All comment threads

See attached file(s)

Hello. I am French, I was working for the French Doctors as a field administrator when I became ill because of waves. Sorry for my English, there might be some errors ! It was during the containment on February 2020, I was very tired with many symptoms and I decided to consult the doctor. We did a blood test and then I figured out than transaminases and ferritin were going up very quickly. As symptoms, I was having : vertigo, dizziness, night sweats, insomnia, waking up systematically at 2 a.m., chest pressure / chest tightness, joint pain, brain fog, short-term memory loss, tinnitus, low libido / decreased, chronic fatigue, erectile dysfunction, proliferation of moles, frequent urgent need to urinate, vision problem.... My doctor did not know what was going bad with me, I did not know either. A few days later, when I was passing by a based station antenna, I had an electric discharge in my head and it began to happen very frequently. That is how I discovered my sensibility to EMF waves, my doctor was useless for it. Then, I discovered that I was must contaminated in my flat in St Etienne. I could see from my flat, 1st floor, the power supply of the tramway on the same street ( a few meters of distance), I was using a wireless phone ( DECT phone), I was much speaking with my smartphone in a place where there is poor signal and smart comunicating meters where fixed for all flats of my buillding. When I realized that, the same day, I left my flat and I went to camp in the garden of some friends. Then, after a few days, I could see some symptoms evanishing like urgent need to urinate. Four weeks after, I did again a blood test and we could see that transaminases increase problem was about to be solved and ferritin was divided by 2 already. I asked my doctor if he knew some other patients with electromagnetic hypersensitivity, he said "NO". Well, as a doctor follows an averadge of 1 000 patients in France and as the estimated prevalence of Electromagnetic Radiation Syndrome is 5 % according to a study dating by 2018 (with no 5G and no comunicating meters Linky in 2018), he should follow at least 50 patients having that. I was wondering, what was going on for the other patients who have not done any link between this environmental contamination and their symptoms ? Having druggs only ? I had problem finding a place where there are not so many radiofrequency electromagnetic waves as there is a clear will to destroy them. Theses areas make it possible for many people to discover the link between their health problems and waves exposure and the autority does not want that any longer. To be clear, I repeat : the Governement want to eliminate areas with very poor reception because they do not want people to make kink between health problem and waves contamination any longer. I followed a training for having an expertise on electromagnetic waves and I have all the necessary instruments to make a diagnostic (low frequency both electric and magnetic fields, dirty electricity and radiofrequency waves). I read many books about this environnemental contamination by electricity. Caregivers (doctors, nurses,…) are not trained in France and medical authorities do not want to train them. Some of them are ill but they even know ! People are now exposed from bearth to death, and even before the birth ! All the living is suffering from that : trees in front of the cell towers are dying, bees and all insects are disapearing and you can drive for miles without having an insect on your windshield, animals in French farms are sick and finally die also. There is a new way of having problems solved : when a farmer get his animals ill from a recently installed electromagnetic wave emitter (radio transmitter, wind turbine...) , he will be blamed for not caring enough the animals and they will withdrow the animals from him...even if they have been having a farm and animals for generations ! Were are destroying life on earth...it is time to wake up ! I added a special document for people who do not want to realise and recognize the biologic effect of radiofrequency waves...it is in French but you will easily translate it in English. Please read it as it gives many information regarding the subject.

I personally love the way wireless radiation makes me feel. It cleans my bones. They feel dirty when I’m away from my G’s.

Re: HHS-OASH-2026-0397 — Occupational RF/EMF exposure and radar-maintenance workers I ask HHS to include current and retired radar-maintenance technicians in its evaluation of RF/EMF exposure and health. My Illinois Air National Guard work ran from 1981–1989; my FAA civilian employment ran from 1990–2017. Please consider this comment with both attachments: 1. “01 HHS response - numbered questions.pdf” answers Questions 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17 and 18. 2. “02 Supporting attachment - ANG and FAA radar maintenance.pdf” provides a partial maintenance account, historical FAA and AFOSH requirements, reproduced source material, research references, records-access concerns and seven policy recommendations. My work included energized radar and communications equipment, close working positions, simultaneous transmitter operation and troubleshooting under conditions different from ordinary operation. During ANG and FAA work, I removed covers and protective shields and energized equipment for troubleshooting and alignment near exposed high-voltage circuitry, discharge thyratrons, magnetrons, and klystrons. Assessments should represent actual maintenance conditions: worker position, task duration, open cabinets, altered shielding and simultaneous sources. They should also address indoor work in the building nearest the emitters, including possible reflections and standing waves. Equipment and building information and measurements are needed; external antenna calculations alone do not resolve indoor exposure. The RFI concerns non-ionizing RF/EMF. The attachment also addresses possible equipment-generated ionizing X-rays as a separate pathway that may coexist with RF. I ask researchers to evaluate each pathway and possible combined effects. Historical hazard descriptions and my recollections do not establish my individual dose or prove disease causation. I ask HHS to include endocrine outcomes, parathyroid disease and calcium regulation in long-term occupational research. The attachment distinguishes proposed mechanisms and experimental findings from established clinical evidence. Occupational-health processes should connect abnormal findings with appropriate medical evaluation and review of continuing workplace exposures. Written safety and occupational-health programs existed. I recall a Safety and Environmental Compliance Manager, but I do not recall ever receiving medical surveillance related to radiation exposure during my FAA employment. That recollection does not establish that no assessment occurred. The question is how requirements were implemented: what conditions were assessed, how findings were communicated, what monitoring decisions were made, and what referrals or follow-up were provided. Obtaining evidence has itself become a burden. Through FOIA, I have requested RF surveys, equipment configurations, technical manuals, safety training and occupational-health records. Despite multiple requests, follow-ups and an appeal, the records needed to evaluate my maintenance conditions are not readily available to me. An FAA response identified radiation-safety course updates in 2018 and 2023 without supplying those materials. FAA's historical requirements called for radiation-survey data, employee exposure records and related medical evaluations to be retained for employment plus 30 years. Employee exposure records were to be catalogued and readily accessible. I ask HHS to address the difference between required retention and effective worker access. Agencies should identify custodians, locate records and explain documented transfers or disposition. Unavailable evidence should not be treated as proof of no exposure or no harm. I ask HHS to coordinate with FAA/DOT, the Department of Defense, the Air Force, ANG and occupational-health agencies to evaluate actual maintenance exposures, provide relevant records, support long-term research involving retired technicians, clarify medical-referral and follow-up responsibilities, and assess workforce and public-safety consequences where gaps are identified. I also ask HHS to cooperate with Congress on a coordinated compensation pathway for occupational radiation harm. VA permits post service disability claims without a filing deadline; FECA generally has a three-year filing rule, with special provisions for latent disability. Workers with military and federal civilian exposure histories can encounter different rules for the same diagnosed illness. Related claims should receive coordinated or parallel evaluation using shared evidence and clear eligibility and benefit-coordination guidance. Please read both attachments as parts of this response. They provide the experience, evidence, limitations and recommendations supporting these requests.

The SAR scam states the safety level of wireless radiation is 1.6 Watts per kilogram of weight. In 1951, as Dr. Andrew Marino states, the newly invented FDA microwave ovens (then called 'radar ranges') needed a label on cooking times for certain recipes. Then Dr Henry Schwan and their team they experimented on animals, mostly dogs, with the radar first and this caused blindness and some testicular degeneration. then the report stated 'the animals were not tested while they were dying'', and they then dissected the dog into separate kilograms of skin, muscle, organs, and found the rare to med rare dog meat would be the safety level the FDA handed to the FCC to use as a safety level. There is no safe level of microwave irradiation, as Dr. Marino states- the two cases are irrelevant. Scientist Dr. Olle Johansson states a cosmic storm is the only safe level (0.0000000001 microwatts per meter square to 0.0000000000001 microwatts per meter square). Scientist Barrie Trower's interview with Deb Tavares says it all: 'The Cooking of Humanity", exactly what this is- WIFI must be removed from schools and all public places, and cell just used for emergencies. Thank you.

See comment attached. *See attached additional Electromagnetic Field Studies demonstrating harmful effects published since 2019. Susan Foster, CEO Rocky Mountains for Safe Technology Email: susan.foster04@gmail.com

See comment attached. *See attached additional Electromagnetic Field studies demonstrating harmful effects. Susan Foster, CEO Rocky Mountains for Safe Technology Email: susan.foster04@gmail.com

See comment attached. *See attached additional Electromagnetic Field studies demonstrating harmful effects. Susan Foster, CEO Rocky Mountains for Safe Technology Email: susan.foster04@gmail.com

See comment attached. *See attached additional Electromagnetic Field studies demonstrating harmful effects. Susan Foster, CEO Rocky Mountains for Safe Technology Email: susan.foster04@gmail.com

ee comment attached. *See attached additional Electromagnetic Field studies demonstrating harmful effects. Susan Foster, CEO Rocky Mountains for Safe Technology Email: susan.foster04@gmail.com