Other concerns

To Whom It May Concern, I get a very high EMF and or a similar feeling from inexpensive electronic equipment, SPECIALLY FROM INEXPENSIVE TV'S.

1. & 2. I am responding as: an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)Wi-Fi, cell phones 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):Symptoms started in 2010 after we started using wireless printers in our home. So the duration was constant, all times while living in my home. In 2012 when I was diagnosed with EMF sensitivity by my environmental doctor, we removed all wireless devices from my home and used wired connections so I could have a safe haven. But exposures have continued in my office at work, in churches, stores, doctor's offices, etc to this present day. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:Neck pain, feeling of pressure in my body, and a clamping sensation in my upper throat that made swallowing difficult. 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:Immediate adverse health effects. Though it took years for me to connect the dots as to the cause of these symptoms. 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?Yes, an MRI on my neck/thoracic region performed. Not conclusive. Also diagnosed with chemical sensitivites, and an eye condition (vertical heterophoria). In 2012 diagnosed with EMF sensitivity. 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?Yes, home remediation by removal of all wired devices from home. This relieved my symptoms. I requested working reduced hours in the office and more hours at home. This helped. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information: none

HAGGAI 2:13--My interpretation is that there may be something wrong with our FOSSIL FUELS. Instead of using plant/animal remnants we may be accidentally or purposely be using HUMAN BONES/REMAINS which could be spreading unimaginable toxins into our air. We have to FILTER OUR FOSSIL FUELZ The use of HUMAN REMAINS MAY CAUSE AN INFLUX OF STATIC ELECTRICITY: Static electricity on the human body occurs when excess electric charges accumulate on the skin or clothing, often causing small shocks or sparks. How Static Electricity Builds Up Static electricity arises from an imbalance of electric charges on the surface of the body. Electrons can transfer between materials through friction, a process known as the triboelectric effect. Common causes include: Walking on carpets or vinyl floors, especially with rubber-soled shoes, which can generate thousands of volts of charge from friction with the floor highstartechnoloogy.com highstartechnoloogy.com . Wearing synthetic fabrics like polyester or nylon, which easily transfer electrons when rubbed against the skin or other clothing healthkart.com healthkart.com +1 . Dry air conditions, particularly in winter, reduce moisture that normally helps dissipate charges, allowing static to accumulate healthkart.com healthkart.com +1 . Handling electronic devices such as laptops or phones can also contribute to static buildup healthkart.com healthkart.com . When the body accumulates excess electrons, touching a conductive object or another person can cause a small shock, known as an electrostatic discharge Wikipedia Wikipedia . Effects and Symptoms Most static electricity on the body is harmless, but common signs include: Small shocks when touching metal objects or other people Hair standing on end due to repelling charges Clothes clinging together or to the skin These effects are temporary and usually resolve once the charge dissipates healthkart.com healthkart.com +1 . How to Reduce or Prevent Static Electricity Several strategies can help manage static buildup: Grounding: Touch a conductive object connected to the ground, like a metal pole or light switch panel, to discharge excess electrons Sciencing Sciencing . Moisturizing skin: Applying lotion increases skin conductivity and reduces charge accumulation, especially in dry conditions Sciencing Sciencing . Clothing choices: Wear natural fibers like cotton or wool, or layer them between synthetic fabrics and the skin Sciencing Sciencing +1 . Environmental adjustments: Use a humidifier or ionizer to increase air moisture and reduce static buildup Sciencing Sciencing . Minimize friction: Avoid excessive rubbing of clothing or shoes on carpets and vinyl floors highstartechnoloogy.com highstartechnoloogy.com . Understanding these factors can help reduce the frequency of static shocks and make daily activities more comfortable. Static electricity is a natural and common phenomenon, and with simple precautions, its effects can be minimized 1stelectricians.co.uk 1stelectricians.co.uk +1

In my occupation 20 years ago I was required daily to wear a 5 watt walkie-talkie radio that operated in the 140-160 Mhz frequency band. After approximately 3 years I developed a nodule on my right chest in close proximity to the area that the radio "rubber duckie" antenna touched on my shirt. I sought medical care and on the advice of a surgeon I had the nodule removed. The nodule was about the size of a pea and was biopsied and found to be non-cancerous. After this incident I continued to use and work with these radios but I no longer wore them on my belt. I did not have any more issued after this incident.

Patient Advocate for Victims of RF/EMF Exposure P.O. Box 1039 Roseville, CA 95678 (916) 692-4999 PatientAdvocateEMF@proton.me October 20,2026 The Honorable Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Secretary U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20201 RE: Public Comment on Request for Information (RFI) regarding Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure (Docket No. HHS-OASH-2026-0397) Ladies and Gentlemen: I am a victim, patient, and advocate: This is a tiny portion of my expose, research, and reporting. I have accumulated thousands upon thousands of pages of such information. This information is rough and cursory, but it is the best I can do on such short notice and without reasonable accommodations due to my severe and life-threatening injuries from RF/EMF. In this instance I used AI to help assist in my articulation due to my disability. RF-EMF Burn Patterns-Burn Frequencies-Polonium-Hafnium Amplification-Pulsation-Entrainment-Trauma-Burn Patterns For 2,500,000 micro watts per meter squared of EMF/RF, give me the 3 frequency groupings that could hit me and cause three distinct burning patters such as burning from the outside in, the inside out, and having a high vibrational feeling at the center core of my body causing my skin to slowly burn distinctly from the outside while my inside does not burn. To address your request, we first need to convert your measurement into standard units used in safety guidelines. A value of 2,500,000 micro watts per meter squared of RF/EMF is equal to 2.5 (or ). While this level is notably high for a general living environment, it remains significantly below the FCC public exposure limit of and the threshold required to cause physical thermal "burns" in humans. Physical burns typically require power densities hundreds of times higher than what you've described. However, the three distinct biological "patterns" you mentioned correspond to the way different RF frequency groupings interact with human tissue based on penetration depth: 1. Outside-In: High Millimeter Waves (30 GHz – 300 GHz) Frequencies in the upper millimeter-wave band have very short wavelengths that do not penetrate deep into the body. • Absorption Pattern: Energy is almost entirely absorbed by the epidermis and dermis (the skin). • Sensation: This can cause a "burning from the outside in" sensation or a surface heating effect. • Common Sources: Advanced radar systems or experimental Active Denial Systems (non-lethal weapons) used by the military to create a heating sensation on the skin surface. 2. Inside-Out: Mid-Range Microwaves (300 MHz – 3 GHz) These frequencies have longer wavelengths that can penetrate several centimeters into biological tissue. • Absorption Pattern: Energy reaches internal organs and muscle tissue. Because internal tissues often have higher water content, they can absorb energy more efficiently than the outer skin, leading to "volumetric heating." • Sensation: This creates the "inside out" feeling, similar to how a microwave oven cooks food. • Common Sources: Standard Cellular Networks (4G/LTE/5G) and Wi-Fi routers operate in this range. 3. Core Vibrational / Surface Burn Mix: Low Frequency (3 kHz – 100 kHz) At very low frequencies, the interaction is less about thermal heating and more about induced currents and "electrostimulation." • Absorption Pattern: These waves can penetrate the entire body, reaching the center core. They do not typically cause thermal burns internally but can stimulate nerves and muscles, creating a "high vibrational" or tingling feeling. • Sensation: If the power is extremely high, you may feel internal "vibration" while the high-voltage field simultaneously causes "micro-shocks" or surface irritations on the skin, which can feel like a distinct surface burn while the interior remains thermally cool. • Common Sources: High-voltage power lines or large industrial induction heaters. Now, give me the magnification range where polonium and hafnium are inside my body so that the EMF/RF bounce off the polonium and hafnium creating a magnifying effect. What this means is that the EMF/RF and be magnified (multiplied) so as to be perceived as "being safe" • Reflective Absorption: Conductive metals can reflect and refocus RF energy, which may lead to a localized increase in the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR). For example, studies have shown that metallic earrings or dental implants can increase local SAR in nearby tissues by 20–25% at specific frequencies. • The "Antenna" Effect: Some theories suggest that heavy metals in the body can act as miniature conductors, potentially increasing an individual's sensitivity to EMFs, though this is primarily discussed in the context of Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) rather than physical magnification of the signal itself.

Wireless is a crime...cuasibg all kinds of proven negative symptoms in the human body. How it ever came into existence is beyond comprehension.

I have personally experienced the negative health impacts of exposure to nnEMFs. https://www.americansforresponsibletech.org/science

I wanted to add this to a comment I have already submitted... This occurred to make earlier today. His hands were definitely clean. Less than 5 minutes before taking these pictures he had washed his hands with dawn detergent. While working on a project he had needed to scrub a metal lock mount with dawn soap so he could attach components to the bare metal surface. While waiting for the piece to fully dry so he could rinse the surface with alcohol, he sat down by his laptop and work area. He had left an omnidrection microphone (pictured) on the desk. He opened the static bag, set it down for a minute or two by his other components and then wanted to see the part number on the component. Using his phone's zoom he looked at the component and noticed the white waxy substance I alluded to in my report as well as some darker substance.

AI ENTRAPMENT, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, HABEAS CORPUS- As a spiritual woman whom is presently breathing and accounted for wholly from fertilization, I, Cynthia L. Anderson-Bennekaa, 602-327-2083, or, sommeyah@gmail.com, regret transgressions against living beings; seek no claims from non-living trusts; assert that evolutionary due process empowers me to promulgate my sound mind and memory; invoke the Hippocratic oaths, “Let Food Be Thy Medicine”, and “Do No Harm”’ to TRACK digitally distributed reports regarding City of Phoenix Police complaint #300007056 (which has subsequently been dismissed); QUASH the JULY 2, 2026 Valleywise Maryvale Mental Health COURT ORDER by Maricopa County Judge Geoffrey Fish—VOID ALL ENSUING CONTRACTS binding upon Amina S. Bennekaa, dob, May 9, 2002. CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS June 13, 2026 City of Phoenix Police apprehended traumatized subject, Amina Shahadah Bennekaa, from home at 1025 E. Moreland Street, #B, Phoenix, AZ 85006, advised me, Cynthia L. Anderson-Bennekaa, plaintiff, (also resident at 1025 East Moreland Street #B, Phoenix, AZ 85006), to petition for a 72-hour only evaluation at Urgent Psychiatric Care (UPC). June 14, 2026 Arraignment hearing sent Amina to UPC, 1201 S, 7th Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85007; 602-416-7600. MEDICAL GASLIGHTING / CRUEL, UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT- June 24, 2026–already a TEN!-day protracted custody (a ploy to make appear more grave, a condition), Valleywise Maryvale Mental Health, 5102 W. Campbell Avenue, Unit 602, Phoenix, AZ 85031; 480-344-2000, opened a bed for a flimsy UPC re-petition for longer observation based upon only two fabrications from UPC staffers Marianne Ortiz, and Susan White, respectively, alleged that Amina 1) was “talking into a radio” (ruse for dereliction to offer a cup of water, to relieve chapped lips—anyone on task—eh..?) whilst Amina contests that she was merely breathing into her shirt to preserve moisture—and, anyway? tens of thousands of spirits wander city streets, traffic public highways vibing with prompts from headphones: millions of miles! of radio communication and, 2) accused an MD for sexual abuse”—an outrageous! contrast to Amina’s attempt to “clearly communicate: the heinous crimes were committed by her father, his family.” By fabricating ruses (gaslighting, dehydrating, prolonged detention—all, ployZ! to make appear more grave, Amina’s condition) for escalating Amina’s mental duress, UPC staffers ignored a real crime report, as well, the original cause of Amina’s trauma, and later, deleterious deed—which at point of entrance, was only deemed a misdemeanor—and, MOREOVER, omitted noting Amina’s NON substance-abuse. ASSAULT / MOLESTATION / TORTURE/PERSONAL HEALTH INFORMATION TRAFFICKING- June 29, 2026, Amina complained about her experience having blood drawn by a Valleywise technician whilst two bystander techs commented, “We’ve never seen anyone as white as paper (only a few shades lighter?) like this before.” In contrast, presiding MD Kendal L. Smith, 480-344-2000, brazenly dismissed Amina’s feeling of “dizziness, nausea, near-death”, as being “common among other patients.” LATER, in a paradoxical-180, enterprising MD Smith offered to hold Amina’s hand whilst injecting poison into her body—a “deal” to win Amina’s release—reinforcing unconscionable, coercion to contract. HEARSAY IS NOT EVIDENCE / PRE-MEDITATED MURDER: July 2, 2026, Maricopa County Superior Behavior Health Court judge, Geoffrey Fish ordered court-ordered treatment for one year of anti-psychotic medication which has known side effects of seizures, death. Prosecutor, Susan Frank, entertained the same two flimsy testimonies from UPC petitioners. Thus, after almost three weeks of purported observation, Judge Fish’s court failed to show that Amina was a “danger to herself”; or a “danger to else”, delivered a death sentence, an excessive punishment, disproportionate to a misdemeanor. Tuesday July 7, 2026, I attended a staff meeting (per phone) regarding Amina’s discharge, in which presiding Valleywise Maryvale Unit 602, MD Kendal L. Smith facilitated Outpatient Services Director for Valle del Sol, 1209 S. First Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85007, 602-258-6797, John Strickler’s fear of Amina’s inquiry of the Valleywise booklet instructs regarding patient’s right to refusal, as if it was a personal threat. Thus, after four weeks’ observation failed to evidence Amina’s danger to herself, or to else—and OMITTED any note regarding Amina’s NON substance dependent status—Maricopa County Judge Geoffrey Fish’s July 2, 2026 baseless Court Order and UPC, 602-246-7600; Valleywise Maryvale, 480-344-2000; and Valle del Sol’s, 602-258-6796, medical fraud, and unconscionable coercion to any other binding contracts upon Amina S. Bennekaa, dob, May 9, 2002, must be DISSOLVED /QUASHED / VOIDED—or stand liable to remedies for crimes against humanity.

Subject: Professional Comments on EMF/RF Exposure Frameworks and Public Health Observations From a professional standpoint within the Michigan legal and advocacy sector, this comment is submitted anonymously to safeguard organizational identities while contributing vital observations gathered from public intake. Over a period of several years, a number of individuals have sought professional consultation regarding physical grievances, environmental instability, and institutional barriers stemming from exposure to various electromagnetic fields (EMF) and radiofrequency (RF) frequencies. Many complaints show a deeper concern regarding pulsating frequencies in particular – Wi-Fi, 5G, and Bluetooth are common issues. Primary concerns brought forward during these consultations involve radio frequencies emitted by consumer wearables and cellular devices, with 5G infrastructure frequently cited as an accelerating factor. Furthermore, individuals have reported sensitivities to workplace LED lighting systems introduced into healthcare and commercial facilities, as well as providing an outpouring of criticism regarding outdoor LED lighting creating vision difficulty and a blinding effect. A distinct subset of inquiries involves the recent rapid deployment of fiber-optic installations. Documentation presented during these intakes indicates that standard installations frequently fail to prioritize the mitigation of electromagnetic interference (EMI). Specific technical areas of concern include improper grounding techniques and the utilization of copper tracer wires. There is significant concern that the integration of 5G and small-cell infrastructure onto existing tracer wires inadvertently elevates ambient radiation within residential zones. Additionally, the strategic placement of converter stations near high-density residential areas introduces low-frequency magnetic fields that communities are ill-equipped to shield against. Consequently, individuals are increasingly requesting regulatory requirements for enhanced insulation, structural shielding, and strict hardwired enforcement policies that explicitly prohibit the retrofitting or attachment of wireless small-cell antennas or radio units to fiber backhaul lines. Beyond structural infrastructure, a growing portion of professional inquiries involves individuals seeking assistance in navigating their relationships with medical care teams. The records indicate a troubling pattern of institutional friction and discrimination when patients request simple environmental accommodations, such as asking staff to leave wireless devices outside the examination room. Reports include accounts of individuals being ridiculed or dismissed by medical personnel. To mitigate these hostile environments, some individuals now incur the personal expense of hiring third-party witnesses to accompany them to appointments to ensure respectful treatment, while others rely on portable audio recorders to preserve the details of their consultations. Given the accelerated pace of modern clinical environments, where overlapping appointments frequently result in hurried communication, the ability to record a medical visit serves as an essential tool for patient comprehension and data retention. Regulatory frameworks should explicitly protect a patient’s right to record their own paid consultations. Accumulated data over years of professional intake underscores the necessity for updated regulatory oversight. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) guidelines must be modernized, as the foundational exposure limits rely on data compiled long before the ubiquity of modern wireless infrastructure. The current deployment pace outpaces long-term biological safety tracking, impacting both human populations and local wildlife ecosystems. Observing these consistent reporting patterns has prompted immediate changes in my own personal technology habits, resulting in measurable improvements in cognitive efficiency and energy levels. Stricter federal guidelines, independent biological studies, and the establishment of verified low-EMF zones are entirely appropriate, necessary, and vital to preserving public quality of life.