All comment threads

*See attached for comments.

*See attached for comments.

*See attached for comments.

I have been hit with directed energy weapons to the point where it popped my breast implants (i felt them both leaking saline in my chest after i was hit) it left my breasts burned and also left me with first and second degree burns on my abdomen. Ive been heavily targeted since 2019 at which time i was in a relationship with a man who was a DEA private contractor who described the entire torture program to me detailing the horrific things they do to people...

These EMF's, Radiofrequency Radiation and Wiress Radiation Exposure, you know the FAKE 5G Towers. They are all over the place. By homes, schools, daycare and you can see them on the freeway too. They appear during the day, and nobody seems to care that they are built at night. My ears are ri ging all the time, people on the freeway especially on motorcycles go over 100 miles per hour, and there are never any state highway patrol or police officers on the freeway at all. And what is the government going to also do about the chem trails in the sky, my car is so dusty from all the stuff that is bring put in the sky. And the government is not doing anything about that either. The pictures I have attached are from Cuyahoga County, Ohio.

I believe my experience could be a valuable case for learning more about NEMETH exposure. Three years ago, I was hospitalized in Fort Worth, Texas, for a medical emergency. I spent 19 days in the hospital under the care of an infectious disease specialist, Dr. McDonald, who saved my life. In the months leading up to that hospitalization, I was avoiding cell towers, light bulbs, and even refrigerators because I associated them with the symptoms I was experiencing. After my hospital treatment, I felt fully recovered—but about six weeks later, the symptoms returned. For the past three years, I’ve continued to experience these symptoms. Although they’re not as severe now, I can usually spend only about 30–40 minutes around electronics before I begin experiencing headaches and body aches. I’m still looking for answers, and I hope to see a new infectious disease specialist soon. The image shows about $400 worth of EMF blankets from an Amazon purchase, which do not work!

The seriousness of this can be summed up easily and we need to put a stop the massive infrastructure being built asap. Health>Money “The brain is an electromagnetic. A cell tower is an electromagnetic transmitter operating at a frequency, modulation, and duty cycle the brain does not produce. Exposure from a tower is continuous and involuntary. A limit written only to prevent heating does not answer whether that field alters the electrical activity the brain depends on.” This comment is against cell towers, base stations, and small cells. The exposure they produce is involuntary, continuous, and aimed at homes, schools, and workplaces. A person can put a phone down. No one can opt out of a tower. Human beings are electrical. Nerve conduction, cardiac rhythm, and the voltage across cell membranes are measurable processes. A tower is an electromagnetic transmitter running all day, at a frequency and modulation the body does not produce. Federal limits address heating only. The tower studies looked past heating and found tumors. The study built as a base-station experiment is Falcioni et al., Environmental Research (2018), from the Ramazzini Institute. It exposed 2,448 rats from before birth until natural death to a 1.8 GHz GSM far-field signal at 5, 25, and 50 V/m, 19 hours a day, meant to resemble an antenna rather than a handset against the head. Male rats at 50 V/m had a statistically significant increase in malignant heart schwannomas. Schwann-cell hyperplasia rose in both sexes at that dose. The estimated whole-body absorption at 50 V/m was about 0.1 W/kg, far under the 1.6 W/kg phone limit, and the field strength sits under the FCC public limit of 10 W/m² in that band. The cancers appeared at exposures the current rules allow. The National Toxicology Program’s 2018 reports found the same tumor under near-field, phone-like modulation: clear evidence of malignant heart schwannomas in male rats, and some evidence of brain gliomas, plus DNA damage in brain tissue. Two designs, near-field and far-field, produced the same heart tumor. Mevissen et al., the World Health Organization systematic review of the animal cancer studies (Environment International, 2025), rated the evidence high certainty for an increase in heart schwannomas in male rats and high certainty for an increase in glioma. Those are the tumors the International Agency for Research on Cancer cited in 2011 when it classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as Group 2B, possibly carcinogenic to humans, on limited evidence of glioma and acoustic neuroma. Acoustic neuroma is a schwannoma of the vestibulocochlear nerve. People living near antennas show the same direction of effect, in smaller studies. Eger et al. (2004), in Naila, Germany, found new cancer cases about 3.4 times higher within 400 meters of a base station in the five years after it began operating, and patients diagnosed about 8.5 years younger. Wolf and Wolf (2004), in Netanya, Israel, reported cancer incidence about 4 times higher within 350 meters. Dode et al. (2011), in Belo Horizonte, found cancer mortality about 1.35 times higher within 100 meters of a base station, falling with distance. Balmori’s 2022 review of 38 studies of people living near base stations reported effects in 28 of them, including radiofrequency sickness, cancer, and biochemical changes. These are not large prospective cohorts. They are the human record that exists for towers, and it does not show safety. In 2021 the D.C. Circuit remanded the FCC’s decision to keep its 1996 limits (Environmental Health Trust v. FCC). The court held that the agency had not explained effects other than cancer, effects on children, long-term exposure, the spread of transmitters since the limits were written, or the environment. Towers are the environmental exposure. Children in schools and homes nearest the antennas have no say in it, and they will carry it for decades. HHS should tell the FCC, state health departments, and local governments the following. No new tower, macro site, or small cell, school, childcare center, or playground. Existing sites inside that distance should be disclosed, measured at the property line and in the nearest classrooms, and removed or powered down where a wired alternative exists. Cumulative exposure from every antenna on a structure counts, not one site at a time. Backhaul and school networks should be wired. Thermal compliance is not a health finding. The far-field experiment already produced the tumor at a level the rules permit. Refrences attached

See attached file(s) Permeability of the Blood-Brain Barrier Induced by 91 5 MHz Electromagnetic Radiation, Continuous Wave and Modulated at 8, 16, 50, and 200 Hz ABSTRACT Biological effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) on the blood-brain barrier (BBB) can be studied in sensitive and specific models. In a previous investigation of the permeability of the blood-brain barrier after exposure to the various EMF-components of proton magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we found that the exposure to MRI induced leakage of Evans Blue labeled proteins normally not passing the BBB of rats [Salford et al. (1992), in: Resonance Phenomena in Biology, Oxford University Press, pp. 87-911. In the present investigation we exposed male and female Fischer 344 rats in a transverse elec- tromagnetic transmission line chamber to microwaves of 915 MHz as continuous wave (CW) and pulse-modulated with repetition rates of 8,16, 50, and 200 s-’. The specific energy absorption rate (SAR) varied between 0.016 and 5 Wlkg. The rats were not anesthetized during the 2-hour exposure. All animals were sacrificed by perfusion-fixation of the brains under chloral hydrate anesthesia about 1 hour after the exposure. The brains were perfused with saline for 3-4 minutes, and thereafter fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 5-6 minutes. Central coronal sections of the brains were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 5 pm. Albumin and fibrinogen were demonstrated immunohistochemically. The results show albumin leakage in 5 of 62 of the controls and in 56 of 184 of the animals exposed to 915 MHz microwaves. Continuous wave resulted in 14 positive findings of 35, which differ significantly from the controls (P = 0.002). With pulsed 915 MHz microwaves with repetition rates of 200,50, 16, and 8 s-l, 42 of 149 were positive, which is highly significant at the P = 0.001 level. This reveals that both CW and pulsed 915 MHz microwaves have the potential to open up the BBB for albumin passage. However, there is no significant difference between continuous and pulsed 915 MHz microwaves in this respect. The frequency of occurrence of extravasates (26%) was found to be independent of SAR for SAR < 2.5 W/kg, but rose significantly for the higher SAR values (to 43%). The question of whether the opening of the blood-brain barrier constitutes a health hazard demands further investigation.

See attached file(s) ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS AND HUMAN HEALTH. FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED RESEARCH SEPTEMBER, 17-24, 2002 MOSCOW - SAINT PETERSBURG, RUSSIA 1. THE GENERAL PROBLEMS OF EMF INVESTIGATION CONCEPT OF INFORMATION SUPPORT FOR MOBILE PHONE USERS SAFETY ON THE BASIS OF PRECAUTIONARY POLICY REALISATION IN PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES. Grigoriev O.A.1, Vasiliev O.A.2, Bichelday E.P.1 1National fund for non-ionizing radiation protection, Moscow, Russia 2Russian Ministry of public health department for State epidemiological inspection, Moscow, Russia Mobile telecommunication is rapidly developing as an element of social technological infrastructure. However none of the specialised scientific organisation could confirm, that mobile phones EMF is unharmful for human health. Numerous researches reveals more questions than answers. World health organisation consider, that the consequences from mobile phones’ EMF exposure of individuals as well as human population in whole aren’t known enough , therefore we have to continue the scientific researches and provide the precautionary policy. According to precautionary principle we have to make all efforts to decrease the risk for human health, even finally unproved. Mobile telecommunication systems drastic increasing, though we have no final results of EMF biological influence researches. It means that mobile phones’ value for society is more important factor, comparing with real and possible risks for human health. Refer to the law project “About the basis of technical regulation in Russian Federation” sellers should provide goods safety for consumers, this means that mobile phones’ sellers and manufactures have to confirm their equipment safety. However it takes time to adopt the law and work out the mechanism of its realisation. In such conditions we consider that the most actual and rather fast method to provide the population safety is let to know the objective and actual information that allows to generate own opinion and make realised choice in all aspects of the problem «Mobile phones and health». Such programs should be aimed to mobile phones services’ consumers (voluntary risk group) as well as to other population who don't use mobile phones, but exposed by mobile telecommunication EMF (involuntary risk group. Now authors are developing the information support complex for population “Mobile telecommunication and human health”, which includes the web-site (www.ecopole.ru), popular scientific book and several leaflets names as “Mobile phones”, “Base stations”, “To children up to 16 is not recommended ” THE RUSSIAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON NON-IONIZING RADIATION PROTECTION AND PROBLEM OF ELECTROMAG- NETIC SAFETY OF THE POPULATION Grigoriev Yu.G. $9,90 #080,7. 03970 3899:90 41 458.8 .3897 41 0,9 #:88,3 0/07,943 Moscow, Russia Now Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection carries out (spend) the constant analysis of achievement of scientific community on a problem of electromagnetic safety of the population, as well as recommendations of the World health organization (WHO) and International commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). We also make an estimation of a real situation in the country. The committee recognizes presence of a problem of probable adverse in- fluence EMF on health of the population. For last 35-40 years we have a sufficient material giving an opportunity to establish dose dependence EMF, as well as influence frequency characteristics EMF on bioeffects. However, now there is the important establishment fact of cumulation of bioeffects in conditions repeated and chronic EMF exposure of small inten- sity. Pays on itself attention a completely new situation in connection with wide use of cellular communication. The large group of the users by cellular telephones has daily EMF irradiation of structures periphery of nervous system and head brain, on the one hand, and the overwhelming part of the population is exposed to a constant compulsory EMF irradiation from base stations, on the other hand. There is till now unsolved problem of a role of EMF modulation in development of bioeffects. This problem practically is not taken into account in definition MPE of EMF. The members of Committee give the large attention to a scientific substantiation and development of sanitary rules for EMF and harmonization of them with the international recommendations and standards, and also the decisions a WHO are taken into accoun

Randomized double-blinded placebo controlled trials (or equivalent) are needed to determine the effects of EMF’s on biological life, specifically nnEMF’s. I strongly recommend that a moratorium be put in place for ANY technologies that emit EMFs to any degree, and current technologies be disabled. I agree with Katherine Watt’s assessment below. “I tend to think 5G, 4G, 3G and other (novel or renamed old) EMF sources are useful for 1) wasting human time and material resources (construction projects with no real benefit or improvement over existing tech); 2) frightening people/inducing sense of helplessness about potential sources of harm they cannot readily see or avoid; and 3) deflecting attention away from global theft (looting/hoarding of land and resources) and from biological and chemical poisoning (vaccination, drugs, low-altitude outdoor and indoor/interior-of-building sprays, derailments, explosions) as primary causes of sickness.”