All comment threads

The government should be requiring all devices that emit radiation to undergo randomized testing and reporting. The emitted levels should be considered healthy or otherwise a warning issued. If no one can decide what is considered healthy, experiments should be conducted and results finalized. There is special concern over wearable devices where there is no long term evidence of safety. Any products with unknown causes of harm should be properly labeled so.

Grok has made this website with SAR data from phones. Maybe the downloadable spreadsheet or the websites search filter can be useful somehow. https://sar-data.grok.me/ Take note that there are different measurement types used in EU and US and in general. Such as head, trunk and limb measurements. But also "1g" and "10g" measurements. The FCC (US), ANFR (France) and BFS (Germany) also have data on SAR you can find. The Grok made website uses data from Apple. Here are the other websites. The FCC has this website, where there is an advanced search tool that may come in handy. https://www.fcc.gov/oet/ea/fccid here is Apple. https://regulatoryinfo.apple.com/rfexposure here is the French ANFR. https://data.anfr.fr/explore/dataset/das-telephonie-mobile And the German BSF. https://www.bfs.de/SiteGlobals/Forms/Suche/BfS/EN/SARsuche_Formular.html I think the Grok or other LLM search tools can be easier to use for searching. So long as links are verifiable and sources included.

Hello, Thank you for investigating the effects of rf/emf. I have personal experience concerning this issue. My husband and I live in a small town in NH with rolling hills and valleys. The cell phone service in the area has not been historically great because of this. Because of the nature of my husband's work he needed better cell service, so installed a warehouse cell signal booster into our basement. This was several years ago. Upon doing that I started noticing that when I was sitting in a certain part of the house my heart would start skipping beats, fluttering irregularly. He didn't believe me but after much complaining we unplugged it and the fluttering hasn't occurred since. Skip ahead, as of approximately a year and a half ago. There is a new cell tower that has been erected in our town that is on the highest hill. We are located on the top of a ridge approximately three miles (the way the crow flies) away from it. Since the cell tower has gone active my ears are hissing, sometimes worse than others. I can quiet the hissing sound by using shungite stones placed over my ears. I believe these symptoms are a direct correlation to the rf/emf that the cell tower is putting out. I have frequently thought about having someone come and measure the amount we are getting exposed to. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

FCC writing about SAR values. https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/specific-absorption-rate-sar-cell-phones-what-it-means-you "Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) For Cell Phones: What It Means For You" French SAR website ANFR. https://www.anfr.fr/en/maitriser/radio-equipment/specific-absorption-rate-sar/sar-measurement-results "To better inform consumers, ANFR continuously publishing the results of SAR measurements performed since 2012 in open data format as part of its mission to control public exposure to electromagnetic waves and monitor the market. Three types of checks are out performed to assess device compliance “head SAR” measurement covering the use of the phone against the ear, during voice calls. They show that, except for one phone, these SAR values have always been compliant with applicable regulations, i.e. less than 2 W/kg. “trunk SAR” measurements are used whene when the phone is carried near the body, for example in a jacket or a clothes pocket or a bag. The maximum value defined by regulation is 2W/kg but this value is associated with a separation distance between the device under test and the body. For mobile phones, the "trunk" SAR is assessed at a distance of 5 mm for all 6 faces.. “limb SAR" measurements , which correspond to the phone being held against a limb, for example, worn in an armband or in a trouser pocket and held in the hand. The maximum value defined by regulation is 4W/kg. For mobile phones, the "limb" SAR is assessed in contact for all 6 faces. ANFR started checking the “trunk SAR” in 2012, considering the new uses for phones relating to the recommendations to use earphones and relating to data exchange (mobile internet, MMS, etc.). At the time when the European R&TTE directive 1999/5/EC was applicableallowed manufacturers to choose a separation distance of between 0 and 25 mm to measure trunk SAR. This variable distance, was not always mentioned in documentation to users, making control more complex. The preparation of a new directive was opened, giving the possibility of to update the standard It was in this context that between 2012 and 2016, the ANFR performed additional trunk SAR measurements using different distances than the one recommended by manufacturers. These distances could not be used to assess the compliance of devices as they went further than the standard requirements. Therefore, France presented these results to member states and as well as the European Commission as consequence the European regulations for separation distance have been amended. All devices sold in France for which the certification file is later than 25 April 2016, were then assessed for the trunk SAR at a distance that cannot exceed 5 mm. This new standard is easier to check while better reflecting current mobile phone uses. Until July 2020, the regulations imposed SAR compliance measurement to be performed on 'head' and “trunk” . Following the entry into force on 1 July 2020 of the Order of 15 November 2019 on "the display of the specific absorption rate of radio equipment and consumer information", the "limb" SAR is now also required for compliance assessment. The ANFR regularly publishes all new SAR measurements and reports it carries out to guarantee the compliance of radio-electric terminals put on the French market. To find out more: SAR measurements on our data.anfr.fr web site The commented report: as reading these reports can prove complex, this commented and explained version is made available to web users to facilitate its understanding. Quick access Public markets Our other sites Recevoirlatnt.fr Cartoradio.fr Data.anfr.fr Hackathon.anfr.fr Conference.anfr.fr" I kept the other sites in, as they seem EMF related. At least the Data.anfr.fr seems to be. Both the US and Europe has SAR data. But maybe the SAR could be lower or we should use cables more. It is possible to connect your phone to an ethernet cable. With adapters. If every office had ethernet connected phones that would reduce EMF.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a parent, family member, healthcare professional, and a concerned member of the public. I have lived between two cell towers for 13 years and am concerned with the lack of safety data in allowing these towers into residential area. We have noticed it is harder to sleep. My neighbor has radiation sensitivity which makes it hard for him to leave his home and Im sure there are more symptoms we could attribute to the towers if we had the actual research behind the technology. daily life. I firmly believe HHS has a responsibility to make sure the technology is safe BEFORE it goes up. Unfortunately we have been failed this far. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

We deserve to know the possible effects this has on the human body we are surrounded by it.

Read your own decades old government funded research from https://www.amazon.ca/Body-Electric-Robert-Becker/dp/0688069711 and for the love of all things good, stop acting so completely stupid all the time.

Please, for our health and the health of our children, we need to better understand the impact this technology is having on our health.

Please take down all these antenas most are up since 2020 and now more citizens are getting all kind of sickness. These antenas are killing us...

Our entire country has been blasted with EMF AND RF EXPOSURE. It affects health for all of humanity. We The People want the facts and information surrounding this. We want exactly where this is emitting. State, city, town, right down to what towers or where it’s coming from and why. We want it stopped immediately. This is crimes against humanity. STOP!!