All comment threads

Patents disclosed for years the penetration of 5 Ghz signals (“5G”) on the human body. A patent for a vascular system measuring necklace (KR20170017989A) , filed in 2017 before the Korean patent office, discloses: Radar source can be divided into 2Ghz, 5Ghz, 10Ghz, 20Ghz area according to permeation depth by using general RF generator. However, it is most efficient to use 10Ghz source at 5GHz because of different penetration / Do. The sensor has a dedicated radar sensor with a middle wavelength in the wavelength range, which improves detection efficiency and minimizes the amount of energy consumed. What is the penetration efficacy of 5G? In the Korean patent, it is: “the biometric information includes blood pressure, blood flow velocity, color information of blood or blood vessels, pulse, blood vessel thickness, etc.” That is a lot of very personal information 5G can read just by being close to our bodies. Cells feel 5G acutely. In studies done on E. Coli and yeast cells, the 5 Ghz signal was found to influence cellular division ( 5G mobile networks and health—a state-of-the-science review of the research into low-level RF fields above 6 GHz | Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology ). The risk of cancer (constant, uncontrolled cell division) is so well-known that one U.S. patent assigned to Fractal Networks LLC explicitly discloses “Cancer Minimization of 5G Cell Phones” . In that patent US11658407B2, where our cell phones contain varied antennas to capture the 5G signal, a revised reflecting cavity inside the cell phone “can change a radiation direction of the 5G antenna to reduce the electromagnetic radiation on the user. In one embodiment, if the user puts the phone next to the face, sensors detect such usage scenario, and uses the 5G antennas most away from the user to increase antenna efficiency and reduce radiation on the user.” 5G is different from the networks that came before it because 5G ( US11658407B2 - Cellular system - Google Patents ): is used to designate fifth generation of mobile technologies. 5G has made it possible to use mobile phone with larger bandwidth possible. It is a packet switched wireless system. It is used to cover wide area and used to provide higher throughput. It uses CDMA, BDMA and also millimeter wave (for backhaul wireless connectivity). It uses improved and advanced data coding/modulation techniques. It provides about 100 Mbps at full mobility and 1 Gbps at low mobility. It uses smart antenna techniques to support higher data rate and coverage. This higher level of function, and penetration, requires an increased number of cell towers with multi-antenna. 5G relies on massive multi-antenna (MIMO) structures. So not only do we have to be concerned about the radiation from our phones on 5G, we also have to be concerned about the increased number and functionality of cell towers. 5G antennas emit radiofrequency (RF) radiation and so far the 3.5 GHz frequency has been used as carrier wave for 5G in city environments. RF radiation, a type of microwave, was already proven to be harmful to human health at levels encountered in the environment before the deployment of 5G. Per OSHA ( Radiofrequency and Microwave Radiation - Health Effects | Occupational Safety and Health Administration ), the WHO/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer, associated with wireless phone use. With 5G, RF radiation has reached such levels we should expect widespread headaches, fatigue, concentration difficulty, insomnia, emotional distress, irritability, dysesthesia, skin lesions including burning sensation, cardiac and lung symptoms. Another term for the illness is radiofrequency sickness syndrome. ( Summary of seven Swedish case reports on the microwave sy... ) Sweden and France conducted extensive studies on RF radiation. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2024-0017/html French studies exposing animals to the 3.5 GHz frequency found negative effects such as oxidative stress in the liver, kidneys, the plasma, degenerated neurons in the brain as well as oxidative stress in muscles and negative effects on bone strength. France combats the health risk associated with 5G by banning certain pieces of 5G equipment ( France introduces de facto ban on Huawei 5G equipment by 2028 – POLITICO ) and favoring local manufacturers, where it can test antennas for radiation reduction among other factors. The United States does not seem to have conducted thorough tests on 5G / RF radiation impact on human cells. We are really falling behind in understanding 5G. It may be best if we place a moratorium on all imported 5G equipment (similar to what France did in July 2020) until radiation reduction policies and equipment options can be explored and prioritized.

Should not be allowed within a certain distance from schools. There are 3 very close to my kids elementary school.

There is a tower in the middle of our town on a river bluff. We don't get service from it because we are below it in a holler. The service tower for us is the next big city in another state. It is never quiet. Only when the power goes down to the tower is it ever quiet. What damage does it do? I have stage IV lobular breast cancer. I have lived here ten years. The cancer I have forms in crystal type and I have one small area of one breast that is affected. But this cancer has eaten holes in all my bones and created these crystal like formations. The frequency of the tower I believe has caused a turbo cancer in me. There is no family history of breast cancer in my family. Actually only one who has developed cancer was in their 80s.

I'm extremely worried about wifi damaging our blood brain barrier. We needs safe 4g, 5g and wifi. Bluetooth is also really harmful. At the very least consumers should be heavily warned about dangers before buying.

Direct Energy Weapon exposure & illegal research stripping citizens of their rights. I’m a victim. I’ve been retaliated against for speaking out in my state, Illinois. I document psychology by scratch & my environment. I was right. Been screaming for years.

As a military individual do I need to remind the less educated concerning the dangers of RF energy. I am a Broadcast Engineer Served aboard the US Ticonderoga with the Spy 1 Radar system as well as other radar and RF communications systems. Do I need to mention the swelling testicles or the eyeballs itching or the digital watched being fried and going black? I guess I do. Now we surround ourselves with: Led bulbs that emit RF radiation. Cellular Phones that emit 4G and 5G radiation and sometimes many in a single household. Laptops Book readers. Alexa units. television sets. Yes your television also emits RF radiation. WIFI routers of which I have 4. 3 for security Cameras and one for Starlink. How about Meshtastic and Meshcore? How about every "smart device" you have? Your video doorbells Every WIFI enabled camera. I have 6 of those. How about that Child Monitor by your baby's bed? Yes that too! CB radio guy wit a base station? Ham radio guy with a base station? Then there is the electrical monitoring system from Emporia Energy of which I have two. As well as every additional special reporting adapters for the freezers and the refrigerator as well as the freeze dryer. Then there are the smart temperature sensors monitors inside the freezers. Oh and the desktop with WIFI and Bluetooth. Bluetooth in my car and the garage door opener. How about that remote for the ceiling fans and the remote for the television? Bluetooth for the irrigation system? That too. Oh and how about that "SMART METER" the electric company put on the side of your home as well as the sides of your neighbor's homes? Those crank out HIGH LEVELS of toxic RF radiation. Then there is the 5G monstrosities every block as well as the Cell Phone towers and all the additional commercial transmitters they stack on them. . . I may have made my point? Perhaps not? ALL of this energy is additive as in 1+1=2+1=3+1=4 Note the above is in my home even though I have tried to wire all that I can with shielded cable. You just can't shut all of the signals off. They keep on transmitting, cabled or not. Imagine each source like a lightbulb, only ones YOU cannot see but any RF meter can. Is your home shielded from all of that? NOT AT ALL! Instead you have to have RF shielding installed at a huge cost. I hung RF shielding curtains on my bedroom wall because of the Smart Meters. We live, eat, dream, and work in heavy RF soup. We are drowning in it. If you own an electric vehicle. YOU DO NOT WANT TO KNOW what you are being exposed to but be assured long trips are a very bad idea. Tesla charging station? Yes RF radiation! I never had migraines UNTIL LED bulbs were forced on us. But hey, I am saving energy right? What does it matter as HilLIARy Clinton said, that I go blind frequently from scintillating migraines and now recently Ocular Migraines. They are only temporary right? So what is going to be done about it? Back when I was a kid living in Beaver Valley down the Ohio we had a problem with pollution from the steel mills. Reganomics fixed that. He sold that industry over seas and tens of thousands of steel workers were permanently laid off. But hey at least the Ohio river will not catch fire again. Oh and now the snows are not laced with soot. I was 14 when I saw actual WHITE snow for the first time. Boggled my young mind it did. Often I remember the smell of coal fired furnaces, nostalgic I guess. But somehow I really do not thing I will ever be nostalgic about a loss or reduction of EMF constantly hammering me. Perhaps because I will be dead long before our glorious leaders decide to do anything real about all of it. Do you need someone to talk openly about this? Or should I be worried some globalist paid killer is going to come to my door and permanently silence me for simply telling the truth? You know like all those people around the Clinton's and Epstein have. Just try and tell me that isn't true. I am quite sure Vince Foster and Virginia Giuffre would have something to say about that IF THEY COULD. I could say more but what would be the point of tightening the noose already around my neck? Have a nice day and if you want you can delete the stuff about the Hildabeeste and Jeffrey. Oddly enough I have sent DOZENS of messages through the White House feedback nd reporting system. Including about a Secret Service Agent cum whistleblower who was framed (he has the evidence proving it) and should have been pardoned long ago and as it is cannot even get social security though he paid fully into it but somehow the US Customs Service got his deductions deleted. He is 73 years old and Social Security was ordered to pay him years ago and yet he receives nothing. His name is John A. Carman of San Diego California.

I don't like the idea of being bathed in microwaves. It does not matter if it's very weak. The effects are still present. I have 5G turned off on my phone. Soon we will get 6G in Terahertz? This is extremely energetic. No, just no to 5g & 6g

I worked for a cellphone company for 17 yrs. I always had a phone up to my ear, activating and troubleshooting several everyday. I havent worked for them in almost 10 years, but still, whenever I put my phone to my ear to talk to someone, it feels like a strong magnetic pull in my temple area. This sensation lasts for some time after Im done talking with the phone up to my ear. I try not to use it for phone calls unless I have to.

I am submitting this comment as a consumer concerned about long-term exposure to wireless radiation from phones, Wi-Fi routers, cell towers, and other connected devices. I urge HHS to conduct a thorough, independent review of whether current exposure limits adequately protect public health. This review needs to consider those most heavily exposed and should examine potential effects beyond tissue heating, including evidence concerning cancer, reproductive health, and children’s development. Please prioritize research that reflects how people actually encounter wireless radiation: repeated exposure over many years, often from multiple sources and devices used close to the body. Assessments should consider signal strength, pulse patterns, duration, and combined exposure. Please consider Melnick and Moskowitz’s 2026 analysis of animal data, which argues that existing exposure limits may inadequately protect against cancer and reproductive harm (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-026-01288-6). I also ask HHS to evaluate Lai and Levitt’s review of exposure intensity, duration, and signal modulation (https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2022.2065683), and Scarato’s review of US regulatory gaps and proposed reforms (https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1677583). These papers warrant careful consideration alongside the broader evidence, including studies that have not found adverse effects. I ask HHS to: •Assess whether additional protections are needed for children, pregnant women, and other potentially vulnerable groups. •Support long-term research with safeguards against industry conflicts of interest. •Provide clear information about exposure and practical ways to reduce it, including wired alternatives in homes and schools. •Recommend updated standards wherever the evidence shows that existing limits are insufficient. Consumers should not have to navigate these questions alone. Please use this inquiry to advance transparent science, meaningful oversight, and public health protection.

I know MANY people who can not sleep in a home with WIfi router transmitting. There are MANY studies that support this fact. Even music at 440hz is harmful or at least causes anxiety. 432Hz (original) does not harm body.