THE LATEST SUBMISSIONS
All comment threads
7067 original comments · Newest first
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Perspective: Individual consumer and person reporting potential adverse health effects.
Questions addressed: 3, 13(k), 16, and 18.
I am submitting this comment because I want HHS to hear from people like me who are experiencing serious health problems associated with wireless technology, electromagnetic fields, and electrical exposure.
My symptoms exploded after I purchased my Florida home in April 2023 and spent a week there. I have experienced burning skin, sharp head pains, fatigue, insomnia, difficulty thinking clearly, heart palpitations, tingling, numbness, worsening tinnitus, and vibrations in my legs when the HVAC runs. The vibrations stop when the system shuts off.
I cannot tolerate Wi-Fi or Bluetooth and dirty electricity. I have made costly changes to my home to reduce same, including replacing appliances, changing lighting and wiring, using wired Ethernet, and rerouting HVAC lines through the garage. I am still struggling.
I use a Greenwave meter to measure electrical noise in my home. My readings fluctuate, with approximately 400 mV on the low end and readings as high as 1212. Around 50 mV is what I can tolerate. I want better research into electrical noise and its possible health effects.
When I purchased my home, a smart meter was installed. The meter was changed in May 2023. I requested a true analog electromechanical meter, but Florida Power & Light provided a digital meter it describes as non-communicating. My concern is not limited to wireless transmission; it also involves the digital and electronic nature of the meter.
I have repeatedly provided FPL with medical documentation requesting an analog electromechanical meter, as recommended by my doctors. I even purchased one that FPL could inspect and install, taking the cost of obtaining the meter off FPL.
I formally submitted an ADA disability accommodation request supported by my medical documentation. However, FPL denied my request without acknowledging or addressing it as a disability accommodation, responding instead as though I had made an ordinary customer request. Despite more than 20 attempts to resolve this matter, FPL has refused to provide the analog meter my doctors recommended. I also continue to pay a monthly fee for the non-communicating digital meter and its manual reading.
What is especially discouraging is even after seeking medical help and repeatedly providing written recommendations, I feel my health concerns have not been taken seriously. It is hard not to feel that companies care more about revenue and policies than the health of the people affected. People reporting serious health problems deserve to be heard and treated with respect.
I have spent more than $15,000 having mercury dental fillings removed in an effort to address my symptoms, but the symptoms persisted. I am desperate to understand what is happening and find relief.
My condition also affects my family and others who do not experience what I do. They must sometimes change their lifestyles when around me. It is painful to struggle with my health while knowing that my circumstances affect the people I care about.
I am severely affected by what I believe are wireless exposures and electrical pollution, and I am frightened by the toll this is taking on my health and my life.
I ask HHS to support independent, thorough research into the potential health effects of radiofrequency radiation, electromagnetic fields, wireless devices, digital electrical equipment, and electrical noise. Research should consider people reporting symptoms in circumstances that may not affect everyone equally, as well as combined exposures in everyday environments.
People deserve clear information about what is known, what remains uncertain, and how exposures are assessed. Practical alternatives, such as traditional analog electromechanical meters where feasible, should also be considered for people reporting serious difficulties with digital and wireless technologies.
More needs to be brought to light about what people like me are experiencing. There are people suffering from serious symptoms who feel that no one acknowledges what is happening to them. Instead of having their concerns taken seriously and properly investigated, they are often dismissed or made to feel as though they are crazy. I know what it is like to struggle with these symptoms while trying to get someone to listen. We deserve to be heard, and our experiences deserve honest, independent scientific investigation. People should not have to prove beyond all doubt what is causing their suffering before anyone is willing to take them seriously.
This has cost me my health, money, comfort, peace of mind, and the ability to safely live in my home. I ask HHS to listen, investigate and support research that provides honest answers based on good science. We should not have to wait for absolute certainty before our experiences are taken seriously.
A healthcare provider cites the FCC court remand and research gaps and recommends standardized clinical i…
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
2.I am responding as a healthcare provider. The federal limits for human exposure to radiofrequency radiation were adopted by the Federal Communications Commission in 1996. n 2013 the FCC itself asked whether the limits should be revisited. In 2019 it answered: no. Environmental Health Trust, Children’s Health Defense and others sued. On August 13, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that the FCC’s decision was “arbitrary and capricious.” The court found the Commission had failed to respond to “record evidence that exposure to RF radiation at levels below the Commission’s current limits may cause negative health effects unrelated to cancer,” had failed to address the impacts on children, long-term exposure, and the ubiquity of wireless devices, and had shown “a complete failure to respond to comments concerning environmental harm.” It noted roughly 200 comments from people reporting illness or injury that the agency had not addressed. It sent the matter back to the FCC with instructions to explain itself. (Environmental Health Trust v. FCC, No. 20-1025) 18. (https://greenmedinfo.com/problematic-action/electromagnetic-field-harms)
The FCC had relied on the Food and Drug Administration’s assurance that the limits were fine. The court said an agency cannot lean on another agency’s conclusion if that conclusion comes without an explanation. 3g. Five years later, no explanation has been produced. https://greenmedinfo.com/problematic-action/electromagnetic-field-harms Recommendations (m). I recommend (1) a validated clinical intake instrument for suspected RF/EMF-related complaints; (2) a federal adverse-event intake comparable to MedWatch; (3) biomarker studies in symptomatic patients following the oxidative-stress findings of Irigaray, Caccamo & Belpomme (Int J Mol Med 2018, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30015864/); and (4) exposure-measurement studies that do not rely on self-report, following Bogers et al. (Environ Int 2018, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30227317/).12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31540320/ (Adams et al., Environ Int 2014, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24927498/; Liu et al., Andrology 2014, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24700791/) and exposure reduction is low-cost. The peer-reviewed record on 5G, 6G, satellite, IoT and smart-meter exposures is thin (Simkó & Mattsson, Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31540320/, concluded available studies "do not provide adequate and sufficient information for a meaningful safety assessment"). This is a gap, not a reassurance.(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34047144/; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34243228/); Balmori, Sci Total Environ 2015 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25747364/).
Attributes arterial calcification requiring bypass surgery to years of carrying a phone against the back …
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
"Here is my story, 12 years ago I awoke in the middle of the night in excruciating pain in my legs, a piece of calcium had broken of from the main artery that supplies blood to my legs blocking at the junction I had to have a double bi-pass, they thought I my loose a leg because of the lack of blood flow. I seen my vascular surgeon and told him what I thought caused this calcification. For over 20 years I carried my mobile phone clipped to the back of my nail bag up against my back that caused the calcification, he's response was "why do you think my phone is way over their" pointing to the table sitting in the corner of his office, then i started to look for conformation of my thoughts and sure enough there is plenty out there like this paper that corelates well with the introduction of the mobile phone in Australia. A week before my experience I had a CT scan and what it showed was calcium build-up at the junction to my legs and the only other bit of calcium build-up was behind my ear."
Attributes a benign meningioma to earlier phone use, reports ongoing monitoring and a spouse’s EHS, and r…
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I appreciate the opportunity to share my comments. I have followed the format of your questions.
2: I am responding as an individual injured by RF/EMF. Additionally, my spouse has been severely injured by RF/EMF.
3a: As to my history with RF/EMF…As a requirement of my job, I was an early adopter of cell phones. I also worked in an office environment with wi-fi. I lived in a house with a smart meter until we had it removed in 2011.
3b: I was exposed daily to wireless radiation at work and at home with a smart meter.
3c: As a result of holding a cell phone to my head in the late 1990s, I developed a brain tumor right behind my right ear – exactly where I held my cell phone to my head. Fortunately, it continues to be benign, however it was growing so rabidly that I needed radiation treatment to slow its growth. It is stable now but must be regularly monitored. This is the only health effect that has manifested for me, however it is unknown what other injuries I may have that have not yet been detected.
3d: My brain tumor was discovered in 2000. I immediately stopped holding a cell phone to my head and only used it when absolutely necessary.
3e: I saw multiple neurosurgeons and had many diagnostic tests. My diagnosis was confirmed of meningioma. I have to have MRIs every 2 years now to monitor the tumor. The Mayo clinic sites radiation exposure as a potential cause for this type of tumor. Is it a coincidence that on that spot on my head where I held my phone is where my tumor grew?
3f: I stopped holding a phone to my head and also greatly reduced the usage of cellular phones. Also, with my spouses’ EHS, we removed all the sources of EMF in our house. My tumor has been stable for over 20 years, but because of my injury – I have the ongoing expense of monitoring it.
With regard to recommendations to HHS, I would share the following:
- Regulate the amount of radiation/power that mobile phones can emit
- Update the standards for “safe” exposure. The current FCC SAR limits are ridiculously outdated and the science has been proven that they are not sufficient
- Enforce better notification to the public about the hazards of wireless radiation from all sources (wi-fi, phones, smart meters, smart watches, IoT devices, bluetooth devices, etc.)
I have included some studies that support the science that RF / EMF causes cell disruption that can lead to tumors
See comment attached. *See attached additional Electromagnetic Field Studies demonstrating harmful effect…
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
See comment attached.
*See attached additional Electromagnetic Field Studies demonstrating harmful effects published since 2019.
Susan Foster, CEO
Rocky Mountains for Safe Technology
Email: susan.foster04@gmail.com
Compound exposure of 2.8 GHz and 9.3 GHz microwave causes learning and memory impairment in rats
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Compound exposure of 2.8 GHz and 9.3 GHz microwave causes
learning and memory impairment in rats
See comment attached. *See attached additional Electromagnetic Field Studies demonstrating harmful effect…
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
See comment attached.
*See attached additional Electromagnetic Field Studies demonstrating harmful effects published since 2019.
Susan Foster, CEO
Rocky Mountains for Safe Technology
Email: susan.foster04@gmail.com
See comment attached. *See attached additional Electromagnetic Field Studies demonstrating harmful effect…
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
See comment attached.
*See attached additional Electromagnetic Field Studies demonstrating harmful effects published since 2019.
Susan Foster, CEO
Rocky Mountains for Safe Technology
Email: susan.foster04@gmail.com
See comment attached. *See attached additional Electromagnetic Field Studies demonstrating harmful effect…
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
See comment attached.
*See attached additional Electromagnetic Field Studies demonstrating harmful effects published since 2019.
Susan Foster, CEO
Rocky Mountains for Safe Technology
Email: susan.foster04@gmail.com
These are separate official submissions grouped by topic. A comment can appear in more than one board.