HHS EMFTHE PUBLIC COMMENT FORUM
The people. The questions. The public record.An independent RF Safe project
Forum index › All threadsLatest posting day

THE LATEST SUBMISSIONS

All comment threads

7067 original comments · Newest first

Browse topics
Read full comments below. More load as you scroll.
Posted 2026-10-14#3008 · Permanent link ↗

Raises concerns about towers near homes and schools and continuous household exposure, requests independe…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I have a deep concern about all the towers going up, close to homes and schools. We have no idea the long term affects all the EMFs are causing because they put them up without ever doing long- term studies. However, we do know that children exposed to the high frequencies have gotten sick from headaches to cancers. We know that high exposure to EMFs causes a lifetime of chronic illness, many problems we don’t even know about yet. Cell phones, towers, smart meters…all have so many potential deadly outcomes. I make sure our family is as protected as we can be, with paying attention to WiFi and placement of routers and our ways to mitigate. But it feels like a battle I will never win when we are bombarded 24 hours a day. Please put the brakes on EMFs and do some quality studies, not by companies who benefit.
Posted 2026-10-14#3007 · Permanent link ↗

Attributes a teacher’s disability to classroom wireless exposure, describes home confinement and denial o…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
My husband was disabled from wi-fi 2 years ago when his job (public teaching) put in so many wireless devices in his classroom that he his system was overwhelmed by the toxicity. He had to flee the city for 5 days as even basic electricity was making him extremely sick. These cases are well documented and there is NO doubt that it is Wi-fi and EMR that is causing this. He is now home bound and can only leave the house for a very short amount of time before the cell towers around town make him extremely sick. PLEASE, HHS, put restrictions on EMR exposure before this happens to more people. Make actual safety guidelines that companies, cities, neighborhoods, etc have to abide by to protect people from this harmful toxin. The federal government denied my husband's disability request because you people don't know this is a real condition yet. Please get informed! This condition is well documented! There is no excuse for remaining willfully ignorant.
Posted 2026-10-14#3006 · Permanent link ↗

Reports persistent family illness after moving opposite a tower and requests inspection following additio…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I live right across the road from a so called phone tower, but my husband, my son, and I are always feeling sick, ever since we moved here 4 years ago. Right outside pyatt Arkansas. I noticed they added more to the tower. I would like for someone to come out and check this tower please. There is a man that lives right next to the tower as well. Thank you, Lisalive right across the road from a so called phone tower, but my husband, my son, and I are always feeling sick, ever since we moved here 4 years ago. Right outside pyatt Arkansas. I noticed they added more to the tower. I would like for someone to come out and check this tower please. There is a man that lives right next to the tower as well. Thank you, Lisa
Posted 2026-10-14#3005 · Permanent link ↗

Objects to proposed residential towers and corporate priority over residents, raises concerns for childre…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Please help us, Americans. We are exposed to what would be illegal levels of radiation, in Europe and other countries. Verizon wants to put "cell" (GWEN) towers,in residential places, among children,etc., and now Berizon is suing the city of Grass Valley, California. Corporations have been given priority over our people! Thank you. -Laura McClary
Posted 2026-10-14#3004 · Permanent link ↗

Reports skin irritation, headaches and sleep disruption around devices, raises questions about neurologic…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Submission to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Regarding: Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure I am submitting this comment to urge the Department of Health and Human Services to expand its review of safety thresholds regarding ambient electromagnetic fields (EMF) and radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure. As wireless networks expand, the public is increasingly exposed to cumulative radiation from consumer devices, cell towers, and commercial infrastructure. My primary concern centers on the need for thorough federal evaluation of how ambient radiation interacts with the human nervous system. Publicly available intellectual property, such as registered patents detailing nervous system manipulation via electromagnetic fields, alongside established military research into directed energy and neuro-technologies, demonstrates that the biological mechanisms for external influence on human physiology exist conceptually and technically. There is a critical need for transparent, civilian public health standards to investigate whether ambient commercial frequencies intersect with these neurological pathways, particularly regarding unintended cognitive or behavioral stress. In my own experience, I have noticed profound physical and behavioral disruptions that correlate with wireless environments. Keeping an active mobile device in close proximity to my body results in localized skin irritation, burning sensations, and rashes. Additionally, I experience persistent headaches and severe sleep disruptions. Ambient electromagnetic signals and visual emissions from household Wi-Fi routers and LED lighting indicators consistently degrade my rest; I experience a noticeable improvement in my sleep depth and cognitive clarity only when these devices are fully powered down or physically covered. Given the complexity of these interactions, I ask that HHS transcend standard thermal tissue heating models. The department should fund independent, transparent research into the neurological and psychological impacts of non-thermal RF exposure, investigate localized exposure risks, and establish clearer public guidelines. Thank you for your attention to these critical public health and regulatory concerns.
Posted 2026-10-14#3003 · Permanent link ↗

Calls for policy grounded in rigorous empirical research and independent systematic reviews and criticize…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am submitting this official comment regarding the Department's Request for Information (RFI) on electromagnetic fields, radiofrequency radiation, and wireless exposure.  The core function of federal health agencies should be to evaluate public health risks strictly through rigorous, empirical, and peer-reviewed scientific consensus. When setting policy or opening inquiries into complex technical domains like wireless radiation, the Department must rely on validated data compiled by actual career scientists, toxicologists, and epidemiologists—not on politicized agendas or fringe medical theories popularized by leadership. Allowing public comment portals to serve as a sounding board for unverified anecdotes, fear-mongering, and pseudoscientific ideas pushed by HHS leadership under Robert F. Kennedy Jr. undermines public trust in federal health institutions. Instead of crowdsourcing health evaluations through an open-door mechanism that risks amplifying conspiracy theories and "crackpot science," the agency should defer entirely to high-standard, independent systematic reviews conducted by recognized scientific bodies (such as the National Institutes of Health, the CDC, and established international health physics organizations). If HHS genuinely intends to evaluate exposure standards, it must anchor its framework in objective, methodologically sound scientific data rather than chasing unsubstantiated narratives. Public policy regarding public health and technology must be driven by verifiable evidence, not administrative panic.
Posted 2026-10-14#3002 · Permanent link ↗

Points out a conflict between the form’s warning against personal information and its mandatory first- an…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Hi, Your form says "Do not submit personally identifiable information through this form. Any personally identifiable information (e.g., name, address, phone number) included in the comment form or in an attachment may be publicly disclosed in a docket or on the Internet (via Regulations.gov, a federal agency website, or a third-party, non-government website with access to publicly-disclosed data on Regulations.gov)" The minimum mandatory fields for response include first name and last name.
Posted 2026-10-14#3001 · Permanent link ↗

Supports the inquiry, expresses concern about dense tower deployment and effects on family and pets, and …

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I absolutely support this request for information as I feel that there are far too many cell towers broadcasting frequencies that are harmful to my health and the health of my family and pets. The fact that we now have cell towers in the midst of our cities every few blocks and every few miles in the countryside is alarming! We need a safer alternative! I find it alarming that so much has been allowed even though it is harmful to our health and well being. I am very interested in knowing ALL of the uses for the towers and the frequencies they are putting out.
Posted 2026-10-14#2999 · Permanent link ↗

Reports disabling pain attributed to nearby antennas, personal devices and neighbors’ Wi-Fi.

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
The excessive wireless around me has ruined my life and causes me terrible and disabling pain. Antennas, but especially the almost permanently connected devices of so many people (they are sending and receiving antennas) Wifi, also from the neighbours the wall of my bed, Bluetooth, etc.

10 comments displayed. More load as you scroll.

These are separate official submissions grouped by topic. A comment can appear in more than one board.