I have a family member this affects whom now basically just thinks she's crazy.
Her storyline. What she goes through. Who she was before this started. Zero doubt it is anything less but using these mechanisms and I am begging. PLEASE. Stop this. So many people are suffering daily, many believing they are insane. Humanity. Please.
I have a family member this affects whom now basically just thinks she's crazy.
Her storyline. What she goes through. Who she was before this started. Zero doubt it is anything less but using these mechanisms and I am begging. PLEASE. Stop this. So many people are suffering daily, many believing they are insane. Humanity. Please.
The department of health and human services should focus less on unproven crackpot theories about radio signals and more on the dozens of recent food recalls and increased spread of vaccine-preventible diseases across the country.
If you've taken middle school science, you would know that the radiofrequency EMF given off by Wi-Fi is a type of non-ionizing radiation and is not harmful to humans. Instead of asking the public, ask the actual scientists who have already studied this stuff extensively, determined there are no actual health risks, and stop peddling conspiracy theories.
Unless you're putting a cat inside a microwave oven, any of the electromagnetic fields, radio frequency radiation, and wireless radiation in the way we use them all does nothing to life. 5g towers do not hurt anyone. The department of human services should be doing their own research instead of crowd sourcing it though. My tax dollars should not pay for cleetus to share his opinion about how 5g towers "gave his kid autism" or anything like that. You're the experts. We pay you to tell us what's safe and what isn't, not the other way around.
As known and currently regulated to some degree by the f.c.c. on many appliances and expecaly radio transmission towers, EMF and RF radiation can be harmful to the human body in high doses and distances. Seeing as said exposure is already limited by the f.c.c. it is known and acknowledged that high exposure to radio frequency emissions can be extremely disruptive and unsafe for the population. Examples of this energy, though not the main culprit due to its relatively low frequency, can be referenced to the a.m. band antennas, where improper matenence and/or contact can cause severe election and/or death, in the same sense as any high level conductor such as power transmission lines due to the high conductiveity in such examples. With this being said and referencing these examples, the high disruption of the electronic field due to long range RF, EMF, and wireless radio/cell signal transmitters emissions can be and is currently able to be measured. Thus with there already being a measurable emission of this radiation within the visinity of the towers themselves(and at farther distances, thus how this technology works) it could easily be durived that the same effects of those in close proximity to these towers could be found in most places farther away but still within range of transmitters just in smaller doses. This goes for ALL transmitters, not just those previously listed. All of the combined devices that utilize RF technology that are used daily, though already listed and regulated by the f.c.c., create constant and heavy disruption in RF fields, which is documented to have negative overall effects of the health and well-being of the human body in a large variety of ways due to how this form of radiation interacts with specific biological processes. Negitivly impact the quality of lives of people whom are in constant contact with afformentiond transmitters.