Children, schools & development

As a registered nurse and mother,I am concerned about the constant and uncalculated exposure of nonionizing radiation we are exposed to. Just because it’s nonionizing- does not mean it’s not damaging. Studies have shown increased oxidative stress, increased histamine response and increased mood and behavioral challenges. We cannot ignore this issue. We must research and in the meanwhile reduce and remove WiFi from healthcare and school settings. I also do not want to be exposed to neighboring buildings and public installments of WiFi as I feel we do not know the effects because we have failed to look for the real effects of this technology. It’s clear we are getting less well as a population- that chronic disease is exploding. We cannot just keep saying it’s idiopathic- we must investigate what is different about this generational exposures- even if it’s inconvenient, expensive, and multi factorial. Thank you, Tracy Navar

The world has changed dramatically since the FCC adopted its human exposure guidelines in 1996, based on science from the 1980s. It's inconceivable and outrageous that the FCC claims to be protecting public health while it ignores the large and growing body of science showing biological harm even at non-thermal levels. . The science and data is readily available and the FCC has turned a blind eye for way too many years. It is time to do the right thing and update these exposure guidelines in a manner that falls in line with the current scientific data, For example this study shows how detrimental exposure is to our children (and children represent future of our country). This is just one of a plethora of studies available on PubMed https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31927574/ The data in 1000's of studies like this show that that current guidelines are outdated nowhere near accurate for the current sea of wireless radiation we are bathed in day after day without our consent. These guidelines MUST be updated to provide the level of safety Americans should be able to expect from their government.

Independent Science on the Effects of Wireless Radiation on Human Health and the Environment There are more than 1,000 scientific studies conducted by independent researchers from around the world concerning the biological effects of Radiofrequency (RF radiation). Here we present some of the most recent studies. Effects on Fetuses Effects on Children and Adolescents Brain Tumors Parotid Gland Tumors Other Malignancies DNA Damage and Gene Expression Changes Neurological/Cognitive Effects Cardiovascular Effects Male Fertility EMR Syndrome (Electromagnetic Sensitivity) Implanted Medical Devices 5G Effects Wildlife and Plants Reports, Articles and Reviews

D.C. Circuit Court (2021) found the agency had failed to adequately address—including children’s vulnerability, long-term exposure, environmental and wildlife impacts, and potential health effects involving reproduction, the immune system, and DNA damage. I have never seen so many cases of infertility, fatigue, brain fog, and headaches. What is causing this outbreak? I believe it is from the radiation people are constantly being exposed to. We did not have much of a problem with this issue in the 1800s and early 1900s. Now, Children are crammed in classrooms with their computers all day. There are so many children complaining of headaches, being tired, and being unable to focus, which I believe is caused by the heavy exposure to radiation from their environment. This is a crime we are committing against our precious children. Let's make the world better for these precious gifts from God. Thank you Dawn Singleton PhD, DHs, DNM

For too long, telecommunications companies have gotten away with gambling with human and animal health via radiation exposure. We need real controlled studies about the potential harms and long-term effects of radiation and chronic exposure to non-ionizing radiation, including children’s vulnerability, long-term exposure, environmental and wildlife impacts, and potential health effects involving reproduction, the immune system, and DNA damage. Here's a link to a relevant news article on this topic, which unpacks the harms potential of radiation pollution: https://www.newsweek.com/migratory-birds-bee-navigation-5g-technology-electromagnetic-radiation-934830 Pollution affects us all, and no person has consented to being chronically poisoned by radiation exposure because informed consent of harms has never occurred. Updated guidelines that take into consideration changes in technology since 1996--and which place a moratorium on new technologies until their potential harms can be properly understood from an informed-consent perspective--are imperative for human and animal health and general welfare.

Thousands of peer-reviewed articles (https://bioinitiative.org/?sm_guid=MTA1NDMyOXw1OTY3NTg4OXwtMXx0ZHJlaWVyQGhvdG1haWwuY29tfDkwNzgyMTd8fDB8MHwzMzQ1NzQxNzR8MTA2MXwwfDB8fDE5NjY5ODJ8MA2) have shown that wireless radiation at levels allowed by the FCC can harm children, adults, plants, trees, birds and their migration, pets, wildlife, pollinators and other insects. The FCC must follow the D.C. Circuit Court's 2020 order in EHT v. FCC to address how wireless radiation affects children and the environment, the health implications of long-term exposure, and the increase in the vast number of devices and changes in technology since 1996.

There has now been an abundant amount of research data that strongly suggests wireless radiation is harmful. It is very late now, but finally the FCC is willing to do what the court has ordered it to do in 2021! The past FCC was dominated by industry-friendly, biased and poorly-done research that should never have happened. The FCC should be regulating the industry instead of accepting industry-produced "research" that was scientifically inadequate, really indefensible and not relevant to real-world conditions. Why has the FCC taken so long to do the right thing, follow the objective and relevant science, and comply with the COURT ORDER? No doubt there are laziness and willful blindness at play at the FCC and excessive industry influence. Please do an objective and comprehensive look at the independent (non-industry sponsored) research. Millions of people have been unnecessarily exposed to excessive levels of radiation. The FCC has placed a deaf ear and blind eye for too long even when many have sent relevant and accurate research to you. This must change for the sake of the health of many people, and especially children.

There has now been an abundant amount of research data that strongly suggests wireless radiation is harmful. It is very late now, but finally the FCC is willing to do what the court has ordered it to do in 2021! The past FCC was dominated by industry-friendly, biased and poorly-done research that should never have happened. The FCC should be regulating the industry instead of accepting industry-produced "research" that was scientifically inadequate, really indefensible and not relevant to real-world conditions. Why has the FCC taken so long to do the right thing, follow the objective and relevant science, and comply with the COURT ORDER? No doubt there are laziness and willful blindness at play at the FCC and excessive industry influence. Please do an objective and comprehensive look at the independent (non-industry sponsored) research. Millions of people have been unnecessarily exposed to excessive levels of radiation. The FCC has placed a deaf ear and blind eye for too long even when many have sent relevant and accurate research to you. This must change for the sake of the health of many people, and especially children.

I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public, a Dual USA and Canadian citizen, and as one who is negatively affected by man-made electromagnetic radiation. I personally suffer from tinnitus and severe vertigo. When I was living in a city with smart meters, cell towers, neighbors wi-fi, etc. my symptoms were becoming more severe as time went by. About 2 years, ago we moved to an acreage where the emf levels are low the great majority of the time and since we have moved here I have not had any more vertigo attacks. In my opinion, man-made electromagnetic radiation is the latest, greatest environmental pollutant and it has become ubiquitous in our present world. Many people as well as all life in the environment is negatively affected, as we have evolved to function in the natural electromagnetic environment. I support the FCC taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge the FCC to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

My son is complaining of the 5Guw that is causing him to have sleepiness nights and headaches on campus in Panama City. I personally can not handle 5G as it makes me sick and gives me headaches with dizziness.