Towers & siting

I am the Board President of the nonprofit, Community and Friends of Seattle-Tacoma Pet Cemetery, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. I am writing as an individual to provide my comments today. I am an advocate for the historic Seattle-Tacoma Pet Cemetery est. 1950 on Kent’s West Hill in unincorporated South King County in a community of color, immigrants, refugees, and low income housing in Kent, Washington. A 100-foot industrial AT&T cell phone tower was installed by Crown Castle inside active Burial Block 13 with graves and mourners just over 115 feet from the neighbors in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic in the wrong zone without a conditional use permit in violation of King County Code and Washington State cemetery law. It is dangerously close, illegal, unlawful, and unethical. It is damaging to the sacred burial grounds and is physically, mentally, and emotionally damaging. Not to mention it is aesthetically ugly and spiritually cruel to the living and to our beloveds. Humans, pets, K-9 officers, and service animals for the blind are all buried here, some as whole families. Crown Castle did not disclose human burials here and the historic significance of the historic cemetery here on the application. They railroaded it through the King County Permit department. Cemeteries function as a sacred space, regardless of a cemetery patron or visitor’s religious background. A cemetery is intended to be a place removed from the noise, hustle. Commercial infrastructure as a cell tower is, is an intrusion of a sacred burial ground meant for honor and memory. Radio frequency radiation exposes harm to people and animals who are mourning their loved ones. Cell towers take away the calm and harmonious space that it was meant to be in perpetuity. We want responsible placement of cell phone towers. We are not against cell towers and advocate for the safe and appropriate placement of cell towers — not here! Thank you for hearing my comments and taking them into advisement. Please update the 1996 wireless safety limits to truly safe limits in 2026, 30 years and counting.

I believe that emf sensitivity is real and that it affects more people than we realize. I would love to see a comprehensive study on public health (long covid, miscarriage, still birth, chronic illnesses, cancer etc) in relation to 5 g towers, data centers, power plants, wind mill and solar farms and substations. God created this would perfect and were are detected from it (plastic everything) and its destroying our natural vibrational frequencies and causing mass issues across the board. We accelorated this when cell companies and data centers decided that there should be no safe space to be disconnected. "can you hear me now?" "Good" except was it good? is having artificial frequencies blasted at our heads 24 hours a day actually good for us? or could it be a major player in the massive epidemic of chronic illness sweeping the nation. I have attached a document answering many of the questions asked about. Please take the time to read. Thank you for considering this. Please help protect us and our children.

1. & 2. I am responding as: an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)WiFi 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):Since it became ubiquitous in people's homes - over a decade. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:Insomnia, vertigo, restlessness, panic attacks. 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:Immediately started experiencing insomnia. Over time, other side effects occurred, including vertigo, restlessness, and panic attacks when exposed. 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?No, because the medical field doesn't acknowledge the harmful effects of EMF radiation. 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?Yes, I only use hardwired internet in my home and unplug the WiFi router when traveling. However, if I am unable to unplug the router when traveling or visiting friends, I experience the negative effects. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information:I think Authur Firstenburgs epic work, Going Somewhere, provides more than enough scientific evidence. Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's: B1a. Sources you experience as causing you Adverse Effects:WiFi, Cell phones, Cell towers B1b. Sources you can sense, but don't seem to harm you:Electric cars B1c. Sources you can use without sensing or being harmed:None B1d. Sources that seem to provide benefit (i.e., electrotherapy):Taking baths in saltwater, getting in water, being in nature, direct sunlight exposure to the eyes and skin B2a. Health conditions you think may contribute to your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless:I do not have any health conditions ie no chronic disease, no specific health issues aside from EMF sensitivity. B2b. Health conditions you don't necessarily associate with your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless, but might be relevant:PTSD from car accident resulting in a TBI B3. For each subquestion please list up to 5 drugs or therapies or home remedies (if any) B3a. That you recommend, as they helped you tolerate or recover from EMF exposure:Taking baths in saltwater, getting in water, being in nature, direct sunlight exposure to the eyes and skin; homeopathy, acupuncture B3b. That you recommend, but you’re not positive that they help:Body work, craniosacral therapy B3c. That helped you but you don’t recommend. (e.g., the benefit did not last long or the side effects were too harmful):Reiki, biomats B3d. Treatments that had no effect:Aggressive chiropractic B3e. Treatments that made your sensitivity worse:35-44 B4. What is your age range?35-44 B5. What year did you become aware of your sensitivity to wireless radiation or electromagnetic fields?2010 B6. What country, state, province, or major city were you living in when you first noticed your sensitivity to wireless or electromagnetic fields?New Mexico

I, Morgan K, submit this filing as testimony and consideration the the HHS review of radio frequency and electro magnetic frequencies which include wifi routers, smart meters, cellular towers, 5g, 4g, 3g, 2.6g, all smart phones and cellular phones, fiber optics, wifi towers and antennaes. I am extremely concerned for the health of myself, my children, my pets and all humans who are subject to very detrimental and damaging frequencies that have been overtly studied and found to cause extreme disease, cancer and even death. I have been experiencing negative effects from RF since I was 18 years old when I began to notice terrible headaches any time I would use my celllular phone to my head. I soon began to notice that the DECT cordless phone would cause me to have insomnia if I did not unplug them and take the batteries out. Some of my primary concerns are cell towers, antennas and wifi towers within 5 miles of homes and schools. My children and I have suffered from RF exposure that caused headaches and migraines, dizziniess, inabiltiy to focus, learning difficulties and disabilities, insomnia, elevated cortisol levels, extreme heating to the head and more. Findings from many studies including the ones I have attached to this filing show without a down that these inorganic frequencies are causing these symptoms and more. They are also causing infertility, birth defects and long term impact on unborn children. As stated in the paper titled A review of potential health risks of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure from mobile phones and base stations in children and pregnant women (see attached), "It has been reported that chronic exposure to low-intensity GSM-like radiation (900 MHz) in female Sprague–Dawley rats shows mixed outcomes. There have been no pathological changes in Short-term studies, whereas long-term studies indicate significant reduction in survival (~9%)." So even lower frequencies as low as DECT 900mHz cordless phones pose a huge risk to humans and the environment. My mother has been effected by these dangerous frequencies when she was diagnosed with cancer. The correlation between RF and Cancer has been demonstrated by the studies I have attached to this filing as well as in many others. I strongly urge HHS and the FCC, under the weight and consideration of the scientific evidence, find the current RF exposure limits are deleterious and completely insufficient to public health and the environment. They should be dramatically lowered to reflect the science and the findings of science and people's irrefutable experiences from around the world that were previously dimissed and disregarded by the Commision. Thank you, Morgan K

I am writing to let you know how EMF's, RF Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure have personally impacted me, plus share their impact on several of my friends. I admit that I am addressing them as an entity, as I do not have access to technology that can single out any one risk to life. But I do have access to my own life experience. "Smart" electric meter: Duke Energy installed one on my house without my prior knowledge. Subsequently, I began to experience frequent awakening during the night; the "smart" meter was located at the far end of my home, away from my bedroom. After a convoluted process involving Duke Energy and notarized paperwork from my primary care physician, I was finally able to get it replaced with a manual read meter, resulting in improved sleep. Two friends of mine both experienced major sleep disruption as they live in a condo with "smart" meters just outside their bedrooms. One has now moved out and is experiencing improved energy and health. The other, financially unable to relocate, created his own inside protections to help shield his bedroom; he, too, is experiencing improved health and functioning. Cell towers: the more that go up, the worse I feel. My personal symptoms include awakening suddenly in the middle of the night with a vibrating, quivering, physical sensation in my chest and abdomen of several minutes duration. Please note that three male friends, of varying ages and with whom I compare such experiences, all experienced similar sensations on that same night around that same time. And this has recurred multiple times since. While it does not seem to be related to age or gender, it may have something to do with our more sensitive temperaments (all are empaths, three of us are healers). We've concluded that someone "turned up the juice" at those times. A woman whom I've met told me that she has to sleep in her car on the Blue Ridge Parkway to get a better night's sleep. Cell phones: have you ever witnessed a bright, personable child evolve into a zombi-like young teenager, after she was given a cell phone by her grandparents (against the wishes of her parents)? I have. It's tragic. Just look around. So many people are glued to their devices. Real human interactions are becoming rare. I've been close to being rear-ended while driving and yup, that person was looking at her cell phone. With more and more cell towers being installed, increasing network strength, plus mandatory "smart" meters for water and propane with no opt-outs, neighbors' Ring doorbells, Flock and other surveillance cameras...where do we go to escape for our health and our very lives??? For the sake of all Life and the future of our fragile Earth, I implore you to investigate this and to establish updated, appropriate regulations--not only regarding what these major energetic disruptions are doing to humans, but also to our declining bees and pollinators, birds, various wildlife and soils. Perhaps this is part of the agenda to reduce population; but do you have children and grandchildren and those whom you love? Thank you for your consideration of these matters.

Subject: Professional Comments on EMF/RF Exposure Frameworks and Public Health Observations From a professional standpoint within the Michigan legal and advocacy sector, this comment is submitted anonymously to safeguard organizational identities while contributing vital observations gathered from public intake. Over a period of several years, a number of individuals have sought professional consultation regarding physical grievances, environmental instability, and institutional barriers stemming from exposure to various electromagnetic fields (EMF) and radiofrequency (RF) frequencies. Many complaints show a deeper concern regarding pulsating frequencies in particular – Wi-Fi, 5G, and Bluetooth are common issues. Primary concerns brought forward during these consultations involve radio frequencies emitted by consumer wearables and cellular devices, with 5G infrastructure frequently cited as an accelerating factor. Furthermore, individuals have reported sensitivities to workplace LED lighting systems introduced into healthcare and commercial facilities, as well as providing an outpouring of criticism regarding outdoor LED lighting creating vision difficulty and a blinding effect. A distinct subset of inquiries involves the recent rapid deployment of fiber-optic installations. Documentation presented during these intakes indicates that standard installations frequently fail to prioritize the mitigation of electromagnetic interference (EMI). Specific technical areas of concern include improper grounding techniques and the utilization of copper tracer wires. There is significant concern that the integration of 5G and small-cell infrastructure onto existing tracer wires inadvertently elevates ambient radiation within residential zones. Additionally, the strategic placement of converter stations near high-density residential areas introduces low-frequency magnetic fields that communities are ill-equipped to shield against. Consequently, individuals are increasingly requesting regulatory requirements for enhanced insulation, structural shielding, and strict hardwired enforcement policies that explicitly prohibit the retrofitting or attachment of wireless small-cell antennas or radio units to fiber backhaul lines. Beyond structural infrastructure, a growing portion of professional inquiries involves individuals seeking assistance in navigating their relationships with medical care teams. The records indicate a troubling pattern of institutional friction and discrimination when patients request simple environmental accommodations, such as asking staff to leave wireless devices outside the examination room. Reports include accounts of individuals being ridiculed or dismissed by medical personnel. To mitigate these hostile environments, some individuals now incur the personal expense of hiring third-party witnesses to accompany them to appointments to ensure respectful treatment, while others rely on portable audio recorders to preserve the details of their consultations. Given the accelerated pace of modern clinical environments, where overlapping appointments frequently result in hurried communication, the ability to record a medical visit serves as an essential tool for patient comprehension and data retention. Regulatory frameworks should explicitly protect a patient’s right to record their own paid consultations. Accumulated data over years of professional intake underscores the necessity for updated regulatory oversight. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) guidelines must be modernized, as the foundational exposure limits rely on data compiled long before the ubiquity of modern wireless infrastructure. The current deployment pace outpaces long-term biological safety tracking, impacting both human populations and local wildlife ecosystems. Observing these consistent reporting patterns has prompted immediate changes in my own personal technology habits, resulting in measurable improvements in cognitive efficiency and energy levels. Stricter federal guidelines, independent biological studies, and the establishment of verified low-EMF zones are entirely appropriate, necessary, and vital to preserving public quality of life.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a parent. We live close to areas with lots of cell towers and other radio signals. As more and more increase in the area, I have real concerns about how this will impact a growing child based on some of the data being shown. A real study that is trustworthy is desperately needed. Therefore, I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

1. & 2. I am responding as: an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)Since 2008 a lot of exposure to WiFi and mobile phones (work). Last year: New cell phone tower on neighbor building 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):New >3Ghz cell phone tower (European non-nanometer 5G), since over one year. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:Bad sleep quality, high stress level, constantly feeling exhausted, chronic issues worsened 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:It was noticeable in the days after the new cell phone sender/receiver was installed 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?Yes, no clear diagnosis, symptoms were attributed to high stress level (flare up) 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?I bought an expensive device to "neutralize" the negative effects of the EMF and it did help to a degree where I could get somewhat decent sleep again. I am now in the process of moving out of this apartment. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information:I have an "e-Spion" meter, an analog HF meter. It was basically impossible to measure anything as the EMF level was way beyond the maximum range of the meter. That was the case before already, so I could not tell a difference from before/after as the device is too sensitive for the intensity in this apartment. Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's:I believe there is a connection between chronic infections (EBV, Bartonella, Lyme, Helminths...), heavy metals and EMF. That combination seems to be especially detrimental to health. And possibly when adding spike protein – it becomes a very toxic mix. B1a. Sources you experience as causing you Adverse Effects:Holding a phone in the hand while charging has directly noticeable effect. B1b. Sources you can sense, but don't seem to harm you:When adding certain "neutralizers" to a cell phone, I can 'feel' a difference. And as I am highly skeptical of such devices, I doubt it's a placebo effect. B1c. Sources you can use without sensing or being harmed: B1d. Sources that seem to provide benefit (i.e., electrotherapy): B2a. Health conditions you think may contribute to your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless:Chronic infection (EBV, Bartonella, mold toxins) B2b. Health conditions you don't necessarily associate with your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless, but might be relevant: B3. For each subquestion please list up to 5 drugs or therapies or home remedies (if any) B3a. That you recommend, as they helped you tolerate or recover from EMF exposure:Toxopheresis (INUSpherese) to get rid of heavy metals. B3b. That you recommend, but you’re not positive that they help:GABA, Theanine, NAC, Glutathione, Apigenine and other plant extracts. Reducing EMF by using shungite powder mixed in wall paint (only one room, but that already made a difference). B3c. That helped you but you don’t recommend. (e.g., the benefit did not last long or the side effects were too harmful): B3d. Treatments that had no effect:Generally: Detoxing too fast or when dealing with LPS carrying bacteria, killing those off too quickly B3e. Treatments that made your sensitivity worse:35-44 B4. What is your age range?35-44 B5. What year did you become aware of your sensitivity to wireless radiation or electromagnetic fields?2010 B6. What country, state, province, or major city were you living in when you first noticed your sensitivity to wireless or electromagnetic fields?Germany, Mannheim

Respondent: Individual consumer. Type of wireless technology: 5G, wirelessinfrastructure, wifi The nature, duration, frequency and approx. timing of reported exposure: At least two years. Please see my posts on this page for more details regarding duration, exposure, symptoms, etc. Posts: January 28, February 7, May 10, May 25, June 14, August 30 @ www.synkrografik_opportunity_chemtrails.html The potential adverse health effects experienced: Please see my posts on this page for more details regarding duration, exposure, symptoms, etc. Posts: January 28, February 7, May 10, May 25, June 14, August 30 @ www.synkrografik.com/synkrografik_opportunity_chemtrails.html When the potential adverse health effects appeared in relative to when the exposure began: Please see my posts on this page for more details regarding duration, exposure, symptoms, etc. Posts: January 28, February 7, May 10, May 25, June 14, August 30 @ www.synkrografik.com/synkrografik_opportunity_chemtrails.html Whether medical evaluation of treatment was sought: Under the current circumstances, and how our healthcare works, medical evaluation is not an option. Why? Please see this page for details as to why: www.synkrografik.com/synkrografik_opportunity.html Whether steps to reduce or eliminate exposure were taken & whether changes in adverse health effects were observed: We have tried to reduce/eliminate exposure. However, it's difficult because we live in an apartment building right downtown; we are pretty much surrounded. Any other info, doc or pictures: I live together with our mom in the city of Gothenburg, Sweden and have my sister on the other side of town. Regardless, symptoms such as tinnitus, blurred vision, heartburn, etc, occurr no matter where. On a regular basis, I visit Copenhagen, Denmark and we experience similar things even there (tinnitus, etc)--it's tiresome! My name is Magnus Palmgren and my mail is: synkrografik.info@proton.me I am--our whole family is--so grateful for the opportunity to tell you about our experience. Thank you!

1. & 2. I am responding as: an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)RFMW from Mobile Phones, Wi Fi routers and Cell Towers 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):Started to notice head warmth around 2003, by 2009 started to associate wireless with headaches. and around 2012 blurred vision happens even when wearing shielding clothing. Around 2019 instant headache passing cell tower or when people next to me turned cell phone on or a call came in. Bloody noise after being in wireless room for 3 or 4 hours. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced: Warm side of head where phone was used, vice grip headache around temples, shooting pain in head, blurred vision, bloody noise and the sound of my voice changes to me like I am in a metal room. 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects: Noticed immediately using a cordless phone, moving away knowing Wi Fi router was close, shooting pain passing cell tower on highway or cell phone turned on. Sometimes it can take 20 to 30 minutes before I notice adverse effects if people near me have a cell phone on or Wi Fi is in the building. 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis? EHS diagnosis at the E.H.C. at W.C.H. in Toronto in 2015. 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?Home is hardwired and no cell tower in sight, do not use mobile phones, use shielding if I am in public, turn off wireless devices whenever I can at work or visiting family/friends. Use PEMF Therapy as my antidote and bio geometry to reduce exposure. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information: Educated and worked as Electrical/Electronic Technologist. I use Microwave meters & Magnetic Field meters to measure my environment. Noticed drastic increase in transmissions from cell phones, Wi Fi Routers, Cell Towers and smart meters around 2019 and then again around 2023. Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's: Doctor and Naturopath could not find anything wrong with me. A medical Intuitive suggested a dormant bacteria or fungal. After following parasite protocols for 4 months due to a wrong diagnosis, my adverse effects have lessened. B1a. Sources you experience as causing you Adverse Effects: Cell Phones, Wi Fi Routers and Cell Towers B1b. Sources you can sense, but don't seem to harm you: Low Frequency and Low Intensity PEMF devices B1c. Sources you can use without sensing or being harmed: Magnetic Fields from Electronic control panels, Electric motors or electrical breaker panels B1d. Sources that seem to provide benefit (i.e., electrotherapy):PEMF Therapy like Magnetic Resonance Stimulation B2a. Health conditions you think may contribute to your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless: Excellent Health but after following parasite protocols for 4 months due to a wrong diagnosis, my adverse effects have lessened. Now after 20 or 30 minutes in a wireless environment it seems like my voice sounds like I am in a metal room. Still get what feels like a kick in the head when a cell phone is turned on or a phone call comes in. B2b. Health conditions you don't necessarily associate with your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless, but might be relevant: I am in excellent health but I have electrocuted myself at work several times. B3. For each sub question please list up to 5 drugs or therapies or home remedies (if any) B3a. That you recommend, as they helped you tolerate or recover from EMF exposure: PEMF Therapy is my antidote. Gets me back feeling good quick. Avoiding wireless transmitters, distance from the transmitter, quality shielding clothing and bio geometry. B3b. That you recommend, but you’re not positive that they help: Walk in nature, swim in a lake/river, exercise/movement in wireless free environment. B3c. That helped you but you don’t recommend. (e.g., the benefit did not last long or the side effects were too harmful):nothing I can think of B3d. Treatments that had no effect: nothing I can think of B3e. Treatments that made your sensitivity worse: nothing I can think of B4. What is your age range?55-64 B5. What year did you become aware of your sensitivity to wireless radiation or electromagnetic fields? 2009 B6. What country, state, province, or major city were you living in when you first noticed your sensitivity to wireless or electromagnetic fields? Toronto