All comment threads

Pls.stop it can affect our health.

This is a serious matter that needs stricter regulations for the health and well being of current as well as future generations. We are electro-magnetic beings! Please do your due diligence and research the evidence and make integral, responsible decisions. Children’s and infant skulls are thinner so radiation can penetrate more. Thank you. I am a very busy and concerned citizen.

I am responding as: an individual. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…): mobile phones Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years): Almost every single day, a few hours of duration, once or twice a day, since 20012. Adverse health effect(s) experienced: Fatigue (some times extreme fatigue), pain, migraines, decreased body temperature, heart arrhythmia, cognitive problems (mainly in concentration and short term memory), irritability, non-restorative sleep. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects: It is difficult to know, since I have been sick for a few years, with the symptoms I mentioned above, until a change of my usual home in 2012, in the mountains, where the radiation was very low, made me realize that I was reacting to the radiation of the mobile phone, and then I began to realize that this radiation made me sick. When you live surrounded by artificial radiation, as it happens today, it is difficult to perceive that this radiation is what makes you sick. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis? Yes, although today the main recommendation is to avoid as much as possible exposures. Other palliative recommendations were provided by physicians, mainly to increase antioxidant intake. Yes, I was diagnosed by four different physicians. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects? Yes, the main step has been to get to live in a place where artificial radiation is very low, so that exposure only occurs when there are neighbors nearby. Nevertheless, I had to shield part of the house, since from one year to the next, radiation increases everywhere. Of course there were changes in the effects, in fact, If I hadn't been able to find a suitable house and shield a part of the house, I don't know if I would still be alive, because my sensitivity is very high. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information: There are thousands of scientific publications that conclude that radiation from cell phones, antennas, wi-fi, etc. is harmful to health at intensity levels below the currently recommended limits, and more studies are published every year. I personally react at levels of 1 uW/m2, if exposed more than 30 min., or immediately at levels of 10 uW/m2 or more. Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's: Yes, it is important to note that, as I explained above, it is not easy to realize that wireless radiation is affecting you, unless you have the opportunity to live a few days in a place were such radiation is very low. Some effects take some time to appear from exposure, although they can last for several days. The impact on life, in all areas, is enormous, it is devastating.

See attached file(s)

Exposer and limits need to be studied,reviewed and updated. With towers in proximity to every neighborhood this should have been done before hand.

Hello Gov USA I had a very bad experience with radiation, I guess it was 5G, strong pressure, I lived in a house where it was installed, just entering the room I would feel strong pressure in my head and constant ringing in my ears, only leaving the room to go to the bathroom or outside would the ringing and pressure disappear, at that time while living there I was very sick, my skin was just burning, dry, I thought my ears would fall out, my eyes were burning. I went to the doctors, allergy medicine, antibiotics, steroid creams, nothing helped, but only knowing what I had done helped me move out to live somewhere else, and my health improved, my skin healed and everything else healed within 2 weeks, I don't even want to remember it was something horible, so people have to check the places they live, especially where they spend the most time, so that there is nothing that makes you sick, and you You are unnecessarily visiting doctors, you are polluting your body with medications that are prescribed for you and do not help, and will not help as long as you live in a room where there is radiation

1. & 2. Responding as: an individual 3a. Type of sources: WI-Fi 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, timing: Pulsed frequencies, continuing during several minutes/hours, from low frequencies (dirty electricity) to high frequencies (mobille Phones, WI-FI), since more than 10 years 3c. Adverse health effects: agitation, hyperactivity, memory and concentration difficulties, insomnia, headaches, ringing in the ears, a buzzing sensation in the head, hunger, abdominal pain, nausea, frequent urination, irritation of the airways and lungs, heart palpitations, chest pain, severe fatigue, flu-like symptoms, feverishness, sore eyes, dry eyes, blurred vision, itchy scalp, rough and red facial skin, restless legs, numb hands, dry mouth (especially at night), emotional, exhausted 3d. Time from exposure to appearance of adverse effects; did a change coincide with onset: more than 10 years 3e. Medical evaluation sought? Diagnosis? Yes. Diagnosis by classical doctors was burn-out/CFS, an endocrinologist has found a mild form of CAH and several auto-immune diseases (hashimoto, parietal cell antibodies, vitiligo) 3f. Steps taken to reduce exposure; subsequent changes in effects: Yes, no use of wireless devices, shielded home, shielding clothes outside home, electricity off at night. The effects dissapear 2 or 3 days after elimination of the exposure, but come back during and after new exposure. 3g. Supporting documentation: You can find links to Scientific reports on: https://stichtingehs.nl/wetenschappelijk-onderzoek-naar-ehs/ Additional Details: B1a. Sources experienced as causing Adverse Effects: WI-FI, smart-phones, antenna's, cordless phones, dirty electricity B1b. Sources can sense, but don't harm: I do not sense EMF, I just get all these health complaints from them, most of them after the exposure B1c. Can use without sensing: clean electricity, one short pulse of HF EMF a few times a day, very short phone call with a smart phone (less than 1 minute), sending an sms, B1d. That provide benefit: I have no idea, never tried them B2a. Health conditions that may contribute: Chronic permanent (day/night) exposure to EMF during many years: WI-FI router under my desk, long phonecalls with mobile phones, cordless phone next to the couch B2b. Other health conditions: Infections (Lyme, Eppstein-Barr), CAH and several auto-immune diseases (hashimoto, parietal cell antibodies, vitiligo), long periods of work stress B3. Drugs, therapies, remedies, or practices: B3a. Can recommend: Take rest, sleep, sun to recover between exposures, light exercises, walking in nature and swimming, reading a book, vitamines and minerals if you have shortage B3b. Can recommend, but not positive they help: If I am not positive that they, help, I won't recommend. B3c. Helped but don’t recommend: B3d. Treatments having no effect: B3e. That made sensitivity worse: 55-64 B4. Age range: 55-64 B5. Year you became aware of your sensitivity to RF/EMFs: 2014 B6. Country, state, province, or city lived in when first noticed sensitivity: Belgium

I want to share our community’s deeply concerning experience with a proposed cell tower installation located just five feet from a school facility where young children regularly play. Despite significant concerns raised by parents, residents, and the surrounding community, the telecommunications company continued pushing forward with the installation. The owners of the building listened to our concerns and recognized the importance of protecting the children and families who use this space. Unfortunately, the telecommunications company was unwilling to meaningfully address those concerns and even fought against the building owners in its efforts to move forward. As a parent, I find it incredibly troubling that telecommunications infrastructure can be placed so close to areas where children spend their days without greater consideration of potential long-term health effects, environmental impacts, or the concerns of the families directly affected. Our experience highlighted a serious imbalance between the interests of telecommunications companies and the ability of local communities and property owners to have a meaningful voice in decisions that affect them. I urge HHS to reevaluate existing wireless radiation exposure standards using current, independent scientific research, with particular attention to children’s long-term and cumulative exposure. I also encourage greater transparency, stronger oversight, and meaningful consideration of community concerns when wireless infrastructure is proposed near schools and other places where children gather. Families should not have to fight this hard simply to have legitimate health and safety concerns heard. Our children deserve thoughtful protections, and our communities deserve a meaningful voice in decisions that may affect their health and well-being for years to come.

See document attached by Rete 6V/mx6' that replaces the one sent previously

I’ll be brief. It is long past due that any and all studies are publicly published while updated and accurate new studies be performed. Transparency, honesty, & accuracy are key. Phones, routers, ‘smart’ meters, 5g+ tech & more-all need to be properly studied & publicly shared. Our health depends on it.