HHS EMFTHE PUBLIC COMMENT FORUM
The people. The questions. The public record.An independent RF Safe project
Forum index › All threadsLatest posting day

THE LATEST SUBMISSIONS

All comment threads

7067 original comments · Newest first

Browse topics
Read full comments below. More load as you scroll.
Posted 2026-10-13#2378 · Permanent link ↗

Questions the rationale for the inquiry and argues that other health issues deserve attention.

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
This is a joke, right? We are wasting time on conspiracy theories that have no basis for anyone to entertain that has a basic grasp of physics? There are many, many real health issues in our modern society, and this is not one of them.
Posted 2026-10-13#2376 · Permanent link ↗

Following hospitalization for anemia, asks about possible effects of nearby towers on blood and requests …

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Earlier this year, I was hospitalized for life-threatening anemia. I realize there are many causes for anemia but I read that it is increasing among both genders and all age groups. I live less than half a mile away from a 5g tower and am surrounded by 3 of them at work. Is there research available regarding the effects of EMF on the blood? As you probably know, anemia can become a serious health issue and a difficult one to treat. Is there research available regarding the effects of EMF on the blood and cans it contribute to anemia? I feel strongly that more research is needed in this area. Thank you.
Posted 2026-10-13#2375 · Permanent link ↗

A retired chiropractor offers mineral-based materials intended to modify EMF interactions with biology an…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Dear Secretary Kennedy, My name is Dr. Michael Halliday. After 45 years in chiropractic practice, I recently retired from clinical work, but not from what has been a major focus of my life: developing natural approaches and technologies intended to protect and improve human health. I have followed your decision to examine the potential health effects of electromagnetic fields with great interest. For more than 20 years, I have been working on this very problem — but particularly on the part of the discussion that I believe receives too little attention: What can we actually do about it? My work began with water and frequency-based technologies and later developed into mineral-based materials designed to mitigate the biological effects associated with EMF, Wi-Fi and, more recently, 5G exposure. Rather than attempting to block electromagnetic signals, our approach is designed to modify their interaction with the biological environment. We have developed applications for plastics, paints, textiles, mobile phones and other products, and have conducted blood-based testing that I would be pleased to share with your scientific team. I have also spent years investigating what I describe as “electrosmog,” including the possibility that electromagnetic environments may influence water and, consequently, biological systems. I am not writing simply to identify another potential problem. I am writing because I believe we have practical solutions worth investigating. The technology exists. We have developed it, tested it, and can demonstrate it. I would greatly appreciate the opportunity for a brief conversation with you or the appropriate members of your HHS team. Rather than trying to explain decades of work in a letter, I would prefer to present the technology, the observations behind it, the testing performed to date, and allow your experts to evaluate it independently. Additional information about our work is available at protxs.com. Thank you for your work on this important subject. I would welcome the opportunity to contribute. Respectfully yours, in health, Dr. Michael Halliday -- Dr. Michael Halliday Founder 616-881-6453 drmike@protxs.com
Posted 2026-10-13#2374 · Permanent link ↗

Calls for prohibiting alleged remote-neurology torture and favors alternatives to 5G.

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Remote neurology (especially since being secret from the people for decades) should be classified as an illegal domestic torture program (or non domestic if it’s from Isreal) As far as the useful utility from wireless transmissions, there are safer ways than 5G (which used to be a weapon and now recycled for the people to use for utility)
Posted 2026-10-13#2373 · Permanent link ↗

Cites The Invisible Rainbow to argue that widespread electrical exposure harms health and objects to expo…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life by Arthur Firstenberg is a book that traces the history of electricity and its impact on health - nearly always detrimental, especially to mitochondrial function, which causes a variety of serious diseases, including heart disease, diabetes, and cancer, among others. YOU ARE KILLING AMERICANS with this onslaught of electricity everywhere without consent from those harmed. Turn back from this wrongdoing. WE OBJECT!
Posted 2026-10-13#2372 · Permanent link ↗

Questions HHS leadership’s scientific qualifications and the motivation for the inquiry.

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
The fact that the person in charge of HHS isn't a doctor or a scientist means that this question is not done with an honest interest in the science. Perhaps RFK should, who is the poster child for the Dunning-Kruger effect should understand that he's unqualified to speak on any topic of merit.
Posted 2026-10-13#2370 · Permanent link ↗

An internal-medicine physician describes sleep and fatigue symptoms attributed to wireless exposure, reli…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am a practicing Internal Medicine physician with roughly 10 years' experience treating adult patients using "Integrative" strategies, ie, specific biologically precise strategies which fundamentally address the root causes of chronic illness. I also personally suffer from chronic illness, thus providing the opportunity to experience the results of many, if not all, of the strategies I employ. Roughly 10 years ago, I became aware of the possibility that I was personally being affected by wireless (ie, RF/EMF) radiation exposure in my own household. Specifically, it was suggested to me by my health coach that my difficulty sleeping (for the previous 5-6 years) might be due to RF/EMF exposure, at that time cell phones not powered off at night plus WiFi router exposure, both at my office as well as at night in my home. I somewhat skeptically agreed to a trial of powering off cell phones and WiFi router at night, and my sleep immediately improved dramatically enough for me to conclude clinically that the improvement was very likely due to this removal of RF/EMF exposure. We eventually permanently eliminated the WiFi router and hard-wired our house with internet cabling, along with powering off our cell phones at night. I also keep my personal cell phone on airplane mode continuously during the day, establishing connectivity only to receive and read texts. I don’t use my cell phone for calls at all. This has resulted in our home becoming a relatively “safe haven” for me from an RF/EMF perspective. In fact, I use only a landline in my home office to make calls, doing most of my clinical work from home, and go to my medical office only to see patients, maybe an hour or two a day. My medical office, even though also hard-wired to minimize RF/EMF, has EMF levels (ie, density) from 700 to 1500 microwatts per meter squared, presumably from wireless devices in adjoining tenants’ offices and perhaps from nearby cell towers and I typically experience difficulty sleeping if I’ve spent three or more hours in my office. I have done extensive RF/EMF measurements throughout various parts of my city, most of which have EMF density levels of at least 500, and often up to 2500 microwatts per meter squared. When I have prolonged exposure to an environment with these higher densities, such as my place of worship which reads 2000 to 3000 microwatts per meter squared, I always experience increased difficulty sleeping, along with increased daytime fatigue for the next two days. Perhaps an experience I had very early in the process of discovering my own reactions to wireless radiation will be helpful. I was attending a neighborhood meeting located on the top floor of a tall apartment building, roughly 20 stories tall. As participants got seated, the middle-aged woman next to me said that she was sensitive to RF/EMF, and that on the roof of this building (right above us) were situated an array of wireless antennae. She then proceeded to pull out an EMF meter to show me the readings, which were very high. In fact, she told me that she would need to leave the meeting before its conclusion to avoid excessive EMF exposure, which she did after thirty or forty minutes. I had never knowingly had this level of exposure, and was feeling no particular symptoms, so I attended the remainder of the two-hour meeting. Within a day or so, I felt exhausted, and it took another 3-4 days to fully recover. Surprisingly to me at the time, I began to notice similar symptoms whenever I was again exposed to excessive RF/EMF radiation. Clinically, it was behaving in a way familiar to any practicing physician; namely, now that my system had sustained injury, the injured system was more susceptible to that same type of injury. What follows is an explanation of how this process occurs on a microscopic level, with both a link to full explanation, as well as sound byte-style quick summary: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2023/07/09/electromagnetic-fields-harmful-effects.aspx • Exposure to microwave EMFs, like cellphones, causes massive mitochondrial dysfunction due to damage done by free radicals from peroxynitrite that also cause single and double stranded breaks in your DNA Excessive free radicals triggered by low-frequency microwave exposure from cellphones and Wi-Fi networks have been linked to chronic diseases such as cardiac arrhythmias, anxiety, depression, autism, Alzheimer’s and infertility Excessive calcium signaling produced by EMF exposures also has important roles in producing pathophysiological effects of EMFs including each of the effects listed above In summary, exposure to nearly ubiquitous RF/EMF radiation has nearly confined me to my own home, essentially imposing upon me excessive fatigue whenever I venture out to the community at large.
Posted 2026-10-13#2369 · Permanent link ↗

A breast-cancer survivor reports improved sleep after switching off household wireless systems and reques…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am submitting this comment as someone concerned about the health effects of wireless radiation as well as the effects on the environment. Please review the current state of biological science and create protective standards I have been personally affected by wireless radiation, as I have now had Breast cancer twice and was looking for all avenues to improve my health upon recovery from surgery. I would not sleep well with the wireless on in the house, and turned off all the cells and was looking for other things to do to elimate as much as I can, since I want to continue to live a long life. I contacted an electrician and he installed a switch in my bedroom to turn all the internet systems off right by the bed. Since then I am sleeping much more soundly and feeling more rejuvinated from it. I hope that HHS will use this opportunity to create a comprehensive report on the current medical, biological, and public health knowledge regarding these effects and take action on that. Please consider what I have experienced and review the current state of affairs of the system. I know there can be improvements.

10 comments displayed. More load as you scroll.

These are separate official submissions grouped by topic. A comment can appear in more than one board.