All comment threads

It's is 100 percent killing me. Migraines, muscle aches, brain fog, ringing in the ears, sleep problems. As they raise the frequency my symptoms get worse. I am barely surviving in a 5g environment. 6G will kill me in 2030.

Please review my website at www.no5gforhumanity.com. While it has not been updated since it was launched it provides a benchmark for this discussion. In addition please reference a book I co-authored 'The Energy Connection' published by lulu.com. All that exists on this planet is 'Energy, frequency and vibration' Nikola Tesla. All of these frequencies cause shifts in life's programming. Thank you! Richard Jackman ncsolutions111@gmail.com

Life has become a horrific nightmare since 5g went live. I had issues from 4g that apparently dominated my adult life causing dozens of er visits and hundreds of doctors visits. 5g has been an entirely different animal. I am very nearly dead now and went from working 50hrs a week taking care of 10 schools to essentially disabled and haven't held a job since. Worked my entire adult life until this 5g happened. It gets worse and worse and I'm pretty well faced with suicide at this point and it's looking like the most likely outcome. It's absolutely CLEAR covid was tied to this as is the materials being released into our air via jets. It's completely unconciable this was even considered by those who decided to engineer things to allow such pervasive and intense rf exposure. This 5g bullshit has absolutely ruined my life beyond repair. There's nowhere to run and hide. It has caused considerable suffering for my kid and I've watched it destroy the health of those around me. Hurry up and act on this and shut this crap off!!!

The military and other organizations MK ultra style CIA department of Homeland security doj are using experimental radio frequencies microwave weapons synthetic telepathy and BCI brain computer interference radiation to torture Americans even children the technology can be your mind your thoughts change your emotions make you angry and they're also using satellite and towers they're dumping tons of radiation low electric magnetic frequencies into our brains and analyzing us I have been to the doctor at Burns been sick and I'm tired of the torture I tried attaching some files to show what they're doing to our brains the people in The doj employees were recognized but the civilians were not recognized for Havana and we need to change this there needs to be lost to stop this MK ultra never ended we are being slow kills I have a non-profit with over 20,000 members who could offer evidence the military is using the government is using nanotechnology and graphene just coming from the airplanes that they're dumping all that fuel and all that metal is going into our body and they are attacking us through that

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

Question 2 — Perspective I am responding as an individual consumer with personal experience that I believe may be relevant to the evaluation of RF/EMF exposure and potential health effects. Question 3 — Personal experience I have experienced what I perceive to be sensitivity to RF/wireless environments, particularly Wi-Fi and environments with multiple wireless devices. My experience has been that prolonged exposure to Wi-Fi or other wireless environments is sometimes followed by significant fatigue and brain fog. In some situations, I notice symptoms after approximately two hours of exposure. I have also noticed more immediate symptoms in certain higher-wireless environments. For example, when riding inside a Tesla vehicle, I have experienced a headache after approximately 15 minutes. I have also experienced headaches when sitting relatively close to an active Wi-Fi access point. In an office environment with numerous wireless and electronic devices, I have sometimes experienced substantial fatigue and brain fog toward the end of the workday. I have noticed that these experiences are less pronounced when I can reduce my exposure to wireless sources. I recognize that these observations are personal experiences and do not, by themselves, establish that RF/EMF exposure caused the symptoms. Other factors could potentially contribute to fatigue, headaches, or cognitive symptoms. However, the recurring relationship I have personally observed between particular wireless environments and the onset of symptoms is significant enough to me that I believe it warrants further scientific investigation. I believe research should examine not only short-term exposure and average exposure levels, but also the effects of prolonged, repeated, and cumulative exposure in real-world environments. Question 8 — Exposure assessment I believe additional research is needed to determine whether current methods of assessing RF exposure adequately represent real-world individual exposure. A person's exposure can vary substantially depending on distance from the source, duration of exposure, number of wireless sources operating simultaneously, signal strength, modulation characteristics, and whether the individual is in a vehicle, workplace, home, or other enclosed environment. Research should investigate whether measurements based primarily on population averages or compliance testing adequately capture the exposure experienced by individuals who spend many hours in environments containing multiple wireless devices. Question 9 — Information disclosed to consumers Consumers should have access to clear and easily understandable information about wireless devices and environments, including operating frequencies, maximum and typical transmitted power, exposure characteristics, recommended separation distances, SAR where applicable, and information about simultaneous or cumulative exposure from multiple wireless sources. Consumers should also be able to make informed choices between wired and wireless connectivity where practical. For example, information about Wi-Fi access points, wireless-enabled appliances, smart-home devices, and other RF-emitting equipment would help consumers understand their potential exposure and make choices appropriate for their circumstances. Question 13(c) — Wi-Fi I recommend additional research specifically examining Wi-Fi exposure under realistic residential and workplace conditions, including prolonged exposure, proximity to access points, multiple access points operating simultaneously, multiple devices communicating concurrently, and cumulative exposure over many hours. Research should also examine whether individual responses to Wi-Fi exposure vary substantially and whether there are identifiable characteristics of individuals who report symptoms in proximity to wireless sources. Question 16 — Research priorities I believe research priorities should include: 1. Long-term and cumulative RF/EMF exposure rather than only short-duration exposure. 2. Real-world exposure measurement rather than relying solely on laboratory or compliance conditions. 3. Individual variability in reported responses to RF/EMF exposure. 4. Exposure to multiple RF sources simultaneously. 5. The relationship between distance from a wireless source and reported symptoms. 6. The relationship between duration of exposure and reported symptoms. 7. Objective, reproducible methods for studying individuals who report symptoms associated with wireless exposure. 8. Research that can distinguish RF/EMF-related effects from other potential causes of symptoms such as noise, lighting, temperature, stress, sleep deprivation, or other environmental factors.

Dear friends, I am strongly reactive to EMFs and urge caution and regulation to protect the public from the health effects of this pervasive pollution. This topic is not adequately studied; please err on the side of caution here. Unfortunately it seems that most if not all regulatory agencies are more interested in "progress" or pleasing the corporations they should be restricting than in sickening or killing off the population. By the way, you are not personally exempt. You are being affected too.

We overall as a family feel sluggish and low energy went in our home. In Connecticut we had a smaller house and so all computers were hardwired into cable. In our new house in North Carolina, which is much bigger everything is Wi-Fi. Part of my dilemma is trusting what devices or what EMF protective-ware, blankets etc. are really helpful. You can really go down to rabbit hole spending a lot of money. I’d like some real third-party testing or government guidelines on how to protect ourselves from EMFs

I am a single woman living in a suburb with 37 cell towers within a 2 mile radius of my home. In addition, there are two transmission lines, and all of them are blasting me with electromagnetic radiation. 24/7. My phone app tells me that I am in a dangerous area with high levels of harm from the radiation. None of these were here when I moved to my home. In addition, children’s schools have had huge, tall, cell towers constructed right close to the schools, causing harm from radiation to our precious children. I have been having balance issues, foggy thinking, memory problems, and a feeling of dullness in my head. I think it’s criminal that we are being bombarded with this radiation. No one asked us if we wanted these towers blasting us constantly. On top of that, I have to watch the planes, dropping all of their nano particles, heavy metals, poisonous chemicals of all kinds, biological weapons, polluting our water, polluting our crops, falling on our bodies and being inhaled into our lungs. If our government cannot see the harm in all of this, then we citizens need to wake up and do something about it.