Other concerns

The key word in the RFI is the word “scientific”; it is repeated eleven time in different contexts as the main motive is to “Understand”; it is mentioned in the RFI: “At the same time, scientific literature is extensive, technically complex, and not always easy for policymakers or public health stakeholders to interpret.” This comment is from a care giver perspective; an independent healer offering services to Harmonize/Balance contaminated areas, places, devices (smart or not) with EMF and RF. The outcome of this so called (Harmonization/Balancing) is the disappearing or the dramatic improvement of the adverse health effects experienced by suffering people living in these places or using these devices. The approach used for Harmonization/Balancing is a "Holistic" approach, considered as Pseudoscience by the contemporary main scientific community, it is called (Physical Radiesthesia): a modality created by independent French researchers in the 1930’s, it works on the subtle effects/planes of the EMF, RF and the Human Subtle Energy Field, i.e. the physical measurements of EMF & RF rest unchanged after the Harmonization. The RFI is asking the following questions: 5.o. Is additional research needed to develop, test, and evaluate the effectiveness of procedures and techniques for minimizing exposure to electronic product radiation? Where are the largest gaps, if any, in knowledge? 16. What are the highest priority research gaps regarding EMF and RF radiation and public health that the federal health agencies should address? The answer is Yes, the gaps in knowledge is to embrace this different paradigm shift with an open and new mind; I personally have published scientific articles (in another field) in top peer reviewed journal in Physics, therefore “I have been there and actually I am still there in terms of awareness of the scientific rigorous process”; so, the scientific path of researching and publishing "shall" start shedding light on this modality (or other Holistic approaches) without prejudgment. On another note, the big challenge of the EMF & RF adverse health effects is that most of it are “subjective” in its core nature; the Physical symptoms (such as chronic fatigue, muscle aches, or digestive distress) are "invisible/intangible" by the standard medical tests as it shows no underlying organic disease or structural damage! The good news is that there a large similarity between the EMF & RF adverse health effects and Psychosomatic conditions that lack clear and tangible medical causes; so, we don’t have to start from scratch or to invent the wheel! The Standardized Questionnaires which are Medical approved tools like the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15) or the Screening for Somatic Symptom Disorders (SOMS-7) translate subjective physical complaints into quantifiable scientific data. (This was the answer of the question 8. from the RFI) 8. What, if any, improvements in exposure assessment methodologies are needed to better evaluate real-world exposure conditions? RFI is asking practical strategies to reduce unnecessary EMF and RF exposure where appropriate! But what if the "exposure" is not the problem per se, i.e. it is "not the physical/detectable components" of EMF and RF waves that cause the adverse health effects ?! What if that our scope/limits of contemporary scientific perspective is "limiting us" to see, study, analyze "other subtle component" of the EMF and RF waves, which is not detectable by our orthodox devices and Equipment ?! What if that there is other modality that can detect these adverse effects and transmute it into another quality that is positively resonating with living beings ?! In that context, this a formal invitation to policymakers or public health stakeholders for cooperation to apply the suggested protocol of Harmonization/Balancing for testing, evaluating its efficiency, strength, and eventually for approval as a big sector of the world population, with our contemporary highly intensive EMF & RF environment, is in real desperate need of this new paradigm shift.

5G proliferation along interstate highways is rendering my car's AM radio unusable. I first started noticing significant disruption of AM reception in my 2010 Toyota Sienna early summer 2025. Affected interstates in Massachusetts were extensive segments of I95, I24, I495, I295 in particular. Over time the affected segments elongated and merged to the point where my radio has become unusable. Since last summer, the interference spread to local roads to the point that AM is unusable almost anywhere. This has clearly been caused as 5G nodes began appearing on poles along our local streets. If the emf radiation is powerful enough to prevent me from listening to a 50,000 watt nearby clear channel AM broadcast station, what detrimental effects has it been having on people?

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public. I'm concerned about the huge amount of EMF and RFR in our environment. We humans haven't been exposed to this until recent years, and who knows what the long-term health effects will be? When I had my first cell phone and put it up next to my head while talking, afterwards my head would feel hot and uncomfortable on that side. I was suspicious about the health risks from that point on. There's plenty of research from scientific organizations showing the damage of EMF and RFR, especially for children. I know many adults are also sensitive to this, and they shouldn't be forced to be exposed to it 24/7. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I received a Garmin smart watch as a gift which I was only able to wear for a few months. I stopped wearing it because it made me feel out of sorts.

Using Bluetooth earphones can cause dizziness and discomfort, making it difficult to use them for extended periods. Additionally, exposure to bright lights can be uncomfortable and may trigger headaches, eye strain, or dizziness. I find that both Bluetooth earphones and bright lighting can negatively affect my comfort and overall well-being, so I prefer to limit exposure to these triggers whenever possible.

To whom it concern regarding the Obamacare health care plan regarding. I have strong beliefs that anything that has to do with radio action microwaves frequencies fiber optic high voltage wiring and any kind of technology affects the human affairs of human safety regarding all the electronics with the 5G frequencies in meter boxes in homes and perhaps in business buildings and facilities also acknowledgment of any power devices does anything to do with the rest. My beliefs and now known to research in fact to be factual that the cell towers give off the microwaves waves and is very toxic they have are where the public. Connected in all sorts of ways it causes ailments of many kinds. There's a lot of other devices connected to be a benefit to the healthcare system regarding the health services of others. I distinctly I'm an advocate for the provision of health.

this is making us sick! 5 g is bad enough you do NOT NEED 6g or more ! The frequency cause many health problems

EMF radiation is terrible for our health this needs to be recognized

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a chronically ill individual dealing with pain and fatigue. In my search for answers to alleviate my pain and exhaustion, I learned about EMFs and how they damage the long-term biological health of our cells and prevent healing according to Dr. Devra Davis, Dr. Martin Pall, and Dr. Deitrich Klinghardt. So I decided to do my own experiment to see if eliminating sources of EMFs would make me feel better. I had 2 certified building biologists come into my home and do an assessment of the current EMFs. I had high levels of magnetic fields due to nearby powerlines, moderate levels of electric fields due to in house wiring mistakes, and extreme levels of wireless radiation in the home (according to Building Biology guidelines) due to wireless devices throughout my home. The building biologist suggested the following: 1) I turn off the electricity at night to combat the electrical fields in certain rooms, 2) I hardwire everything in my home and eliminate all RF and Wireless devices, and 3) obtain a Qi Machine that is suppose to help neutralize the various EMFs and create a more balanced energy field. I did all 3 of these suggested changes, and I had really great results with my severe back pain and overall body aches and fatigue. I still suffer from these ailments, but I went from a 9 out of 10 to a 6 out of 10 by making these changes. I even did multiple experiments where I would take the 3 suggestions and turn them on one night and turn them off the next. The results were consistent and my pain/fatigue would re-surge when I exposed myself to the EMFs, or the pain/fatigue was reduced when I made the changes each night and removed the EMFs as much as I could. I have noticed since I made these changes in my home, I have developed an almost 6th sense to when someone is sending/receiving on their cell phones. I have developed a heightened sense that occurs in my brain when signals are present and close by. This further deepens my experience as these EMFs should really be studied. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of EMFs and specifically, wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard!

The Radiation levels we are being sujected to aee dangerously high and causing multiple physicle ailments among many this needs to stop! What if anything is DHHS doing anout this? Are they trying to kill eweryone?