Children & vulnerable groups

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a [patient, parent, family member, caregiver, healthcare professional, researcher, advocate, concerned member of the public, or other]. One of my good friends is deeply affected by EMFs and has made significant changes to her lifestyle. Reducing exposure made a tremendous difference, and have improved her daily life. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public. I suffer from migraine headaches and believe EMFs contribute to them. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

EMFs are legit & harmful to health! Please take this seriously! You wouldnt want a cell tower or data center on your kids school!!!

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a family member. Upon moving into our new home, the smart electric meter is located on the outside wall of my house opposite where I sleep and have my work desk. I noticed over the course of a few months that I wasn't sleeping as well, a constant ringing in the ears (louder and more often than Tinnitus that I have) and getting daily headaches. I ruled out physical health reasons and did some research into Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I then took precautions into my own hands; for one, using a copper layer on the inside wall of the house to shield me from the radiation. Within less than a week, my symptoms lessened and went away. If these somewhat minor health effects are happening to a full grown adult, what harm will it be doing to a small child?

EMF’s cause harm. Please protect Americans…especially our children.

There is already so much research - which has existed for decades - showing the impact of light, frequency and magnetism on plants and animals. Read John Ott's book Health and Light, published in 1973, documenting these effects. European countries have different standards - even for their cell phones, the SAR ratings are much lower. To act as if we are unaffected by frequency is unfathomable. Now that we have Wi-Fi and wireless devices everywhere, even in our NICUs and schools, it is irresponsible to not acknowledge the effect that these frequencies can have on children and infants who have much less dense brain bone structures. We also need to consider the light we live within. Full spectrum incandescent is by far the healthiest option. Did you know that animal breeders can even change the sex ratios of their litters by altering the light frequencies they are exposed to? To make matters worse, we are now dealing with the effect of the growing South American Anomaly (SAA) which is lessening the geomagnetic field of the earth. This amplifies the effects of non native EMF, SARs, etc . It is imperative that we tackle this important issue from every possible angle immediately. Thank you.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a [patient, parent, family member, caregiver, healthcare professional, researcher, advocate, concerned member of the public, or other]. PERSONALIZE YOUR COMMENT HERE: Tell HHS how wireless radiation has affected you, your child, your family, or someone you care about. You may describe the source and duration of the exposure, health effects experienced, when they began, whether reducing exposure made a difference, and how these experiences have affected daily life. If you are an ally, describe why you support people affected by wireless radiation and why you believe HHS should address this issue. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a parent, family member and concerned member of the public. Wireless radiation has negatively affected several people I know and care about over the past 12 years. It has majorly impacted critical areas of their lives such as housing security, employment, school attendance, finances and above all, their physical health and emotional well-being. It is imperative that the HHS assess this issue. It pertains to essential human rights. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a parent and a highly concerned member of the public. The proper role of government and the agencies created is not to allow corporations or different branches of government to experiment on the citizens. YOUR ROLE IS TO PROTECT THE PEOPLE FROM HARM BEFORE EVERYTHING ELSE. It is not acceptable, nor Constitutional, for Congress to give power to an agency that infringes on the rights of the people to be free from what are essentially experiments. Those who suffer impacts already are ignored. A clear example is the entire medical establishment. Medical care has been perverted by sick incentives, and the proposed solutions do not mitigate the harms that have been caused. The same is going on with the FCC and the regulations that prevent towns and cities to negate contracts with companies like Verizon and AT&T—to try and stop the 6G and who knows, eventually 12G?, towers and the constant bathing of people in radiation exposures and wireless pulses.. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. Private citizen groups comprised of those opposed need to be at the table as we are ultimately the largest stakeholders, and in fact the people that fund all of it. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard. Leadership is not about being in charge. It is about taking care of those in your charge. - Simon Sinek