All comment threads

I’d like to comment about the Wi-Fi towers or whatever they are. They definitely block both of my ears if I’m in a place of business that has a strong Wi-Fi my ears will also plug sometimes it takes over an hour to calm down. I’d be more than happy to be studied because it is truly a real thing. …not very fun and clearly just getting worse with more of the towers going up. Thank you for your time.

I am a female U.S. citizen and USAF veteran and have suffered with tinnitus/sleep issues during and after my Air Force enlistment. Since February 2024 (living in an apartment complex near MacDill AFB), I now experience increased symptoms of severe tinnitus, insomnia, EMF/WIFI sensitivities, nausea, dizziness, balance issues, eye pressure, head pressure and headaches, erratic heart rate spikes waking me out of sleep. Along with other veterans who have commented on this forum, I agree there are serious issues that need to be investigated. Government employees are not the only people experiencing AHI/Havana syndrome symptoms. Civilians, U.S. veterans, and military members are also suffering from the same symptoms.

To whom it may concern. I am a senior citizen and a grandfather. For many years (about 40 years) I have suffered from Havana Syndrome (Anomolous Health Incidents) symptoms. Some of the symptoms I experience are extreme ringing, screeching in my ears (tinitus) Headaches Sudden vertigo Ear pain and pressure Sleep disturbances Memory problems Etc. I am not a diplomat or government employee. I am just an ordinary law abiding citizen of the United States. Thank you for allowing me to comment my concerns. And thank you for everything that you do. God bless you

See attached file(s)

Department of Health and Human Services, The health impacts of wireless RF radiation. RF exposures are growing , cell towers and small cells, smart meters, 5G, and emerging 6G technologies. wireless RF radiation, extremely low-frequency electric and magnetic fields from power lines, electrical grid equipment are critically bombarding children how are biologically developing, pregnancies in families who are also biologically developing and are both facing critical health traumas. Please respond to my Letter below/ Attached. Eric Barnard and Family.

2. Individual consumer 3. a. Wi-Fi, wireless infrastructure (both 4th and 5th generation). b. Indoors, invariable with brief intermission. f. Commercially available silver fabric enclosure, including grounding wire, sufficient to fully attenuate 99 percent of 5G type band radio frequencies received by my body. I used this device by sleeping inside on a nightly basis for seven days. Noted consistent effects on mental state within five minutes, including profound relative clarity, calm and ease. Effects on sleep quality including consistent elevated mood and improved energy persisting through the following day, sleep duration required to perceive being fully rested consistently timed to be reduced from eight hours per night over the previous seven days to seven hours per night. g. Trifield EMF meter model TF2 used to measure electromagnetic frequency exposure for my location kept consistent within two feet of measurement during the seven days of using of the silver fabric enclosure. Taking several measurements: radio frequency was within 40-113 mW/m^2 with the majority of the measurements near the mean. Magnetic field strength was likewise measured and read consistently 0.1 and 0.2 weighted for high frequency mG. AC electric field strength was likewise measured and read consistently 0 and 0 weighted V/m.

Dear Secretary of Health and Human Services, I urge you to make the potential health effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs), radiofrequency radiation, and continuous wireless exposure a public health priority. Where is the comprehensive, independent, long-term research demonstrating that a lifetime of continuous wireless exposure is safe for human health at every stage of development? The absence of definitive evidence of harm is not the same as proof of safety. Our children and future generations deserve answers, not assumptions. Quantum physics reveals that matter and energy are deeply interconnected, and the human body depends on intricate electrical and biochemical processes. Why, then, would we dismiss legitimate questions about how chronic exposure to external electromagnetic fields might affect biological systems? We must follow the science wherever it leads, free from industry influence. We are already dealing with a healthcare system that too often prioritizes managing disease over investigating its root causes. Too many people feel trapped in a system that relies on costly, patented pharmaceuticals while underinvesting in prevention and broader approaches to health. When financial incentives reward treating illness, we must ask whether enough attention is being given to preventing it in the first place. When will human health matter more than a business model? When will transparency matter more than profit? People deserve a healthcare system that serves them—not one in which financial interests overshadow prevention, scientific integrity, and public well-being. I call on HHS to fund truly independent, long-term research into wireless radiation and human health; disclose uncertainties honestly; protect children and other potentially vulnerable populations; and ensure that public health policy is never dictated by corporate interests. Our bodies are not merely markets. Our health is not a commodity. And our children's well-being must never be an acceptable gamble. The American people deserve truth, accountability, prevention, and a healthcare system that puts human life before profit. When will we finally make that our priority? Respectfully, Sara, a concerned citizen, and taxpayer!

“Given the growing concerns about electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and radio-frequency (RF) radiation from cell towers and wireless technology, what steps are being taken to ensure public safety, promote independent research, and address residents’ concerns about unusual physical painful sensations and body vibrations? Thank you for your time and commitment to protecting our community.”

i am not for cell towers, especially near schools, there is research, tests, studies, etc showing children develop problems when near these towers. At the present time, these cell towers are powerful enough to do damage to children as well as some adults. The signal, transmission, evolved from 1G, to 3G, to 5G, in other words the broadcast keeps getting stronger, imagine the future when it goes to 10 or 20G. When a cell tower worker goes to work on these towers why do they have to be shut off, it is obviously to protect the worker, to say its not doing damange is misleading.

I first became aware of the possible negative effect of radar on foraging bats when a student returning from nocturnal fieldwork who kept a bat detector wedged in his car window reported no bat activity as he passed Aberdeen airport radar. Together with Dr Barry Nicholls we then positioned bat detectors close to a series of airport radars which are often conveniently situated close to the airport perimeter. Significantly fewer bats were recorded in the vicinity of the radars compared with nearby control sites. We then purchsed a Furuno small boat radar and set it up close to a pond which was a well used bat foaraging site. When the radar was switched on a maximum of 40% fewer bats were recorded over the water. We were unable to change the parameters of the radar emissions and despite attempts to do so were unable to engage the collaboration of radar experts who could do so. Nicholls, B. & Racey, P. A. (2009) The aversive effect of electromagnetic radiation on foraging bats – a possible means of discouraging bats from approaching wind turbines. PLoS ONE .4:1-10 Issue 7 e6246