HHS EMFTHE PUBLIC COMMENT FORUM
The people. The questions. The public record.An independent RF Safe project
Forum index › All threadsLatest posting day

THE LATEST SUBMISSIONS

All comment threads

7067 original comments · Newest first

Browse topics
Read full comments below. More load as you scroll.
Posted 2026-10-26#4608 · Permanent link ↗

Offers religious commentary on judgment and jurisdiction, with references to Mind Nexus and legislation.

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Mind Nexus! Cares Act of 2016, Section 3024! Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. The earth and the heavens fled from his presence, and there was no place for them. And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Another book was opened, which is the BOOK of LIFE. The dead were JUDGED according to what they had done as recorded in the books. The sea gave up the dead that were in it, and DEATH and HADES gave up the dead that were in them, and each person was judged according to what they had done. Then DEATH and HADES were thrown into the LAKE of FIRE. The lake of fire is the second death. Anyone whose NAME WAS NOT FOUND WRITTEN in the book of life was THROWN into the lake of fire(PRISON) The KING and JUDGE Yeshua's law( Land Air Water) Jurisdiction of the Air! Revelation 20:11-15 in the KINGDOM GOVERNMENT constitution of Heaven.
Posted 2026-10-26#4607 · Permanent link ↗

Calls for radiation and microwave exposure to be treated as a national security and public safety concern…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
This issue is long overdue the health effects are potentially way greater than we even suspect. It should be treated as a national security issue to keep your citizens safe from harmful radiation, microwave technology and frequency emitting waves.
Posted 2026-10-26#4606 · Permanent link ↗

A senior reports acute cognitive discomfort near a store-side 5G tower, improvement after leaving, and op…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Hello, I am a senior citizen of the US and Canada and walking into a big box store with a 5 G tower right beside it scrambled my brain so fast and it made me feel absolutely horrible. As soon as I left the store and got out of there I felt myself again I will not live near those towers and for you to think they are ok - they are not and there are plenty of experts that will testify to their dangers....how can you not listen to them?? Are you working for the people or for big business?? I ask you - stop trying to kill and maime us with military type weapons, Ann Blackmore
Posted 2026-10-26#4605 · Permanent link ↗

Attributes persistent difficulty losing weight to a nearby tower and describes financial and practical ba…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I moved to a house within 300m of a cell tower approximately 10 years ago and I've never been able to lose weight since. After finding Dr Jack Kruse and his work I have begun to understand what damage this cell tower has been doing to me slowly over time and while I can mitigate some of it, I cannot move for financial reasons and I cannot plant enough trees to block it in my neighborhood. Please stop the ceaseless barrage of nnEMF into my house!
Posted 2026-10-26#4604 · Permanent link ↗

Argues that vulnerable populations need greater protection, reports family sensitivity and symptoms near …

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Dear Department of Health and human services, The UK government has found conclusive evidence that vulnerable populations (children, sick, and elderly) are the most susceptible to having negative effects of being within 600 m of cell phone towers and power lines. Leukemia, and other developmental impairments are linked to the substantial increase of 24/7 EMF and RF exposure. In most urban areas, cell towers are within 600 m of each other- compounding the EMF pollution. The UK has regulations on cell phone and power companies on the proximity and amount of towers that emit EMF and RF for the safe guard of their most vulnerable populations. The research that is relied upon by cellphone and power companies often benefit their profit margins as well as commuting their responsibilities and risks of their operations to other entities or pollution centers. The classic, “nothing to see here” and “look a that a way” tactic of purely self preserving opportunists. Yet, research that has shown that EMF and or RF pollution have negligible impacts on people’s health, growth, development, and resilience; firstly, do not take into account Quality of Life and secondly, are taken from research samples of healthy, 18-35 year old, military strong men. The research in favor of confident unregulated EMF and RF fail to include women, children, infirm, autoimmune, mentally ill, elderly, and other less predictable populations in our country. Reminding the Department of Health and Human Services of their role to protect the health of all humans in our great nation, not simply the strong and resilient, would be patronizing. Instead, I have faith that by the simple request for feedback on this matter is an absolute testament to the DHHS’s commitment to the “least among us”. Personally, my mom (a disabled veteran) suffers from severe sensitivity to EMF and RF pollution. It is such that she cannot think clearly with any device or tower near by. She lives in a constant state of vague distress. She’s Hispanic and she may literally be the first one on our family to be exposed to EMF and RF pollution. My husband and I have experienced terrible reactions to living within 100m of a new 5G tower, including hallucinations and mood disturbances. Pollinators and birds lose their ability to navigate. Children retain their primitive reflexes and our already vulnerable elderly have reduced neuroplasticity. It would be important to take care of these people versus protecting Cell phone and power companies bottom line. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Posted 2026-10-26#4603 · Permanent link ↗

Reports palpitations, headaches and shortness of breath around wireless technology and asks for recogniti…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I have suffered heart palpitations headaches shortness of breath and other symptoms always around wireless technology. It is beyond my comprehension that this is allowed and that it's not recognized as a problem right now. I even know doctors that suffer symptoms and their offices are absolutely full of wireless technology. Let's get this problem fixed yesterday.
Posted 2026-10-26#4602 · Permanent link ↗

Reports an EHS diagnosis, community and animal illnesses and deaths attributed to towers and smart meters…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
MY NEIGHBORS AND ANIMALS ARE DYING I am SICK. My family members have been SICK SINCE more than a hundred UNREGULATED TOWERS WENT LIVE over our community. This has been a challenge for me to get anyone to help in my community. I wanted to share my story in hopes of helping others. My story is one of many in Terrebonne Parish. After multiple (9) 300-foot 5G towers were put over our homes, four 300-foot 5G towers were put over my home and animal sanctuary, and four 300-foot towers were put over my office. At the same time, smart meters were put on my home, along with those of every other Entergy customer. I began getting sick, very sick. It began in my petting area with heart palpitations, headaches, vomiting, ringing in my ears, confusion, bleeding gums, insomnia, nightmares, dizziness, anxiety, ears buzzing 24 hours a day, severe fatigue, muscle weakness, and more. I have now been diagnosed with radiation syndrome / EHS (electromagnetic hypersensitivity syndrome) caused by extreme exposure to radiation. Many residents are experiencing similar symptoms. Countless children are now suffering. Being a very healthy person my whole life, this has been a life-changing situation. I am usually the one helping others; now I need your help. I never thought this could happen until I was forced to face it by becoming sick. I'm not sure where this illness will take me. However, I must do all I can to protect my family and my community. Seven neighbors on my street and friends have died after the towers went live over their homes. Many other residents are also sick. My community is surrounded by towers that have no regulatory testing information, nor does our planning department ask for it, citing the FCC's outdated RF radiation guidelines. I became certified in RF radiation testing. I now test the towers and smart meters. I can confirm that the EMF (electromagnetic frequency) / RF (radio frequency) radiation being emitted is extreme for every single product, tower, and smart device I have tested. has been a fight to protect my family, my community, and myself, with EVERYONE CITING THE FCC'S OUTDATED RF RADIATION GUIDELINES. I had to learn all I could about this to protect my health and theirs. I've had to turn my home, where I have lived for 28 years, into an EMF-safe house (until I sell it), as well as my barn, which is surrounded by EMF material and protection. My bed is covered with EMF protection as well due to the radiation levels in my home. I now have to wear protective clothing all day. Leaving my safe area means becoming exposed due to the unbridled towers around me. I am a very private person. This is not easy to share, but if I do not ask for help now, many more innocent people will be sick, or they will die like my neighbors, my friends, and my animals. Since the towers went live, six of my horses have died instantly under the towers. All of my little animals have died. My 200-pound tortoises started going blind. I'm not sure where the daily radiation exposure will take me, so I thought now is the best time to ask for your help in making a change. THE FCC MUST REGULATE THE RADIATION, OR THE DEATH & DESTRUCTION WILL NEVER END. Technology is safe only if it is REGULATED.
Posted 2026-10-26#4601 · Permanent link ↗

Supports HHS review of experiences and evidence and research priorities addressing children and vulnerabl…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.
Posted 2026-10-26#4600 · Permanent link ↗

Reports family sensitivity, headaches and cancer attributed to radiation, describes spending on protectiv…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. As a very concerned mother and now grand-mother and Holistic Health Care Advocate for family, friends and many healing groups I learned already as a young person about all good and harmful Earth Earth radiations. A topic well known to professionals and families in Germany for decades but sadly ignored and even villified and fought over here! Family members and I have always been very sensitive to these radiations, even leading to cancer which had been diagnosed and confirmed by their doctors. I would have a constant headache 24/7 right away and even receive electric shocks by just holding a cell phone--already before the more intense 4G and 5G Smart phones and in addition to those smart Meters and huge cell towers were built!! My search was therefore focused on finding protection from these harmful rays, spending ( investing) initially over $4,000 to protect my home, and so I was always led to more and more inventors who offered devices which could protect us personally from these rays. But people are being kept so ignorant over here and many get so sick and have to suffer needlessly because all their specialists cannot find the cause. Friends of mine here in Co. and in Santa Fe were on their death bed and were given up when they read the book by Arthur Firstenberg which helped them improve but not to full recovery. So, please, do not just follow the money because technology can be created for a higher expense! So I urge you to establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.
Posted 2026-10-26#4599 · Permanent link ↗

Calls for independent and transparent research, precautionary exposure safeguards and updated biologicall…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
While EMFs affect all ages, children are uniquely vulnerable and deserve special consideration. They are exposed to wireless radiation at increasingly young ages, often beginning during pregnancy and continuing throughout childhood and adulthood in their homes, schools, communities, and workplaces. The widespread use of screens and wireless devices has become normalized and encouraged, while questions about hazardous, long-term and cumulative exposure effects remain routinely ignored by federal regulatory agencies and government authorities. The FCC’s current RF exposure guidelines were established in 1996 and are fundamentally flawed and outdated. Wireless technology and infrastructure has exploded since the guidelines were introduced, and yet the industry has actively suppressed the extensive body of scientific literature that clearly demonstrates harm to people and the environment. Furthermore, federal regulatory agencies have yet to demonstrate to the public that the FCC’s decades-old RF exposure guidelines adequately protect children, other vulnerable populations and the environment from the risks of exposure. Rather than continuing to dramatically expand population-wide wireless radiation exposure, we should exercise a precautionary approach when it comes to wireless and take this opportunity to thoroughly examine the current state of scientific literature and conduct new studies that appropriately consider the long-term consequences of ubiquitous and cumulative exposure to current and future wireless environments. That means supporting independent research into the health and developmental effects of RF radiation, particularly the effects on children, pregnant women, and other vulnerable populations. Additionally, it is equally critical that federal regulatory agencies are transparent about the body of scientific literature that is used to establish exposure standards, and must ensure that they are based on biologically-relevant models. This scientific literature must be independent of industry influence and any entity that has a financial interest in continued wireless deployment. It is of utmost importance that HHS and other public health agencies play a central role in evaluating the evidence and identifying where research gaps remain. We must not allow yet another generation of children to be harmed by the effects of wireless radiation. For the sake of our children and their future, we must consider independent science, exercise transparency, and implement the necessary protections to make safer, and more responsible decisions about the wireless environment in which they are growing up. I urge HHS to prioritize rigorous, independent, and transparent research into the health and developmental effects of wireless radiation, particularly for children and other vulnerable populations. As wireless technologies become increasingly embedded in our daily lives, we have a responsibility to ensure that their widespread use is guided by sound science and accompanied by safeguards that fully protect children’s health and development.

10 comments displayed. More load as you scroll.

These are separate official submissions grouped by topic. A comment can appear in more than one board.