All comment threads

I'm a target from Nigeria. Proving that EMF's & RF are been used to perpetuate these horrific crimes against humanity from this part of the world is almost impossible due to..well..it been Nigeria, in the African continent, an all round horrible place to be in. Imagine been targeted in it. Horrific. But at this point, it's obvious something's up worldwide & the wrongs been done cannot be denied, underplayed & overlooked. Been targeted is, as you can tell from the testimonies worldwide, a horrific, painful & sad experience. Technology & development is for the betterment of humankind. The blunt hijack by malicious forces is unacceptable. From this part of the world, a different causal narrative may prevail but when compared with & against other victims of the world, it's obvious that, you, doing something about the gangstalking/targeted individual phenomenon is a step in the right direction for all victims, past, present, future. We, targets, victims & the world as a creation are at an important time in creation. Thank you for your service.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13102818.2022.2046505?scroll=top&needAccess=true#abstract "Radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitted from wireless devices increases rapidly and the most sensitive groups are pregnant women and children. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the fidgety movements (FMs) and motor repertoires of the infants of pregnant women with different durations of mobile phone usage (DOMFU) in the prenatal period by performing a general movement assessment (GMA) using the Prechtl method. Infants suitable for the study were divided into 4 groups according to their mothers’ duration of mobile phone usage during pregnancy, comprising those who did not talk on a mobile phone (Control Group, n: 31), those with mobile phone usage (MFU) of ∼20 min a day (Group 1, n: 33), those with MFU of ∼40 min a day (Group 2, n: 31), and those with MFU of ∼2 h a day (Group 3, n: 28). The analysis showed that the abnormal fidgety (AF) and absent fidgety (F–), suboptimal motor optimality score (MOS) and reduced motor repertoire were statistically higher in Group 3 compared to the other groups. Normal posture and the quality of other movements were statistically higher in the Control, and Groups 1 and 2 compared to Group 3. According to the findings, infants of mothers with different DOMFU during pregnancy differed with regard to the quality of FMs, MOS, repertoire, posture and other movements. In conclusion, the findings suggested that there may be a relationship between prenatal RFR exposure and motor development in infants. More long-term studies are needed to determine whether these changes are temporary or permanent"

i was a manager and adviser to the industry, including communication companies. I was very successful and had very good life. i was also sure the regulation protects our health and didn’t know about hazards from EMR to our health or environment. i was part of the business decision and strategy to start mass marketing of cellular devices to the public in the 80's and continued to participate in developing better phones and services. and i loved my work and my mobile and all technology and my wireless new helpers. I was really excited by all this new developments. during my 40's i began developing MCI - mile cognitive impairment which wasn't mild at all - i was quite demented - forgetting important stuff, confusing data, missing words and I ruin research and processes at work and in my personal life. i was told it's the beginning of Alzheimer’s and that there is “nothing to do about it”. i heard about trials of treating people in my condition with hyperbaric chambers. i paid a lot for joining that, starting with CT, PET SCAN and fMRI checks. The day after i became very weak and strangely sensitive/ allergic to many synthetic chemicals. i couldn't function, my smell sense became extremely sensitive and I discovered many everyday products felt like poison. exposure to any industrialized substances made me very sick. I was healthy and looked very young and fit before and suddenly every exposure started severe headaches which i never had before, palpitations, tinnitus, I lost a lot of weight/ body mass (mainly muscle because i was very thin before) and i couldn't sleep. my body collapsed and my brain couldn't find words, i struggled to speak, couldn't understand simple things (tasks and phrases or simple calculations), couldn't reason or plan things. i was lost, my identity and intelligence was completely lost (and I was really brilliant). i began looking for a clean place to live in and heal (with the environment agencies and maps and measures) but i realized that i suffer severe symptoms in many places that are not polluted (I monitored it carefully with specialists) but not in other places/ I discovered I have symptoms when i approach landlines and wireless infrastructure/ antennas/ routers/ streamers and mobile devices. i thought i was hallucinating because i never heard about such phenomena and my MD's didn't know what it could be. My life changed when i met some persons that suffered the same symptoms - not all the time, only after exposure to EMR and/ or artificial chemicals (and mold) - exactly like me. i had to study what radiation does to our body and found research that the U.S Navy and army made or collected and that Swedish and east European researchers made. i bought EMR measuring devices and discovered that when i have pain and symptoms - the sensors measure RF radiation and usually it is much lower than the regulatory standards. when i felt good with no pain - no radiation was measured at all. BINGO I contacted MD’s and researchers that know what EMR syndrome is and started learning how to handle this nightmare. finding a place to live and heal was very difficult – the environmental radiation is high and raising all the time. But when I found and gave my body the right conditions my health and my ability to function improved dramatically. The MCI / Alzheimer’s condition disappeared and I began activism in this field and helped many suffering confused people. But .. my brain and body function only when I’m in safe low- radiation low-pollution environment. I use a lot of counter technology to protect my living and health. When I go out to shops or visit my old parents (with a lot of Antioxidant and special protection hat with metal mesh) the exposure to regular EMR radiation in the environment cfter several hours makes me suffer and ruin my ability to function, the symptoms return gradually and my brain begin to act poorly. During the 14 years of this ordeal I had to move a lot and spend a fortune to heal and function. I can’t work or study and volunteer as I used to. I live in solitude and I lost all my human rights. People in this condition don’t get any recognition or proper help. life is extremely difficult and many can’t find housing and work/ education and can’t make a living. Many suffer a lot and can’t have meaningful life. Too many kill themselves and considered “depressed” or PTSD without noticing the real environmental reason.

I am Mrs. Wally Verboog, Dutch and age 69 years young. In 2013 we found out that my severe health complaints were only due to the overdose of high frequency EMF's, RF Radiation and wireless radiation. That was also acknowledged in 2015/2016 in the official Dutch research project GESOND by GGD and University of Utrecht and paid by the Dutch Government (ZonMw programm): 50 % of the 63 participants were able to feel the presence of radiation and immediately received (many of the) specific health complaints. As our Government was probably not amused by the results, the complete results were never published, only a summary in which was stated that the survey was not adequate, without any comment. Of course, every scientific research can be done better and that is even the reason why one should do a survey once again with better requirements! No doubt, our ministry of Health will be delighted to give HHS the complete results, which prove that even low levels of radiation affects directly the health of people. Another nice survey to mention is the large-scale study conducted by Kantar in 2019/2020 on behalf of the Dutch government. Main conclusion was that even 6 % of the Dutch population experienced health complaints due to radiation/wireless communication! My main health complaints due to RF radiation, HF EMF and wireless devices are: a) extreme high blood pressure and hearth rythm problems, b) muscle cramps, c) tinnitus, d) headache and sharp pains in the head, e) feelings of fear and disorientation and loss of focus/concentration, f) ongoing dizzyness and after 10 minutes of ongoing high exposure of radiation all my energy literally drains out of me, and I fall to the ground, not even knowing who I am and half-conscious. This all was also verified by medical specialists, who could not find another reason than over exposure to radiation. Yes, we have found an overload of evidence that the current idiot high levels of radiation affects negatively our health, see e.g. the list of the University of Achen Germany of surveys world wide (EMF Portal). No doubt a lot of organisations world wide will send you lots of surveys, so no use of mentioning them here as well (but our 2 special Dutch surveys were very special, so we mentioned them earlier!). I have done a lot of activities to inform people and official organisations as well: in 2016 we launched our website www.stopoverdosisstraling.nu (which means stop overdose radiation now), the top 26 health complaints are well known in Holland and Belgium (https://sosstraling.nl/gezondheidsklachten-top-26/). We also appered in many interviews on Dutch TV, radio and newspapers. In 2023 the Dutch former Minister of Culture, mrs. Mr. Medy van der Laan, gave a presentation about her health problems of radiation (HF EMF/RF radiation/wireless devices) on the Symposium event of the Dutch Kennisplatform EMV (Knowledgeplatform EMF). This Kennisplatform EMV is an initiative of the Dutch Government, paid by 3 ministries and has particpants like Tech institute TNO, ministries, Health organisations like RIVM and GGD GHOR. Unfortunately this all has so far not lead to any positive step in doing something about the (high) levels of radiation in Holland nor informing the public in a good way nor informing the medical specialists/gp's in a proper way about this increasing humanmade environmental issue, which radiation is.Well "humanmade" is in fact "tech companies made" and "supported by governments" abnd unfortunately these parties are not interested in heath issues it seems. But HHS appears to be an exemption as HHS is willing even to mention the problem and do something about it: compliments! I am not insane. I had my own company but had to stop my active roles. I was forced to stay in a protected (shielded) house, drive a shielded special car. I was not able to even be preent at the funeral of my mom due to the radiation in church and graveyard.I had to stop all my oudoor activities and social life as the level of radiation was increasing rapidly everywhere. "I am not insane", I mention this because in Holland lots of (stupid) people think that when you say you have health complaints of radiation, you must be insane. Of course they are not willing to read the facts....I even had to consult 2 psychiatrists to try to convince these stupid people that I am just as insane as the most of the Dutch (which means I am normal). You notice, I am still positive, but be aware that my life has changed in a terrible way. Due to ongoing rising high levels of radiation and the fact that all actions of shielding and protecting were not sufficient, I was forced to leave Holland and move ( “refugee” is the better word) to France where my husband and I found a house in a low radiation area. Now I can do my gardening and stay in my house without fear of radiation and without health issues. I published an article: https://stralingsbewust.info/2026/06/23/wij-zijn-gevlucht-grote-verbetering-gezondheid/

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5506372/pdf/nihms866566.pdf "Methods—We used individual participant data from 83,884 mother-child pairs in the five cohorts from Denmark (1996–2002), Korea (2006–2011), the Netherlands (2003–2004), Norway (2004– 2008), and Spain (2003–2008). We categorized cell phone use into none, low, medium, and high, based on frequency of calls during pregnancy reported by the mothers. Child behavioral problems (reported by mothers using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire or Child Behavior Checklist) were classified in the borderline/clinical and clinical ranges using validated cut-offs in children aged 5–7 years. Cohort specific risk estimates were meta-analyzed. Results—Overall, 38.8% of mothers, mostly from the Danish cohort, reported no cell phone use during pregnancy and these mothers were less likely to have a child with overall behavioral, hyperactivity/inattention or emotional problems. Evidence for a trend of increasing risk of child behavioral problems through the maternal cell phone use categories was observed for hyperactivity/inattention problems (OR for problems in the clinical range: 1.11, 95%CI 1.01, 1.22; 1.28, 95%CI 1.12, 1.48, among children of medium and high users, respectively). This association was fairly consistent across cohorts and between cohorts with retrospectively and prospectively collected cell phone use data. Conclusions—Maternal cell phone use during pregnancy may be associated with an increased risk for behavioral problems, particularly hyperactivity/inattention problems, in the offspring. The interpretation of these results is unclear as uncontrolled confounding may influence both maternal cell phone use and child behavioral problems."

This is merely anecdotal and episodic phenomena that I have observed when I’m coming up on a 5G tower while driving (sometimes not even seeing it until I’m closer), but when within a half mile of a 5G tower, especially one that is situated lower to the ground, I begin to experience a lot of discomfort, a feeling like I’m about to jump out of my skin or need to get away from that location as soon as possible, sometimes accompanied by difficulty taking in a complete breath, and a feeling that my heart rate changes. I mentioned this to my doctor, but he told me “that is all internet conspiracy theory stuff” and that the waves emitted are not powerful enough to affect the human body. Just thought I’d let someone else know! Maybe others have experienced the same thing.

I am sorry to not have seen this in time to review studies and attach relevant ones. Five years ago I delved into numerous studies since a cell tower was about to be installed within a few hundred feet of our residence, in the middle of a residential designated historic district. It was on the edge of a residence with a woman with a pacemaker who was fighting cancer (she died within a few months of the installation) and across the street from a family with an infant. It was demonstrated at a city council meeting that the public works officer responsible for working with the telecom company concerning placement had failed to fulfill requirements for approving cell tower placement, including the review required before placing a cell tower in a historic district (among others). When this was pointed out, and the city attorney was asked to look into this, the cell tower was immediately installed (several weeks before it was scheduled). In addition, no concerns or studies about the deleterious effects of RF's on human health or on the environment was allowed to be cited as a reason for delay or in order to regulate placement of the cell towers. There were numerous studies available then which pointed clearly to the need for a serious review of safety standards, and which also highlighted the negative effects on insects (including pollinators) and migrating birds with regard to navigation and orientation. The amount of money which telecom companies were offering municipalites (where not prohibited) and private individuals in order to install cell towers, and their disregard for property rights in some cases (I know of several) is disturbing. In our city, the first cell towers to be erected were close to the hospital, a public school, a college campus, and a historic residential neighborhood. The restrictions against a municipality considering health or environmental impacts regarding cell towers is itself disturbing. If there is in fact nothing to be concerned about, then why prohibit citing relevant studies. Shouldn't health and environmental safety be top priorities? What are the telecom companies afraid of? Since the FCC has not reviewed its safety standards since 1996, and has been historicaly reluctant to do so, one wonders if the cell tower industry might not be a trillion-dollar juggernaut which our government allows to roll over and disregard even legitimate and documented concerns for human health and for the environment. The consequences for the government continuing to evade the responsibility to provide and enforce safety guidelines, based on serious evaluations of the proposed hazards, could well be devastating for our comunities and ecology in general. I strongly encourage the HHS and FCC to respond in a serious and earnest way to the Supreme Court mandate issues in 2021. Respectfully submitted, October 21, 2026

These are all crimes against humanity, violations of human rights, etc.

We do not need these towers. I’ve seen them over apartments and playgrounds. We don’t need this!!! These towers are horrible!!!

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/1107612 "Maternal Exposure to Magnetic Fields During Pregnancy in Relation to the Risk of Asthma in Offspring" "Results After adjustment for potential confounders, a statistically significant linear dose-response relationship was observed between increasing maternal median daily MF exposure level in pregnancy and an increased risk of asthma in offspring: every 1-mG increase of maternal MF level during pregnancy was associated with a 15% increased rate of asthma in offspring (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.27). Using the categorical MF level, the results showed a similar dose-response relationship: compared with the children whose mothers had a low MF level (median 24-hour MF level, ≤0.3 mG) during pregnancy, children whose mothers had a high MF level (>2.0 mG) had more than a 3.5-fold increased rate of asthma (aHR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.68-7.35), while children whose mothers had a medium MF level (>0.3-2.0 mG) had a 74% increased rate of asthma (aHR, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.93-3.25). A statistically significant synergistic interaction was observed between the MF effect and a maternal history of asthma and birth order (firstborn). Conclusion Our findings provide new epidemiological evidence that high maternal MF levels in pregnancy may increase the risk of asthma in offspring. Asthma is the most common chronic condition among children. Approximately 13% of children younger than 18 years (9.4 million children in the United States) have asthma.1 Based on reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, asthma is a leading cause of hospitalization and emergency department visits for children younger than 18 years in the United States, with staggering annual costs of more than $30 billion (http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/asthma).1 The prevalence of asthma has been steadily rising during the last several decades, with an increase of about 74% from 1980 to 1996. While not ruling out genetic susceptibility, such a secular increase indicates the presence of important environmental risk factors that remain elusive. Environmental exposures during pregnancy could affect fetal development of the immune system and lungs and thus have an impact on the risk of asthma in offspring.2-5 Among the limited research, chemical exposures have represented much of the focus, while the potential of environmental physical exposures has rarely been examined. One such physical exposure is increasing man-made electromagnetic fields (EMFs). In addition to traditional low-frequency EMFs from power lines and appliances, the buildup of increasingly stronger wireless networks both inside and outside living and work spaces and the proliferation of cell phones and other wireless devices have led to human populations being surrounded by EMFs of increasing intensity. This parallel increase in both EMF exposure and asthma prevalence in the past several decades warrants examination. Studies have shown that EMFs could adversely affect reproductive outcomes and the immune system.6-15 A recent study also showed an EMF effect on brain cell activities.16,17 Therefore, it is conceivable that exposure to high EMFs, especially during pregnancy (the period of fetal development), may have an impact on the risk of asthma in offspring. To examine this hypothesis, we conducted a prospective study based on a cohort of pregnant women whose daily exposure to magnetic fields (MFs) was captured objectively by a meter during their pregnancy and whose offspring from the index pregnancy were followed up for as long as 13 years for their asthma diagnosis."