The commenter proposes developmental and historical brain research, spatial exposure mapping and mandator…

To whom this may concern, When considering the impact of EMF not only on the environment but on human physiology with regard to known cases of wifi sensitivity, I would first consider if said frequencies have an impact during human growth and development on the human brain in vivo or on the foetus. This information garnered with the least invasive method would probably be found in areas with high EMF saturation in comparison to low saturation as well other places where there is a higher population density with lower emissions standards on communication devices(e.g. India, developing nations). Also, a cross reference of brain scans and other data collected on bodily function pre-dating the introduction of certain EMF (e.g. 1920's to 1970's 1970's to pre-2000) and handheld technologies (cell phones, cellphone based applications) with a note to the size or shape of the Amygdala, Pre-frontal cortex, and Visual cortex if suspected frequencies/technologies may have impacted human behavior or memory not withholding the solar maximum and lunar cycle as variables due to possible synergism. Newer technologies capable of mapping the current level of saturation and providing heatmaps to attest to if said EMF radiation's propagation have or would ever pose a detriment to life beyond a certain threshhold; specifically, cellsites and surrounding areas with special consideration to the experimental EMF auctioned off during the Coronavirus by the FCC. Moving forward understanding if and when the threshhold of saturation would reach a danger to human or other life on Earth would seem to me to be immediate issue. A proposed idea is a device somewhat like a giegercounter/wifi analyzer connected to a drone with a program possibly pythonic capable of mapping time, date, altitude, geolocation, and EMF levels. These surveys then Federally mandated as requirements to Telephone Service and Internet Service providers similar to carbon emission standards in the Automotive industry. This may be a non-sequitur seeing as the current and projected electro-magnetic frequency spectrum saturation on our planet could be deemed non-hazardous at any level but so Science goes as they say. To a brighter future, Aaron X.