Towers & siting

I appreciate the opportunity to submit formal comments in response to the Department of Health and Human Services’ Request for Information (RFI) regarding Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) and Radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure. As federal agencies evaluate modern wireless infrastructure, it is critical that public health guidelines shift from evaluating purely thermal, acute effects to addressing the mounting body of evidence surrounding non-thermal, chronic biological impacts. The systemic integration of high-density wireless technologies—including macro cell towers, small cell deployments, and widespread commercial wireless infrastructure—has fundamentally altered the ambient radiation environment. A rigorous, independent review of the current science reveals several critical areas of concern that the Department should formally address: • Non-Thermal Biological Effects: A significant body of independent, peer-reviewed literature demonstrates that chronic exposure to low-intensity, non-thermal RF radiation can induce biological stress. These documented effects include oxidative stress, cellular DNA damage, metabolic disruption, and changes to blood-brain barrier permeability, occurring at levels far below current federal safety thresholds. • Vulnerability of Developing Children: Regulatory safety margins must be updated to account for distinct physiological differences in vulnerable populations. Research indicates that children absorb higher relative doses of RF radiation into deeper brain tissue due to thinner skulls, higher tissue conductivity, and smaller physical stature. Chronic exposure near schools and residential zones represents an unquantified multi-decadal health risk. • Flaws in Aggregate Exposure Models: Current safety guidelines generally evaluate isolated exposure from a single device or antenna. They fail to model the cumulative, multi-frequency environment where individuals are simultaneously exposed to macro-towers, localized small cells, smart utility meters, and indoor Wi-Fi networks 24 hours a day. • Environmental and Wildlife Disruption: Beyond human health, the expansion of high-frequency wireless infrastructure introduces unique ecological pressures. Peer-reviewed studies suggest that ambient RF fields can disrupt the navigation, behavior, and reproductive health of critical insect populations, migratory birds, and bees. Recommendations for the Department: 1. Adopt the Precautionary Principle: Implement exposure guidelines that err on the side of public safety, rather than waiting for absolute definitive proof of widespread clinical harm. 2. Fund Independent Long-Term Studies: Commission comprehensive, epidemiological studies completely isolated from telecommunications industry funding or influence. 3. Establish Environmentally Safe Zones: Protect residential neighborhoods, medical facilities, and educational institutions by recommending strict structural setbacks from high-output wireless transmitters. Thank you for your rigorous attention to this pressing public health issue and for thoroughly evaluating the independent scientific data during this inquiry. Sincerely, Dawn Quirk

I am a grandmother who worries about my grandchildren being around so much of these types of frequencies. They have all of this in the classroom, at home, in libraries, etc. Young developing minds and bodies are sensitive to all the rays they are being bombarded with. I have read that France stopped the I phone 16 from being available because of the hazards. More information on how it affects us all is needed. It should be done by a 3rd party impartial entity. Also, to many towers and antennas everywhere!

5 g anterna killing us around here

Dear Secretary Kennedy, Thank you for giving the public an opportunity to express our sincere concerns regarding EMF, RF, and wireless radiation exposure. As a mother of five children (ages 25, 23, 22, 19 and 11), I am truly concerned about the effects of EMFs and 5G radiation exposure. There are increasing reports of adverse effects from cell towers and 5G, and sadly, many of these towers are right next to our schools, playgrounds and in our neighborhoods. I live right behind a small elementary charter school on Big Pine Key, an island in the Lower Florida Keys. There is a large cell tower right next to the school and about .10 - .20 miles from my house. Not only am I concerned for the children at the school, but also for my own family, as I am sure the radiation emitted from the tower is not good for our health. We try hard to limit exposure in our home by using wired headphones and turning off the router at night, but I am sure there is still so much more we are exposed to than we should be. It is my understanding that 4G LTE is much safer and still widely used in Europe. Can we please look into safe alternatives for Americans? While I understand that it is not a popular idea, I feel that grounded or dial-up options may be much safer. Thank you for taking a look into this very important issue to our health.

I am extremely sensitive to EMF. My WiFi router is in my closet and I cannot sleep at night if I enter my closet for even 20 seconds 5 hours before bed. When I am in an airport I cannot sleep that night as I have been around so much EMF in the airport/plane. I looked at purchasing a home that had a 5G tower a block away, however when I walked around the neighborhood my husband and I were extremely dizzy after 20 minutes because of the 5G tower. Please do not place 5G towers or any cell tower in or near neighborhoods or schools. Thank you, Emily

The science shows that EMF's damage DNA. Children are at more of risk. They have these towers really close to schools which is insane. Protect our kids and the adults from over exposure. I'm a sensitive person and feel ill a lot now aways from it coming through my home. I leave and go where there isn't any EMPs form towers and I start feeling better.

I am an individual, a family care provider, and a small business owner. I have witnessed numerous side effects pertaining to EMF exposure in myself and my family members, as well as customers who have patronized my business. The EMF exposure has grown exponentially over the last 30 years. Our bodies can only take so much before they begin showing signs. The USA has not done enough to keep up with the standards or the limits of exposure. Other first world countries have surpassed us with their updated thresholds for EMF. We have clearly reached a point where there is just too much exposure. Headaches, nausea, dizziness, and neurological issues are all reported due to the giant microwave we are all forced to live in. Why are we putting up more and more towers? Why are we lowering the panels to be closer to the humans and animals? Why is there a lack of transparency? There have been documented cases where "experts" have said there is tech within these panels that they are not at liberty to discuss. Why is that? Not like the 5G service is any better; in fact, many would say our services have dropped off with these newer technologies. Makes you wonder what's really going on... You all have a tremendous amount of work to do on this. Especially, in regards to improving the trust level with your citizens.

Bonjour sur quelle base scientifique et médicale , les antennes 5g ont été autorisés , alors qu elles représentent un grave problème de santé ? Dans quel but ? Y a t il eu des test de santé publique en amont de l installation de ces antennes 5g et de leurs conséquences ?

These towers are totally and regulated and they are showing up in the middle of towns, as well as in homeowners back yards- I would appreciate knowing the level of risk to those directly exposed, This should have been assessed long before now!

Call them what you wish, 5G, 6G etc.. EMF, RF wireless equipment towers are dangerous to all living things. The radiation they disburse is destroying all life and they should all be removed.