over throwing up in the ditch, inability to sleep, depressive emotions, blurry eyesight, physical neural pain in the old injury site, rarely but sometimes actual headaches.. In a hotel I "wake up like a shot" at 3:00-4:00 AM with WIFI router on and cannot sleep after. Usually only one or two symptoms at a time ranging from irritating to disabling, and comes in waves. 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:One hour to 4 days- and yes- see above for the three factors that totally coincide; Strength of signal and duration of exposure lead to severe symptoms. 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?see above... no doctor that I have seen believes me , but recently I told an allergist receptionist on the phone that I would need a phone-appointment as I could not come to the City, and the receptionist said" No problem at all , a lot of our clients have that issue, let me set up a phone time"..... 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?I am 100% free from symptoms when in areas with no WIFI and, Magnesium supplements, BLUSHIELD devices help against home wifi signals, methylene blue blue in emergencies is magic-and homeopathy for EMF seems to help as well although I am skeptical....but it helps so I keep using it... these are all things that help after overexposure. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information:I have been self diagnosing and collecting data and receently collating with AI I can share that data if needed - how do i do that Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's:Help me please- B1a. Sources you experience as causing you Adverse Effects:Cell phone and multiple cell phones ( bus, concert , airplane), WIFI router, "Small Cell " radiators on telephone poles, Cell towers B1b. Sources you can sense, but don't seem to harm you:ELF waves I cannot sense and don't seem to harm me that I can see, but the dtat seems to say that there are effects B1c. Sources you can use without sensing or being harmed:Cell phone I use briefly- then turn back on airplane mode- short exposure seems OK. B1d. Sources that seem to provide benefit (i.e., electrotherapy):see above B2a. Health conditions you think may contribute to your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless:see above B2b. Health conditions you don't necessarily associate with your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless, but might be relevant:n/a B3a. That you recommend, as they helped you tolerate or recover from EMF exposure:see above B3b. That you recommend, but you’re not positive that they help:Acupuncture, "brain fire" herbal tea, also bio energetic allergy treatments seemed to make me more resilient, silver -lined blankets and hats seem to reduce some of the effects ( ie in a ferry line up in a beam , the blanket shows a large reduction in the RF , B3e. Treatments that made your sensitivity worse:55-64 B4. What is your age range?55-64 B5. What year did you become aware of your sensitivity to wireless radiation or electromagnetic fields?2012 but symptoms started around 2002 B6. What country, state, province, or major city were you living in when you first noticed your sensitivity to wireless or electromagnetic fields?British Columbia Canada

On behalf of the EFEIA Institute (Miami, Florida), I submit our organization's attached public comment, evidence summary and supporting proposal in response to HHS Request for Information, Docket No. HHS-OASH-2026-0397. This comment represents the perspective of a research entity. The attachments are an evidence summary and a national plan proposal, both prepared by EFEIA in October 2026. Disclosure: the undersigned is also founder and CTO of NOXTAK Corporation, which develops SPIRO electromagnetic-hygiene products; one source both documents cite evaluates SPIRO in two vehicles, and the 180 cases they describe were received by NOXTAK. A modern vehicle places traction batteries and power electronics alongside cellular modems, onboard hotspots, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, ultra-wideband access systems, V2X equipment and radar, including interior radar in the 57 to 64 GHz band for child presence detection and road radar at 76 to 81 GHz, in a small occupied cabin used for repeated daily journeys by children, pregnant women, older adults, professional drivers and people with implanted devices. U.S. drivers spend about an hour a day at the wheel. National campaigns in Germany and Switzerland found low average fields with brief magnetic-field peaks, highest at the feet; in the German federal campaign, the reference values of the 1999 EU Council Recommendation were exceeded locally or briefly in all vehicles but one, while basic restrictions were never exceeded. Existing methods cover parts of this picture: IEC 62764-1 measures low-frequency magnetic fields from 1 Hz to 100 kHz and excludes intentionally transmitting antennas, UN Regulation No. 10 addresses electromagnetic compatibility, and FCC rules address RF exposure from mobile and portable devices and provide for multiple sources. No method yet connects the full installed source inventory, the occupied cabin, and the fields and absorbed energy in each occupant. The 2023 study funded by the Swiss Federal Office of Energy acknowledged temporal and spatial gaps that could have missed short events or the highest field values, and EFEIA's own study of two Tesla Model Y vehicles used instruments limited to frequencies below 6 GHz, which cannot capture 60 GHz or 76 to 81 GHz systems. NOXTAK has received 180 cases of people who attribute symptoms to electric vehicle use and sought help; both documents treat this as an author-reported case count, not a prevalence estimate, and propose a registry and clinical pathway to examine it. We urge HHS to support a coordinated 24-month national program with independent laboratory participation and an independent scientific steering process: a reproducible whole-cabin measurement protocol covering every installed band; a version-controlled library of real driving, charging and connectivity scenarios; a validated occupant dosimetry atlas with child, pregnant and adult anatomical models; a consented symptom registry and staged clinical research below established thermal thresholds; a technology-neutral method for evaluating mitigation claims; and recommendations for a whole-vehicle evidence requirement with change control and a complaint reporting channel. HHS and its research agencies would guide the health evidence, with DOT and NHTSA on vehicle integration and transportation safety, the FCC on RF equipment and exposure requirements, and NIST, universities and independent laboratories on measurement traceability. This comment responds to questions 4(k), 4(l), 4(m), 5(n), 5(o), 5(p), 7, 8, 9, 10(a), 10(f), 11(a) to 11(f), 12, 13(i), 16, 17 and 18. The attachments are the Additional 4 summary and the national plan that corresponds to it: - Additional 4 summary: Modern Vehicles as Occupied Electromagnetic Environments: Measuring What Reaches the Person in the Seat (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23541753). - Additional 4, National Plan: National Plan for Electromagnetic Biocompatibility in Modern Vehicles: A proposal for whole-vehicle exposure assessment, occupant dosimetry and regulatory development (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23541733). Please accept and consider all attached documents, the Additional 4 summary and the National Plan, as part of the public record. Respectfully, J. Joaquín Machado EMR Researcher and Director of the EFEIA Institute

1. & 2. I am responding as: an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)All RFs, Wi-Fi, cell phones, cell tower, smart anything 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):Reactive for nearly six years. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:Full body weakness, fatigue, post exertional malaise, brain inflammation, heart irregularity, Sensitivity in parts of body. Eye sensitivity, tinitus. 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:Gradually came on through multiple exposures for years, and then suddenly tipped into EHS over the course of a week. Using cell phone a lot and texting a lot because in bed with concussion 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?Yes, treated by integrative MD. Diagnosed as EHS, MCS, Lyme/Bartonella, Mold, POTs,orthostatic hypotension, post concussion syndrome 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?Eliminated exposure almost completely at home. Building remediated. Very little public exposure, just errands. The longer away, the less sensitive I became. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information:no Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's:Underlying conditions of mold, head injury and Lyme are common causalities of EHS along with exposure to RFs.

To US HHS and. Robert Kennedy Jr Dear Robert As a fellow Irishman I feel I know you. I first came across you giving a speech in Berlin summer 2000, "this is a bit more like it" I thought at the time. I was in France, organising a 5G demonstration in Lyons with Collectif 1815. My Grandfather is a Hero of Ireland having fought in the Easter Rising, then the Tan war. My Godfather is probably the 3rd most famous terrorist in the world, after Anders Brevik and Osama Bin Ladin. But Brendan Behan is known as a playwrite and novelist, not as an IRA man. But would either of these ancestors have bothered had they known that within a few decades of their courageous acts the entire world would be poisoned by toxic microwaves? Microwaves are toxic, they have always been toxic, they have never not been toxic. Microwaves toxicity is not new. But tell someone today and they will laugh in your face I have carried our surveys recently. Microwave toxicity is a thought that cannot be thought today. The best work on this is Stenek The Microwave Debate (MIT Press) and Paul Brodeur The Zapping of America (from 1977) I see many excellent contributions From Collas Diallis Collectif 1815 From Einar Flydal from Norway From Radiation Research UK From Camilla Rees (USA) To that I have little to add so I will not take your time nor load you with even more copy Just Robert is welcome here anytime I live in a cabin in west Sweden with no electricity and very low microwaves by contemporary standards, no water, cand heating is by a Norwegian wood oven. Many of us live like this, or try to! Such places are hard to find. It is bliss compared to a flat in the city. To me such places are like pig styes. C'mon over Robert, but you do the cooking! I have seen a few videos from Robert guiding people to make more healthy food. One more thing It is really happening And no one will belive it, I know this as I have tried Below sould be a Lancet Publication from Karolinska, Anna Johansson. It shows Cancer rates significant increase over the last 20 years. from the time 3G was introduced to just the time 5 G was being rolled out. Cancer rises significantly moreover the age of presentation reduces significantly. The Aging Population is a thing if the past. Anna's paper shows exactly what you would expect from microwave Carcinogenicity. following the rollout of microwave based technologies, which are not just the phones. It behøves HHS to conduct future studies to look at the effects post 5G rollout and AMS rollout. One night expect a comparatively enormous rise in cancer. From measurmenrs I have personally taken, 5G gives signal strength 100X greater than the signal pre 5G. Thank you Dr Stephen McGill BA(høns)(cantab) PhD (cantab)

Countless scientific studies on the impacts to humans and nature of Electromagnetic Fields, RF and Wireless Radiation exposure have proven the harmful effects and long term dangers that must now be address and rectified. As we face every more increasing radiation and the potential increases that AI and data center usage brings to the table, we must pause and give voice to the personal, environmental, societal, and even spiritual costs that we incur. Please consider the health and stability of all humanity and nature.