Research & federal duties

Have these things been studied or are people the lab rats yet again

'The MT [Mobile-Telephony] EMFs were significantly more bioactive even for much shorter exposure durations than the other EMFs. Moreover, they were more damaging than previously tested cytotoxic agents like certain chemicals, starvation, dehydration. Individual parameters of the real MT EMFs like intensity, frequency, exposure duration, polarization, pulsing, modulation, are discussed in terms of their role in bioactivity. The crucial parameter for the intense bioactivity seems to be the extreme variability of the polarized MT signals, mainly due to the large unpredictable intensity changes.' https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331661949_Comparing_DNA_Damage_Induced_by_Mobile_Telephony_and_Other_Types_of_Man-Made_Electromagnetic_Fields (Whereas studies that found only benign effects, aledgedly did not use 'Real-Life' MT EMF Variability/Oscillation)

Hello, I am a concerned mother. I believe the HHS must look into wireless radiation exposure to protect our children. Currently, the regulatory oversight on this matter is insufficient to protect the public. We need more information regarding safe doses, along with research on the cumulative effects of wireless radiation exposure. Children are particularly vulnerable to this radiation, yet every school has an iPad in every child's lap. They have WIFI boosters in the halls. We need to know what exactly these EMF waves are doing to our children, what's safe, and how to protect ourselves from harmful exposure.

I really want to know all data collected on these things as they relate to the health of the human body.

I am submitting this comment as a consumer concerned about long-term exposure to wireless radiation from phones, Wi-Fi routers, cell towers, and other connected devices. I urge HHS to conduct a thorough, independent review of whether current exposure limits adequately protect public health. This review needs to consider those most heavily exposed and should examine potential effects beyond tissue heating, including evidence concerning cancer, reproductive health, and children’s development. Please prioritize research that reflects how people actually encounter wireless radiation: repeated exposure over many years, often from multiple sources and devices used close to the body. Assessments should consider signal strength, pulse patterns, duration, and combined exposure. Please consider Melnick and Moskowitz’s 2026 analysis of animal data, which argues that existing exposure limits may inadequately protect against cancer and reproductive harm (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-026-01288-6). I also ask HHS to evaluate Lai and Levitt’s review of exposure intensity, duration, and signal modulation (https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2022.2065683), and Scarato’s review of US regulatory gaps and proposed reforms (https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1677583). These papers warrant careful consideration alongside the broader evidence, including studies that have not found adverse effects. I ask HHS to: •Assess whether additional protections are needed for children, pregnant women, and other potentially vulnerable groups. •Support long-term research with safeguards against industry conflicts of interest. •Provide clear information about exposure and practical ways to reduce it, including wired alternatives in homes and schools. •Recommend updated standards wherever the evidence shows that existing limits are insufficient. Consumers should not have to navigate these questions alone. Please use this inquiry to advance transparent science, meaningful oversight, and public health protection.

Want proper testing to be done to ensure safety… with no release of new technology until confirmed safe

I work in a building directly under a 5G Verizon tower. We are renters and it is literally on the roof above my office. Almost all of my coworkers and myself get brain fog at work that we don’t get at home. My bosses recently hired an independent RF tester who confirmed the levels were unsafe. Our landlord denies this and has sent their lawyers to deal with my bosses. They don’t want to modify the lease to allow us out of it early. This is a pretty big deal for us right now, I guess. I really wish there were more and better reliable studies about how this affects people. I’ve been working here for three years: is Verizon damaging my body?

This is so necessary - no one believes there is any harm from these fields ... Look at the companies who show what is happening to the cells. Also the RF from driving an EV or being near a charging center. EMFsol.com has a comprehensive explanation on their website. Experiments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-aMs0kOitc - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scjF0qyis8A - claims no detrimental effect from a low voltage microwave RF source. FYI: Using the hamonizers from EMGsol.com on my self, in my car around my home, also the techniques of grounding pads, ground sheets, grounding shoes to remove the positive charges of ions. Have an account with an Amish (who are never sick) farm for fresh food, in particular raw milk and pesticide-free meat and vegetables and feel great and supplements from globalhealing.com ... hence no aging/ very healthy. My younger tennis friends in their 40-70's, are experiences many injuries, falls, broken bones, joint replacement rips in tendons (all vaccinated). Not sure if this helps. Good luck with your research and effort in resolving

I can "hear" the end/radio waves (whether it's wifi,5g, high voltage I don't know) in my head at times (probably depends on if I'm distracted or not, like the worst is when I try to go to sleep). I am so confident this is real that I would be willing to prove it in a study.

Yes, I am concerned with all this. I believe that they cause nerve and chronic pain which I have experienced this past year where I lived. I have moved now and my pain has subsided. Please check into that area of how it is affecting us. Thank you, Paula G