AI summary & topic connections
Criticizes the inquiry as fear-inducing and argues that HHS confuses non-ionizing and ionizing radiation.
- Research & federal duties: “S, WE ARE SERIOUSLY CONCERNED THAT THIS NON-IONIZING RADIATION DOES IONIZING RADIATION STUFF" Resign in shame, ”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
HHS has single-handedly permanently disqualified itself from opining on ANYTHING related to the electromagnetic spectrum, by the mere existence of this facile investigation.
I am permanently embarrassed by the fact that my HHS department is publicly scaremongering regarding: "HEY GUYS, WE ARE SERIOUSLY CONCERNED THAT THIS NON-IONIZING RADIATION DOES IONIZING RADIATION STUFF"
Resign in shame, you flock of cocksure dilettante amateurs. Every single one of you.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. Reply publication follows the forum settings. Display names are not verified.