Research & federal duties

Please use the thousands of existing studies and build from there

Hi, I would like to know if you are investigating the health effects of 500kv powerlines that companies like PP&L are trying to put up in Pennsylvania. I believe these powerlines are extremely harmful, and I would like to hear about this research.

I request clear, evidence-based information about the possible health risks associated with exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs), radiofrequency (RF) radiation, and wireless technologies. Please address exposure levels, duration, and multiple sources, as well as potential implications for children, pregnant individuals, and workers with frequent exposure. The assessment should distinguish established risks—such as tissue heating at high RF exposure levels—from possible long-term effects, including cancer risks, that remain uncertain or under investigation. Please also explain how current safety limits are established and recommend practical ways to reduce unnecessary exposure.

EMF, dirty electricity, etc. all need to be studied quickly because they are affecting humans. I know many peoples through the years that have had issues with this and the towers and now with everything wireless, problems are much more wide spread I believe one of the answers is for people to have adequate iodine in their bodies. Every day I use LUGOULS solution it comes in different strengths. I use it as a patch. People can do a urine test to check their level of iodine or they can just do a patch test on their inside arm and see how long it takes to absorb please check for further instructionsDr. David Brownstein has been talking about iodine for years LUGOULS iodine comes in two strengths, a 2% and a 5% I know this is an answer Another answer is grounding — they also should have an ongoing way for people to report their experience with this this window that is closing on October 21 is way too short most people will never even know about it in that time and it is a very big problem so they can end this phase, but they need to have ongoing contact information so people as they learned about the study can become a part of it

Unless we know definitively that there is no harm to human health from 5G radiation those studies should be done before any further use of the technology. How often do we find out 20 years or more later what a terrible mistake was made, and how the common good was ignored in the name of profit and progress. Independent studies need to be conducted before allowing industry and government to continue using 5G.

To HHS: wireless radiation is a serious Health Risk. I have personally dealt with severe chronic health issues for many years. I'm aware that Radiation exposure has effected my sensistive nervous system affecting sleep, thyroid issues, hormone imbalance, exhaustion, depletion etc... I go to great lengths to reduce exposure and protect myself. It is a constant, daily challenge in this world of increasing bombardment of Radiation Poisoning. I'm also aware it is absolutely possible to make technology safe for health and still effective Studies show oxidative stress (167 abstracts), DNA damage (82), male infertility (44), lipid peroxidation (43), cognitive decline (38), cancers (34), low sperm quality (33), brain cancer (28), headache (20), sleep disorders (15) and fatigue (14). Further down the list: childhood leukemia, acoustic neuroma, salivary gland disease, hearing disorders, ALS, Alzheimer’s, autism spectrum disorders, birth defects, hypothyroidism, autoimmune disease.... I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals, families, health care providers, researchers, and scientists with an opportunity to finally be heard on this critical public health issue.

I fully support scientific research and reviewing public health standards, but I also believe we need to be careful not to create unnecessary fear about technology that has been studied for decades. Let's stick to the facts. 5G, Wi-Fi, and cell towers use non-ionizing radiofrequency radiation. This is not the same as X-rays or gamma rays. It does not carry enough energy to directly damage DNA through ionization. The World Health Organization and National Cancer Institute have reviewed extensive research, and the overall human evidence has not established that everyday wireless exposure within established safety limits causes cancer. A major systematic review published in 2024 also found that mobile phone use likely does not increase the risk of several types of brain tumors. That doesn't mean we should stop studying it. Science is constantly evolving, and reviewing long-term exposure, newer technologies, and existing safety standards is perfectly reasonable. What concerns me is when legitimate scientific questions get turned into fearmongering. Just because something is called "radiation" doesn't automatically mean it's dangerous. Exposure levels, frequency, duration, and actual biological effects matter. I would encourage HHS to prioritize credible, peer-reviewed research, distinguish established risks from theoretical concerns, and be transparent about what the evidence actually shows. If new evidence demonstrates a legitimate health risk, then absolutely update the regulations. But public health policy should be based on reproducible scientific evidence, not speculation, political agendas, or public fear. We owe the American public accurate information, not another reason to be unnecessarily afraid of something they use every day.

Good to look into, we need you too.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of EMFs. I'm concerned about the impact such radiation is having on everyone, especially the children. I'm particularly concerned about the effects of wearing devices such as air pods for extended periods of time. From teenagers to adults, a vast % of our population wears these without really knowing the effects. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard!

From all studies I have read I'm very concerned about EMFs for myself and my family including grandchildren. GreenMedInfo lists the studies but I have heard of the dangers from other reputable sources.