All comment threads

Additional Supporting Documents to add to my Comment submitted previously

As a retired Electrical Engineer, possessing a GROL (Commercial License), issued by the FCC, who has operated three nuclear reactors, and acquired a background in Radiological Controls and Health Physics, in the process of qualifying as a Nuclear Reactor Operator, I could comment, endlessly, on the scientific reasons for my objections to the ever-increasing levels and distribution of Pulsed-Mode Radio Frequency Electro-Magnetic Radiation, as well as give testimony to the negative health effects I have personally experienced from exposure to same, but I would like to focus my comments on my opposition to the Federal Communications Commission, in general and, more specifically, to HR 2289, before the 119th Congress, which would Eliminate Local Authority Over the Communications Infrastructure. To this filing, I plan to attach two documents. The first is a .doc file, in which I express my full comments to the Department of Health and Human Services, concerning Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure, as it pertains to the Federal Communications Commission and to our Founding Documents. The second is a .pdf document, generated by the National Call for Safe Technology, addressing HR 2289, which is being considered by the 119th Congress. Thank you. Dan Medbury

comment in pdf; https://www.regulations.gov/comment/AHRQ-2025-0001-0970 [ July 2025 ] to:  Honorable Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services. Thank you for attempting to bring the federal government to care about the effects of electromagnetic fields and electromagnetic signals upon the health, and well being, and quality of life, of citizens. In July 2025, I participated in your Public Comment period concerning any HHS regulations that need review or change. Please, I welcome your sincere follow up with that. I hope that you have reach out to have a diverse panel of ordinary citizens who reviewed those Public Comments, and developed a report for you as to some (many) issues, in their opinion, where Policy Changes in HHS policies would simply make the U.S. an good a nation as we can be. ----------- Question 2.: I am writing to you in my capacity as one of the (300 to) 500 to 2000 or more complaining victims of the widely alleged illegal U.S. Government program of Ongoing non-consensual human testing, which subjects invididual victims, to day and night, very well-developed, advanced-technology, electromagnetic-signals monitoring and harassment/assault of the human body and brain. The well developed, real time, detailed, brain and full body neurological monitoring is now about 35 old, since about 1990 - 1991 (or perhaps a little earlier). In particular, I am a victim of interactive, day and night, monitoring and harassment for over 36 years. You should understand that because this technology is so detailed, and so well developed, it is likely that the U.S. government possesses the technology to perform measurements of the impact of electromagnetic fields upon at least the human brain and the human neurological system. This is tax-payer paid for technology, and the public, and members of the Public, should benefit from it being used FOR THE GOOD. Further, you should realize that it is likely possible to decode what sorts of electromagnetic fields or electronic signals, would have more interference with a particular human's brain, and neurological system, than other field or signals which would have significantly less interference with each particular, unique, individual human being. Question 5: n. re: Gaps in Knowledge; It is wonderful for HHS to have a Request for Information to attempt to hear from many citizens regarding the adverse effects of EM fields and EM signals upon human health and well being. The government needs to develop very large or even 'Big' data, to better be able to study this matter. 1) there are many breakthroughs in science that come from advances in measurement, and/or the availability of newly advanced measurement and sensing devices.  There needs to be an infrastructure of equipment, and standards/protocols for using such equipment.      2)  very importantly,

*See Attached: Non-thermal Electromagnetic Field studies demonstrating harmful effects.

WiFi frequencies are impacting health of me & friends- We have 6G in our apartment building! -heart flutter balance issues , new cancers please change to a frequency which will harmonize with our body normal frequency! Thank you JS

*See Attached: Non-thermal Electromagnetic Field studies demonstrating harmful effects.

*See Attached: Non-thermal Electromagnetic Field studies demonstrating harmful effects.

*See Attached: Non-thermal Electromagnetic Field studies demonstrating harmful effects.

Make sure you connect with Dafna Tochover [I went to her excellent summit in WV and she has spoken before Israeli and US politicians. make sure you read Olle Johannsson's responce and research or email him at olle.johansson500@gmail.com. Also Magda Havas. https://magdahavas.com/ in canada, and the bioinitiative report. https://bioinitiative.org/

Adverse effects and harm from EMF/wireless tech is not imaginary and "harm", per se, should not be the standard for concern and action. If zero cigarettes is the standard for health and "harm" doesn't result from smoking one or two, then why the double standard on clearly bio-toxic field-effect phenomena? The legacy of cumulative harm from this era of reckless disregard will have your names on it.