Li-Fi, fiber & alternatives

I live in Sweden and I write as an individual from my own experience. About 15 years ago or so, I started having heart problems, skin problems and strong headaches. I was unaware of the base station on the roof opposite, 20 meters from and in level with my home. At that time there was little or no knowledge about what a base station was or looked like. During six years or longer, I began to experience symptoms of sunburn pain in palms, soles of feet and mouth; heart palpitations and irregular heart beats; headaches and head pressure, nerve pain and face rashes, trouble swallowing, blurred vision and then nose bleeds. Unaware of why at the time, symptom decreased when I went away was in large buildings with metal roofs, like offices or malls, with no base stations and at times when there was few visitors. I was diagnosed with heart arythmia and tried antihistamin medication for skin problems but it made no difference. But after moving and having longer distance to base station I began to feel better. Skin rashes and swallowing problems disappeared, arythmia decreased from daily / nightly to a few unregular beats weekly; headaches decreased from every week to about once every second month; nose bleeds decreased from a few every month to once or twice a year. Since then I use cable wired devices with wireless turned off. I think on of the most important things is to get information about using cable wired devices and the "pros and cons". I am glad I got aware of the situation. But of course, I am sometimes worried about the more serious health effects it might have for me living so close to a base station. Some additional information: Bioinitiative.org scientists reviewed around 1 800 studies and summarized that "Chronic base station level exposures can result in illness." And that "Many of these bioeffects can reasonably be presumed to result in adverse health effects if the exposures are prolonged or chronic." (https://bioinitiative.org/conclusions/). In the livingroom sofa and bedroom – where I spent most of my time – the measurements was 10 – 30 microwatts per squaremeter (bedroom) and arund 2 000 microwatts per squaremeter (livingroom sofa). This was in 2017, with a Cornet consumer meter. In other part of the home it was higher. Most likely communication from 3G (2100 MHz and 900 MHz )and 4G (1800 MHz and 2 600 MHz). Comments (links) to some of the quieries: 5. https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec04_2012_Evidence_for_Inadequacy_of_the_Standards.pdf https://iaacn.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/EMF-Sleep-Standards-by-the-Building-Biology-Institute.pdf 5 o: There are already many peer reviewed studies (Bioinitiative, Henry Lai and more), and peoples experiences: "However, maximum attention should be paid methodology, exposure setup and other exposure parameters when new studies programed. More human exposure studies are necessary to clarify the topic." (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891061815000691?via%3Dihub) (https://www.stralskyddsstiftelsen.se/om-oss/var-forskning/ 11. https://bioinitiative.org/conclusions/ 12. https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec04_2012_Evidence_for_Inadequacy_of_the_Standards.pdf https://icbe-emf.org/management-team/erica-mallery-blythe/ https://drive.google.com/file/d/19VyRuDUwuKQCWbH-eqbagGPUi7zNyapZ/view) and https://ehtrust.org/science/wireless-radiation-health-effects/ 14. Environmental Health Trust: https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Radiofrequency-EMFs-and-Effects-to-Wildlife-EHT-Flyer-pdf.pdf

In the beginning of 2021 I began waking up with nusea, slight headache and 'brain fog', felt like i had a 'hangover', except i diddent drink anything. For years before 2021 i had made it a habbit to always turn my wi-fi of at night, cause i would fall asleep much faster without the Wi-Fi on, and wake up feeling a lot better. By 2021, just turning of my Wi-Fi seemed to not be enough anymore, do i shielded my house from a nearby celltower, and quit all wireless stuff in my house.. bluetooth speakers, wireless thermostats etc. I also started using ethernet cables when at home, and installed dirty electricity filters in my house. It helped! I dont wake up with nusea anymore, my migraines are a lot less frequent, and my mood is better in general. Also.. my cat doesnt have flee allergy anymore, and have managed without medications since 2021. Adverse effects related RF-EMF seems to me to be obvious. Proving it should absolutely be possible. Thanx for taking this initiative to let people share their stories. Greetings from Europe.

I dont sleep with the EMF for 4 apartments on the outside of my bedroom wall until i put Orgone pyramid there inside. I wear orgone pendant to harmonize emf to my body. I want all schools and hospitals to use Grounded , hard wiring ways for All computers and for kids ages 5- 18 to be off computers in school!!! And No cell phone towers within 3 miles of schools.,hospitals.

Children's schools should not be located near mobile phone towers or TV towers or electrical transmission power lines. And the powerful Wi-Fi routers often used in schools should not be near any children's desks. California officially issued guidelines advising of mobile phone dangers, warning of increased risk of brain cancer and other health problems, and that children’s developing brains could be at greater risk. The biggest source of RF exposure for most people is using a mobile phone next to the head. You can reduce RF exposure a lot by using the phone's speaker and holding the phone farther away from your head, or using wired headphones say neuro-oncologists & public heath experts. The city council in Berkeley California passed a law that requires retailers to tell consumers how far away their phone should be held. The European Union recommends wired Internet rather than wireless in schools. France also banned WiFi routers in nursery and daycare centers, and restricted elementary school WiFi to only when in use for education. The American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) states in an open letter to school superintendents, “There is a consistent, emerging science that shows people, especially children who are more vulnerable due to developing brains and thinner skulls, are being affected by the increasing exposure to wireless radiation.” In 2021 a New Hampshire report outlined health risks of cell phone towers in residential neighborhoods. Scientific American reported a study of mobile phone exposure and cancer in rats: www.scientificamerican.com/article/major-cell-phone-radiation-study-reignites-cancer-questions/ According to Dr. Joel Moskowitz (UC/Berkeley), "The study's results reinforce the need for more stringent regulation of radiofrequency radiation and better disclosure of the health risks associated with wireless technologies." Dr. Martha Herbert, a Harvard Pediatrician, wrote in this letter to Montgomery County Schools "there are thousands of papers...that document adverse health and neurological impacts of EMF/RFR"..."Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation from wifi and cell towers can exert a disorganizing effect on the ability to learn and remember, and can also be destabilizing to immune and metabolic function"..."Powerful industrial entities have a vested interest in leading the public to believe that EMF/RFR, which we cannot see, taste or touch, is harmless, but this is not true". The American Academy of Pediatrics in 2013 requested a review of EMF radiation emissions from technology devices, citing impact on children. Some schools have reduced WiFi exposure of children: https://ehtrust.org/tag/wifi-in-schools/ https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/school-wifi-networks-could-put-12602188 In 2011 the World Health Organization classified cell phones (and other wireless devices) as a possible carcinogen due to RF emissions. In 2013 Dr. Anthony Miller from University of Toronto School of Public Health recommended that based on new research, radio frequency (RF) exposure should be reclassified as a probable carcinogen. Regarding power lines: Researchers have found health effects, including a doubling of leukemia rates associated with living in AC magnetic field strengths greater than 4.0 mG. www.emfs.info/health/leukaemia/ www.powerwatch.org.uk/elf/overview.asp www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10944614 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20877339 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11055621 The Swedish National Energy Department issued an advisory warning that schools, playgrounds, and day-care centers should not be sited near power lines, and that children should not be subjected for long periods every day to AC magnetic fields over 3.0 mG.

Public Comment on EMF, RF Radiation, and Wireless Technology
Docket No. HHS-OASH-2026-0397 I am concerned about the rapid expansion of wireless technology and its potential effects on our health, homes, and natural environment. Cell towers, Wi-Fi, smart meters, and wireless devices have become widespread, yet I believe the public needs more independent research, transparency, and meaningful input into decisions affecting our communities. I have personally experienced headaches, nausea, feeling unwell, neck and chest tightness, and ringing in my ears in situations where I believe electromagnetic fields or wireless technology may be relevant. I have noticed discomfort near high-voltage power lines and when using my computer over Wi-Fi. At home, I have noticed a significant difference when using Ethernet with Wi-Fi turned off. I have also noticed significant differences when my phone's Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and hotspot are enabled versus disabled or when it is in airplane mode. My hand can feel hot and tingly when I hold my phone for an extended period. I recognize these observations do not prove that electromagnetic exposure causes my symptoms. Other factors may contribute. However, I believe these experiences deserve consideration and that independent research should investigate the questions they raise. Electromagnetic fields and radio frequency emissions can be measured. I would like greater public access to reliable exposure measurements and clear explanations of safety standards, the evidence behind them, and remaining uncertainties. Research should distinguish between low-frequency fields associated with electrical infrastructure and radio frequency emissions from wireless communications. I am also concerned about how quickly wireless infrastructure has expanded. Cell towers and antennas are appearing on schools, atop small apartment buildings, and on large towers next to homes. These structures change our neighborhoods and natural landscapes. Smart meters and other wireless technologies have also become increasingly common. I do not recall being meaningfully consulted about this expansion or given a clear opportunity to understand the trade-offs. We should ask who is driving this expansion and who benefits financially. What interests and incentives influence the companies and institutions promoting these technologies? Why is there such strong pressure to expand them, often with little public discussion of alternatives or long-term consequences? Are public health and environmental protection receiving the same attention as commercial interests and economic growth? The public deserves transparent, evidence-based answers. I believe we should protect the natural world and carefully consider the visual, environmental, and potential ecological effects of infrastructure. Technology should not automatically be considered beneficial simply because it is newer or more convenient. Wired alternatives deserve consideration, too. Ethernet provides internet access without Wi-Fi transmissions from a local network. Where practical, wired options should be considered. The public should also receive clear information about smart meters, their communication methods, applicable standards, and available alternatives. I respectfully ask HHS to: 1. Support independent research into potential health effects and symptoms reported by people concerned about EMF and RF exposure. 2. Improve access to exposure measurements and clear explanations of safety standards and scientific uncertainties. 3. Examine real-world exposure conditions in homes, schools, workplaces, and communities. 4. Provide information about reducing unnecessary wireless transmissions and using wired alternatives where practical. 5. Investigate potential ecological effects and consider environmental protection when evaluating technology. 6. Promote public participation and transparency about infrastructure decisions and the financial interests involved. 7. Review guidance as credible new scientific evidence becomes available. I am not claiming that my experiences prove a causal relationship between wireless exposure and my symptoms. I am asking that these concerns be investigated fairly. The public deserves reliable information and a meaningful voice in decisions affecting our surroundings. We should be able to evaluate technology critically while protecting health, personal choice, and the natural world. Thank you for considering my comments.

Subject: Public complaint about electrosmog in Italy and personal testimony on electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) I am writing to denounce the abandonment of Italian citizens in the face of exposure to electromagnetic fields and the lack of protection for people suffering from symptoms attributed to electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS). In April 2024, national exposure limits were raised from 6 to 15 V/m. There are also no uniform minimum safety distances from homes, schools, and sensitive sites. I call for greater public attention, transparency, and precautionary measures to protect health. My story began in July 2024, one month after a mobile phone antenna was installed directly in front of my home. Other installations are located about 250 metres from my home and 200 metres from my workplace, where I have worked for 18 years. I began experiencing severe pain in my left epididymis and big toes. For months, my nails stopped growing. Medical examinations and treatments did not resolve the problems. Antibiotic and anti-inflammatory treatments only made my symptoms worse. I also noticed a strong stinging sensation in my face whenever I approached my mobile phone. That was when I understood the link between my symptoms and the new antenna. When I tried to explain my suspicions and the scientific evidence I had found to doctors, my concerns were met with scepticism and ridicule. In desperation, I contacted the Italian Electrosensitive Association, which gave me guidance on investigating the situation. My home was already partly protected: during renovations in 2012, I removed all wireless devices and fully wired my internet network and alarm system. To see whether leaving my usual environment might help, I spent several days in an isolated country house in the hills, keeping my mobile phone switched off. My symptoms eased and disappeared; within two days of returning home, they came back. This experience strengthened my conviction that the possible environmental causes of my symptoms needed to be investigated more seriously. By late 2024, convinced that the new antenna in front of my home was responsible for the onset of my electromagnetic hypersensitivity, I was forced to leave my apartment and move into a small ground-floor flat in an attempt to reduce my exposure. In 2026, the antenna was upgraded to accommodate two operators. Despite environmental shielding and protective clothing, I continue to feel unwell, even at field levels I measure below 0.1 V/m. My workplace is also a source of distress because of Wi-Fi devices, wireless equipment, and a nearby antenna. I currently suffer from chronic pain, including pain in my left epididymis, severe insomnia, tinnitus, difficulties with concentration and speech, night-time cramps, photophobia, episodes of migraine, nausea, and dizziness. I also experience debilitating fatigue, intestinal problems, food intolerances, and significant weight loss. I am paying for numerous medical tests myself in an attempt to find answers and treatment. This condition has profoundly affected my life. I am a divorced father of two young children and can no longer share many everyday activities, holidays, school events, or sports events with them. I have had to give up my social life and many essential activities. The only place where I have experienced a marked improvement is the country house in the hills, far from sources of electrosmog, but moving there permanently is incompatible with my family responsibilities and work commitments. I asked the local council to halt new installations, adopt a municipal antenna plan, and prevent further expansion in areas that are already saturated, but my efforts have not achieved the desired results. For all these reasons, this is not merely a testimony of suffering but a firm call for legislative action. It is essential and urgent that the authorities introduce concrete laws to protect public health: national emission limits must be drastically lowered, well below current levels, and strict, non-negotiable minimum safety distances must be established from residential areas, schools, and sensitive sites. It is also essential to encourage and promote wired connections in public and private spaces, guaranteeing every citizen the fundamental right to live and work in safe environments that are protected and free from electromagnetic impacts. Finally, public healthcare must urgently provide appropriate scientific and medical training so that healthcare professionals are prepared to take people experiencing these complex problems seriously, putting an end to an unacceptable culture of ridicule and scepticism. We cannot continue sacrificing people's health at the altar of technological profit, leaving people with EHS invisible and without rights.

I am very sensitive when exposed to all wierless tecnical gadgets, mobilephones, WiFi, Routers and similar things. I can only use wired technology for my dayly use of technology. These problems I have had for twelve years now and I have had to rearrange everything in our house without wireless technology. ee Visiting official areas like healthcare institutions is troublesome and takes several days to get back to a stable situation again. The symptoms are lack of centration, trembling, distant, mild headace and less sleep per night. The problems are constant, without meauserable variasions. These problems constrains my social life and are annoying. My contact with the Swedish Healthcare has not been able to give me the help I need to change my situation.

I AM EMF SENSTITIVE. I did not know this 12-15 years ago. Because my symptoms were 'vague' and I was not feeling well without any SOURCE to point to, the Doctors thought it was psychosomatic. And, my friends thought it was due to getting OLD. I had less energy, ringing in my ears, fatique, constant nose bleeds and headaches, and BRAIN FOG. INSOMNIA, Poor Eyesight. HEAT and SWELLING on my Right Forehead when USING my Ear Headset. This started when I UPGRADED my Cordless Phone to the HIGHEST RANGE on the Market, and also Bought a BLUETOOTH EAR HEADSET, which was also the STRONGEST RANGE and top of the Market. Then I went from WIRED Internet to WIFI, Because I thought it would be MORE CONVENIENT to have Internet over my large 1acre Property, anywhere I wanted to LOGIN MY TABLET, also the TOP OF RANGE and EXPENSE. Microwaves and my CELL CHARGING within 5ft of my DESK where I worked from Home. Within a FEW MONTHS of these 'UPGRADES' I could not FUNCTION as BEFORE, GENERAL MALAISE, with constant COLDS and FLUS. At the Time the Signal was 3G, then I bought My 4G Devices, and my SYMPTOMS got worse! Still NO CLUE what was MAKING ME SICK! Then I MOVED FROM MY HOME to a TOWNHOUSE less then 1 MILE AWAY from a CELL TOWER, and ALL MY SYMPTOMS got so Bad, that I COULD NOT GET OUT OF BED! I could NOt FUNCTION! At that time, I started learning about Electromagnetic Frequency and the RFR Sickness that other peoople were also EXPERIENCING. THAT IS WHEN I STARTED TO HEAL! I researched the PApers that Dr Martin Pall wrote about the 'Voltage Gated Calcium Ion Channels' I did one SIMPLE REMEDY. I UNPLUGGED!!!! I canceled my Home WIFI, Removd my Microwave, Stopped using the BLUETOOTH EarPiece, Went back to a ANALOG Phone, TURNED MY CELL PHONE OFF. and WIRED My Internet. Within a Few Weeks, my Symptoms LESSONED. The NoseBleeds completely STOPPED! The headaches only when I was UPSTAIRS at the Bedroom Facing the CELL TOWER. The Fatigue Lightened, my ENERGY Returned, and the BRAIN FOG that Felt like DEMENTIA, NOT NORMAL for a Young Person, Also went away. AFter Reading Dr. Carolyn Deans Research, I began Taking MAGNESIUM DAILY, sometimes 400 mg 3xDay. THEN my ENERGY and HEALTH returned!!!! I started learning about Fermented Foods that HEALED my Microbiome, because I was getting Sick so Often from the ElectroMagnetic Frequency POSOISONING. My Health and IMMUNITY Returned. I did NOT GET Sick Very Often! It has been 5 years that I've NOT BEEN SICK!!! Yes, I will get Symptoms from time to time, Especially when out in CROWDS, but I take Zinc, Vit C, and Elderbery for a Day or So, and I'm Well. The Biggest REMEDY to my Health was UNPLUGGING from the 5g Phones, Cordless Phone, BlueTooth HeadSet, and WIFI INTERNET. Going 'Wired' and Limiited Internet Use was my Discipline. My Family did NOT Understand, and was UNHAPPY that I did NOT VISIT their RFR Polluted Homes, but they SAW FIRSTHAND How Sick I got on my Visits, and they began to Understand. Though they STILL didn't BELIEVE that EMF SENSITIVTY is a 'Environmental Disease.' They, like the Doctors, think it is it JUST MY BODY, since the don't Experience what I do. It's been 15years now, and when I do visit they will TURN OFF the WIFI, or put a SHIELD in front of the ROUTER, so that I can sit AWAY from the Source and FEEL WELL to Visit with my Family in their WIFI Home. Now, I Drink Kombucha and Kefir, and Eat Kimchi, and REAL Fermented Pickles and Beets. I feel Well now. My Energy has Returned and I FEEL Young Again. My Skin an Body is not Aching like before. SIMPLE Life Changes for Health and Vitality!! The EPIDEMIC of UNWELLNESS in My Own Family is WideSpread, but NOW when I talk about HEALING EMF SENSITIVITIES they LISTEN! I want Secretary Kennedy to also LISTEN to the MANY others just like me.. This 'Sickness' is PREVENTABLE!!! Reduce Exposure to Radio Waves, and Cell Towers, DISTANCE from the RF Sources, and Keep DISCIPLINE to UNPLUGG to BE HEALTHY. Now, It is my Mission and Passion to TEACH People about EMF Sensitivity, and how to Strengthen their Microbiome. I learned from Teachers like Donna Gates, Donna Scwenk, Hannah Krum, who TAUGHT me how to make 'FOOD AS THY MEDICINE.' The World needs this Awareness for Healing. It is Possible to BE WELL! FIRST the AUTHORITIES must Acknowledge that EMF and RF is a External Health POLLUTION. Governement Agencies MUST Stop increasing 5G to 6G EXPOSURES!!! These RF Radiation are DANGEROUS and are SLOWLY KILLING People. MORE RESEARCH Please, and UPDATE the POOR TEST MODELS from 1950's and 1980's. Current Models are Drastically Needed to EXPOSE the TRUTH!!!! Thank you for Reading my Testimony. Respectfully Submitted, ~LV Hill

1. & 2. I am responding as: an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)wifi, mobile phones, smart meters, cell towers 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):I have reacted for 24 years, and had to move house because if it. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:chronic fatigue, memory loss, headaches, twitchy and cramping muscles, eye focus, pressure in my head, sleep problems, unable to concentrate at times, heart palpitations, dizziness, burning sensation, tinitus, tingling on my skin, bladder problems as if I have cystitis, lower immune system, weakness 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:Almost immediately. I very close to the university where they were developing the technology. The top of the building was suddenly covered with the emitters they put on the towers. Immediately when a wifi box was put into the house and cordless phone was also bought. 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?Yes, the diagnosis was it was all in my head. Then I finally met a doctor who took my blood and looked at it under a microscope in his office and my blood cells were clumping together, not flowing freely as has been seen by many scientists studying exposure to EMF's. My blood look just like those discovered. by the scientists. 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?Yes, moved house. Put ethernet cables throughout the house and corded phones. Don't use a mobile phone. It made a big difference to how I felt. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information:Health risk from wireless? The debate is over. by Associate Prof. Olle Johansson and Associate Adj. Professor Einar Flydal 25 April 2014 The debate on health risks from mobiles, wireless LANs, baby calls and other wireless equipment based on microwaves, is, in fact, over – at least from a professional health and biophysics perspective. Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's:Digestive and gut problems, sensitivity to food, problems socializing with friends. travelling, staying in hotels, walking around cities, eating in restaurants. It has effected my life severly. I am very isolated now, where as I used to be a very much an extravert, visiting museums, art galleries etc but now I have to be very careful where I go, how long I can tolerate the environment before I need to return home and retreat to under my protective net. This has caused a lose of friends, and a lot of contact with people. Because it is invisible people don't believe that I am struggling to stay normal and lead a normal life. When I am somewhere that has no EMF's I am my oldself. But that is rare these days as they are determined to cover the whole world. B1a. Sources you experience as causing you Adverse Effects:cell towers, wifi, cordless and mobile phones, smart meters, electric cars B1b. Sources you can sense, but don't seem to harm you:Non B1c. Sources you can use without sensing or being harmed:Non B1d. Sources that seem to provide benefit (i.e., electrotherapy):grounding on the earth, bednet B2a. Health conditions you think may contribute to your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless:I had no health conditions when I became sensitive to EMFs. B2b. Health conditions you don't necessarily associate with your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless, but might be relevant: B3. For each subquestion please list up to 5 drugs or therapies or home remedies (if any) B3a. That you recommend, as they helped you tolerate or recover from EMF exposure:I have found nothing other than trying to live with it as best I can. Removing all exposure when in the house, so stronger for the times I do go out of the house. B3b. That you recommend, but you’re not positive that they help:Non B3c. That helped you but you don’t recommend. (e.g., the benefit did not last long or the side effects were too harmful):taking supplements, acupuncture, cleanses, B3d. Treatments that had no effect:Any exposure has made it worse. B3e. Treatments that made your sensitivity worse:65-74 B4. What is your age range?65-74 B5. What year did you become aware of your sensitivity to wireless radiation or electromagnetic fields?2002 B6. What country, state, province, or major city were you living in when you first noticed your sensitivity to wireless or electromagnetic fields?Edinburgh, Scotland

1. & 2. I am responding as: an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)mobile phones 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):4g, 4hours a day, every day 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:headache and noice in my ears (very small vibration on low frequency) 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:3hours; yes 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?no 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?sometimes i plug an headphone with wired. Thats better for my head 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information:no Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's:i sleep better when i stop to phone arround 4 pm B1a. Sources you experience as causing you Adverse Effects:Wifi B1b. Sources you can sense, but don't seem to harm you:Alarm stuff wireless brand AJAX B1c. Sources you can use without sensing or being harmed: B1d. Sources that seem to provide benefit (i.e., electrotherapy): B2a. Health conditions you think may contribute to your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless:I'm a bad sleeper than very stressed. i think that's increase the sensibility. B2b. Health conditions you don't necessarily associate with your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless, but might be relevant: B3. For each subquestion please list up to 5 drugs or therapies or home remedies (if any) B3a. That you recommend, as they helped you tolerate or recover from EMF exposure:switch off the 5g on my wifi box. switch off the wifi box by night switch off my mobile and don't sleep close B3b. That you recommend, but you’re not positive that they help: B3c. That helped you but you don’t recommend. (e.g., the benefit did not last long or the side effects were too harmful): B3d. Treatments that had no effect: B3e. Treatments that made your sensitivity worse:45-54 B4. What is your age range?45-54 B5. What year did you become aware of your sensitivity to wireless radiation or electromagnetic fields?1998 B6. What country, state, province, or major city were you living in when you first noticed your sensitivity to wireless or electromagnetic fields?France, Grasse