Cancer & tumors

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a person who has been educated about the dangers of EMFs and RF and Wireless Radiation Exposure. After years of exposure from a beeper and cell phone attached at the hip of a family member and using a laptop on the arm of a chair as he sat in that chair, he had a massive infection that became a tumor that would be called cancer, likely due to all that radiation he was exposed to. I thank God for Hope 4 Cancer in Mexico for bringing him back to health and ridding his body of the toxic tumor that formed. We need Hope 4 Cancer Centers across America to help others recover from infections (cancer) caused by EMFs, RF and Wireless Radiation Exposure. The information about the damages caused by EMFs, RF and Wireless Radiation Exposure is being hidden, most people going about their lives are not exposed to this important information. This truly is about life and death, people and the planet are being damaged because of their exposure to these things on a daily basis and with more and more of the towers and satellites being put up the humans, animals, bees, vegetation, all of the planet is being damaged. This excessive use must be stopped and looked at carefully so that we can be smart about how we use technology. Money and the powers that be, who seem to be in control, need to step back. This needs to be investigated deeply, our lives and the life of the planet are at stake here. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

1. & 2. I am responding as: family member of an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)high voltage power lines 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):During two years when we lived very near to high voltage power lines. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:My 4 year old son was diagnosed with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia at the age of 4 years old after living for two years in close proximity to high voltage overhead power lines. 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:approximately one year after exposure over a two year period he was diagnosed. 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?Yes, he received three years of chemotherapy and cranial radiation after the diagnosis of ALL 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?We moved away from the power lines once he was diagnosed.

. & 2. I am responding as: 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)Apple phones with latest updates 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):Tumor on thumb for a year with agonizing searing pain in the presence of cellular phones, but absolutely updated Apple phones. I have generalized EMF sensitivity for 10 years as a background with fatigue. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:Fatigue Agonizing pain Nausea and vomiting 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:The change would’ve been the tumor coming on my thumb with a fungal infection and as soon as that started to be controlled, the pain totally goes away with the iPhones 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?Yes 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?My home was mitigated 10 years ago. I have no Wi-Fi in the house. Everyone’s cell phone is off in my house. We are ethernet. My problem was when I went anywhere. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information:Oh, we could talk for days on the metering my husband and I have done in our home. The one other wild card was installing Starlink. Plugging in the Starlink put the dirty energy in the house up to 1700! I know that is not the focus of the study, but that was a huge part of my problem until we mitigated the one plug for Starlink. Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's: B1a. Sources you experience as causing you Adverse Effects:Dirty energy, magnetic fields, Wi-Fi, cellular phones, especially Apple phones that are newly updated. Transformers on the powerlines, kitchen appliances. B1b. Sources you can sense, but don't seem to harm you:Before the tumor on my thumb, I would’ve said being around cell phones. But that tumor was ago agony with cell phones. B1c. Sources you can use without sensing or being harmed:Ethernet Provide be B1d. Sources that seem to provide benefit (i.e., electrotherapy):Frequency, specific micro current Rife PEMF Photo wave therapy B2a. Health conditions you think may contribute to your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless:Massive fungal infection in the thumb. If I am in Wi-Fi or EMR’s out of the home, it causes blistering on the thumb and severe pain. History of Lyme, disease and fatigue and mild exposure B2b. Health conditions you don't necessarily associate with your sensitivity to EMFs including wireless, but might be relevant:After reading the invisible rainbow, everything is connected to it. B3. For each subquestion please list up to 5 drugs or therapies or home remedies (if any) B3a. That you recommend, as they helped you tolerate or recover from EMF exposure:Avoidance Greenwave and Satik filters Astaxanthan Ray wave Supplement EMF protective clothing B3b. That you recommend, but you’re not positive that they help:The products they sell for cell phones to put on your cell phone to mitigate B3c. That helped you but you don’t recommend. (e.g., the benefit did not last long or the side effects were too harmful):A lot of the filters they sell to mitigate it for your cell phone B3d. Treatments that had no effect:Having to go to places blasting with Wi-Fi and dirty energy for my treatments. And everybody else on staff walking around with their cell phones. B3e. Treatments that made your sensitivity worse:55-64 B4. What is your age range?55-64 B5. What year did you become aware of your sensitivity to wireless radiation or electromagnetic fields?Around 2015 I was dealing with mold, exposures and lime. I bought a hybrid car and that pushed my body over the edge for wireless and dirty energy. B6. What country, state, province, or major city were you living in when you first noticed your sensitivity to wireless or electromagnetic fields?Michigan Link to HHS Comment Submission Form

In response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am a grandmother who is concerned for the public. I’ve long been concerned with EMF radiation effects, especially for young children, like my grandchildren. Wi Fi radiation is also a major concern. I have bought EMF protection for my home and my children’s home. Honestly, I hope it works, but it was costly to buy. The smart meters are terrible for home owners because of the constant Wi-Fi going across the rooms constantly. Watch this documentary and it will show you proof why EMF radiation isn’t good and how 5G gave college students brain cancer in college because the 5 G towers were aimed at their college campus building. They all died and the 5G tower was the only common denominator. I hope their story was on this documentary. I think it was. https://youtu.be/8ZTiT9ZSg3Q?is=h6TnmG-9u4F_CY3U I’m very concerned about long term exposure especially from the 5G they’re using now. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. HHS needs to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence. Also to identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for letting us voice our opinion.

At 22 years old, I was diagnosed with a skull based Meningioma behind my right ear. I was studying in the university library when my left ear bud fell out of my ear and I couldn’t hear music in my right ear. My life would soon change forever. I first found out I was deaf in my right ear and then after an MRI showed a meningioma. I received a cell phone for my 13th birthday and the location of the Meningioma seemed to line up. We always wondered if it caused my brain tumor. It was extremely rare for a 22 year old to get that type of tumor, and rare that it was hard and sticky. This caused me to lose function of the right side of my body. I had to learn to walk again, read again, word finding and speech was difficult. I still managed to graduate college, and after 6 months of therapy, I went to graduate school and became a mental health therapist. At 34 I was pregnant with my first child, which most likely caused it to grow again. I am about to have a second surgery, and pray it goes better than the first. I also pray I can safely carry another pregnancy. More research needs done to ensure safety.

These towers need to all come down they're giving cancer to children when they're putting near the school in Brazil they took them all down because the crime rate went up that's what's happening here now it's out of control it messes with the brain makes you angry mean and hateful and vindictive it's unhealthy to have these frequency radiation penetrating our house and our bodies I painted my house with Marine lead paint to stop it from coming in I change the screen Windows to copper even the electric meter puts in electric frequencies to not let you sleep I put copper ring around it to stop that and reverse the electricity that they're overcharging us with the new meter people are going to get really angry and start taking them all down it's going to be like a civil war all over again whoever's putting them up are mass murderers just like Bill Gates who profit off a killing people worse than Adolf Hitler I guess if you're a billionaire you could kill people and get away with it you need to do something about this and fast before an epidemic of these continue to harm us people will fight back and start destroying these towers doesn't take much to take him down battery powered sawzall on both them let them fall you had better do something quick we are getting tired of it why isn't your organization do anything about it don't you care or you in on it too population control it's a lethal weapon what don't you understand

1. & 2. I am responding as: an individual 3a. Type of wireless (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)5G+ WIRING/JUNCTION BOXES 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years): CONSTANT. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:Low blood oxygen, severe thyroid disruption (incl. heart thrumming, weight gain), insulin resistance & blood sugar issues, low grade skin cancers, brain fog, constant need to sleep but sleep is interrupted, immune system breakdown causing delayed healing, musculoskeletal disorders, thinning hair, gaunt face and accelerated aging. 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:Within 90 days after installation and activation in my neighborhood. 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?No. It would be pointless and there are no available licensed NC physicians who can comprehend this level/type of physics, and most are terrified of completing and documentation about the effects of electrosensitivity. 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure? I tried to stop the installation of 5G+ by informing the County Commissioners of the dangers from 2021 - 2023. They ignored me. I cannot reduce or eliminate my exposure. I wear two pendants: an Essential Energy Life Plate ($350) and a Biogeometry pendant ($180.00). I have Biogeometry plates in my vehicle. I have installed tensor technology on my property where possible. 3g. Any supporting documentation?: I have done some random power measurements with my SafeLivingTechnologies.com training meter. The ambient power measurements in my area used to be 4-5 microWatts/sqm within the "Safe" range. Now, it is 60,000 microWatts/sqm... which is into Bau Biologie's Extreme Concern levels where cellular destruction commences along with carcinogenicity. Additional Details: This form is inadequate. We are being impacted by EMR (EMF is a misleading term. Frequencies can be good.) - Electro Magnetic Radiation from MANY sources we do NOT control at this time. I was made electrosensitive by Florida Power and Light's installation of Smart Meters on the 4-plex where I lived without any notification. For 2 years, I was pounded by 13,000 pulses a day from four meters. Fort Myers, FL experienced the forced installation of 5G masts there caused VISIBLE accelerated aging. I only know that because I was gone for most of year. My friends had visibly aged 3-5 years. Gray hair went white, and everyone's faces stressed looking. Public facing jobs endure the worst of the C19 injection bio-synthetic nano-tech shedding, and all-source EMR. The cumulative effect was devastating for them. B1a. Sources - Adverse Effects: 5G+ grid, Smart grid, Cell towers, LED lights, Other Peoples "dumb" phones. B1b. Sources you can sense w/o harm: None. B1c. Sources that don't harm: None. B1d. Sources that provide benefit: Online healing frequency recordings found on youtube. These frequencies are from PC speakers. They are simply audible frequencies. B2a. Health conditions contributing to your sensitivity: Low blood oxygen, thyroid disruption (incl. heart thrumming, weight gain), insulin resistance & blood sugar issues, low grade skin cancers, brain fog, constant need to sleep and sleep interruption, immune system bkdown: delayed healing, musculoskeletal disorders, thinning hair, gaunt face and accelerated aging. B2b. Health conditions you don't associate with EMR: None. I was in great shape before FPL installed the smart grid without notice in Fort Myers, FL in 2012. B3. Please list up to 5 drugs or therapies or home remedies (if any) B3a. That you recommend: I wear two pendants: an Essential Energy Life Plate ($350) and a Biogeometry pendant ($180.00). I have Biogeometry plates in my vehicle. I have installed tensor technology on my property where possible. Online healing frequency recordings found on youtube. These frequencies come from my PC speakers. There is no EMR behind them. They are simply audible frequencies. I use nutraceuticals, supplements and detox methods to reduce or eliminate the nanotech from the everpresent tropospheric aerosolization with metals and toxins, and the C19 injected and contaminated people. The nano-tech ramps up reactivity with EMR (Electro Magnetic Radiation), so getting rid of it helps a LOT. B3b. You recommend, but you’re not positive that they help: If something I try doesn't increase my energy, speed my healing and provide immune support, I don't do it anymore. B3c. That helped you but you don’t recommend. (e.g., the benefit did not last long or the side effects were too harmful):None. B3d. Treatments that had no effect: None. B3e. Treatments that made your sensitivity worse: None. B4. What is your age range? 65-74 B5. What year did sensitivitystart? 2014 B6. What country, state, province, or major city were you living in when you first noticed ? Fort Myers, Florida

I am very concerned about the effects of EMFS, RF and wireless radiation on humans, animals and plants. The detrimental effects on reproduction, mitochondria, thyroid and numerous organs have been researched and documented. Children and pregnant women are particularly vulnerable. Researchers have also found that exposure to these types of radiation increase the risk of various kinds of cancer. Even migratory birds were shown to be affected by exposure to cell towers. I personally know numerous people who are seriously adversely affected by exposure to wireless radiation in cell phones, cell towers and modems. I’ve attached documents and studies that provide evidence of harms from exposure to cell phones, wifi and EMFs. It's time for the HHS to take action to safeguard the public in regard to this important issue.

I submit this to document my great concern over 5G 6G and all the equipment and manners in which they are operating. The evidence is showing greater incidents of cancer and so many other dangers. I do not give my consent to have those frequencies going through my brain and my body in all places at all times. We live in a time when things should be able to function without that kind of danger and illness.

I appreciate HHS undertaking this important inquiry into electromagnetic fields (EMFs), radiofrequency (RF) radiation, and their potential effects on human health. My central concern is that the widespread deployment of wireless technologies has outpaced our understanding of the biological consequences of chronic, cumulative exposure. Compliance with existing exposure standards is not equivalent to demonstrating long-term biological safety. I urge HHS to address the following concerns: 1. Reevaluate safety standards beyond thermal effects. Current RF exposure standards have historically emphasized protection against tissue heating. Yet peer-reviewed research has reported biological effects involving oxidative stress, neurological function, reproductive health, and cellular processes at exposure levels that warrant investigation beyond heating alone. The National Toxicology Program’s 2018 studies reported clear evidence of carcinogenic activity involving malignant heart schwannomas in male rats exposed to certain RF conditions. The Ramazzini Institute independently reported increased heart schwannomas in male rats. Although these findings do not establish cancer risks from ordinary human wireless exposure, they raise legitimate questions requiring further investigation. 2. Investigate cumulative, real-world exposure. Americans experience simultaneous exposure from Wi-Fi, cellular networks, Bluetooth devices, smart meters, and other wireless technologies. Research must examine long-term exposure to multiple sources, including potential effects of duration, frequency, modulation, and cumulative lifetime exposure. 3. Prioritize vulnerable populations. Children, pregnant women, developing fetuses, and individuals with neurological vulnerabilities deserve particular consideration. Children increasingly experience wireless exposure throughout their school day, often without meaningful alternatives. HHS should determine whether existing standards adequately protect developing biological systems rather than assuming uniform safety across populations. 4. Ensure independent research and regulatory transparency. The telecommunications industry has substantial financial interests in maintaining existing infrastructure and exposure standards. HHS should disclose how current limits were established, how conflicting scientific findings have been evaluated, and what role industry-funded research and representatives have played in regulatory decisions. Independent replication, transparent methodologies, and full disclosure of financial conflicts are essential to public trust. 5. Protect informed choice and individual autonomy. Americans deserve understandable information about wireless exposure and practical ways to reduce it. I urge HHS to support wired alternatives in schools and public facilities, greater transparency regarding infrastructure emissions, meaningful community participation, and reasonable accommodations for individuals reporting electromagnetic sensitivity. 6. Apply the precautionary principle. The absence of conclusive evidence of harm must never be misrepresented as conclusive evidence of safety. Reasonable precautionary measures should not require absolute scientific certainty, particularly when exposure is widespread, continuous, and difficult to avoid. Specific Actions Requested I respectfully urge HHS to: 1. Independently reassess existing RF exposure limits, including potential nonthermal biological effects. 2. Commission replication and follow-up studies of significant National Toxicology Program and Ramazzini Institute findings. 3. Fund long-term research examining cumulative exposure from multiple wireless sources. 4. Prioritize research involving children, pregnancy, neurological health, sleep, and reproductive outcomes. 5. Require transparency regarding industry influence, research funding, and regulatory conflicts of interest. 6. Expand public access to real-world exposure measurements and meaningful consumer information. 7. Support wired alternatives and reasonable exposure-reduction measures. 8. Establish a transparent process for periodically updating exposure standards as scientific evidence evolves. Closing Statement Wireless technology provides undeniable convenience, but convenience must never substitute for rigorous public health evaluation. The burden of establishing reasonable safety should not rest entirely upon individuals after a technology has already been deployed throughout their homes, schools, workplaces, and communities. The American public deserves an independent assessment that examines all credible scientific evidence, acknowledges unresolved questions, and places human health above commercial interests. I urge HHS to make this inquiry the beginning of meaningful scientific investigation and regulatory accountability rather than another exercise in reaffirming existing assumptions. Thank you for considering my comments.