I am Susan Pierce of Eden'S living TV ch 16 WYBU I am being biomedically trafficked and tortured by my brother Craig Wann ex ATT executive - Maria Angelova of Rebellious International her engineering husband Maher Abjawald, ABi dirty agent Kristin Sherman 150001219 and sheriff Johnathan Horton are torturing me through the cointelpro program. I have 8 semi conductor implants and it is tied to an obsolete NATO channel. I had a non liner JUNCTION test done with MRI proving implantation against my knowledge or consent. I am being fried nightly with direct energy weapons. I am a whistle blower on covid - I am ex biotech pharma nano expert now Naturopathic I am being murdered and stalked daily
Help https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1LY8KPfvZK/
I have been sending case reports on DEW USED against me to Senator Warner - He passed the Havana Syndrome Act - I was tested for Havana and the doctor discovered a brain tumor. I am fighting to save my eyesight and life
DECLARATION OF John Decristofaro_____________
John Decristofaro__ declares under penalty of perjury as follows:
1. I am a U.S. Citizen who resides temporarily in Umbria, Italy.
2. I have never consented, nor do I consent today, to the continuous, involuntary exposure to biologically active RF (Radio-frequency) radiation.
3. Working in offices and universities with heavy Pulsed RF (Radio-frequency) from cellular towers, phones, industrial Wi-Fi Routers, repeaters, Bluetooth and wearable smart tech devices causes pressure in my head that leads to a crushing migraine. It also causes my blood sugar to rise and crash. From all the hours being exposed to these harmful microwaves, it is more than likely the cause of my early age onset of cataracts. I had to have costly surgery to correct my eyes.
4. My wife who worked for a large US Telecom, became disabled with radiation sickness/microwave sickness from high exposure to pulsed RF from antennas placed on her office roof (and facing her desk 200 feet away). On bad day at work, standing 40 feet under the roof-mounted 3G cellular RF antenna, the worst migraine started with brain swelling. She became instantly weak, collapsing on a desk. She started vomiting and then blacked out, losing consciousness. She also observed several incidents at her high level RF office where employees needed ambulances to give them oxygen from shortness of breath and cardiac issues. A 50 year old employee died at work of a heart attack.
5. The health decline of my wife becoming weaker and more ill over a painful 10 year time frame with escalating symptoms that almost killed her. She lost substantial weight from 130 to 83 pounds! She could not sleep. She started developing MS like symptoms with tremor and severe burning nerve pain. Her endocrine system, neurologic and cardiac were heavily affected. This is an EXPECTED outcome after chronic high levels of RF microwave exposure.
6. We did not have symptoms in the early days of cellular and Wi-Fi. We used wireless tech and RF devices at home and at work. We were not afraid of the health implications. She said she never imagined these devices and this technology would be allowed by the United States Government IF if was unsafe. We found out the hard way.
7. After we realized the harm to our bodies from RF microwaves we removed all RF emitting technology from the home and our vehicles. This was accomplished by turning Wi-Fi off, using hardwired ethernet internet. We use no cordless handsets or any Smart devices. I keep my cellphone turned OFF and only have it for emergency.
8. The results of having zero RF devices has been incredible to my health improvements. I no longer get daily headaches. I have better cognitive abilities, more memory and retention, more focus. My mood has improved. I have more energy and stamina. I have better circulation and coloring in my feet and hands. I don’t have the same muscle aches pains and tension. My sleep has improved. Hair loss has stopped.
9. My wife received more exposure from RF at her work and being an early adopter of the cellular phones in the early 90’s. She has not been able to regain her health as she still suffers from severe neurological, endocrine and cardiac health problems.
10. The chronic exposure from cell towers, Starlink, small cell antenna with mmWave and strong RF has forced my family to move twice since 2021. We had to move to rural areas far enough from cell towers. We had to sell our connected vehicles. We can’t even buy new cars because they make us sick with all the radar RF “safety” features and Wi-Fi, cellular etc all harmful pulsed RF. I had to retire to stop being made sick working in a soup of RF e-smog.
11. My wife continues to be disabled from RF and cannot use any wireless device at all. She cannot go freely away from the home. She needs a wheelchair to be taken to health appointments from all the cardiac and neurological problems as well as chronic fatigue. She cannot be around strong RF signals. She has to wear RF Shielded clothing every time we leave the home. She has lost her freedom to go and do things in public (dining, movies, concerts, travel) and lives at home exclusively, only leaving the home for medical care since 2019. **Due to space limitation for this initial comment, my comment is continued on attached pages.
Alerte Phonegate — Joint Submission to HHS and FCC
We welcome the HHS decision to open this public consultation at a time when our organization has assembled substantial official evidence from **France, the European Union, Canada, and the United States**, raising serious concerns about the reliability of radiofrequency exposure testing, regulatory standards, and market surveillance.
Since 2018, Alerte Phonegate has investigated these issues through scientific research, independent testing, and extensive exchanges with regulatory authorities. Official documents and test results obtained across these four jurisdictions reveal significant shortcomings in SAR testing procedures, the transparency of proprietary power-management algorithms, and the oversight of mobile phones.
We therefore submit the attached report, prepared for both the HHS and FCC consultations, bringing together this documentary evidence, scientific findings, and specific recommendations to strengthen independent testing, regulatory transparency, and public health protection.
Public health protection cannot wait. Authorities must act now to inform smartphone and connected-device users that these devices should no longer be kept in direct contact with the body or head.
This simple preventive measure is especially important for children, pregnant women, and workers who use these devices extensively. Implementing clear, nationwide public information campaigns would represent a major step forward in protecting the health of hundreds of millions of people.
For Alerte Phonegate
Dr. Marc Arazi
President
French non-profit organization
https://phonegatealert.org/en
2. I am submitting this Comment to the HHS hoping that positive change can be effected through informed, ethical policy-making; and revised Radiofrequency/Electromagnetic Fields standards that prioritize and protect human health and the natural environment on which we rely.
I write as an individual functionally disabled by EMR-S with a metal hip for whom there is currently no guidance on safe exposure levels to rf/microwave/emfs radiation.
11d. Individuals with implanted medical devices – metal implants
- see attached file for references
People with metal implants should be considered a ‘significant, high risk population’ rather than a “sensitive’ one.
Nearly a third of US adults aged 40+ have a metal implant inside the body and the numbers are increasing. 1
There are implications for the wider population using/wearing/carrying metals: tatoos (metal inks), spectacles, 2 jewellery, clothing, hearing aids, keys & coins.
Implant metals act as antennas and amplifiers of pulsed rf/emf radiation to varying degrees depending on their conductivity rate; absorption of, and re-emittance of rf/microwaves; accumulated exposure time to emfs/rf; resting periods between exposures. They create hotspots; produce galvanic reactions; resonate at different frequencies from human tissue; and multiple metals at the same or different sites set up body micro-currents. Unlike chemicals which are blocked by the blood-brain-barrier, metal ions can traverse it.
A dental research paper notes:
“In biological dentistry, every metal in the body is regarded as a kind of antenna for microwaves and other electromagnetic fields (EMF) …”The standard absorption of emfs can be increased 400-700 times simply by using a mobile phone (ringing or SMS reception) in combination with metals in the mouth.” 3
Analysis of rf/emf radiation exposure on a human head with metallic implants states:
“Metallic implants significantly alter the spatial distribution of hotspots in the head resulting in enhanced energy localization and deeper penetration in surrounding tissues.” 4
So, given the dangers of metallic implants why are people with metal implants excluded from IEEE Standards & ICNIRP Guidelines on rf/emf radiation used by the FCC; & why does there continue to be a failure to communicate risk & issue a public health warning to those with these implants?
ICNIRP’s ‘Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields’ have been adopted by some European Union countries as a ‘Standard’ although they remain ‘Guidelines.’
I.C.N.I.R.P.’s relationship with and influence on the F.C.C. has been reviewed by the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields who maintain “the assumptions underlying the FCC’s and ICNIRP’s exposure limits are invalid and continue to present a public health harm.” For example, “The exposure limits … do not account for any impact of differing signal characteristics, such as carrier wave modulations or pulsing of the signal.” 5
Nor, unbelievably have ICNIRP’s “scientific experts” 6 ever sought to include people with metal implants in their dosimetry for ‘recommended’ safe rf/microwave radiation exposures. In ‘Guidelines’ published (1996,7a 2010 7b & 2020 7c) they stated the issue of interference with or effects on “metallic prostheses … is beyond the scope of the present document.”
An U.K. barrister confirmed for people with metal implants the “2020 [ICNIRP] guidelines expressly do not cater for their safety.” 8
The IEEE’s position has also been to exclude metallic implants from their standard adding:
“The recipient and provider of these devices should be aware of the potential for hazards and precautions that may be necessary with such devices.” 9
ICNIRP and the IEEE employ the SAR as a means of determining thermal risk from exposure to rf/emfs but How relevant is the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) as a means of assessing biological risk?
Professor Andrew Marino states that the SAR was created by those “interested in developing microwave ovens, and in understanding how to cook meat” and so has no relevance to a “live brain… because mobile phone fields have nothing to do with heat… it makes no sense to say, “I have a really great way of measuring heat” when the measurement of heat is irrelevant to understanding health risks.” 10
So, what is a safe exposure level for people with metal implants?
What is the best way biologically to measure it?
How much more pulsed rf/emf radiation will be absorbed by metal implants if existing SAR measurements are taken at 0 distance from the body instead of a way off? 11
EMFIS welcomes the opportunity to respond to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Request for Information concerning high-frequency and electromagnetic-field exposure and human health. Our full response in the attached PDF. In particular, EMFIS recommends that federal health agencies consider indoor exposure benchmarks that integrate the research, guidance, and regulatory approaches of the national and international authorities discussed above with practical experience from on-site measurements in occupied buildings. EMFIS was established because no comprehensive framework then existed that combined protective, measurable, and practically achievable exposure limits specifically for indoor environments. The EMFIS exposure limits were developed through this combined approach: reviewing established scientific and technical frameworks, such as Baubiologie SBM 2015 and EuropaEM, evaluating field-measurement data, and focusing on values that can be distinguished reliably from the measurement system’s noise threshold. This approach supports protective targets that are technically measurable and realistically implementable in places where people spend meaningful periods of time, including homes, schools, workplaces, healthcare facilities, and hospitality settings.
In EMFIS’s view, this building-centered approach can improve federal assessment and disclosure by supplementing source-specific compliance limits with transparent measurements of actual indoor conditions. Such assessments should document relevant frequencies, typical and peak levels, source locations, operating conditions, measurement methods, instrument sensitivity, the applicable noise threshold, uncertainty, and the cumulative contribution of multiple sources. Regulatory frameworks should also encourage practical exposure reduction through source management, distance, wired alternatives, system optimization, shielding where appropriate, and post-intervention verification.
EMFIS believes that its exposure limits provide the most suitable framework for indoor environments because they combine precautionary protection, technical measurability, and practical feasibility. This position should be evaluated through independent comparison, transparent validation, and continued research. We therefore encourage federal agencies to examine the EMFIS limits and assessment methodology as a potential model for voluntary indoor guidance, building-level disclosure, standardized measurement protocols, and future research.
I am sensitive to wireless radiation, especially the newer 5G short poles affect me greatly. I noticed it for the first time while eating at a restaurant, I started to feel ill and my eyes became blurry. I could not figure out what it was originally, but saw a 5G type short pole nearby, and wondered whether it was that. So in the future, I monitored my responses and realized it was the poles. Since then, I realized that there are actually scientific studies showing the harm to eyes from this sort of radiation, including cataracts and other damage. Please stop putting these poles everywhere in cities and around people and wildlife. We need to hardwire more and use wireless much more judiciously. It disturbs me to see the children near this radiation constantly when it ruins the eyes and harms the body.
Exposure to electromagnetic radiation at intensities lower than thermal safety standards has been associated with non-thermal biological effects including damage to cells and DNA and changes in them.
My colleagues and I demonstrated severe and unique vascular calcification in the aortas of rats exposed to intermediate frequencies of 150–155 kHz in an animal model of chronic kidney disease. We thought that an irradiating device could remove calcium from cardiac valves, but the result was the opposite .
We repeated this study with ELF exposure to 50 Hz using cell phone chargers and found the same results but the data were not published. Two long-term RF exposure studies performed at the Ramazzini Institute and by the US Department of Health and Human Services National Toxicology Program (NTP) found clear evidence of an association between long-term low-intensity RF EMF exposure and tumors in the hearts (and brains) of male rats.
Health effects from exposure to chronic exposure, low levels of EMF exist, the following Preventive & Protective Measures are adapted from Recommendations published by international scientist groups; medical organizations; environmental protection and selfhelp activist groups. Many of these groups have called for lowering allowed EMF exposure levels and halting plans to expand exposure with 5G networks . An increase in distance and use reduction are important factors to reduce exposure and consequent health risks. Proximity is the most important factor in exposure. Radiation levels fall dramatically with distance from the source.
A. The public realm. Reduction of exposure from cell phone towers / antennas is technically possible and is carried out in some countries better than in others. Keeping long distance from kindergartens and schools is extremely important, since children are a more susceptible population to any environmental exposure; and distancing antennas from bedrooms, to avoid unnecessary and harmful exposure during sleep
Wireless utility meters and wireless devices in the public realm, while perhaps emitting low mean intensity levels of EMF, emit biologically important pulsed exposure that is more harmful, even at low measured intensities. Furthermore, EMF intensity measurements are often incorrect if performed using a measurement device that does not have the
adequate measurement speed .
Avoid use of Wi-Fi at school – always prefer safer wired technology that does not emit RF EMF.
B. Exposure from personal devices. The most extensive and problematic exposure
comes from use of personal devices since they are closer to a body. Devices that emit pulsed waves are especially harmful even if the exposure intensity is not high.
Recommendations on preventing health symptoms from EMF exposure. Distance wireless devices from your body:
Avoid carrying cell phone on your body at all times. Reproductive organs, especially in pregnancy; the nervous system; and cardiovascular system are sensitive.
When talking or texting, position the cell phone away from your body as far as possible, use speaker or an “air tube” wired headset (not Bluetooth).
Avoid placing cordless home phones near you, especially when sleeping.
Do not place a laptop or tablet device on your lap since these devices emit Radio Frequency radiation (RF EMF) like cell phones; it is especially important during pregnancy.
Do not place a powered cell phone near you while you sleep.
Do not charge a cell phone near your body.
Reduce use of emitting wireless devices in your home:
Prefer use of corded home phones that do not emit RF radiation for most calls.
Connect the internet router via Ethernet cables and turn off Wi-Fi.
Use wired keyboard, mouse, etc.
Turn Wi-Fi off when not in use (router and devices), especially at night.
Turn off printers’ Wi-Fi feature since printers continuously emit very high levels of RFR.
Minimize exposure:
Minimize time of phone use. Prefer texting to long phone conversations.
Reduce use of streamed media on the cell phone; whenever possible download the
content and then access it on “airplane mode”, with Wi-Fi and other modes (Bluetooth etc.) switched off, to reduce your exposure while handling the device.
Children should only use cell phones for emergencies since cell phone radiation penetrates deeper into their brains.
Avoid using cell phone inside spaces that are surrounded by metal, when the signal is weak, or when moving at high speed, for example in vehicles or elevators. The cell phone emits higher radiation because in such places it makes a greater effort to connect to the antenna, or to connect to changing distant antennas (when moving).
Avoid charging laptops while in use. When charging, use a 3-pronged grounded cable
The expected exposure effects of planned G5 antenna density: G5 networks would emit a 6-fold increased ambient radiation compared to current networks, and would require a thousand times as much electricity to power the networks.
Min EHS historie fra 2010- 2026 - Gennem mit arbejde i telebranchen fra 1995- 2015 er jeg blevet påvirket af skadelige EMF stråling / felter, gennem 20 år med højt forbrug af mobiltelefon og trådløs teknologi især i perioden 1995-2015, hvor jeg var ansat i SONOFON / Telenor/ ISS Denmark,( på sammen fysiske lokation, Skelagervej 1-9, 9000 Aalborg), hvor vi skulle bruge vores" egen medicin" den trådløse teknologi dvs. jeg talte i mobiltelefon 7-9 timer og brugt trådløs data trafik på labtop pc alle arbejdsdage samt udsat for mobilstråling fra telemast inden for 0-50 meter - arbejdet meget i teknisk miljø (data/EDB rum) + kontor miljø med meget trådløs udstyr mobiltelefoner / wifi / bluetooth mm. i 2014 måtte min krop give op, jeg blev sygemeldt og er altid kommet tilbage på arbejdsmarked igen - gik total ned i 2014- 2018 tildelt førtidspension i 2018 - føler mig snydt af Danica pension selskab, som ikke vil udbetale tab af erhvervsevne årlig minus på 200.000 kr. - selv om kommunen har indset og tildelt mig førtidspension i 2018 .- I dag jeg kan forsat ikke fungerer i det danske samfund - der indgår trådløs teknologi i alle arbejdspladser i dag - der er ingen virksomheder, som kan rumme de skånehensyn som er nødvendig for at jeg kan være på arbejdsmarked. - så jeg må nøjes med min førtidspension selv om jeg egentligt gerne ville tilbage på arbejdsmarked. - jeg har mistet tilliden til den danske stat / politikkerne og den danske regering - de ønske ikke at gøre mennesker raske / penge og industrien er vigtigere end borgernes helbred - Staten vil holde os fast i frygt og elendighed - så er vi nemmere at styre !! EHS er blot endnu en forurening kilde - lige som COVID- Chremtrials - Flouride - sprøjtegifte i vores fødevare, som vi konstant bliver udsat for. - Jeg har vedlagt min sags agt fra kommunen som beskriver det jeg oplevede tilbage i 2014- 2018 under min udredning i detaljer og håb om at komme tilbage på arbejdsmarked - samt en kort oversigt over mit samlet forløb og svigt fra pension selskab. .jeg er heldig at jeg fik førtidspension fra staten -men andre i samme situation i dag bliver overladt til at klare sig selv uden økonomisk hjælp - EHS-symptomer anerkendes ikke i Danmark- i følge politikkerne finders der ikke gener ved trådløst teknologi.