HHS EMFTHE PUBLIC COMMENT FORUM
The people. The questions. The public record.An independent RF Safe project
Forum index › All threadsLatest posting day

THE LATEST SUBMISSIONS

All comment threads

7067 original comments · Newest first

Browse topics
Read full comments below. More load as you scroll.
Posted 2026-10-09#2168 · Permanent link ↗

Describes sensations and sleep disturbance attributed to phones, Wi-Fi and a modem battery, reliance on w…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I have a flip phone that I use only in emergencies. I depend on landline because whenever I use a cell phone for any length of time a burning feeling of pins and needles crawls up my arm. I have computer attached by wire from modem. Wifi disturbs my sleep. The cable company was going to attach a battery pack to the modem, in order to ensure service when electrical service is disrupted. Within 20 minutes I was shaking, despite sitting over 15 feet away. Fortunately the workman was able to quickly return and remove it. The feeling stopped. I have no idea why the installation of the battery pack would cause this. We look at the physical and chemical aspects of the body. We need to start looking at the energetic/electrical as well.
Posted 2026-10-09#2167 · Permanent link ↗

Attributes bee deaths, humming and anxiety to 5G and describes shielding and travel to seek relief.

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
All the bees died when 5 g was put in in our small town. We all had to buy new bees for hives. I can hear constant high pitched humming and I finally had to buy silver infused clothes and blankets. Sometimes have to go to 9000 ft or higher to get away from it when it makes me too anxious.
Posted 2026-10-09#2166 · Permanent link ↗

Reports tinnitus and bee decline after tower installation, questions siting near children and claims DNA …

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
https://bioinitiative.org/ Why are towers always placed by schools and parks? The bee population around my neighborhood has declined and there is a shocking amount dead bees. Tinnitus started when several towers were place around the neighborhood. Honestly, how can anyone claim these towers are safe. The exposure is detrimental to our DNA.
Posted 2026-10-09#2165 · Permanent link ↗

Reports altered wrist sensations with a wearable tracker and asks that wearables be examined.

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I think it is extremely important what you are doing and to look into wearables as well things like health tracking wrist bands and smart watches, I notice a marked change in sensation in my wrist when I have a wearable health tracker on.
Posted 2026-10-09#2164 · Permanent link ↗

Proposes analysis of historical zoo pathology records alongside reconstructed exposures, while acknowledg…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Perspective: Member of the public and parent. Responding to Questions 10, 11, 16, and 18: historical animal pathology records as an overlooked data source. I ask HHS to examine a long-running record that, to my knowledge, has never been studied for its relevance to electromagnetic exposure: the autopsy archive of the Philadelphia Zoological Garden. The zoo's Laboratory of Comparative Pathology (later the Penrose Research Laboratory) was founded in 1901. From 1916 to 1964, directors Herbert Fox and Herbert L. Ratcliffe kept complete autopsy records on more than 13,000 mammals and birds. Their published reviews describe a striking change: - In 1923, Fox described arterial lesions as "exceedingly rare," found in under 2% of autopsies. By 1964, arteriosclerosis was found in about 25% of mammals and 35% of birds. - No coronary artery disease appears in the records before 1945. The first heart attacks were recorded in 1955. By 1963, over 90% of mammals and 72% of birds that died had coronary disease. Heart attacks had struck 24% of the mammals and 10% of the birds, often young animals. - A 1959 Penrose report compared 1901-1934 with 1935-1955. Malignant tumors rose 2- to 20-fold across nine mammal families, and benign tumors rose even more. Among 7,286 birds, malignant tumors rose 2.5-fold and benign tumors 8-fold. - The changes spanned 45 families of mammals and 65 families of birds. The investigators considered the usual explanations. Diets were improved in 1935 and then held constant through 1964, yet coronary disease emerged only after 1945. Population density and exercise were reported as stable. Ratcliffe suggested social stress from breeding programs begun in 1940. That cannot explain the arterial disease of the 1930s, or the continued rise in animals that were not being bred. Similar rates were later reported at the London Zoo (1960) and the Antwerp Zoo (1962). I learned of these records from Arthur Firstenberg's book The Invisible Rainbow. Firstenberg notes that this period coincides with rapid electrification and, after World War II, a large rise in environmental radiofrequency radiation from radar, broadcasting, and industrial RF equipment. The records contain no exposure measurements, and I am not claiming they prove a cause. But they are a rare, consistent, multi-species dataset covering decades in which diet, crowding, and activity were reasonably stable. The main explanation offered at the time does not fit the data. Captive animals do not change their own habits, which makes them valuable sentinels. Two broader points. First, any population shows a spectrum of responses to an environmental factor. Even if the median person and above notice little effect from RF exposure, safety standards should be built with the most sensitive people in mind, not the average. A limit that protects the typical adult may not protect the bottom quartile. Second, exposure drops off sharply with distance from the source, so simple awareness goes a long way. Turning off Wi-Fi at night, or simply not keeping a router two feet from your bed, is not Luddite thinking. It is a reasonable, no-cost precaution that most people have never heard of. My requests: 1. (Q16) Fund a re-analysis of the Philadelphia Zoo pathology archive and comparable long-term zoo and veterinary records. Pair it with historical reconstruction of local electrical and RF exposure, such as power distribution and nearby broadcast and radar installations. 2. (Q10) Treat zoo and wildlife pathology programs as a standing sentinel surveillance system for environmental exposures, including RF, with exposure monitoring at those sites. 3. (Q11) Because the disease in these records so often struck young animals, give particular attention to children's cumulative exposure as wireless devices multiply in homes and schools. 4. (Q9, Q11) Publish plain-language public guidance on reducing exposure through distance and nighttime habits, and make sure exposure standards account for the most sensitive members of the population, not just the average. References: Fox H. Disease in Captive Wild Mammals and Birds. Lippincott, 1923. Ratcliffe HL, Cronin MTI. Changing frequency of arteriosclerosis in mammals and birds at the Philadelphia Zoological Garden. Circulation 1958;18:41-52. Ratcliffe HL, Yerasimides TG, Elliott GA. Changes in the character and location of arterial lesions in mammals and birds in the Philadelphia Zoological Garden. Circulation 1960;21:730-38. Lombard LS, Witte EJ. Frequency and types of tumors in mammals and birds of the Philadelphia Zoological Gardens. Cancer Research 1959;19(2):127-41. Firstenberg A. The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life. Chelsea Green, 2020.
Posted 2026-10-09#2163 · Permanent link ↗

Calls for expert scientific input rather than public opinions.

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I think you should talk to scientists about this and not ask random fucking people about it. This is screaming that dumbfuck "5G was used to spread covid" conspiracy we had to deal with in 2020. The average person knows nothing about the subject matters this form is asking for opinions on. Hell most people don't even have a basic understanding of how wifi work. Leave it to the professionals.
Posted 2026-10-09#2162 · Permanent link ↗

Reports personal RF readings near a former home and requests greater separation between towers and occupi…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
We used to live 1,000+/- ft from a cell tower in 15071. My RF meter measured it unsafe on our back deck, and even in our bedroom, with the wall at the back of the house. It the unsafe levels are accurate, we should not have towers this close to houses and buildings where people or animals live and work. Period. I always worry about the families who live in the 15+ houses that stand between our old townhouse and the tower!
Posted 2026-10-09#2161 · Permanent link ↗

Reports headaches after a meter replacement and objects to opt-out fees, lack of consent and privacy impl…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
My comment is to address the RF transmitting from my home's electricity meter. The meter was switched without my approval or knowledge, the meter is located outside my bedroom about 3 meters from my bed and where I rest my head. I have had headaches ever sine it was installed and when I contact Pennsylvania PPL to return to a standard meter I was told I would need to pay an additional fee. This is unacceptable in many ways, primarily my health; next is my consent and next is my privacy. This violates many of my constitutional rights moreover. Thank you for allowing me to comment.

10 comments displayed. More load as you scroll.

These are separate official submissions grouped by topic. A comment can appear in more than one board.