All comment threads

What is the true intent behind this inquiry? Is the goal simply to find out whether—and in what way—one’s own creditors have already perceived this technology as a threat, or is it merely to be able to claim afterward that one has always taken this issue seriously? No (military) technology has been researched more extensively over the past hundred years than this one. None has ever been deployed so successfully or decided the outcome of wars. None can be concealed so effectively (as a false flag) and, moreover, offers such a wide range of diverse (invisible) mechanisms of action that extend far beyond the potential biological risks to humans. Judging by the countless patents and based solely on the existing research and medical information that has been released to the public so far, EMF technology is and remains, without a doubt, the jack-of-all-trades for those who strive for power and control. Have we already forgotten Chernobyl and the Duga, for example? Or that, diagnostically speaking, flu symptoms are virtually indistinguishable from the symptoms of EMF exposure? Dead exosomes are merely the result of cellular damage and cannot possibly be the root cause or even evidence of anything, not even if you put a "crown" on it. So, do we all get an infection every year, or are we simply being exposed to a little more EM-radiation? Maybe we should start by addressing that? What about indirect factors (caused by EMFs); factors that, for example, negatively impact our living conditions and thereby harm humans? People are wondering why landscapes are either drying up or being flooded? Or why a global temperature change—which is minuscule when viewed in the context of Earth’s overall evolution—should directly cause the entire weather system to go haywire; in a natural system that strives for balance, where “differences” are immediately counterbalanced? How could such extremes even develop naturally? Or why do clouds suddenly start to visibly display “Doppler signatures” everywhere? Where else could these come from, if not from the thousands upon thousands of Doppler systems that are supposedly essential for weather forecasting—systems that, unfortunately, haven’t improved one millimeter despite quadrillions in investments over the past 50 years? Why is there a patent for “hurricanes caused by EMFs” if no one would ever use it? Why, in fact, are there no known hurricanes from the time before EMFs? And weren’t chemtrails even developed specifically to compensate for evaporation effects caused by increased atmospheric energy density—because otherwise it probably wouldn’t rain at all in some places anymore? This brings us to the next point. The effects of exposure to electromagnetic frequencies depend on far more than just power output; the problem is that there are no limit values at all for the other criteria. No one takes biological frequency ranges (such as those of the brain) into account, and this really raises the question: Why—on purpose?! ... A 70-hertz wave, for example, can cause disorientation, since the brain uses precisely this frequency range to coordinate perception. This is primarily due to the fact that the ELF frequencies used by the military are also pulsed, at approximately 7–8 hertz ! Just kidding? No! ...but who do we tell that to... And what are those who are actually responsible for protection doing? The »terribly independent« Commission (of the ICNIRP) consistently denies and ignores any form of athermal symptoms associated with radiation exposure. Its recommended exposure limits are set so high that we’re just barely avoiding getting burned (like a rotisserie chicken)! The failure to account for non-thermal symptoms creates a legal vacuum for all kinds of harm caused by EMFs before or without burns even occurring! Why? Furthermore, the extremely high power peaks in pulsed signals are not taken into account in any limit values; instead, the argument is based on the average power of continuous-wave signals. Why? 99% of the output power of EMF signals is absorbed as heat. ...and the world wonders why temperatures are rising. Spot the mistake. We could go on like this for hours, but that’s not necessary to understand the pattern behind it. In any case, this inquiry should be expanded to include the far more compelling question: Who will be held liable for the unimaginable consequences resulting from the use and (government) abuse of this technology?! The truth will always prevail, and when it does, the time will come for those who will be held accountable. Amen. Your Creditors

Re: Department of Health and Human Services - Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure I am reentering my Declaration as the first iteration did not have my actual signature on it, this one does. DECLARATION OF DOROTHY “DOE” KELLY Oct. 21, 2025

Dear Department of Health and Human Services Subject: Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this Subject. I have Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) and Electromagnetic Sensitivity (EHS). Radiofrequency (RF), and Wireless Radiation Exposure magnify and compromise my Health and Safety. I am a Senior and Disabled. My Landline is my Lifeline. I presented Testimony and Research on the World EHS Day 2023 via Massachusetts for Safe Technology. Ms. Cece Doucette presented my Narrative as the ZOOM technology was a challenge for me. * I presented at the World EHS Day 2023 6.16.23 01:08:34: Virginia Rosen, RN by Cece Doucette AND. to: Dear Department of Public Utilities (DPU) and Kerri Phillips (At Mass.Gov), Subject: Public Comment: AMI Data Access and Related Proposals (DPU 26-20/21/22) I cannot be around any Internet, devices, or any such Toxic radiation. **I use a Landline, no text, no Caller ID, no microwave oven, no LED's. Please do all in your Personal and Collective power to safeguard my Landline for my Health and Safety. Thank you for your time, energy and consideration of this matter. Gratefully yours,

The dangers of EMFs are real. My father, as an example, began having strange complaints such as dizzyness, irritated skin and headaches. Upon inspection of his home with an EMF detector, we learned that a digital electric meter had been installed on his home without his consent, He had it removed and the symptoms disappeared. He has to pay an additional fee each month as a result. An additional concern that I want to express is that of directed energy weapons. With so many satellites above us, how are the people being protected from threats? Where are detection devices and alarms? There are so many WiFi towers (strangely set up while we were quarantined due to the Covid pandemic) that we are saturated with EMFs from satellites and towers. Many of the satellites are operated by people, under contract with the government, who have displayed unconstitutional and antisocial behaviors. There are numerous reports circulating on social media about people who have been treated for symptoms similar to Havana Syndrome. Direct energy weapons are said to be able to remotely directed at a target, animal or human, in order to stop a beating heart. Musk cryptically mentioned being asked by the “government” if he had the ability to hit a baby seal. Clearly, he was not suggesting that he could do so via one of his automobiles. Why is no one considering the military weapons these people have that can kill without detection? Marcus Lamb might be someone to look into as a potential victim. I have some personal experience regarding being affected by direct energy. To make a report in person, however, with no way to prove it would be detrimental to myself as I would be labeled mentally ill. The public is unable to defend ourselves. We need help from those who are supposed to be protecting us. Furthermore, linking every government database to AI has further put the public in danger. The AI billionaire leaders are now able to access government information easily. That decision was plainly stupid and a serious dereliction of the duty to serve and protect the people. Safety and security are being sacrificed for technology.

My family has been in active litigation against AT&T, etal for over a year now. Their wireless antenna emits so much RF, my family has suffered life threatening health effects. I have a state complaint and an AT&T Office of President called us. Over 3 months promising to inspect their equiptment as it also made loud humming noises. They reported to the ICC. They never sent anyone to ensure their equiptment was safe. They told the ICC they were RF compliant and not willing yo move their antenna. I received nothing but a pole attachment document. They have no paperwork in any city department. Despite exhausting all legal channels begging for help for someone to look into what this technology is doing to our family personally, I am continuing to fight as a prose litigant. I have no law background. Ive been transferred 4 times now in Chancery. No MTD has dismissed me thus far. I have Negligence, Willful & Wanton Conduct & Injunction that are surviving. The new judge will decide on their mtd 2-219. I am 1 person who will do anything I can to provide education and how this tech is harming our world. We are not all the same. We are allergic to tech environmental factors. You are not alone. Be the voice we all need. So many people are suffering. A big tech company decides to ignore our family and suffering and safety. It blows my mind. The science is there. However AT&T has actual knowledge of our complaints and took our letters at first to hide our cry for help we put on the pole. The alderman can't do anything and even after all that they did nothing to help us. They are trying to get us out of court fast. Sorry to all for being forced with all this corruption and non regulated tech. God Bless!

EMFs have been very harmful for my health. For years now, I have exhausted my sick time at work with illnesses that include but are not limited to severe muscle pain, headaches, brain fog, always feeling sick, tired, and dizziness etc. It does not help that I am a 30+ yr Targeted Individual. I believe that EMFs exacerbate the effects of DEWs. I also believe that EMFs are to blame for many other serious illnesses, including cancer, which was the cause of death of my late husband. He had two types of cancer. I further believe that advancement in technology can be a great thing. The problem is that not enough research has been done, along with the fact that in the past, the government has been ruled by the 'Deep State'. I believe that the new Administration can do better! GOD BLESS!!! 17

See attached file(s)

Comment on Docket HHS-OASH-2026-0397, responding to Questions 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 18. Perspective (Q2): I am submitting as an individual, a citizen journalist with 16 years of independent investigative work, the last 10 on electromagnetic radiation and health. I am the author of The Non-Tinfoil Guide to EMFs, host of the Smarter Tech podcast and director of the documentary Body Burden, and I have interviewed more than 100 scientists, physicians and engineers in this field. My comment focuses on research gaps (Q16). My perspective is that our RF safety standards rest on the wrong assumption, that only tissue heating matters, and that this assumption keeps the gaps open: it created a culture of "no effect" from the public to regulators to researchers, and the topic was systematically defunded. The research is completely inadequate to protect the public, while the technology rolls out faster than our ability to study it. The attached document gives the evidence and full references for each gap below. 1. Combined exposures and the exposome (Q16, Q18, Q5o). Almost all RF research tests one exposure at a time, while people live with RF alongside metals, pesticides and mold. Dr. Ronald Kostoff's work documents how other agents modify EMF effects. Exposome studies should include wireless exposure (ambient RF, home Wi-Fi, smartphone use and position) as a standard variable. 2. Real-world exposure measurement (Q7, Q8, Q5n). The U.S. has no national program measuring actual RF exposure in homes, schools and hospitals, no routine post-market SAR testing of devices in body-contact positions (GAO-12-771), and the FCC has said it lacks the resources to routinely monitor transmitter emissions. 3. Sleep (Q12, Q16). Pulse-modulated RF alters the sleep EEG below current limits. Sleep clinics, which produce our reference data on sleep, are full of Wi-Fi, wireless equipment and phones, so the baseline is polluted. Sleep studies should run with and without wireless, with RF recorded; children sleeping beside phones and routers need study. 4. The microbiome (Q16). A 2024 study found a 5G-band RF field altered the gut microbiome and 258 metabolites in mice. People keep phones, laptops and tablets very close to the abdomen for hours on end, yet human studies do not exist. 5. Antibiotic resistance, tested in hospitals (Q16). Laboratory studies report that Wi-Fi and phone radiation change bacterial antibiotic susceptibility, biofilm formation and gene expression. Hospitals combine resistant pathogens with dense wireless, and no one has studied that setting. This is urgent. 6. Pregnancy (Q11b). Dr. Hugh Taylor's Yale research found in-utero cell phone exposure caused hyperactivity and memory impairment in mice. Prospective birth cohorts with measured exposure are needed. 7. Fertility and phones in pockets (Q5p, Q9, Q11). Frequent phone use is associated with lower sperm concentration. Carrying position cannot be settled because nearly every young man carries a phone against his body. Female fertility is barely studied. 8. Cancers where phones are now carried (Q12, Q11a). If RF is a possible carcinogen at the head (IARC Group 2B), the concern does not stop at the head. Dr. De-Kun Li and Dr. Devra Davis have raised phones in pockets and bras as worth investigating alongside rising early-onset colorectal, testicular and breast cancers. No study has examined carrying position. 9. Devices in the ear and on the head (Q13f, Q11). AirPods and other Bluetooth earbuds, Bluetooth hearing aids, smart glasses and VR headsets place transmitters near the brain for hours a day. Their effects on tinnitus, enlarged lymph nodes, hearing loss, cognition and head and neck cancers are unstudied. Hearing experts should test whether loud sound does more damage when an RF transmitter, a source of oxidative stress, sits in the same ear. 10. Towers near schools, hospitals and sensitive populations (Q15a, Q15b, Q11). Studies in several countries report symptoms, DNA damage and cognitive effects near base stations. They need replication in the U.S. with measured exposure. Chile bars towers near schools and hospitals; Switzerland applies limits ten times stricter at sensitive places. 11. Pollinators and insects (Q14). To my knowledge no RF exposure standard considers wildlife. Insects absorb more RF above 6 GHz, where 5G and 6G are heading, and field research on pollinators is almost absent. These answers will not come quickly, even with a massive research effort. Hundreds of scientists (the International EMF Scientist Appeal, the 5G Appeal) have asked governments to apply the precautionary principle: minimize exposure now and give the public informed consent. Instead, governments have a financial incentive to speed up wireless deployment. Further development of 6G, the Internet of Things and satellites needs guardrails in place first. Thank you for opening this question to the public. Nicolas Pineault, The EMF Guy

My name is Johanna Valentin and my family are getting hit with dew-electronics, I have been a targeted individual since 2020 when I first noticed it but know I think it’s been all my life. I have lost all of my hair my teeth breaking, I’ve had 6 knee surgeries thanks to this, I have been raped and drugged I get microwaved every day while my kids they put bad thoughts in there mind that makes them sad and depressed with anxiety. Please if this does not stop they are going to kill me and my family I already lost 3 to suicide cause of this. Please end this for there are many targeted individuals suffering everyday cause of the hands of these evil people!!

I was diagnosed with MCS And EHS over 10 years ago. It is debilitating. Exposure to wifi especially results in symptoms like fatigue, insomnia, disautonomia and severe nervous system complaints. I rely on medications and limited exposure to survive but it is not easy. Approximately 10 years ago I was incapacitated for over one year. While I did get some better, I am now 70 and just recently lost my job and I must somehow find another one to live. I believe the EHS began with mold exposure. To this day I suffer from chronic fungal sinusitis. Please study the existing science. Think about the children being exposed to microwave radiation. There must be a solution to help people like me and save the health of children, animals and nature. Now with the explosion of satellites raining down 5g, think of the people with symptoms who won't know what is happening to them. Please educate doctors. As far as the disautonomia, most doctors have not heard of disautonomia. Please find a way help those of us who are suffering from the effects of EFs and help save the children. Thank you for giving us a chance to be heard. Thank you for studying this issue and being willing to stand up for the people who quietly have been suffering for years. Respectfully, JALLEN