Research & federal duties

I am a grandmother who worries about my grandchildren being around so much of these types of frequencies. They have all of this in the classroom, at home, in libraries, etc. Young developing minds and bodies are sensitive to all the rays they are being bombarded with. I have read that France stopped the I phone 16 from being available because of the hazards. More information on how it affects us all is needed. It should be done by a 3rd party impartial entity. Also, to many towers and antennas everywhere!

I urge the Department of Health and Human Services to take immediate, independent action to evaluate the potential health effects of radiofrequency (RF) radiation and electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure. Regulatory inaction is unacceptable when scientific questions remain and public exposure continues to increase. We must not repeat the mistakes of the tobacco industry, where warnings and scientific concerns were met with years of delay while the public remained exposed. The comparison is about regulatory responsibility—not a claim that the evidence on wireless radiation is identical to the evidence on tobacco. Scientific evidence warrants serious attention. In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified RF electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B). The U.S. National Toxicology Program’s animal studies reported evidence of certain tumors associated with cell-phone RF exposure. More recent systematic reviews have found no clear increase in some cancers examined, underscoring the need for continued independent research rather than complacency. Research also raises questions about reproductive health and biological effects. A 2024 systematic review by Cordelli and colleagues examined RF exposure and male fertility, including evidence from animal studies and human sperm in vitro. Grimaldi and colleagues reported in 1997 that exposure to 50-Hz electromagnetic fields affected Epstein–Barr virus antigen expression in a laboratory cell model. These findings do not establish that everyday wireless exposure causes disease, but they demonstrate why biological effects deserve rigorous investigation. The scientific literature must be evaluated objectively, including evidence of harm, evidence of no effect, and uncertainties. Research should be independent of industry influence, transparent, reproducible, and sufficiently funded to address long-term and cumulative exposure. I call on HHS to take the following actions immediately: 1. Commission an independent, comprehensive review of peer-reviewed research on RF radiation and EMF exposure, including cancer, reproductive health, neurological effects, and other potential biological impacts. 2. Reassess whether current exposure limits adequately reflect the scientific evidence, including uncertainties regarding long-term and cumulative exposure. 3. Increase funding for independent research and long-term studies, with particular attention to children, pregnancy, and other potentially vulnerable populations. 4. Improve public education and transparency about exposure sources, scientific uncertainties, and practical ways to reduce unnecessary exposure. 5. Establish clear timelines for review, public reporting, and regulatory action. The absence of definitive proof of harm is not proof of safety. HHS must not wait for incontrovertible evidence of widespread harm before acting responsibly. The public deserves transparent science, independent oversight, and precautionary policies that put health ahead of commercial interests. Relevant peer-reviewed research and sources • Baan R, et al. Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. The Lancet Oncology. 2011;12(7):624–626. • National Toxicology Program. Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of cell-phone radiofrequency radiation. Technical Reports 595 and 596, 2018. • Karipidis K, et al. The effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on cancer risk in the general and working population: A systematic review of human observational studies. Environment International. 2024;191:108983. • Cordelli E, et al. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on male fertility: A systematic review of experimental studies. Environment International. 2024;185:108509. • Grimaldi S, et al. 50 Hz electromagnetic fields induce changes in the expression of Epstein-Barr virus early antigens in a cell line. Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology. 1997;16(2–3):205–207. • Environmental Health Trust: Wireless Radiation Health Effects Research • National Toxicology Program: Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation Studies I urge HHS to act now, prioritize public health, and ensure that wireless technology policy is guided by independent science rather than delayed until preventable harm becomes undeniable.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am a concerned citizen and I do not consent to the continued deployment of said technologies everywhere. Personal story of how wireless radiation has affected me. I recently lost my closest friend of over 40 years, her untimely death in part due to high EMFs that she could not escape. Can I prove this? No. But it is most certain. For years, she could not go out in public because of the high EMFs – RFs, cell towers, cars emitting painful frequencies, mobile devices, etc. As much as she tried to avoid the high EMFs, this non-native force took a toll on her body that finally did her in. I too know being around wireless technology zaps my mental energy and ability to think well. So, I whole heatedly support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research nd establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Pay particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations who do not have a voice but are deeply affected by this technology. And also consider our pets, wildlife, and plant life, all of which don’t have a voice but are being negatively impacted. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard. Sincerely, Karen DeHaven

2. Individual & research entity 3.a. Everything is frequency 3.b. 24/7/365 3.c. Discombobulation 3.d. 2012, 1995 3.f. Meta cognition 5.n. Transparency 5.o: Aliens minimize exposure to electromagnetic radiation as they are telepathic and traverse space through time through consciousness. They have an understanding about how everything – light, dimensionality, fractality – makes One. Light travels at 186,282 miles/sec*. If you convert that to nautical miles per geometric second*, its approximately 143,526.736. The reason the figure is not exactly 144,000 is because space time is changing. When you measure in geometric time, you can drop leading and trailing zeros, the decimal point and truncate numbers because space collapses to a wave where time is eternal. Therefore, light can more simply be expressed as 144. Since we have intuition and can do things like channel, we are in the 5th dimension which is expressed as 432 hertz* and cymatically as the penteract or the double pentagon. All of nature is expressed fractally by the golden ratio, 162*. This is how aliens see the Oneness in everything, the product of - light, dimensionality, fractality – 144 times 432 times 162 equals One. All light expressed as a pentagon has an equal and opposite pentagon in the penteract which must be an information field. The light and opposing information field must meet on an inertial plane with gravity making gravity the reciprocal of light. Accessing that plane through two roots of the golden ratio, one for each the light and the information field, equals the Schumann resonance (1/144 X root root 162 = 783). The Schumann resonance is the standing wave of earths cavity and everything on it connected non-locally through piezoelectric transduction of the pineal gland. Two opposing waves creating that differential must access the plane as it recreates the double pentagon where all living organisms exist uniquely through DNA. Life can then be modified through a gravity quantum computer using meta materials by reflecting down into the 5th dimension for an ion cyclotron resonance like effect. This is efficiently radiating consciousness evolution tech that can be programmed for either ascension or descension as it works in the infinite quantum information field where One, or our fragment of it, see either possibility (no nanites required) or a limited 3rd dimension based on reinforced models. My opinion: 1. Research the 144 degree angle of the penteract in a ten by ten resonance in DNA for singularity through meta material space wave collapse in a light based quantum computer. 2. Accelerate acknowledgement of the profound positive health effects of ion cyclotron resonance in the biologically active window of 70 millivolts or 50 microtesla. 3. Collaborate art and science to merge subjectivity and objectivity through transformative fine art so community taps into its natural creativity to ask – how is this possible? (Montreal engineer now in Sedona Jimmy Blanchette of Human Initiated Contact has done ground breaking research into this. Gerret Lisi of E8 has begun discovering the science behind the penteract and hyper cube geometry based on existing models. Klee Irwin of Quantum Gravity Research has begun laying the philosophical foundations. Seqex of Italy has created ion cyclotron resonance technology). *Expressions of fixed intervals over another. Special thanks to: Dr. Nick Begich, Dr. Joe Dispenza, and Adam Apollo 7. RF, Gauss meters 8. Anomalous biofield decoherence detection 9. Non-thermal effects of non-ionizing radiation 10. Additional biofield monitoring survey system 11. Unique individualized assessment for all individuals 12. Anomalous body emissions by Cosmic Clarity Connections LLC 13. a – k. Millimeter and Terahertz waves create biofield decoherence 14. Anomalous body emissions by Cosmic Clarity Connections LLC 15. a – e. Deconstructive interference increases transmission proximity 16. Non-thermal effects of non-ionizing radiation 17. a – c. Cross functional team communication

Being on a cell pjone bothers me. Talking on one creates a jarring, unpleasant sensation that makes it difficult to concentrate. This lasts for hours after a call. A cell phone on the console net to me in a car makes my right leg very weak. To a lesser extent, the same thing happens to me when I'm on a landline talking to someone on a cell phone. I can tolerate this for about 30 minutes. Some cell phones are worse than others. One cell phone I connect to is so bad I cannot tolerate even a few seconds or connection. I cannot even listen to voice messages from that cell phone. I strongly urge the FCC to update their standards on safe levels of wireless radiation. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate the experience of individuals with electrical hypersensitivity, the effects of wireless radiation on other vulnerable populations and on the environment. Then, establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing me with an opportunity to be heard. Karen Perrin

Bonjour sur quelle base scientifique et médicale , les antennes 5g ont été autorisés , alors qu elles représentent un grave problème de santé ? Dans quel but ? Y a t il eu des test de santé publique en amont de l installation de ces antennes 5g et de leurs conséquences ?

I have worked in the construction industry for almost my entire 30 plus year career. Ever since becoming a Dad I have taken a natural interest in the impact of the environment on our health. In the last 5 years I have studied the impact of all forms of EMF (electric fields, magnetic fields, RF and wireless, indoor lighting, and Dirty Electricity) on our health. It is critical that we take a precautionary approach now with all forms of EMF and that we pay attention to the independent science and studies that we already have available that were not biased by industry. We also should support more independent studies. Please begin educating the public about the concerns. Also, my wife and I have experienced symptoms when in close proximity to wireless, cell phones, and electrical fields. These fields have impacted our nervous system, trigger headaches, impact our sleep, and there have been times when it seems they disrupted our digestion. I have purchased professional grade meters and I recently completed studies and certification with the Building Biology Institute. This has enabled me to measure the fields in our typical home, community, work, and while traveling and we have been able to correlate the higher fields to negative symptoms. I have also observed negative changes in behavior of people I live and work with when they are exposed to these fields. Thank you for taking the important step to receive comments and take steps to help mankind be healthier physically, emotionally, mentally, and spiritually. Let's look to nature as our guide as to what is healthy.

These towers are totally and regulated and they are showing up in the middle of towns, as well as in homeowners back yards- I would appreciate knowing the level of risk to those directly exposed, This should have been assessed long before now!

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure, especially through electric companies' smart meters. I am responding from the perspective of a healthcare professional and a concerned member of the public. In my acupuncture practice I saw several people who were sensitive to EMFs and wireless radiation. It is easy for people to write them off as a little crazy, or at least oversensitive, but I saw people have dramatic effects with increased exposures, and then saw their symptoms subside when they were able to reduce EMFs and wireless radiation in their environment. I personally am lucky enough not to have severe symptoms, but it is difficult to have so little control over my environment, especially when my electric company puts a wireless meter on the entry of my home without my consent. As someone with a history of dementia in my family, I do everything I can to control my exposures to anything which may be a neurotoxin. I feel we need to take this issue very seriously. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public and possible victim. Living in an apartment complex, I am exposed to as many as 20 known EMF sources, coming from nearby wirless routers.The result is constant tinnitus whenever located at home; the Tinntus goes away as soon as I leave the premises. HHS should take an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.