All comment threads

I lived on the center of the hypotenuse of an isosceles triangle of cell towers for approximately four years. During this time, I experienced daily headaches and tinnitus. Since moving in 10/24, the headaches have stopped and the tinnitus has persisted. Our bodies have not evolved sufficiently to function properly with constant signal bombardment. Exploring methods to mitigate the signals seems a fruitful path to pursue. A device that neutralizes the signals to our bodies without interfering with transmission would be valuable.

Biology and Technology should go hand in hand rather than diverge to a point of one decimating the other- AD Primary Etheric Substrate/Non material informational substrate or the Zero point universal memory reservoir is a quantum field of possibilities- Akasha ( In Sanksrit) The substrate needs a site/receptor to intercept or act on: mind (non material) on the material platform of brain. Once interception occurs: thoughts are perceived, intentions are formed and actions are planned. The ones we act on are defined by the ego as 'our actions', the ones that are perceived are 'our thoughts' and the ones that intercept but are never formulated or acted on leave the plane of mind and remain in the etheric substrate. 1) Google has patented https://patents.google.com/patent/US20090062677A1/en (Author offers a method for re-writing the human brain on electronic chips. This method allows for the modeling of a human soul in order to achieve man immortality. This method does not damage the brain but works to extend and enhance it. This method of writing and saving of Human Soul includes: writing of views which person see in during his life by a micro video recorder to a portable memory; writing of sounds which person speaks and hears by microphone; writing of person physical conditions by micro sensors; writing of time and dates; writing of person body position and so on.) The above patent will be operational if the quantum mechanisms by which life in sustained in the body is operational. A Dead brain will not hold any memory. Memory retains itself in its non material informational substrate/space. Hence the chip reader will fail to collect data of a dead being. While the biology is active in the body and when the mind is functional on the platform that we call brain( operational aerodrome for thoughts) this patent will be able to collect and recreate a profile of the subject. Perhaps it already has created such subjects in hand but remain unknown to masses. To study the impact of disturbances created by EMF's, RF's, Wireless fields and microwave radiation exposure on human biology is of significance as it diverges away from the nature intended interception of Non material informational substrate on its subjective on its intended platform. Of significance in discussion is unwanted financial impacts of field interference as such, seen due to smart devices, smart energy utility read meters and smart energy appliances. Energy costs are soaring and one aspect that is implicated is the smart reading meters which utilize RF to read energy usage, many a times inaccurately so due to interference. Reference: Appraising the Economics of Smart Meters: Costs and Benefits March 2020 DOI:10.4324/9780367203375 ISBN: 9780367203375 Authors: Jacopo Torriti One of the most consistent findings across smart meter studies is that many users perceive the meters as more useful to energy providers than to themselves (Shirani et al. 2020). This perception reinforces a sense of asymmetry in value: while utilities benefit from improved billing accuracy, remote disconnection, and load management, users often see little direct benefit -particularly when energy prices remain high or usage feedback is difficult to interpret (Torriti 2020). In such cases, users may ignore or disable interfaces, view the meters as irrelevant, or interpret them as tools of control rather than empowerment. Of note: In the state of NY customers who request Smart meters be replaced back to conventional meters are fined and penalized every month.( This is from my personal experience) Reference: Radio-frequency interference to automotive radar sensors Andrew Stove, Chris Baker First published: 11 September 2018 https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2018.5027Digital Object Identifier (DOI) Radio frequency interference (RFI) from various electronic devices in newer cars can disrupt radar speed detection systems, potentially leading to false speed readings or reduced detection range. This interference is particularly concerning in environments with multiple vehicles equipped with radar technology. Of note: Upstate NY is seemingly popular for radar detected speed tickets. Above study demonstrates how E Cars have populated themselves with technology that interfers and misreads speed by radar detectors- thus leading to unnecessary tickets and court trips. Reference: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361923024002247 A review on the consequences of molecular and genomic alterations following exposure to electromagnetic fields: Remodeling of neuronal network and cognitive changes https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12829706/ https://www.emf-portal.org/en/article/18368 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378427410013196 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895398811600895 Such is the Border crisis within the body.

I am an individual consumer. I have had a pacemaker since June of 2020. I was told by cardiologist at the hospital to not have a cell phone on the side of my body with the pacemaker as it will affect my pacemaker. After my internet carrier changed to fiber optics, I found out from the company that makes my pacemaker monitor that 5G will destroy it. If that happened, I wouldn’t know if my pacemaker was working correctly and I would die. Because of this I had to get rid of my home phone and only use my cell phone. Presently, my cell phone carrier still has 4G. When it goes to 5G, I won’t be able to have a cell phone. I am extremely affected by my internet on my computer and the smart meter at my home. I become very agitated and filled with anxiety when on my computer. Since they installed the smart meter at my home a few years ago, my health began deteriorating. I am a copyeditor for authors, so staying off the computer would not allow me to continue my occupation. I need the money to even pay my lot rent as well as my other bills. Please lower the current 5G to 4G or less for the benefit of my physical and mental health and that of everyone else exposed to these frequencies. I researched SAR absorption rates before purchasing my last cell phone. I believe most people are aware of the danger of these frequencies, however they have no ability to affect a change. Their speaking up about this to their politicians has not made any difference. 10. I don't know. 11. Should exposure assessment or risk evaluation differ for sensitive populations such as those noted below? No, I believe that each of the following populations should be protected as they are all vulnerable to adverse health effects or even death because of these frequencies. 12, 13, 14. I don't know. 15 All of these things should be taken into account for the safety of everyone. 16 I don't know. 17 This is something Mr. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. needs to investigate. He needs to be the one to write the guideless on the roles for all the federal health agencies listed. 18 The average person reading this will be overwhelmed and not respond. It would take an entire law firm working in concert to get this information within six months to one year.

I would like to know the effects of EMF and if there are steps to reduce EMF from the body.

Could these systems (5G towers, flock cameras, etc ) potentially be used as weapons or be hacked into by adversaries? These systems are being placed very close to schools. As well as in neighborhoods. It is highly concerning. More importantly, what is the over time accumulated effect on the nervous systems of humans exposed? Brian fog? Fatigue? Neurological disorder exacerbations? Psychological harm? What are these devices providing to the population of taxpaying, citizens and their offspring ? Is that service worth the potential health effects? We're we not productive enough of a society before 5G? In addition to human health, where does the natural environment that sustains us come into play, how are we making sure that the wildlife -flora and fauna are not being negatively affected?

5G causes cancer, heart attacks, strokes, migraines, brain fog, memory loss, insomnia, fatigue, tinnitus, flu like symptoms (AKA Covid), muscle pain, muscle deterioration, loss of collagen just to name a few. The 5G antennas also kill trees, insects, birds and animals.

Acoustical weapons and DEWs used against me. My health is being affected negatively. Taylor County Florida

Because of a medically caused injury, I retain MRI contrast that is impacted by EMFs causing me additional pain and injury. Many other people are harmed, as well.

If these systems have not been tested to prove the public’s health is not at risk they should not be used so widespread. If these technologies are not safe they are basically weapons. People lose work and lose wages from headaches and some are very sensitive to EMF. Who is going to pay for these injured people’s living expenses? A few can I get Rich at the risk of millions. You are comply we demand and surgery demand safe technologies in our communities and planet. We have about WIFi. I think “rolling out” new tech is pointless unless you’re getting rich Doing it. We do not want it. We do not need it. Thankyou.

"Radiation" just means energy traveling as waves. 5G uses radio waves, the same family as FM radio, TV, and Wi-Fi. These waves are non-ionizing, meaning they can't break chemical bonds or damage DNA. Even 5G's highest bands carry about 0.0002 electron-volts per photon. Visible light carries about 2 eV, and damaging UV and X-rays start around 10 eV. 5G falls short of that by a factor of tens of thousands. The one established biological effect of radio waves is mild tissue heating, and safety rules exist to prevent exactly that. ICNIRP (the international standard) and the FCC set public limits about 50 times below the level where measurable heating begins. Reaching the limit doesn't mean harm. It means you still have a wide safety margin. Radio power falls with the square of distance. At twice the distance you get a quarter of the power, and at ten times the distance you get 1/100th. Tower antennas are mounted high and aimed at the horizon, not at people standing below. Measurement surveys around 5G sites consistently find public exposure at around 1% of the limit or less. Midday sunlight delivers about 1,000 watts per square meter to your skin. The public limit for 5G millimeter waves is 10 W/m², which is 100 times lower, and real-world tower exposure is far below even that. A few minutes outside on a summer day puts more energy into your skin than living next to a tower. A higher frequency doesn't make a wave more dangerous. 5G's high-band (mmWave) signals are absorbed in roughly the top millimeter of skin and can't reach your organs. Walls, windows, leaves, and even your hand block them, which is why mmWave needs so many small cells. Your skin sheds much larger heat loads every day through blood flow and sweat. Most US 5G doesn't use mmWave at all. It runs on low and mid bands (600 MHz to about 4 GHz), similar to 4G and Wi-Fi. At rest, your body generates about 80–100 watts of heat. A phone transmits at most a watt or two, and much less when the signal is strong. The energy from a tower that actually reaches you is a tiny fraction of a watt. When a phone feels warm, the heat comes from its battery and processor, not from radio waves. A microwave oven concentrates about 1,000 watts inside a sealed metal box. Wi-Fi uses the same 2.4 GHz frequency at about a tenth of a watt, spread in every direction. The danger comes from concentrated power, not the frequency itself. Cell towers deliver neither high concentration nor close proximity. Radio-frequency energy has been researched for over 60 years across radar, broadcasting, and the millimeter-wave body scanners used at airports. The World Health Organization states that no adverse health effect has been causally linked to wireless technology exposure within the limits. In 2011, IARC classified RF fields as "possibly carcinogenic" (Group 2B). That was based on limited, inconsistent data about heavy phone use held against the head, not towers. The same category includes aloe vera extract and pickled vegetables. Brain cancer rates have stayed flat despite billions of people adopting phones. Some researchers want more long-term mmWave studies, since widespread public use is relatively new. A minority argue for non-thermal effects, but those haven't been reliably reproduced. Workers right in front of rooftop antennas are a different situation. That's why access is restricted and occupational rules apply. Bottom line: 5G towers emit low-energy, non-ionizing waves. By the time those waves reach you, they're a sliver of a limit that is itself set 50 times below the point of any measurable heating. The sun, your own metabolism, and a hot shower all put far more heat into your body.