HHS EMFTHE PUBLIC COMMENT FORUM
The people. The questions. The public record.An independent RF Safe project
Forum index › TopicsLatest posting day

TOPIC BOARD

Research & federal duties

2151 original comments · Newest first

Browse topics
Read full comments below. More load as you scroll.
Posted 2026-10-24#4224 · Permanent link ↗

The commenter supports HHS evaluation of health experiences and scientific evidence, identification of re…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.
Posted 2026-10-24#4223 · Permanent link ↗

The commenter raises concerns about radiation effects on people and ecosystems, alleges atmospheric and o…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am a concerned human being about the damage wireless and other types of radiation being emitted are doing to the environment and to people and ALL organisms. Plants, insects, and other animals are being negatively affected also. We know that we are all electromagnetic beings with a frequency. Insects navigate their world through frequency and plants do also. I suggest reading the book "The Invisible Rainbow" A History of Electricity and Life by Arthur Firstenberg to learn more on the topic if you are not familiar with this concept. Earth's natural resonance is around 8hz if I am correct. We are now bombarding ourselves with harsh debilitating and damaging frequencies and radiation at levels FAR exceeding that. Now blasting the Earth with radiation from sattelites in space, cell towers near and far, and devices in our hands or pockets 24-7, 365 days a year. Military installations like HAARP in Gakona, Alaska and dozens of others around the world are beaming high frequency transmissions into the ionisphere, disrupting our atmosphere and weather patterns and degrading our protective ozone layer which at this point is only at aboyt 30% of what it should be- thus allowing even more damaging rays of UVB and UVC to reach earth's surface. Rising cancer levels and other neurological diseases are skyrocketing. Trees, plants, humans and animals are being scorched and harmed by these rays. This is FACT not conjecture. Every rocket, bomb or sattelite launched tears yet another hole in the ozone layer. Militaries around the world including that of the USA- MUST be brought under control and these practices HALTED- if we are to have any hope of survival for our own species and that of all the other myriad and wonderful creatures inhabiting Earth. AI and data centers are now yet another threat to the equilibrium of the natural world upon which we ALL depend for LIFE itself and our survival. We are analog beings in an analog world. Humans have been greedy, foolish, selfish stewards of this planet.The race to digital supremacy will be omnicidal for us all. Including innocent plants and animals, sea creatures and insects who have had NO say in any of this. Do we want this to be our legacy?! I know I DON'T. I urge you to PLEASE begin to rein in and put a HALT to these harmful transmissions. Stop being lap dogs for the technology industry. Please do some dilligent and honest research into these matters. The digital age is NOT making things better for the human race or any of the other beings whose home is planet Earth.The lives you save may be your own or that of your families.Thank you for your consideration.
Posted 2026-10-24#4222 · Permanent link ↗

The commenter supports HHS evaluation of health experiences and scientific evidence, identification of re…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a parent. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.
Posted 2026-10-24#4219 · Permanent link ↗

The commenter supports HHS evaluation of health experiences and scientific evidence, identification of re…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.
Posted 2026-10-24#4218 · Permanent link ↗

The commenter attributes headaches, fatigue and other symptoms in both spouses to vehicle wireless system…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am a concerned member of the public. I have experienced headaches and neckaches from wireless radiation while riding in a fully electric car for only a half hour. Additionally, I have experienced the effects of wireless radiation when driving for longer periods of time in new cars that are not fully electric, but have too many EMFs coursing through it via numerous apps, sensors, and features that require WIFI and other EMFs to function. The effects I have experienced include headaches, reduced immune system, core frequency imbalance of my body, and a specific fatigue. Wireless radiation has affected my husband in the same manner. He is also negatively affected by wireless radiation when driving by cell towers and other areas that expose the public to wireless radiation. I fully support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by “uncaptured” federal agencies with appropriate, uncaptured expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should serve as primary evidence and considered alongside the additional, numerous studies and the scientific evidence. Protection from wireless radiation needs to be built into every device that emits the harmful radiation. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these first-hand experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal guidelines and research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard. Kind regards,
Posted 2026-10-24#4217 · Permanent link ↗

The commenter reports a detector spike near a phone, questions daily wireless exposure, and supports HHS …

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public. My EMF detector shows a dramatic spike in activity when held over my phone, which raises concerns about the intensity of wireless emissions that consumers may be exposed to daily. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.
Posted 2026-10-24#4215 · Permanent link ↗

The commenter describes an eye condition and sleep effects considered potentially related to devices, rai…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am a concerned citizen. I have experienced pronto exfoliation in my right eye. One of the studied causes is exposure to cell phones and computers. I also have read foreign studies about EMFs, RF, and Wireless Radiation exposure affecting the body and especially sleep. I have found this true for myself. I have also noticed the effect on my grandchildren and have read studies that it is affecting their brains. We need to as a nation study the effects of these now and not wait any longer. All this technology is nice but comes with a price as it affects our body. I now have a special cover on my phone that minimizes exposure but how many people know to do this. We need to study and inform the public.
Posted 2026-10-24#4213 · Permanent link ↗

The commenter raises concern about infrastructure expansion near schools and densely populated areas and …

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Little is public about the harms from this type of radiation. Yet, industry and the Whitehouse are aggressively expanding infrastructure near schools and other densely populated areas, while dismissing concerns and mounting anecdotal evidence of harm. I urge you all to make this a top priority as well.
Posted 2026-10-24#4212 · Permanent link ↗

The commenter supports HHS evaluation of health experiences and scientific evidence, identification of re…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.
Posted 2026-10-24#4210 · Permanent link ↗

The commenter calls for independent safety testing and accountability for harmful exposures and opposes 6…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
It's unbelievably crazy that dangerous levels of EMF pollution has been allowed to be forced into our lives without proper safety testing through multiple independent (and un-bribable) testing groups. Is the toxic soup we're all bathing in through ever-increasing cellular speeds, wifi, etc.safe for children and adults? It seems as if our government has sold us out to the companies with the deepest pockets, keeping its citizens sick, fat, and dumb on purpose through the hundreds of thousands of toxic chemicals and frequencies that have become ubiquitous in "normal" American lives. It's truly no wonder why we're the most chronically sick nation on the planet. I support any legislation making it illegal (and criminally punishable) for companies, individuals, and our own government to poison our citizens. And so should EVERY lawmaker we elect and every government employee we hire from this point on. It's time to care for the PEOPLE, not the corporatocracy that sacrifices human health and wellness for profit. Just like the fall of Rome, we have lost our way and have allowed psychopaths to control our health. It's time to right these wrongs and put the wellness of our people at the forefront of our political goals and agendas. Anyone, regardless of wealth and stature, who fails to do so should be immediately investigated and held accountable. And absolutely NO 6G unless and until it's determined to be safe for even our most vulnerable children, elders, and those who are sick!

10 comments displayed. More load as you scroll.

These are separate official submissions grouped by topic. A comment can appear in more than one board.