I am now 62 years old and have been electrosensitive since I was 28, more than half my life.
In Sweden, this is silenced, doctors who want to help us get into trouble (for example, with their medical licenses revoked). I don't feel like you get any help.
I worked as a computer technician with a great interest in electronics. When I became electrosensitive.
When I was working around 1990, I got an NMT mobile phone installed in my car.
NMT was a big problem. I became sensitive to all electronics and solvents, etc.
I was on sick leave for 17 years. Then I had to start working in gardening and as a school janitor.
I got an ABC 80 computer early on, which I used to program a lot.
Before I got sick, my mouth was full of amalgam. I lived in an apartment with a printing shop underneath for a few years, and the apartment sometimes smelled of glue. I did my military service on a robot boat with asbestos insulation. And was exposed to a lot of radar. I tanned in a solarium and had a waterbed with sky-high electric fields. For a while, I may have had a mobile antenna outside my office where I worked on the outside of the house.
When I was programming in my youth, it sometimes happened that my brain would shut down (mental standstill. Before it broke out, I turned down the brightness on the TV. (contrast)
I had a cordless phone in the house where I worked. Someone had it before me and got sick. I don't know what it was from. When I got sick, it was during a course with a lot of computers. It was way too much.
I was very sensitive to regular wired phones, which we ended up with. I have a cell phone now but always use the speaker function.
I now take antidepressants that dampen the sensitivity.
I feel less sensitive to radar and wifi and cell phones today. It was a good thing that NMT was discontinued. I have the most sensitivity to power lines now, apart from all kinds of solvents. It was probably a good thing that they removed the lead in gasoline. I avoid cell phone towers as much as possible and exposing myself to too much.
There is a lot more I could cover, but this will have to do.
Lennart Ohs
Lennart.aahs@gmail.com
Stockholm
Sweden
See attached file(s)See comment attached.
*See Attached Testimonial From Another Innocent Individual Injured By Wireless RF Radiation
Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director
CA Brain Tumor Assn
Email: wirelessbiologicaleffects@gmail.com
HHS should treat low-frequency magnetic emissions from television and monitor displays as an exposure in this docket, with children's programming first. Current radiofrequency limits are built on heating, specific absorption rate, and power density. They do not describe image-driven magnetic pulses in the band that overlaps the electroencephalogram. Laboratory work by W. Ross Adey and colleagues found frequency-specific changes in calcium binding in brain tissue at field levels that do not heat tissue. U.S. patents to Hendricus G. Loos claim that pulsed images on monitors and television tubes can excite sensory resonances near 1/2 Hz and 2.4 Hz. An observational analysis of the soundtrack of *Meet the Teletubbies* found intermittent energy below 20 Hz, strongest near minutes 51–54. That analysis does not establish a neurological effect or an intent. It does establish a concrete children's-media case. Speaker limits on airborne infrasound do not answer the magnetic-field question. I ask HHS, with FDA and in coordination with the FCC, to require measurement and disclosure of these emissions, to test them under realistic viewing, and to review whether subliminal-content policy covers the physical display.
The source is the television or monitor and its associated electronics, driven by ordinary program material. The population I ask HHS to put first is children watching commercial programming, including *Meet the Teletubbies*.
The quantity of concern is the extremely-low-frequency magnetic field produced by the display process: image-intensity changes, power circuitry, and, on older tubes, deflection systems. A common objection is that television speakers cannot produce meaningful airborne sound below 20 Hz. That objection answers a different question. Magnetic fields pass through tissue, induce electric fields in the body, and do not depend on the speaker's acoustic cutoff.
An observational study of the full program *Meet the Teletubbies* (running time 1:01:43) built an ELF spectrogram of the soundtrack from 0 to 100 Hz and aligned it with the picture. Magnitude below 50 Hz and below 20 Hz was intermittent and at times dense. The strongest sustained cluster below 20 Hz fell near minutes 51–54, during insert and outdoor segments. The study states that these findings do not by themselves establish intent or a neurological effect. They document a children's-program case that should be followed with controlled measurement of the magnetic field at the set, not only of the audio file. Report: https://esui.cc/detail.php?slug=case-observations-sub-audible-elf-signatures-in-meet-the-teletubbies
Exposure of this kind is repeated, often daily, during a period of high neural plasticity. A child cannot detect a magnetic pulse and cannot opt out of it. Parents are not given a measurement.
I am not submitting a personal symptom diary or any personal health information for this comment.
I submit this comment as healthcare professional
Question 14
What scientific evidence exists regarding potential adverse environmental effects associated with RF radiation?
Observation and documentation of trees in the vicinity of over 1,500 mobile phone base stations (2005 to 2026) and studies (2016, 2021) suggest a causal relationship between RF radiation and tree damage.
The reason for the tree observation:
After the Bamberg Appeal was published in 2004 – in which 130 medical doctors warned against expanding mobile phone networks – many residents living near mobile phone base stations contacted the initiative for help with health issues. We visited affected individuals at home, documented their symptoms, and took RF radiation measurements. We learned that many people became sick far below the legal limits. We urged all responsible authorities to start health investigations of the long-term-exposed residents. One example (see attached):
https://mdsafetech.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/cell-tower-letter-2005-dr.-cornelia-waldmann-selsam-to-german-state-chancellery-.pdf
But the desperately needed investigations have not been carried out.
During our visits, the affected residents showed us that changes and damage to the trees started around the same time as their symptoms appeared. People and trees got sick at the same time!
The tree damage was visible. Because we hoped to be able to show quickly the causal relationship between RF radiation and tree damage we started to document trees around mobile phone base stations.
Please see the whole comment attached.
Dr. med. Cornelia Waldmann-Selsam, Germany
PLEASE PUT A STOP TO THE EMF, RF AND WIRELESS RADIATION. YOU HAVE BEEN BLESSED TO BE IN THE POSITION/TITLE YOUR IN AND WE THE PEOPLE ARE DEPENDING ON YOU TO HELP PROTECT US FROM ALL THIS RADIATION HARM. IT IS SLOWLY KILLING EVERYONE AND NEEDS TO BE SHUT OFF. WE DONT NEED IT. THE OLD WAY OF DOING THING WERE MORE DEPENDABLE AND SAFER WHEN WE DID NOT HAVE THIS WIFI AND EMF POISON. THIS EMF, WIFI IS WARPING PEOPLE'S MINDS AND DISTORYING EVERYONE'S INCLUDING YOUR BODY. YOU BEEN PUT IN A POSITION TO PROTECT AND SERVER THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND WE NEED YOU TO FOR FILL YOUR DUTIES. OUR AND OUR CHILDREN'S HEALTH AND LIVES ARE DEPENDING ON YOU. SHOW THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT YOU CARE AND SHOW THE BIG TECH AND BIG COMPANIES THAT YOU ARE IN CONTROL AND WILL NOT TOLERATE ANYMORE OF THIS POISION RADIATION THAT IS KILLING AND MAKING PEOPLE SICK. IF YOU DONT THAN ALL OUR BLOOD IS ON YOUR HANDS, PLEASE MAKE A DIFFERANCE AND HELP PROTECT MAN KIND. WE NEED YOUR HELP TO PUT A STOP TO THIS.
See comment attached.
*See Attached Testimonial From Another Innocent Individual Injured By Wireless RF Radiation
Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director
CA Brain Tumor Assn
Email: wirelessbiologicaleffects@gmail.com