All comment threads

I would really like to know more about this. From all that I’ve read it looks like this is a big issue.

I am responding as an individual consumer and parent. I’m 52 but my cognition is sometimes that of a 92 year-old due to EMFs. I eat healthy, whole, organic food; take care of my mental health; incorporate daily movement into an already active life as a partner-free mama to a nine year-old; and go to sleep between 9-10pm, yet smart meters and WiFi from adjoining houses prevent me from sleeping through the night. What EMFs are doing to the younger populations who have never known a world without 5g towers and the like is unbelievable. Please study these: https://substack.com/redirect/fa0e0b40-9971-4f20-8a7d-b24d9db59e1d?j=eyJ1IjoiNHY5bWEifQ.ThwqzKXOhra7eQnIDlMYDXIXp9lVxrwpuABHg4Ox3AE Thanks, Viv

One of our most important tasks of a civilization is to create an environment that allows people to be safe in their homes and at school. It is known that radiation, EMF’s and radio frequencies are harmful to humans when exposure is consistent and at close proximity. Our bodies and brains are constantly being bombarded with these dangerous conditions when our homes and schools are close to these toxic environments. Regulations must be put in place and enforced to keep populations from becoming vulnerable to cancer, brain damage and damage to our immune systems. Save our children and families and keep these towers are safe distance from all schools and neighborhoods!!!

I formerly worked at a telecommunications company in South Africa and am now in Florida USA. I can tell you I saw first hand how the field technicians said working on the cellular towers gave them cancer. How EMF can also disrupt and manipulate people. We would like answers on why our kids have no more sparkle in their eyes. What has happened to our natural ingenuity. How has this affected our own human electromagnetic field. We want to know why companies prioritised high tech communication above our neural, physical and emotional well being.

I sat next to a cell tower and I started to grow a third arm. Then I found out I had a cancer that is only genetic. I blame the 5G. I also started to fly.

Can we look into chronic illness and health deficits post COVID vaccine that was mandated for nurses?

Where are the safety studies on this technology? How is cumulative EMF, RF, and Radiation exposure demonstrated to be safe?

I am a licensed mental health professional who specializes in child and youth mental health and trauma. I have been working with children and youths in multiple capacities for nearly 30 years, and I have not only watched their screen addiction increase dramatically over the past decades, I have noticed something especially troubling in the past few years: A sharp increase in restless, unspecified anxiety and panic attacks in children and youths, and at younger and younger ages, starting with toddlers. This is sometimes misdiagnosed by other therapists as "ADHD". In the past, I saw anxiety and panic attacks primarily in children ages 12 and up, but now, it is becoming common in very young children, and one of the primary presenting complaints. I believe that many of these symptoms on the anxiety, restlessness, and panic spectrum, especially in children whose needs are otherwise met (e.g., they have adequate outdoor play time) and without trauma histories, are a direct result of their exposure to EMFs from screens, devices, and cellphone towers, but especially wifi and 5G. I believe that children and youths are especially exposed to this in public schools and public universities. When I suggest, as part of my treatment protocol, that parents drastically reduce or even remove their child's access to screens (and even find alternative education environments or homeschool if necessary to do this), this greatly reduces or even resolves the anxiety and panic symptoms in young children, pre-teens, and teens. It is harder for young adults to escape EMFs when devices are necessary for social functioning and the exposure is high at college or work. Of course, sometimes, the parents are so addicted to their own devices that they struggle to "unplug" the family, including the kids, from exposure to EMFs and symptoms persist. Likewise, I know anecdotally how EMFs affect me and my family members, causing sudden, intense pressure "headaches" or a sensation of there being a pressured force around the head, as well as general restlessness or even akathisia and inability to concentrate, when the wifi is on or nearby. I have read interesting research by the Weston A. Price Foundation that suggests that most of the modern viral epidemics and seasonal illnesses that we suffer are correlated to the installation of EMF-emitting towers and infrastructure. It is possible to use and emit frequencies for communications that heal human health rather than harm it--Take a look at Nikola Tesla's devices, inventions, and blueprints that were confiscated by the government. Please go beyond only researching this issue and make the infrastructure and frequency changes NOW. It will be easier to do this in 2026 before 5G and more intense harmful frequencies are so entrenched into our society's functioning that it will seem impossible to disrupt it. I am listing some links for your consideration below: https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/5g-negative-health-effects/#gsc.tab=0 https://www.westonaprice.org/podcast/272-the-shocking-truth-about-electricity-emfs-with-arthur-firstenberg/#gsc.tab=0 https://www.westonaprice.org/podcast-category/emfs-5g/#gsc.tab=0 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12531076/ Thank you for accepting public comments! Laurie A. Couture, M.Ed., LCMHC, LMHC New Hampshire

Different phones have different max specific SAR levels. Why are some phones using a higher SAR than others and do we really need them to do that? Can we not have relatively low SAR phones that still do their job? What if the consumer themselves was able to decide through software if they wanted a lower SAR on the phone than what the manufacturer set as max peak allowed?

Different phones have different max specific SAR levels. Why are some phones using a higher SAR than others and do we really need them to do that? Can we not have relatively low SAR phones that still do their job? What if the consumer themselves was able to decide through software if they wanted a lower SAR on the phone than what the manufacturer set as max peak allowed?