AI summary & topic connections

Considers wireless-risk concerns exaggerated, argues current exposures are not unreasonably dangerous, and expects efficiency incentives to reduce future emissions.

  • Research & federal duties: “ower radio waves generate more, but the levels of radiation from the towers and even the devices are not enough to caus”
  • Other concerns: “est way to do that will be to make more efficient radio transmitters and receivers.”

Matched review of original text; attachments excluded. Review provenance

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
The concerns about EMF, RF, and WiFi radiation are exaggerated. The sun above shines many more times the radiation every day. We simply cannot go through our lives without artificial radiation if we are going to have electricity and radio at all. Yes, higher frequency and higher power radio waves generate more, but the levels of radiation from the towers and even the devices are not enough to cause an unreasonable amount of danger to humans. Also, over time, the levels will eventually go down because vendors have an incentive to lower electricity costs, and the best way to do that will be to make more efficient radio transmitters and receivers.
Research & federal dutiesOther concerns
Official source ↗Open this comment on its own →