Disability, access & daily life

I'm suffering from the emr-syndrome (electrohypersensitivity since 2020. When exposed to man-made electromagnetic fields, I experience the following problems: headaches, extreme fatigue, a sensation of being "electrified," cognitive difficulties, speech impairments—sometimes progressing to total aphasia—short-term memory issues, tremors and spasms, and tachycardia (at times so intense that it feels like a heart attack). I also suffer from joint and mobility issues, such as complete stiffness in my legs—to the point where I am almost unable to move—after a car journey or after remaining still in an environment where electromagnetic fields are present. Other symptoms include an urgent need to urinate every 15 minutes, immune system issues, sharp, highly painful stabbing sensations in various parts of my body, and muscle pain, feelings of nervousness, anxiety, and depression—with no apparent reason. When I am in a place free from electromagnetic waves, I feel perfectly well and all my symptoms disappear. I know a great number of persons who suffer from the same symptoms. I am in touch with patient organizations all over the world, and we can see that the phenomenon is the same everywhere. Even people who do not identify as having EHS (electromagnetic hypersensitivity) exhibit symptoms such as fatigue, insomnia, feelings of nervousness, anxiety, and depression. We can also observe that the number of children suffering from ADHD has increased at an alarming rate—as has the number of cancer cases, particularly among children, a increasing number of persons suffering from fibromyalgia, Alzheimer etc. Despite more than 50 international appeals from the independent scientific and medical community, our governments continue to push for ever-increasing wireless technology—a trend that is affecting a growing number of people. It is urgent to take measures to protect the entire population, especially the most vulnerable: those suffering from electrohypersensitivity, children, pregnant women, and the ill. The number of people with electrohypersensitivity who have died in recent years is alarming. Our lives are truly at risk; the symptoms are a form of torture, and we face a significantly higher risk of serious illnesses, including cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular conditions, and immune-system disorders. There are almost no places left where we can still find refuge. The situation has become untenable for us.

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. Here is just one study I believe the FCC should review when addressing the concerns about wireless radiation: • McCredden, McLean & Steinemann (2026): Wireless sensitivity and co-morbidities: A prevalence study in Australia, Canada, and the United States – Examined the prevalence of self-reported wireless sensitivity and co-occurring health conditions in the United States, Canada, and Australia, without establishing causation. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: I am writing to express my deep concern about the potential health effects of radiofrequency (RF) radiation from cell towers and to ask that the FCC take a more serious, proactive role in investigating the experiences of individuals and families who believe their health has been affected by exposure to these emissions. In 2007, a cell tower was erected near our home. Following its installation, my daughter began experiencing a series of serious and debilitating health problems that dramatically altered the course of her life. The timing of these symptoms and the profound impact they have had on her life have left our family deeply concerned about the possible relationship between her health and her exposure to RF radiation. Her symptoms were so severe that her school attendance became extremely poor, and she was on the verge of being forced into homeschooling. As parents, we were desperate to understand what was happening to our daughter and to find answers that would allow her to live a normal, healthy life. We pursued extensive medical care, including multiple appointments with specialists in cardiology, neurology, and other practitioners, including neurological chiropractors. We even spent ten days at the Carrick Brain Center trying to determine the cause of her debilitating symptoms. Among other problems, she experienced stabbing abdominal pains, chronic migraines, and numbness in her arm when she used a cell phone. These were not minor inconveniences; they interfered with her ability to attend school, participate in everyday activities, and enjoy the quality of life every young person deserves. She was eventually diagnosed with an autoimmune disorder, electrosensitivity, and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). Despite years of effort to understand and manage her conditions, the consequences have been devastating. My daughter is now 34 years old and remains unable to work outside the home. Our family has gone to extraordinary lengths to investigate and reduce potential environmental exposures in our home. We have had the house thoroughly checked for electrical wiring problems. She sleeps in a specially tented bed surrounded by silver-lined material intended to block wireless signals. We have eliminated Wi-Fi from our home and turn off the electrical power to the rooms surrounding her bedroom every night. These are not steps a family takes lightly. They reflect years of concern, searching for answers, and trying to give our daughter the best possible chance of improving her health. I recognize that the timing of an exposure and the onset of symptoms do not, by themselves, establish medical causation. However, the fact that her symptoms began after the cell tower was erected, followed by years of serious illness and disability, raises questions that deserve careful, independent scientific investigation rather than dismissal. Meanwhile, more cell towers and wireless infrastructure continue to be added to our surrounding area. For families who are concerned about RF exposure, it increasingly feels as though there is nowhere to go to escape it. We need reliable research, transparent information, and meaningful consideration of the people who report serious health problems and whose lives have been profoundly affected. I respectfully urge the FCC to: 1. Support and facilitate independent, long-term research into the potential health effects of RF exposure, including the effects of chronic exposure from multiple wireless sources over time. 2. Ensure that research examines a broad range of reported health concerns, including neurological symptoms, migraines, autonomic dysfunction, and other chronic conditions, while using rigorous scientific methods to establish what relationships, if any, exist. 3. Reevaluate existing exposure standards as new evidence emerges, with transparent scientific review and appropriate consideration of uncertainty, vulnerable populations, and cumulative environmental exposure. 4. Improve transparency and public access to information about cell tower locations, emissions, compliance measurements, and the scientific evidence used to establish safety standards. 5. Create a meaningful process for documenting and investigating reported health concerns from individuals and families who believe their symptoms began or worsened following the installation of nearby wireless infrastructure. 6. Consider precautionary measures and appropriate policy changes if credible evidence identifies risks that current standards do not adequately address. My family has spent years trying to understand why our daughter became so ill and why, at 34, she still cannot work outside the home. We cannot go back and change what happened, but we can ask that our experience contribute to a more thorough examination of a public health question that deserves attention. This is not simply an argument about technology. It is about people, families, and the responsibility to investigate legitimate concerns with openness, scientific rigor, and compassion. Wireless technology continues to expand rapidly, and the public deserves confidence that its safety standards are based on the best available evidence and are revisited when warranted. I ask the FCC to take these concerns seriously, to encourage independent research, and to consider what changes may be necessary to better protect public health. Families should not have to spend decades searching for answers while watching a loved one struggle with chronic illness and disability. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. I hope the FCC will give serious consideration to the experiences of families like ours and take meaningful steps toward obtaining the answers that are still needed. Sincerely, Beth Osborn Carmel, IN 46032

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. Here is just one study I believe the FCC should review when addressing the concerns about wireless radiation: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12940-025-01220-4#Sec15 The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally: As this is a global issue please accept my submission from the UK. I understand there are similar levels of permitted RF-EMR (Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation) in the USA and UK. Also please understand that I started experiencing symptoms years before I understood about RF-EMR or was introduced to the idea of being EHS (Electro Hypersensitive) so my symptoms are NOT psychosomatic. Interestingly I discovered recently that the severity of my symptoms has increased in line with the rising levels of RF-EMR in the UK from mobile phone masts and mobile phones, Wifi routers, SMART meters and appliances, satellites etc. The first symptom I experienced was in the early 2000’s when I used a cordless phone for the first time. I started to make the call and my head felt hot and my brain felt confused. I had to stop making the call and put the phone down. I was shocked. Then I noticed, as mobile phones were upgraded to 3G and then 4G, my head felt hot where my mobile phone was close to my ear and my brain felt confused. I could not continue to use my mobile phone. When the router in our house became wireless rather than wired and my son bought a computer that connected to the router wirelessly, I felt disorientated and as though I might collapse when standing between the router and his computer. Interestingly the engineer installing the computer knew exactly what I was experiencing and wired the computer via ethernet immediately. Since then all our computers, landline phone (via internet now), TV etc are all wired via ethernet cables. This has improved my health but has been very expensive. My health went into, what I would describe, chronic RF-EMR sensitivity, when I started to make regular car journeys through a large town with 4G and 5G masts in 2022. As I drove past 2 mobile phone masts that were positioned close together (causing interference?) I felt ill. I started experiencing tinnitus and heart palpitations. When I am in a high RF-EMR environment for any length of time I can also experience vertigo and I feel as though my body is shutting down and I might collapse. The tinnitus and heart palpitations became persistent symptoms, so I investigated protecting myself with clothing and a Blushield device. Also grounding helps. All my symptoms improve when I have been in a low RF-EMR environment for some time eg when I am in the countryside. With increasing ubiquitous levels of environmental RF-EMR in the town where I live, I have now become quite isolated. I only make occasional short trips to my local town for necessary shopping. I do not use public transport due to possible Wifi on trains and buses and being near other travellers’ mobile phones. I could not even contemplate going on a plane for a holiday abroad. I only make short visits to friends and family due to Smart Meters and Wifi in their house, and I take a router shielding bag for use when agreed. Some friends and family I no longer visit when there are numerous Smart appliances as well at a router and Smart meter at their house. I do not go to the cinema or theatre. The list goes on of the restrictions to my life to avoid my health being impacted further. If this is affecting me so acutely, how many others are going to be affected by long term and increasing levels of exposure, and what about the animal, insect and plant life? It is utter madness! I do not consent to these levels of environmental RF-EMR. Surely this must contravene the Nurenberg Code? Something needs to be done. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

My brain became “unhinged” when 5G transmitters were placed on phone poles right in front of my house. One is about 50’ away, one less than 100’ away (not sure why they are so close; everywhere else they are spaced much further apart). I was born with a pretty good brain – I graduated from Harvard at the top of my class! (junior year Phi Beta Kappa, class of ’73). No signs of dementia before this. When the transmitters were installed, I developed brain fog, memory loss, deep fatigue, irritability / anger outbursts, inability to think clearly. I work at home and I have been almost completely unable to work since then. I have acquired some EMF protective gear which has helped to some extent. I also have a Safe & Sound meter to measure EMF levels; it has a green light to indicate a safe zone, a yellow light to indicate acceptable levels, an orange light for problem levels, red for danger; and a blinking red light indicates 10 times the danger level; mine blinks much faster, indicating 100 times the danger level. On EMFradar.com, the EMF exposure at my street address is listed - on a scale of 1 to 100 – at a 100. I work in health care and I like to think that my life is dedicated to serving the health of others. Please help to protect me so I can continue to be of service!

Hi. I suffer from Electro Hypersensitivity, which has limited my life drastically, caused the end of my marriage, and caused me 3-4 decades of illnesses no one had any diagnosis for. I now know what it is caused by. After seeing ear specialists, due to the unrelenting tinnitus, and neurologist for the malignant insomnia and migraines, and no one could find anything wrong with me. I had to begin to look out of the box for other explanations. I found this is more common than I had any idea, and millions like me are suffering from this sensitivity and are simply canaries in the coal mine. We are showing how harmful this out of control ubiquitous RFR is. I live in a shielded home and use only wired communications. It took me over 10 yrs to learn how to remediate my environment to get as well as I seem to be able to get. I have lost my freedom to travel or even go to visit a friend at their home. I fear needing to go into a hospital with WIFI, as it makes me instantly very sick. I feel there needs to be a total new perspective on the well know adverse health effects of Manmade Radiofrequency Radiation or RFR, and a complete revamping of our safety standards. Our old standards set in 1996 are BEYOND outdate and totally wrong. The declassified Naval Military Research documents easily available on the internet, on the subject of how man made radiation affect the human body, are from the 50's and again in the 1970's clearly showing evidence of damage to every system of our bodies from this radiation. Also the study done a few years ago by the National Toxicology Institute shows clear evidence of RFR causing cancer in rats. There are thousands of studies showing this is harmful, and most other first world countries have much more rigid standards. The toxic nature of these emissions and devices needs to be told to the population so they can make informed decision about wiring their homes and using wired communications, if we want to see cancer and a host of thousands of other illness on the rise start to decline. We also need to make safe hospital and doctors offices ASAP so those of us who already are suffering this dis -ease, have a safe place to go for health care. We urgently need to listen to the research that shows carcinogenicity and cellular damage WAY below current standards of heating!! We need to start to regulate and educate about this horrific global poisoning, proliferating at lightening speed out of control and causing skyrocketing suffering, diseases, and deaths. If our doctors and our public are kept from this info, our regulatory agencies are essentially killing our population. There are thousands of valid studies showing harm from RFR. http:bioinitiative.org , https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/research/topics/cellphones , "Zapped" By Ann Gittelman (book) and many more. Please work to change legislation so that our populations are protected. You are the people who can and must work to reverse the skyrocketing diseases that are directly related to the installations of cell towers near homes and schools and hospitals, and our fire stations which are hotbeds of cancer! We need updated safety regulations to protect and educate folks on not carrying these devices on one's body and choosing wired communications being healthier than wireless. It is not until our governments stand up for us and protect us from this that most of the population will listen sadly. We need this as cancer and all kinds of neurological disorders ect are on the rise due to this ubiquitous toxin escalating daily our of control in our world. Debby L. Baskin D.C. Sent from my Wired Computer.

As a retired RN, I'd like to speak for those of us with EMF sensitivity/illness. We don’t often get a window into the life of a person with EHS (electro-magnetic hypersensitivity) – how isolating it is – how marginalized people are – and how withdrawn they must become to protect what is left of their health. We need to listen with ears wide open. This is real and real people are living greatly diminished lives. Imagine yourself forced to give up a productive life to live on the edge, and that edge keeps moving. Imagine being denied access to business opportunities, education, transportation, healthcare, public participation, recreation and places of celebration and renewal. Again and again we are hearing the same things. I lived a normal life until… smart meters were installed on my wall… until a major cell phone tower was built next door…. until my office installed several wireless routers. My family didn’t understand. It took me some time to realize what was making me sick. It destabilized my relationships. I lost my freedom. People with EHS have to give up so many things most people take for granted in life. Shopping, going out to dinner, attending meetings in public places, going to a child’s graduation or recital, travel along an interstate or by rail or air. Everyday activities that make up the fabric of life are no longer accessible – at least without paying the price. It is an insidious and invisible progression where the activities of daily life are incrementally diminished by exposures that intensify with time, subject to no health and safety accounting at all!!! No one is keeping track of cumulative RF body burdens. There is no governmental agency that is tracking EHS illness reports, nor conducting a serious effort to revise health standards!!! EHS is real and people are being harmed by wireless technology. Please set lower MPEs for this real toxin.

There are indications that humans possess a magnetic sense. Since this is a fact that has not yet shifted the scientific paradigm, we must rely on current knowledge. Is it ethical to turn a deaf ear? Canaries were used to ensure the safety of mines. We have “canaries” who can speak and write, but our current worldview prevents us from listening to them. It’s ethical to consider this line of thinking. What if people had a magnetic sense? What would change then? What should be studied in that case? What should be taken into account? What should be done differently? What should be done when it is a known fact that all senses function in such a way that there are people in the population whose particular sense is more sensitive than the average? We are familiar with hyper-tasters, people with hypersensitivity to sound, people with sensitivity to light, etc. Is it ethically right, then, to design living environments in such a way that a sensitive person cannot find refuge from the very factor that causes their sensitivity and symptoms? Magnetic sensitivity could affect neurological symptoms, such as dizziness, headaches, or sleep disturbances, especially in technology-rich environments. Doctors might begin to assess magnetic sensitivity as part of a neurological examination, particularly in patients with unexplained symptoms. A new medical specialty might emerge—such as “magneto-neurology”—that focuses on the effects of magnetic fields on the human nervous system. Current safety limits (e.g., SAR values for MRI machines) are based on tissue heating and electromagnetic effects. If magnetic sensitivity were recognized, restrictions might also be imposed based on neurological effects. Henshaw, D. L., & Philips, A. (2024). A mechanistic understanding of human magnetoreception validates the phenomenon of electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS). International Journal of Radiation Biology , 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2024.2435329   Open Access article. I have symptoms: pains that come and go, pain in everywhere : ears, fingers, legs, teeth, tongue. Skin burning. I can't hear properly when there is too much radiation. I can't sleep since my neighbour watches smart-TV at night and my body resonates with the wireless technology used. My blood sample shows that I have become allergic. Elevated allergy year through even though I am supposed to have symptoms only when trees blossom in the spring. It feels all of a suddend that air is really cold eventhough I know it's completely normal. Radiation feels like the air is polluted and dangerous. I know that what I'm saying sounds odd. Please do something to wifi and base town radiation. No wireless meters for waterconsumtion, electricity consumtion. No wireless firealarms, wireless fresh air sensoreita. I deserve to live a normal life but I live inside a nightmare. It's a deligate matter and you will publish it online. Seriously??!!!

To whom it may concern: Oct. 13 2026 In 2018, we moved into our home in Geneva, Florida. My wife almost immediately started having convulsions with blackouts multiple times daily. Because she had brain surgery before, she went back to her Neurologist. After extensive testing and trying many medications, The Neurologist. could not identify a cause. Nothing stopped the convulsions or the blackouts. Her days were reduced to getting up every morning and sitting down with a bowl of ice water in her lap. She would place a cold, wet washcloth on her forehead between convulsions. This went on all day long for months. She was physically exhausted which caused memory loss and disorientation. During this time, a close friend sent an email containing a video of a woman talking about Smart Meters used by electric companies that might be a fire hazard. We were unaware of Smart Meters. After watching the video, we checked to see if we had one on our home. We did. It was located on the exterior of our bedroom wall, about eighteen inches from our heads where we slept. We looked online for our power company's website. There the Power Company explained that the meter was transmitting (pulsing) RF signals a few seconds a day and was harmless. I was an aviation electronics technician specializing in airborne side-looking radar and infrared photography in the Navy. Upon leaving the Navy, I worked in the Telephony Industry during the development and deployment of wireless telephone systems and telephones. So, I questioned the frequency of signals the Smart Meter was transmitting and how often they were being transmitted. I rented a NARDA SRM-3006 meter. With it, I was able to measure the number of transmissions and the magnitude of the pulses which were in the 10,000 µW/m² range. Also, I saw when the transmissions occurred. The transmissions were numerous and spread throughout the day and night (24/7). My wife had titanium sutures implanted in her head from her previous brain surgery. I was concerned that these signals might be triggering the convulsions. The family shielded another bedroom in our house to shelter her. The convulsions with blackouts ceased. Many doctors expressed doubt about her condition and refused to help. She decided go back to see the GP who had been her doctor for many years, hoping he might understand. After explaining to him precisely what had occurred, he began to laugh. We asked what was funny and he explained. He had been having heart palpitations and periods of shortness of breath. After testing, he was unable to find a cause. It was then he learned that his office was located directly under the WI-FI router for the entire multi-storied building his office was in. He had his office rooms painted with shielding paint. His cardiac symptoms diminished. Because the RF signals were rapidly increasing with newer technology, when my wife went out into public communities, she began having more intense and longer lasting convulsions with blackouts. I began having to take her to the hospital to gain control. She started wearing a silver lined head covering to help shield herself from the waves. Because the RF signals were becoming endemic, we decided to relocate to a safer environment. In 2023 , we purchased an old farm in West Virginia's Quiet Zone. Even here she has to use shielding due to the wide use of wireless devices, IE, cell phones which can produce 5G signals in ranges of 350,000 to over 2,500,000 µW/m² range, WI-FI signals over 10,000 µW/m² , Bluetooth devices with signals over 6,500 µW/m² , and the deployment of 5G frequencies. Yes, even here in the “quiet zone” many people never turn off their cell phones. Although their phones will not work, they still transmit RF signals. So, the use of higher frequencies still penetrate her shielding and can again cause convulsions and blackouts. Here are two examples: Due to a product recall my CPAC machine was replaced in June 2024. The new machine was installed immediately and put into use. During the night, my wife had severe convulsions. Using a Safe and Sound Pro II Broadband RF Meter, I was able to find the source of the signals that triggered her convulsions. My new CPAC unit was emitting Bluetooth signals in the 4000 to 6000 µW/m² range. I was able to turn the Bluetooth off using the CPAP controls. My wife had two nights of peaceful sleep. On the third night, she had severe convulsions again. With the meter, I learned that the new CPAP unit had independently turned the Bluetooth signals on again. Consequently, I had to repeatedly reset the Bluetooth controls to off prior to the third day automatic re-activation. In September 2025, I was visiting a neighbor. Because of their home WIFI, my wife sat in our car. His wife went out to speak with my wife. While they were conversing, my wife began to convulse. Our neighbor's wife ran back to her house and told me my wife was not well. I quickly saw what was happening and removed my wife from the area. I went back to the neighbor's home with the meter. The neighbor's wife had recently replaced her hearing aids. Her new hearing aids were both emitting Bluetooth signals in the 1050- 2000 µW/m² range. Recently, a physicist in Canada suggested my wife try using two silver lined shields (one over the other) and for the most part it now blocks the higher frequencies. We do not know if she will be able to shelter from satellite waves which are in the 18 GHz frequency range which can be detected with the Safe and Sound Pro mm Wave Broadband RF Meter 20 – 40 GHz. These increasing high frequencies and their extensive deployment causes my wife to live in isolation and be constantly shielded. Thank you for putting public health first. Meter #'s used: Safe and Sound Pro II Broadband RF Meter 200 MHz – 8 GHz Acoustimeter RF Meter Model AM-10 200 MHz – 8 GHz Safe and Sound Pro mm Wave Broadband RF Meter 20 – 40 GHz WIFI signals in medical waiting Rm: 5200 µW/m² Cell phone activated using 5G: 2,5000,000 µW/m²

I have both MCAS and EDS (both medically diagnosed by doctors) and non ionizing radiation/wifi/Bluetooth trigger horrendous neurological, vestibular, nerve, dysautonomua symptoms. I have become disabled as a result. There are literally zero studies showing safety and again literally thousands of scientific studies showing human harm and detailing that harm. Radiation exposure limits in the US are TEN TIMES that of Italy. What ever happened to “First Do No Harm”? I could go on but I don’t know how many characters I have left. All I can say is that irradiating people without any scientific or medical studies is crazy.

Because of radiofrequency pollution, I can no longer work. Because of radiofrequency pollution, I can no longer work. I no longer have access to stores, government offices (including courts), hospitals, retirement homes, trains, or vehicles (which have too much electronics), places of learning and culture, etc. In fact, this disability cuts me off from everything, even help from my family and loved ones. I am far from being the only one affected by this. Unlike many people, however, I am aware of it. Artificial radiofrequency pollution—which is becoming increasingly widespread and causes mutual interference—poses a threat to life and all living things (both animals and plants). It is urgent that we reduce these levels. Translated with DeepL.com A cause des pollutions par les radiofréquences, je ne peux plus travailler. Je n'ai plus accès aux magasins, aux administrations (tribunaux compris), aux hôpitaux, aux maisons de retraites, à l'accès aux trains comme aux véhicules ( qui ont trop d'électronique), aux lieux d'étude et de culture, etc. En fait, cet handicape me ferme la porte à tout, même à l'aide de ma famille et de mes proches. Je suis loin d'être la seule à en être malade. A la différence de beaucoup de gens, moi, je le sais. Les pollutions par les radiofréquences artificielles, de plus en plus nombreuses et qui s'interfèrent entre elles, représentent un danger pour la vie, toute le vivant (animal comme végétal). Il est urgent de baisser les niveaux. Because of radiofrequency pollution, I can no longer work. Because of radiofrequency pollution, I can no longer work.