HHS EMFTHE PUBLIC COMMENT FORUM
The people. The questions. The public record.An independent RF Safe project
Forum index › TopicsLatest posting day

TOPIC BOARD

Research & federal duties

2151 original comments · Newest first

Browse topics
Read full comments below. More load as you scroll.
Posted 2026-10-09#1955 · Permanent link ↗

Provides an abstract reporting chromosomal damage and enhanced gamma-radiation effects in exposed human b…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
See attached file(s) Mobile telephony radiation exerts genotoxic action and significantly enhances the effects of gamma radiation in human cells 2024 Abstract. I previously reported chromosomal damage in human peripheral blood lymphocytes (HPBLs) induced by: a) mobile telephony (MT) electromagnetic fields (EMFs)/electromagnetic radiation (EMR), b) a high caffeine dose, and c) the combination of the two stressors. HPBLs from the same subjects exposed to gamma radiation at doses 0.1, 0.3, or 0.5 Gy, displayed more aberrations than those exposed to MT EMFs or the high caffeine dose in a dose-dependent manner. When the cells exposed to these gamma radiation doses were pre-exposed to a single 15-min MT EMF exposure, the number of aberrations increased significantly more than the sum number of aberrations induced by the individual stressors in all subjects. Thus, MT EMF exposure at a power density ~136 times below the latest International Commission on Non- Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) exposure limit, apart from the fact that it is genotoxic by itself, significantly enhanced the genotoxic action of gamma radiation. Since gamma radiation at similar doses is applied for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, people should be aware of the increased risk during treatment periods. Comparison of the genotoxic action between MT EMF and gamma radiation shows that the ICNIRP limits are, at least, ~4.5×104 times less stringent than the limits for gamma radiation. Key words: Electromagnetic fields — Mobile phone radiation — Gamma radiation — Human lym- phocytes — Chromatid aberrations — DNA damage

Attachments · 1

Original public attachments. Their contents are not included in category reviews.

Posted 2026-10-09#1954 · Permanent link ↗

Provides a study abstract reporting regional cerebral blood-flow changes during mobile-phone exposure in …

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
See attached file(s) Mobile phone affects cerebral blood flow in humans 2006 Abstract Mobile phones create a radio-frequency electromagnetic field (EMF) around them when in use, the effects of which on brain physiology in humans are not well known. We studied the effects of a commercial mobile phone on regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in healthy humans using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Positron emission tomography data was acquired using a double-blind, counterbalanced study design with 12 male subjects performing a computer- controlled verbal working memory task (letter 1-back). Explorative and objective voxel-based statistical analysis revealed that a mobile phone in operation induces a local decrease in rCBF beneath the antenna in the inferior temporal cortex and an increase more distantly in the prefrontal cortex. Our results provide the first evidence, suggesting that the EMF emitted by a commercial mobile phone affects rCBF in humans. These results are consistent with the postulation that EMF induces changes in neuronal activity. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism advance online publication, 22 February 2006; doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600279 Keywords: cerebral blood flow; electromagnetic field; human; mobile phones; positron emission tomography

Attachments · 1

Original public attachments. Their contents are not included in category reviews.

Posted 2026-10-08#1945 · Permanent link ↗

Requests FCC monitoring records and evidence that established exposure guidelines are being tested and en…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Where are the FCC reports of monitoring them? I believe that they are harmful but more so when guideline established are not tested. Show me the paperwork please.
Posted 2026-10-08#1943 · Permanent link ↗

Raises cumulative-exposure concerns about connected household devices, describes paying a smart-meter opt…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
With more Wi-Fi being included with personal items in our homes, from our alarm systems to our HVAC systems and everything in between, how do we know how much we're ultimately being exposed to? We had a Wi-Fi smart meter removed from our power panel because it sits directly beneath our master bedroom, which means that we are being exposed to Wi-Fi all night long while we are sleeping. But we have to PAY an extra fee to not be radiated by our smart meter every month. And yet, the power company has NO RESPONSIBILITY to ensure that their Wi-Fi meter is safe for our health. There are so many issues that have yet to be addressed and I strongly urge this administration to fully research the safety of all these technologies.
Posted 2026-10-08#1941 · Permanent link ↗

Reports reproducible headaches near a mobile hotspot, improvement with distance or switching it off, and …

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Hello, Please look into mobile hotspots and headaches. I work remotely and when I do so from a car, coffee shop, airport or where have you with my hot spot on I get a headache within 1 minute. When I work without Hotspot, no headache. Its repeatable and consistent for the past 5 years. I do notice however when I place the mobile Hotspot more than 6 feet from me the headaches are gone or much more subtle. When the Hotspot is turned off, my headache resolves within minutes. Perhaps its rare or some people are more sensitive than others, but this is a real issue for me and makes me concerned what the health effects are. I dont suffer from headaches otherwise and am in great health. I've taken into consideration confounders like posture, stress, poor sleep, long sessions but the issue remains. I've even had my friend "blind test" me by turning a hotspot on and off near me without telling me and I was able to tell every time. Thanks!
Posted 2026-10-08#1937 · Permanent link ↗

A healthcare practitioner attributes rising insomnia to smart meters and wider EMF exposure, describes pe…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
As a concerned healthcare practitioner, parent and citizen,I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. In the past 20 years, my healthcare practice has shown a drastic increase in patients with chronic insomnia along with all the other chronic disease that shows up in the human body when it does not get to repair itself from a decent night’s sleep. Most people wake up now about 3 am as a result of the data dump on smart meters. Then everyone continues to get assaulted by all the EMF pollution in our homes, cars, places of work and cities we live in for the rest of the day. Even going out in nature has radiation humming. There is no escaping EMF pollution currently. Removing people from their immediate environment is a temporary fix. There are certainly ways to lower EMF pollution in the home, which shows drastic improvement in symptoms for those affected. We shouldn’t have to do that. We should have our federal agencies looking out for human health so we don’t have to take such drastic measures. I personally have watched many friends become aware of this unavoidable pollution throughout the years as well. I look forward to seeing HHS hiring the best scholars in medicine, biology, epidemiology and public health and examining the large body of evidence exposing the health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Alongside these studies, individual experience of the detrimental effects citizens are reporting should be examined closely and brought to light. HHS responsibility is to protect the health of our citizens, especially the children and other vulnerable populations from any health insult, especially the big ones that have already done so much damage like wireless radiation. Thank you for giving the public a chance to tell HHS our experiences, research and opinions so that we may be heard and you may step up. I so look forward to you turning the tide in this critical health issue.
Posted 2026-10-08#1934 · Permanent link ↗

Recommends appointing Beverly Rubik to an influential review-panel role and links to an unread video.

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Beverly Rubik who is a PHD has been discussing this in a public format for years. How about we appoint her on the mission? Anything I describe would be anecdotal and the data needed to collect would make me seem like a schizophrenic. Watch her videos and get her on the panel / decision podium with power and not a title… https://youtu.be/mm3ljbrZR9g?si=8tBEB4Pa_2t28lCr
Posted 2026-10-08#1930 · Permanent link ↗

Cites The Invisible Rainbow as evidence of biological harm and calls for revised U.S. exposure limits.

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
The book "The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life" by Arthur Firstenberg has cited several reports and scientific peer review studies that shows high exposure to RF/EMF causes biological harm. The United States has the highest legal exposure ratings approved by any country in the world. I believe the FCC needs to update the United States legal exposure limits. Thank you for your time.
Posted 2026-10-08#1925 · Permanent link ↗

Alleges weaponized medical and body-area-network technologies and nonconsensual experimentation, and call…

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
focus on the white papers of past studies. WBAN "A body area network (BAN), also referred to as a wireless body area network (WBAN), a body sensor network (BSN) or a medical body area network (MBAN), is a wireless network of wearable computing devices.[1][2][3][4][5] BAN devices may be embedded inside the body as implants or pills,[6] may be surface-mounted on the body in a fixed position, or may be accompanied devices which humans can carry in different positions, such as in clothes pockets, by hand, or in various bags.[7]" the government needs to admit that they are using our body part and weaponizing the medical industrial complex against humanity. How are people suppose to show evidence of directed energy weapons that has been used against them and share their experience without acknowledging this first. Doctors won't acknowledge or lack certain knowledge or get paid to push the BIG Pharma meds onto people that question anything. Until humanity is not used as a lab rat to pursue nefarious agendas the truth will continue to be buried under the highest bidder that can pay for things to continue. History has not been factual it is only allowing lies to continue and narratives to continue. Accountability should be at the fore front of open dialogue to happen with the public on information and what they have experienced with health issues.

10 comments displayed. More load as you scroll.

These are separate official submissions grouped by topic. A comment can appear in more than one board.